Absolutely breathtaking! This video has few views because the idiotic search for white tailed jackrabbits serves nasty hunting and falconry videos and other junk before offering yours which is on topic!
Hello, I'm interesting to know your complete setting for yours 2 gunshoot videos (frame rates, lenses, lighting etc). At this moment I'm unable to get something acceptable. I don't know were I'm wrong. Thanks for your help.
Hi, the first clip is 512x128 at 21,000fps. I use the Computar 12.5-75 lens, usually I have the aperture closed a little bit to get the image sharper. maybe f2-f3 to get lots of light. For that shot I would have used a very short exposure time, maybe 5 microseconds. If you use too long an exposure time with bullets they will be blurry. If I can't get the subject to be sharp and well lit by reducing the exposure time I sometimes will add one or two steps of gain but I try to avoid it because it degrades the image. Remember that light is your friend for these very fast shots, with more light you can use shorter exposure time and still see your subject well.
The shot at 2:50 is 720x300 @ 6,316 fps. The original clip was dark so I think I used too high a frame rate and probably even had a bit of gain. I'm not sure about exposure, but in this case the parts of the gun aren't moving fast so I likely used the longest exposure time possible.
@@Gyppor Hello, Thank you very very much for your help. For now I can't repete your setting because my lenses. I will notice you when I receive the correct item.
Man I would love to have your skill in our sand pit here in Manitoba im loading 7 trucks 28 tons each with a 972 H 6 yard bucket and I have to break up frozen chunks and spread sand to dry so it dosnt stick in trailer using alot of fuel over here lol your a very good operator man ive only seen a couple operators that move like that
I've been on this machine for 3 months now and I'm not a big fan. It does the job and earns me a paycheck, but it's not as refined as a Cat, Deere or even Komatsu. Pulling grade: not very good. It's difficult to pull smoothly when all the way out. I have to go slow and turn the engine RPM down to about 1600rpm when pulling grade to avoid the cutting edge going up and down. Lifting seems a bit weak, it will not tip the machine when lifting over the front of the tracks. I seem to recall all the other machines I've used would do it. With RPM down a bit I can lift loads fairly precisely, but I have to really take my time. Power is decent, it loads trucks fairly quickly. pushing power with the bucket is very weak. Overall my biggest gripe is the valving isn't smooth. For instance, pushing on the pedals a little bit will jerk the machine forward, resulting in your feet jerking, releasing pressure on the pedals, slowing the machine down with a jerk, moving your feet forward again etc. The only way out is to stop and start again very gingerly. This is compounded by what I perceive to be loose and fast-wearing pins and bushings, which aggravate the jerkiness of the machine. I ran a brand new one with 6 hours on it and while it was much better than this one with 2,200 hours, it was still looser than other machines I've run. As I said overall it earns me money, but it's not super refined or smooth. I hope this helps.
Hi, this is one of the most interesting videos on the net! all through my youth i loved messing with these very small explosions, and without the benefits of modern technology in the form of high speed cameras and computers to handle the data, i live in Scotland, a once free land destroyed by 80 yrs of soscialisim so i dont play with these things enymore and content my self designing model steam engines, when i was about 9yrs old i pestered my father to buy me a starting pistol, i wanted a 38, my father knew me and bought me a 22, just as well for me because i fired it in the bath and in a blinding flash of educational light worked out why depth charges sink submarines! i didnt even hear a bang it just went Pink! and a million tiny drops of water lept up from the surface, it was a while before i could whitle again! i didnt try it again though a less bright friend said he did and couldnt replicate the results
I've had a few comments on this video lately so I think I'll re-do it with my Chronos 1.4 which goes up to much higher frame rates. Canada still has a few fun things we can play with, but the socialism epidemic is gaining steam. People these days are willing to throw away all of their freedom in exchange for the illusion of safety. It's sad.
The only thing the video shows is literally the bug clicking. There's no sound on the camera I used - high speed cameras generally don't record it. The sudden bending at the thorax/abdomen is what makes the click sound and what makes the beetle jump. Here's a video from the suggestions showing it in real time. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Vew2nzaLerY.html
Gyppor If the camera was limited to just 1,500 FPS, I'd be impressed, but the fact that it goes well above that rate is impressive. I'm thinking about getting one after this lockdown is over and production of the cameras resume.
@@BobDiaz123 It's absolutely worth it Bob. While you lose resolution as the frame rate increases, you get a whole lot more "temporal resolution". It's really interesting for analyzing quick events. Currently the maximum is 40,400 at 320x96 pixels and unbelievably, that's still too slow for certain things. The beta version of the software I have on the camera right now goes up to 109,000 fps at 320x32!
@@Legursvp Almost! Canadian, actually. I tried using google translate. I guess it did not work well? Канадец, на самом деле. Я попытался с помощью Google Translate. Я думаю, это не сработало?
