China is having a wave of electric vehicles exploding & burning, while charging. ... That will happen, when a manufacturer wants to save money, by not installing 'overcharge prevention circuitry' in the battery.
Your numbers are false. An ICE car including drilling for and refining the gas/diesel uses 10 times as much energy as an EV over its useful life. Take a grade 9 science class and you can understand how math and science works.
You mean the figure of 100k miles to break even on emissions used to build an EV? As I said, it's the figure I keep seeing when I research it. Not the result of any math I've done. The point on that is people are led to believe their EV is net zero when it hits the showroom floor, and that simply not true.
What, in particular? Late in the video, I did say I'd be talking about other battery technologies in another video. If there's some relevant in overlooking, please let me know. I want to be as informed as I can if I'm talking about this stuff. Thanks.
I am convinced that present day automotive batteries are comparable to what tape cassettes were in personal music players. For quite a while, cassette decks were the "state of the art" as lithium batteries are now. My thought is that we will find a battery chemistry that will obsolete lithium cells.
@@jimrageLT1 Sodium ion batteries are available now but the tech is new and needs to mature. At present Sodium ion cells allow 0 volts for safe transportation as well better cold weather performance.
HIT A POTHOLE? It would have to be a HUGE pothole, the battery is inside the passenger cabin (under the back seat) Not much of a chance the pothole is going to dent or damage the battery pack.
Have you ever driven on South Carolina roads? LOL. I get what you're saying. It was a crazy hypothetical to illustrate a point. The affected batteries may not be exhibiting a detectable problem at the time of inspection.
@@jimrageLT1 I currently (excuse the pun) own a 2022 4XE, I only level one charge it on a 110vac outlet. I have all night while it is parked outside my house, I would park it in the garage, but my All electric 2018 Smart for two sleeps there. So I am not too worried about the latest recall.
I have a Tesla model 3 and my house has a full house solar system with Lithium batteries. The solar system cost me 14,000 dollars and pays for itself in 5.5 years. The Tesla model 3 has of course Lithium batteries. My house energy savings per year with the solar is over 3,000 dollars a year. My EV produces annual savings of over 3,000 dollars a year over my previous gas cars. That's 6,000 dollars a year savings and over 10 years about 60,000 dollars I've saved. All with lithium at the base. My objectives have nothing to do with the climate change or CO2 discussions. Looking after me and my family is priority.
Have you had the system for at least five years yet? Are those savings actual numbers you've experienced or the figures in the documentation? I've heard of people not getting the savings that's claimed and some ending up with hardly any savings for whatever reason. Hopefully, you're an exception. If you have a chance, I'd suggest swapping for sodium ion batteries if they're ever available for your system: faster charging, more lifetime charge/discharge cycles, and safer than lithium ion.
@@jimrageLT1 Hi, I've had my system for just on 3 years. My numbers taken directly from the App which is called Solarman Smart. It's pretty comprehensive with the daily, monthly, and yearly numbers. A nice graphic that shows the direction of energy from panels, grid, batteries, and house. Always showing production and consumption. The graphs daily show an average of about 45+ kw consumed on average daily basis. It's also a bit fun as it shows how many tons of CO2 I've saved or equivalent trees I've planted and and tons of coal saved. Cute. Production pretty much matches that consumption unless it's an ugly day. The inverters are (2) actually. 5kw each with 6kw of solar going in which is within the spec. If selling back to the grid (I don't) the utility providor limits the size of a system on single phase to 5 kw. Hence I have 2 5kw systems with the inverters in a master/slave configuration. The 22 545 watt panels are on a fairly flat carport type roof. Not ideally angled but it works. The height is not so high so they are easily cleaned with a ladder. The inverters are programmed in 6 hour blocks. This allows for the movement of energy in a priority type focus. The 20 kwh of batteries are 10 each with each inverter. I could add more in chain if needed. Generally the batteries are fully charged by just around noon or a little later. We run appliances such as washers and dryers in the afternoon or throw some juice in the EVs. My pool pump runs during the day not at night which would be normal. My house has 2 meters. One standard meter with my house distribution panel. A 2nd meter expressly for charging EVs only is offered by my grid providor and is a Time Of Use meter or TOU. It runs from the power pole directly to my carport and the wall charger and does nothing else. So we swap between EV wall boxes depending which car or how much "excess" sun. The batteries have a lower cut off of 20%. Then