On my channel you will find an in-depth analysis of my favorite classic chess games. Classic games are much more instructive than the modern ones, as it is much easier to follow the strategic plans and their gradual implementation. Modern top-level grandmasters make much less mistakes than their predecessors, know everything about their opponent’s strategic plans and typical tactics and prevent these plans from being implemented, while the lower-rated viewers have no clue about these plans, as all these strategic and tactical ideas stay behind the scenes. Thus, chess classics is essential for anyone who wants to get a deep understanding of positional chess, strategy, tactics, develop intuitive thinking and recognize typical strategic and tactical patterns. Classic games are a treasure house of the deepest chess wisdom and by studying them you will also develop a better understanding of the modern high-level chess.
Habla el Filosofo. Otras paradojas mias. 1. Si el ajedrez es tan complicado como se dice, ¿por que un niño de 8 años, casi analfabeto en todo, puede derrotar a un joven campeon; y, porque un joven campeon derrotara siempre a un otro mas viejo campeon? 2. Si los movimientos posibles, de dos jugadores son la mitad de infinitos (porque no pueden ser los movimientos de ambos totalmente infinitos), las partidas siempre terminan en un promedio de entre 30 y 76 movimientos? 3. El ajedrez aparece como un gran ejercicio de la mente humana, pero no lo es. Basta que uno aprenda sus cien reglas, para dominar el juego completamente. Todos pueden ser campeones. La prueba esta en que ningun campeon sera campeon para siempre, es decir, ningun campeon esta excento de ser derrotado.
(9:24) "White has a deadly threat - the rook (...) will join the attack." I don't get it: after Ng6 there is nothing Black can do to stop a mate by the White queen on f8 or h8 - you have shown the rook moves and as for the other imaginable moves: Kf7 would lead to Qf8# and Qd8 would lead to Qh8 with a mate to follow soon. Why bring in the rook?
Black can play 21...f5, closing the white bishop's diagonal so that it doesn't defend the knight. After this, White continues with 22.Qf8+ Kh7. Now, 23.Qh8 isn't checkmate anymore as the king would capture the knight. Instead, White can play 23.Rf3, bringing the rook into the attack, and after the possible 23...Kxg6, White checkmates with 24.Rg3+ Kh7 25.Qg8+ Kh6 26.Rh3#.
@@chesswisdom Ah, those "imaginable moves" ... It turns out that (to use a favorite of yours) my imagination was deficient: f5 indeed - oh yeah ... Thank you so much for your prompt reply and your patience with the lesser gods amongst your crowd .
Is this all computer generated? No human thinking went in to generating the individual particular script for this video, right? And all this is developed from conversational chat bot programing with a computer understanding of the meaning of the language it is using going no further than the way a language translation software can match and convert words and "concepts" from one language to another. You have read the entire chess literature (and viewed all the chess diagrams that go with it all) and can convert all this into your own thinking words? This channel is perfection.
What's with the affected accent? Trying to copy Agadmator, just use your normal American pronunciation. Croatia, Russia, Azerbaijan... what's the difference! But no trouble with r, th, short vowels a, i, or rounding long o and u.
Nezhmetdinov is the strongest player that majority of people never heard off. Thats sad, just because of communist politics he never had a chance to shine on a world stage, a man who was on the level of Tal
Thank you for all your video even though my English not good but now i know how to play positionally and my chess has improvement, i will always waiting for your video , thank you so much
@@user-wi8we1xu9c David Bronstein was my favorite, both as a player for his creative and imaginative style, and as an author for his deep insights into the nature of chess.
Excellent insights, not only on *why* what happened, _happened_ but why each player dismissed certain options all the way through the game. Thank you! It helps one appreciate just how strong Fischer was.
it would be interesting to see stockfish's evaluation of the position, to understand how bad his baiting moves are and what white could've done to punish black's wasted moves ... maybe actually sac-ing a pawn or two somewhere.
Tal was super unique. He was the best in visualising chess as the battlefield during war. Breaching walls (Pawns), sacrificing bigger pieces to enable easy access to the King, and the list goes on.