Too much bucket banging! No reason for it, dry material. They would run you off the pipeline for that. Tough on cylinder and who wants to listen to it.
Glad you like it, please link to the vid if you use some frames. I have a much better high speed camera and I'm looking to revisit this, no sure when I can get to it but it's on the list.
Just because it's black powder doesn't mean it won't burn you badly. When I did re-enacting and fired cannons, we had to be careful of where we held the linstock that held the burning slowmatch which was used to ignite the pure black powder that primed the cannon. It would produce a solid jet that was up to about 7-8 inches the diameter of the vent hole as the excess powder would burn outward and upward. We had a couple guys who were not careful and luckily for them, the only thing burned was the heavy cuff of their uniform coat. What burns you from a cylinder gap blast is the powder. Nothing actually comes out but the excess powder being burned off as it escapes the chamber and forcing come. All revolvers, blackpowder or otherwise, do that. Go to a gun shop, open a revolver, any revolver that's been used and shot some, and look underneath the top strap, you'll see a fine line behind the forcing cone, it's called flame cutting, look it up. It's where the steel of the revolver has been burned and etched over and over as the gun is fired. I've seen them even in .22 LR revolvers, and if it does it in a .22, guarantee you will get burned by that gun of yours.
Thanks for watching and commenting! I'm going to film this again at some point with my Chronos camera which films much faster and at higher resolutions.
It's more efficient for me to break up the clumps with a 20 ton excavator than it is for a 3.5-ton skid steer to do it at the other end. Thanks for watching and commenting!
Thats easy for to say for you John I would like to see you hop in there and move like that as a matter of fact post a youtube video back up your pansy negativitey post or dont post at all
That is a the silliest set up ive seen. Big truck with tiny tipper body and trailer with a long retarded draw bar. Standard European rigid would bring more
Thanks, be sure to check the in-cockpit footage too on my friend's channel! he flies a lot of this type of mountain stuff, it keeps getting better and better. The limits are being pushed quite fast on these quadcopters, it's incredible. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4Qo-2t02q4o.html
Thanks, it was hard to follow through the viewfinder at times, especially in front of the rock. It turned out ok, more stabilization in post might clean it up a bit. I'll play around.
My buddy builds and flies these, it's FPV. Here's the video from the drone: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4Qo-2t02q4o.html check out his channel, it's wild!
I believe it was also a yellow .22 nail gun blank. I want to repeat this with the chronos camera, it goes to 38,000fps so much better for looking at the instant of the explosion. Thanks for watching!
Thanks for commenting and checking out the channel. This channel isn't owned by gryphon energetics. I've been posting slow motion videos of firearms, wildlife and heavy equipment since well before exploding targets were even available in Canada. I've given both sure shot rimfire magnum and thundershot rimfire a fair shake here: I've shown that you indeed give more than 1/2 pound per target, I've shown the targets are just as powerful as gryphon's offering, and I've even given you suggestions to improve your product - adding an anti-caking agent and changing the bag tying method - to make them more user-friendly. Heck, I've even shown in this video that your targets have less empty room in the top for a glancing shot to destroy the jar without setting off the charge than gryphon's targets do. This is a point in your favor. If you decide to alter your formula to reduce or eliminate the caking, I'll do another video comparing them.
We have seen Gyppor promoting at first “Gryphon energetic Exploding Targets” and after Sure Shot was being made and sold in Canada “Thundershot”.. hmmm? Ask Andrew.
The actual targets said "gryphon energetics exploding target" on the label back when they were introduced so that's what I called them then. Since the jars now say "thundershot exploding target" that's what I call them now. When and how gryphon energetics chooses to name their targets isn't any of my concern, neither is whatever grievance you seem to have with them. The issues I've pointed out with your rimfire targets are very easy to address, and I'm trying you help you by pointing them out and suggesting fixes. Either way, thanks for looking at the channel and I hope you at least enjoyed the high speed footage of your targets if nothing else. And thanks for bringing the rimfire targets to Canada in the first place. I've shots lots of them over the years.
Actually the performance of the sure shot looked a slight better in the slow mo than the Gryphon, albeit the caking is a bit of a set back. The fine powder could be Ammonium Perchlorate, which has a tendency to "cake" This could be solved with anticaking agents.
That's the standard model 1.4, but as you've seen to reach that frame rate the frame size has to be really small - 336x96 pixels.Quality takes a hit but it allows you to see things you just can't see at 1500fps in 720p :-)
Thanks so much, imo 336x96 is very good for 38500fps and for the price, I mean my current camera does 1200fps at 320x120 and 400fps at 640x240 so it's amazing for me lol. Btw I would really like to see something like and egg being broken by an arrow or just the ground at the super high framerates 😉