the grid kicks in. If this occurs it's seamless and usually in the wee hours of the morning. They are LFP and I didn't investigate any other possible chemistries. After 3 years I don't observe any degradation,,,,, yet. I had an inverter fail and it was fixed under warranty but it took an entire month. (not happy about that) The system was then shut off and a switch box puts me on the grid solely and bypasses the solar system. The panels are Longi, inverters Deye, and the wall format batteries LV Topsun. Overall I'm quite pleased. My buddy has a similar system on 3 phase from the same company. But he massively over sized his system so his return is not very good. The grid providor offers energy buy back but if a system is limited to 5kw there won't be any excess to sell back and the price they pay is silly low. It appears they are playing the game of solar cooperation but don't really want to make it viable for them buying excess power. All my cabling is run underground and 🤞 it is reliable. We've had to reset the system a few times in heavy thunder and lightning storms and I think it's likely the copper ground rod needs to be a bit deeper. But actually that only happened a few times. I think that's about all the details I know. It works nicely for me. Thailand has low cost labor so that expense is not a consideration. Goods from China are low cost as so much is traded between Thailand and China. (same for Chinese EVs) as they are plentiful and low cost due to a tax treaty between the 2 countries. I'm an expat from the west. 😉
@@jimrageLT1Hi, I've had my system for just on 3 years. My numbers taken directly from the App which is called Solarman Smart. It's pretty comprehensive with the daily, monthly, and yearly numbers. A nice graphic that shows the direction of energy from panels, grid, batteries, and house. Always showing production and consumption. The graphs daily show an average of about 45+ kw consumed on average daily. Production pretty much matches that. The inverters are (2) actually. 5kw each with 6kw of solar going in which is within the spec. If selling back to the grid (I don't) the utility providor limits the size of a system on single phase to 5 kw. Hence I have 2 5kw systems with the inverters in a master/slave configuration. The 22 545 watt panels are on a fairly flat carport type roof. Not ideally angled but it works. The height is not so high so they are easily cleaned with a ladder. The inverters are programmed in 6 hour blocks. This allows for the movement of energy in a priority type focus. The 20 kwh of batteries are 10 each with each inverter. I could add more in chain if needed. Generally the batteries are fully charged by just around noon or a little later. We run appliances such as washers and dryers in the afternoon or throw some juice in the EVs. My pool pump runs during the day not at night which would be normal. My house has 2 meters. One standard meter with my house distribution panel. A 2nd meter expressly fir charging EVs only is offered by my grid providor and is a Time Of Use meter or TOU. It runs from the power pole directly to my carport and the wall charger and does nothing else. So we swap between EV wall boxes depending which car or how much "excess" sun. The batteries have a lower cut off of 20%. Then the grid kicks in. If this occurs it's seamless and usually in the wee hours of the morning. They are LFP and I didn't investigate any other possible chemistries. After 3 years I don't observe any degradation,,,,, yet. I had an inverter fail and it was fixed under warranty but it took an entire month. (not happy about that) The system was then shut off and a switch box puts me on the grid solely and bypasses the solar system. The panels are Longi, inverters Deye, and the wall format batteries LV Topsun. Overall I'm quite pleased. My buddy has a similar system on 3 phase from the same company. But he massively over sized his system so his return is not very good. The grid providor offers energy buy back but if a system is limited to 5kw there won't be any excess to sell back and the price they pay is silly low. It appears they are playing the game of solar cooperation but don't really want to make it viable for them buying excess power. All my cabling is run underground and 🤞 it is reliable. We've had to reset the system a few times in heavy thunder and lightning storms and I think it's likely the copper ground rod needs to be a bit deeper. But actually that only happened a few times. I think that's about all the details I know. It works nicely for me. Thailand has low cost labor so that expense is not a consideration. Goods from China are low cost as so much is traded between Thailand and China. (same for Chinese EVs) as they are plentiful and low cost due to a tax treaty between the 2 countries. I'm an expat from the west. 😉
@@jimrageLT1I've written extensive comprehensive replies but they keep getting deleted. 😢 My system 3 years running and data from actual use. I provided lots of detail but this channel or RU-vid apparently didn't appreciate my level of detail. I think the secret is to size the system correctly. And my system is at least 50% cheaper than what is available in most Western markets.
