Tako je! Kongresman je u pravu! Nije važno da NASA koristi matematiku i fiziku pri gradnji šatla, več je važno da javnost ne posumnja da NASA možda ne koristi matematiku i fiziku pri gradnji šatla. Potpuno odobravam! Vi morate vjerovati znanosti! Zato pri gradnji šatla glavni postulat koji treba sljediti je vjera, a ne fizika. Feynman je kriv što je šatl bio tako usrano sklepan, jer je htio nešto računati, a samo da je imao zerke vjere u šatl... To je zato što je bio staromodan, zaostao... nije shvačao da je budučnost fizike u... trans gender debilizmu!
I love this well-documented investigation into the paradox of engineering management! Working any kind of engineering you learn (to some extent) the paradox between engineering and management principles. Visionary people invest money in programs and appoint managers to ensure they get product within a timeframe. Engineers are paid to design, debate and help document risk but ultimately managers are paid assess and recommend to-what-extent anyone need listen to engineers. Because it takes all sorts of people to make a complex thing and 20 people will reveal 25 different personalities when it comes to assessing risk and taking responsibility. The bottom line is that humans don't achieve monumental things without taking enormous risks, and visionary investors pay management to run-in-the-red-zone exclusively until the cost of paying for damages exceeds their personal risk tolerances. They assess the financial cost of lost lives, damaged equipment, reinvest and repeat the cycle. We have to understand as engineers that the things we consider tragedies are nothing more than numbers on a financial risk-scale to investors, and we must also realize that waiting for all major problems to be solved prior to deployment is not considered a money-making strategy. Feynman showed that the space program was run like the military, beyond safe tolerances, because the goals were considered greater value than the lives that might be lost. Management ran the program that way. Its no accident when companies run like this. It simply reflects their goals and values and risk strategy. The only real surprise was inviting school teachers to be astronauts...most of us didn't think of a school teacher as quite so expendable as Nasa management did. Fortunately we got someone like Feynman to help make it very clear.
The pressure from the White House to launch through the freezing temperatures so that Reagan could take credit for it all in his State of the Union address was also a factor; adding to the pressure NASA felt at the time.
Dr. Strangelove: Of course, the whole *point* of a Doomsday Machine is lost,…. if you *keep* it a *SECRET*! *Why didn't you tell The World, EH?* Ambassador de Sadesky: It was due to be announced at *the Party Congress on Monday.* As you know, The Premier loves *surprises.*
If you look into Oppenheimers eyes, it's clear he was trying to impress the woman, who was sitting at the desk in front of him. He was really impressed with his little speech when he finished it, and was looking directly at her, for her reaction to it. The dude was a dog, ready to hump at the slightest breeze. LOL. You Go Robert.
We had a similar problem when I worked at Unisys. We had a customer and management kept promising them all kinds of things. I remember one day the director was talking to us and told us he had promised this customer something. He then asked us if this could be. Everyone said No. You can't (or at least should not) promise things that you're not sure can be done.
I think during this interview Legasov was hinting at the possibility of known safety flaws of the RBMK reactor that had not yet been resolved. His answers after being asked if he shared the same pessimism of another known nuclear Physicist were vague and non committal.
He does a good job keeping his composure during this, even if barely. At that time he already knew the grim reality but was being forced to lie for his own safety. Eventually he got the truth out, at a great personal cast, and for that he should be considered a hero
В чем мрак? Взрыва не было. Крышка скороварки подскачила и раскидала ядерные материалы. Легасов говорит ровно то, что известно до сих пор, ни больше, ни меньше. Сериал ложь
We watched ( cued) this in 1984, I studied how materials break engineering because of this video... chapter F==Feynman==Physicist; Feynman is a NASA hero.
This filtering out bad info as it moves up the chain is a typical problem. It all depends upon the attitude of the people at the top. Some don’t want anything but good news. That insure that crucial but negative info is not shared with the people who should know. I have a good friend who runs a large enterprise in Chicago. His primary instruction to all who report to him is, “Give me the bad news first”. I want good news too but that can wait, but the bad news probably can’t.
Robert knew here that he was gonna get roasted by the Republican better-dead-than-red crowd, not to mention the FBI. Read the Oppenheimer biography “American Prometheus”, which goes WAY beyond what you see in the Oppenheimer movie… powerful stuff.
Legasov trying to give serious message to the world and media are like ooops, out of time! Whatever, we don't give a shit anyway, it's the other side of the world, let's play commercials and then some stupid reality show.
Learning all these years that president Truman was a cold hearted pos. Telling that man dont let that cry baby back in here after his meeting with Oppenheimer. Offered him a handkerchief after he expressed that he felt that after the bomb was dropped that he felt the death of those in japan he had their blood on his hands. I truly see now how this country works. Just imagine the bombs that we now have available to us due to Oppenheimers work.
Hi sorry but could you send a link for the pdf for this? I know you already sent one in reply to another person but that link doesn't seem to work for me. Sorry about that. Anyways, that aside I just want to say I love how this song sounds and right now I'm trying to learn the bassoon part for it so I can play it with my friend that plays oboe (I hope you don't mind) currently I'm in grade 9 in case you're wondering. Again, beautiful song and hopefully I'll be able to play it well.
as seen here and in the HBO series this man speaks with a reluctance because of that damn Soviet system where they were afraid to admit the blame to three fools,,, the difference that system Who was to blame it wasn't that systems were a breakdown of the machines another causes but in no case this system no case those in management always drive they want to be clean,
