Times Higher Education is the world's most authoritative source of information about higher education. Our World University Rankings are the only global university performance tables to judge world-class universities across all of their core missions - teaching, research, knowledge transfer and international outlook.
The UK electrocial system is a joke & a bad 1 at that Reform got 4 mill votes & 4 seats. Lib Dems got 3.4 mill votes & 69 seats. Labour one 2 thirds of the seats with only 1 third of the national votes They wear corruptions on there sleeve & r proud of it. Nothing is done about it. The little people and their opinions don't matter any more its all corporate. David Lammy the male version of Dianne Abbott. His 1st speech, he opens by saying " a desendant of black enslaved people " the same twat who said men can have a cervix And in charge of national security 💩🤣😭😂 the country is doomed
The crucial point here is how does one go about answering the question of whether or not one should do it? In a general sense, I guess one weighs up the pros and cons. The possibility of making money out of doing it is one "pro". But wait, should all the pros and cons be given equal weight? If so, why? If not, then how much weight ought one give to making money? I suspect most decision makers would tend to give it a very high weight. "Should we do it? It is risky! Yeah, but we stand to make millions! Okay, let's do it!" I'm certainly not implying that Prof. Freshwater would think like that. I'm just pointing out that the question "should we do it?" is not in itself very meaningful, not without knowing the weights given to the pros and cons.