@sunrisejak2709 That's weird, I did see them in one app I use, but I dont see it now. Hadn't had a chance to reply. You had a lot of info there. Your friends solar system sounds like one of those that isn't providing what was advertised. Whole house systems just seem very inconsistent, that way. I'm not sure how reliable those figures for saved CO2 emissions and stuff are. They can make an app say anything to make you feel better, but it sounds your system is doing the right thing, thankfully.
"...how much lead are you putting in my neighborhood lead affects my thinking capacity lead there's only one thing on the planet more dangerous than lead and that's manganese manganese will make you kill your mama and let me tell y'all something if you want to see the largest homicide rate in the world it ain't in no black ghetto in America it's a little town in Australia where them white folks homicide rates 200 times what their population is and that town just happened to be located across the street from a manganese. that that that town is located across the street from a manganese plant how much manganese are you spraying in my neighborhood at night while I'm sleeping how in the world can a nine-year-old child find a heroin man but the FBI can't find it and you gonna tell me that's a black thing y'all crazy what is this about these are the things that need to change while this brother and sisters on their way to the White House and when you see Hillary and y'all see brother Barack thank them for me and you white folks need to be thankful because if y'all had a brother like me y'all would really be in trouble that's right that's right that's right that's right okay" - Dick Gregory, State of the Black Union 2008, RIP
A Lot used, a lot spilled, a lot wasted, but still needed. Using the correct alternative will help that considerably. lithium ion is NOT that correct alternative for cars, in my opinion.
After doing the math myself, the CO2 related impact on the climate doesn't look bad, more like a drop in the ocean! I heard that we annually release about 37.5 billion tons of CO2 worldwide [2023], so if mining 1 ton of lithium gives us 15 tons of CO2 (so 37B/15 = 2.5B) and we mined 180,000 tons of Lithium in 2023, then it gives us.... 2,500,000,000/180,000 = 13889 years of lithium production. Which is about 38 years of producing lithium to equate *just a SINGLE DAY* of our worldwide CO2 production (or in other words annual production of lithium equates to only ~38 minutes of our annual CO2 production!!), which in my opinion looks decent! 🙂
Yeah, the numbers suggest a comparative drop in the bucket. If we scale that up to the 2035 estimate of our lithium production needs of about 4,500,000 tons that 13889 years suddenly becomes 548...still good (comparatively speaking) but we won't make that number. We're projected to come up short by 24% or 1.1 million tons in production by then. All of this, of course, assumes the 1:15 ton ratio remains constant...which I doubt it will. I expect it'll get worse. The point I was trying to make was that lithium is too costly (and I don't just mean money) and too dangerous for 1000lb batteries. If we limited it to small applications then we get so much more out of that same lithium per ton. Example: From what I've read, a Tesla Model S battery contains 62.9 Kilograms of lithium which translates to about 14 batteries, if my math is right (900Kg=.99 Tons, 900/62.9=14.3). Assuming the figure of 1 gram of lithium per cell phone battery is correct, we would get 900,000 batteries for that same ton of lithium. In the world of the Net Zero fantasy, any emissions are too many emissions. The best we can do, on that front, is maximize the bang for the buck, as they say.
@@jimrageLT1 I heard that some scientists are working or more carbon based batteries, though with no good efforts without making things ultra expensive. However, if technology keeps getting better, then one day in future, after we already destroy the climate completely, maybe we will be able to produce good and clean batteries? ...not much of comforting thought though.. And I agree about things possibly worsening too, the deadly desire to be as greedy as possible and make things as cheap as possible, on the biggest scale one can, will probably make pollution even worse :-(
Yeah, there are some good alternatives in the works and I'll talk about those in a later video. But in the end, there's not going to be one single solution that works for everything.
