Great showing but I just don't get why motherboard manufacturers added quick release to the m.2 slots. I get the pcie slots, which makes a lot of sense because the cards are so big!!! But the m.2's? I would rather them cost less instead of using the quick release for something 99.9% of pc owners and builders only touch once during the life of the board. Also they could work on the socket strength, and the cpu brackets not causing the socket to get warped over time....Intel this was meant for you.
Nvidia Drivers on Linux are not good, thats Nvidia Fault, if you use Linux the recomendation for get the best performance for now is AMD GPU, until today 2024 Nvidia still having a bad performance on their linux drivers.
In other words, this is an excellent case. Well built. Supports USB 3.2 at front x 2, which has been problematic finding in other white cases of this price range ($69 USD on NewEgg). Great cable management. Plenty of space for any GPU. The nitpicks are unreal. "It hasn't been marketed so they have no confidence in it" uh ok. Can't easily mount GPU vertically. Oh shoot. It can hold full ATX but micro ATX users wont like seeing the extra space? What?!
The first one will always be special, no matter how slow it was. i still have my first graphics card, an ASUS Geforce 2 MX400 with 64MB, it's broken though. And i still have my first RAM Stick, 64MB of SDR100 🙈
#BTF #TheUltimateSimplicity #ASUSBTFHiddenConnector It significantly enhances the aesthetics, reduces space waste, and provides more convenient DIY options. I believe these are all quite meaningful improvements.
Man, watching this as a designer is hard. Another car salesman sounding like Jack. CAM is targeted at notebooks, and just look at the board, how to we place two of them on the board? For workstation CAM seems to be too small, for real workstation needs. What this will do, is to limit the RAM capacity just like m.2 has limited the SSD capacity by landing on 82mm. In the end, laptops and workstations probably will use the same form factor, which the industry will love, but will ruin the advantage of a workstation. As a designer, the writing is on the wall. Speeds are now getting really hard to obtain through slotted parts. The voltage is getting ridicules low, resulting in extreme VRMs, and everything loves to live next to the CPU, while we are still placing the CPU at the edge of the board. CAM is just going to underscore this. As for form, people do get that they cannot make a pretty MB? It needs to be dressed up, the way they are currently making a MB, so you are flashing the makeup, not the board. A pig with lipstick is still a pig. Things just feel driven by technicians, not designers, and sold by Jack of all trades, who used to be a car salesman. There is no vision. Things are just lapped together. It is just a mess of a design. Why do we need a gazillion m.2 SSDs, if there is only room for the same amount of RAM as the laptop of your grandma? Why? Also, m.2 extension could easily be done by a PCIE x16 slot. Particularly for PCIE5. Just offer one x4 and offer 12 lanes. That is like 7 m.2. Just use both sides of the card. The cooler may even be massive. And it would work for every price bracket. Instead you guys are removing slots, placing a gazillion m.2s on the MB, hindering a second CAM. And that rear connector thing, they are all in the wrong places, and a ton of them need to go, due to the demands on the space round the CPU. Not to mention, letting them go, and you do not really need back side connectors, if you only design the right way. Connectors perforate the MB. It is just frustrating. As a designer, to watch how the bleached blonde botched body of a MB, is trying to define the future. But this is the best we got. This is where we are going. I guess we just have to live with it? CAM is really promising and I guess laptop RAM and laptop capacity it is. The MB will be mounted into a piece of Swiss cheese. It is an industry with hardly any vision. With Jack selling it, like a used car salesman would. It is such a string of horrible design choices, for the desktop. It is like Intel and AMD wants to give in to ARM. AMD hardly offer any PCIE slots at all. If they go CAM and m.2 like they currently do, all Workstation got, is higher TDP, the ability to swap GPU, and more slots for m.2. Over an ARM laptop. Just add an external GPU and storage to that laptop, and then what? This is such a pain to watch. As a designer. No vision. None.
Love the gaming NUC so much <3 perfect for moving places (in the house or to lan parties). Sure "just" mobile GPUs but there now totally cap. for 1080p/144-240hz!
MSI has not been able to produce boards specialized for overclocking since the 12th generation motherboard. Their BIOS is stagnant and seems to be no longer developing. I hope that from this 15th generation, it will become the 4th company to grow significantly following ASUS GIGABYTE ASROCK
there are actually good reasons why CAMM2 is better for notebooks. As for desktops, if it actually allows higher speeds than traditional memory modules, then absolutely I would want it.
You can't really get around physics though. I'm sure there could be optimization at some level but in the end more powerful GPU's are going to use more power.
@nadtz Sorry to disagree. A better way to make a GPU and CPU perform better is optimisation, better architecture, etc. Not bindingly drawing more watt. Otherwises, we will soon have GPUs draw 600w or more. 5 slots, 6 slots thick, and weight more than 4kg a piece.
@@spektrumB It's easy to say that when you don't actually have to do the work to make it happen. There are physical optimizations that are coming (backside power delivery for example) that will definitely help but R&D for those kinds of advancements take time and money. If you compare GPU's apples to apples a 4070 which can be a 2 slot GPU provides more performance than a 1080 at the same size and uses less power, so it's not like optimization isn't happening, but at the high end physics is still physics.
