May I ask why? The alternative would've been no film at all... Only the voice over is AI, not the rest of the content. I'm a terrible voice actor myself, that's why I used AI. The cost of a human professional voice actor would've made a film like this impossible.
Ja, du kan prøve at google artiklen "Syddør, norddør og det kønsopdelte kirkerum" af Martin Wangsgaard Jürgensen. Den ligger online som pdf, men jeg kan desværre ikke indsætte linket her.
Fin fin film! At gå fra en religion til en anden er nok ikke blot et resultat af missionærer. Det politiske incitament skal ikke forglemmes. En forskydning af magt og muligheder for ambitiøse personer er en stor del af denne udvikling.
Det har du helt ret i, men grunden til at jeg ikke lader det nævne, er fordi vinklen i denne film er på arkitekturen og byggeriet, mere end det er på det religionshistoriske. Oprindeligt havde jeg også noget med om Knud Lavard og hvorfor han blev myrdet i Haraldsted Skov, men blev rådet til at droppe det fordi resten af filmen jo kun handler om arkitekturen.
@@mediumaevum har ikke været derude et par år, men det er ikke længere end jeg har en lille madpakke med og så går jeg derud. Spørgsmålet er om man kan piske/lokke sine trætte teenage unger med, eller om de skal bæres ligesom sidste gang vi var derude hæhæ.
If you ever visit the ruin remember the visitors center, it is a turist attraction all on its own, it was designed by Jørgen Utzon. the architect behind the Sydney Opera house.
While I do understand the arguments for rebuilding lost castles now in ruins, I don't think it's such a good idea at all. First of all, you can never rebuild a castle without damaging the ruins. Secondly, there are too many uncertainties as to what it originally looked like. And thirdly, even if we did know what it looked like, you have to choose exactly which time period to reconstruct, as some buildings may not even have been there at the time the other buildings were constructed, and so on. In my opinion it is always best to just leave the ruins as they are, while still restoring and maintaining them with respect to their original appearances as a ruin (no modern alterations like Koldinghus). If people want to know what it originally looked like (alternative what it probably looked like), I suggest either building a new castle somewhere else, or make use of virtual reconstructions.
Actually, if you read the Credits, you'll notice the voice acting is an AI (text-to-speech). And I had a little problem/issue making it pronounce Hammershus correctly. Just writing it as it is written, makes it say "Hammer Shus". Writing it Hammers Hus makes it say "Hammers Hohs". But "hus" (da. "house") is pronounced like a short "hoos"-sound. Unfortunately I couldn't make it say "hoos" short, only the long pronunciation, but it's better than making it say "Hammers Who's", which actually sounds even worse... As for Søborg, it wrote it Sirborg, instead of Soborg. "Sir" was the closest thing I could get to the Danish "Sø" (lake), albeit it's not perfect. But I hope it works anyway :). I believe a real human English-speaking voice actor would be perfectly capable of pronouncing it correctly. But I'm on a very tight budget, so AI is my first choice.
No. My channel here (mediumaevum) is not affiliated with anybody else. But I hear we're using the same "voice actor". It's "Daniel" from Eleven Labs (AI). You'll notice it in the credits in this video description.
Been there many times since i was a yung mand. Have friends at Bornholm. I have walked on the edge arund the of the island 125 km. And the center from top to button. I is my " Mallorca" it got it all. You can walk or take a bike. Short distance on the island betwine nice citties. Cliffs, sea. forrest and beautiful landscape. I live in the middle of Juthland . So it's on a nice trip with a ferry to the island. And the eastern island and part of Denmark is the little island Christians Ø
Vil I ikke nok skrue ned for volumen på baggrundsmusikken. Til tider er det svært at høre speakeren. Det ødelægger delvist en ellers super interessant video. Jeg glæder mig til at følge kanalen fremover.
Temple knight was there in the 1100 1200 there is prof of it on oak island usa that the viking work with the Temple knights to hide the ark of the covenet an its seem to be true that it is hidden on that island together with the temple knighs gold they never found back in the 1200 so lets see i am pretty sure we gonan hear something in the nedt of 2024 25 what they have found i have follow this for 17 years all prof is there an the Symbols the Temple knigt useing is from the stone of Bornholm that is 3000 years old.. even navigating an the runes is the same on oak isalnd as it is on that stone on bornholm.
@@mediumaevum porberly not they whare there back in the 1200 so no one can prove this is not true the knolge comes from them how to build all this or the idea of it
Archaeologists may conclude that the castle is from the 1290s, however, if they haven't found evidence of earlier activity, they haven't been paying attention, because in the courtyard there are _several_ very well known petroglyhps that predate the castle by hundreds of years, so the area has obviously held some form of importance to the Bronze Age people who lived there, and for all we know they could easily have built a fortification there - after all the location didn't all of a sudden became strategically important, having some sort of protection built at that spot will have been a good idea long before _this_ castle was built, but sure, the present-day ruin is obviously a lot younger.