Battery is a power source of not the EV itself.. Bred Thermophilic bacteria cold steam Tesla generators for electric vehicles or HOMES. Mulch catches fire on its own, Thermophilic bacteria they don't TELL YOU THE NAME. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oO4FH9hn0_I.htmlsi=EKPp4I3Akb048OYW Because its a heat source you can feed yard waste nutrient drip and control density of nutrients in solution to control their heat level. *Piles mulch* They will WAKE even if they were frozen when they detect nutrients.. Find them, find the hottest of them, and feed them to replicate them. Warm your homes too. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2pGxVvSizoE.htmlsi=FeT-hY1on48hAq9Z He made a looping capable design that can maintain low pressures like near space to greatly multiply all heat value. 134F = Look at the data he shows with that tiny thing. Thermophilic bacteria panels sending heat? OH MY GOD.. Thermophilic bacteria as stated can get so hot they can cause fires. *Lights a log and puts it under a NORMAL WEAK steam system* We need that kid.. Let him BE KNOWN! 😉So pressure overwhelm our masters saying NO because they already stole everything in govt database and are evil.
(For censored part in main comment) Imagine feeding your homes yard or food waste solutions made automatically by ultrasonic food processors. And it lasting a super long time. *Squints at Mulch piles steaming in the cold forever* That's just them getting their own nutrients.. Nutrient drip = Dragon juice..
A LOT, over the years, for sure. In my opinion, we're trading that out for something that's comparatively as bad or worse. I'm not - and never have said - oil is the only way. The long term solution is going to be a mix of technologies to meet our energy needs. Lithium ion has its place, but it doesnt offset as much oil as proponents say it does and its too dangerous to be in big things like cars, again, my opinion.
@@jimrageLT1🇨🇦 There are some very bad people behind Lithium mining in particular. Mining a major force in Canadian industry. There is violence in Africa and South America directly related to our industry. When mines open up in the US, you will see these pros in action. They do not lose. Wake up.
I'd be interested to see what you could find out about an Australian scientific organisation called CSIRO and their ammonium to hydrogen metal membrane that was announced probably 5 years ago and has all but vanished. When it was announced it was a co-venture with Toyota Australia who had to functioning examples in a pair of Corollas. The technology touted ammonia as an abundant production by-product that was the best form of transporting hydrogen that could exist (better even than pure hydrogen due to the molecular structure of ammonia). The ammoniia was supposedly split on the fly by this metal membrane forming pure hydrogen. The only reason I give this any credence is that it came from CSIRO, which from its historical scientific prowess is not one to say they have created something without substantial evidence.
I want less shit to fail in my car and not membranes that need an total overhal ever 2-3 y for the price of an engine rebuild. If you can even handle that stuff safely is on a way other side of the medal
@@jimrageLT1 from memory it was pretty unclear on the details. But the key message was this membrane allows the live conversion from ammonia to hydrogen for use in vehicles. And from by very basic understanding, this is ideal because ammonia is an extremely abundant waste product from various industrial processes. Secondly because it's 3x more efficient method of storing and transporting hydrogen than pure hydrogen. The way the technology fell off the face of the earth (more or less) has me concerned that conflicting interests from the fossil fuel world had development stopped or slowed.
It’s great that you not only mention how many gallons of water are needed but how much weight that is equivalent to that way you have a better idea of pounds of water, yielding X amount of pounds of lithium instead of gallons of water, yielding gallons of lithium. Very well doneand presented. In both ways, the mining as well as the pools of Brian, take up a huge area of land that will be forever changed just like a super fund site is here in the United States.
Slavery. Take that one word for what you want. Another word. Politician. Current political goings on in America. Open borders. Distribution of wealth. All these years everyone thought it was white to black. Hahahaha
Is it true that kamalas husband is a major investor in a lithium mine in NC . Where the hurricane is wrecking vthe place . And the 750 $ is just a loan and if people don't pay it back they lose their land ? Is this true ? 😮
I dont know if that's true. The only sources for that I've seen are social media sites and small media outlets like the Costa Rican Times. If he his, then that info is being suppressed, I think. I dont know anything about the $750 FEMA payment beyond rumors.
@jimrageLT1 thank you for responding. I don't like reposting untrue info . I will do some more searching. It's a beautiful night here in Thailand , I hope this finds you and yours happy and healthy. God bless.
Funy thing they try to delay as hard as possible cant sell: Service plans, engine trims and tunings, extended warantys (well out of waranty your car will be trash anyways so no one will buy it)
EVs and Lithium are still in the Beta Test phase, and it's proving to be one hell of eye opener. New research is coming on line that may prove much less expensive and far less pollution.
So the comparison you're doing with the EVs Battery's and other things that uses lithium like your phone and gropro etc. Yeah sure bud did you know this? It only takes 166 smartphones to recycle enough cobalt to build a new EV battery. -Redwood materials That means your phone and my phone is more cobalt rich now i know you are talking about EV battery and Lithium but let me tell you this, only ~17% of the 150 million devices Americans discard each year is recycled. That's each year. Why mine when you can recycle this is not as big of a problem you think, you're reading too much fear mongering articles that goes around and tells you EVs are bad and they aren't possible. Absolutely false, if you would just find the proper amount of lithium to be extracted here in America like with EnergyX you'll understand that the demand is for Lithium is not a problem to be solved, it's already being solved
17% might a generous figure, if you ask me. The claims are that 95% or more of the minerals can be reclaimed in the recycling process "under optimum conditions", which is great for the sustainability part of it. In the shredding part of the recycling process, its comparatively easy to separate the black mass (the minerals) from the rest of the material. But after that, its gets very expensive and chemically intensive to fully reclaim and separate the black mass into the mineral components. There really isn't a cost-effective way to do that (yet) as far as I am aware. The whole recycling process is so expensive (right now), manufacturers find it easier to keep on digging. So few batteries are recycled because A) people find it inconvenient to take their batteries to the right drop off location and B) It's really difficult to make a profit without a contract deal with particular manufacturers to recycle their batteries. But yeah, if everything was being recycled consistently then we'd have something.
@@jimrageLT1 it's not a claim, it's the on Average they recover by recycling batteries, there are three basic approaches to recycling batteries each with it's own drawbacks 1. You can burn them which is wasteful and can result in toxic emissions 2. You can dissolve them in strong chemicals which is expensive and uses the most energy. Or 3. Separate them mechanically which can be labor intensive and dangerous. Until the last few years recyclers are simply ground up the batteries and sent them overseas for someone else to deal with but Redwood materials is borrowing the most useful bits from each of those categories or recycling. The Redwood materials process starts by grounding up the batteries in vacuum and they go to a conveyor belt to the RCI which is essentially an enormous slow cooker baking the materials at several hundred degrees for about an hour and perhaps it's redwoods biggest innovation thus far, traditional recycling uses well over 1,000° c or 1,800 Fahrenheit to separate out precious materials. If you go and the do some digging around you'll find the entire process of recycling Redwood materials do what I told you is just the early stages of their recycling methods learn about it and yes this is more cost effective compared to the 3 traditional ways of recycling pls do more research about this before making assumptions of what you think is happening
Thanks for the info. I'm aware that nailing down the recycling process is still a work in progress, but I'll add this to my list of research for the video I'll be doing on recycling.
it really just feels like you have no idea what you're actually talking about... the usual "it doesn't solve absolutely everything in one go, therefore don't bother at all"-argument
Despite pushback by (mostly older) Americans the rest of the world are buying EVs like crazy. It pains me to say it but Chinese EV automaker BYD (Build Your Dreams) is skyrocketing. America is freezing BYD out and talking about slapping tariffs on them but the reality is they’re sold all over the world including Canada and Mexico. The U.S. is surrounded and will cave eventually just like in the 80s over Japanese cars. Americans that think EVs are dead are fooling themselves. This is coming from a guy that’s not happy about anything I just said but I’m not afraid of being realistic.
True, it's coming. I'm not sure about BYD skyrocketing sales, though. I keep seeing reports and photos of acres and acres of unsold Chinese EVs sitting in fields. Not sure if they're BYD vehicles or not...and it is China, after all. Who knows what's true or not?
@@jimrageLT1 Warren Buffet is a big investor in BYD. Watch a few vids on the Shark, Dolphin and Seagull then read the comments. It’s eye opening. Especially the American company that took one apart that retailed for $11,500. They were shocked at how well engineered it was. Price is so low, quality is good, and it will inevitably win over younger buyers. Of course it probably listens to every word you say and runs owners profiles through AI. But the latest iPhones do that already.
the amount of toxic chemicals released in our environment from EV fires so far....... the mining of materials for them.... Is far more destructive then all the existing combustion engines combined.
That's a bold statement. I'm, personally, not ready to say that (exactly). However, the first 20 or so years of the modern hybrid/EV are WELL on their way to making that a fact, imo.
Stella is huge it won't bury them. Recalls have zero enforcement. The manufacturer essentially gets to decide what the recall will be and when they'll do it. Bad actors like always claim there's no parts so that they can age the vehicles out. Some owners can't be tracked down on because they're not the original.
You're probably right. But they do have a lot of other problems right now with sales and the need to cut a lot of inventory. Stellantis, itself, can probably weather the storm, but that doesn't mean they wont have to take serious action to keep the Chrysler brands afloat and these type of recalls certainly don't help. but, yeah, they'll probably survive.
If the government wanted everyone to switch to electric all they would have to do is provide free public charging for all electric vehicles. But that will never happen because it doesn't fit into the The Greed New Deal.
Cars so green they could burst out in a toxic fire at any moment, requires 50 thousand gallons of water to put out and requires a hazmat team to contain the chemicals.
So people pay more for a hybrid only to be told, you can't use electric because your vehicle may explode. Can't these idiots hire a real EV team and sell quality products
I came SO CLOSE to buying a Wrangler 4xe a year ago but didn't because of all of the oil issues with the 4xe (not to mention their general unreliable nature) but this is immeasurably worse!!
@@laughingbird The issue with the oil is the aready crappy 2.0 litre engine had oil being diluted by fuel but it's far worse with the 4xe since it runs much less. The system would disable the electric driving capability after only a couple thousand miles and demand an oil change. Look up Jeep 4XE F.O.R.M. for more info.
Form is fuel and oil refresh mode. It's purpose is to protect your car and most hybrids do it for cases where you can be on electric for forever and not use your fuel (refreshes it). There is a question on if it's was too aggressive but it isn't a 'problem'. It's preventing problems.
@@jimrageLT1 Stop talking as if people live off-road. Most people drive their wrangler in cities and on highways etc. and every model doesn't have to be 100% off-road.
@@laughingbird if you're going to have a mall crawler get a rav 4 or some other toyota. Jeeps were used to be OK on pavement but mainly meant for off-road. The latest parent company does not understand that.
"Orange Cruel Aid", lol. Look, show me an EV battery that'll last almost forever *or* one that will last that long with a VERY SIMPLE reconditioning process AND won't spontaneously combust into a fire that CANT be controlled....and I'll be ok. I still probably won't buy it...but at least it'll actually do what people say they do now.
Just wait for an aftermarket manufacturer start making an aftermarket EV battery case One that has a better protection against water intrusion, damage and has better cell conditioning But most of all can be opened so that the modules, cells and circuit boards can be fixed or replaced This will be a 'HUGE'! game changer because it will make battery repair much much cheaper EV batteries are composed of a few circuit boards and dozen or so modules which themselves contain a few hundred single cells and a few circuit boards When an EV battery goes bad it is just a circuit board or module or two Modules or circuit boards can be easily and relatively in expensively replaced When bad modules go bad the problem is usually a circuit board and or a few cells that can be replaced Auto manufacturers always make replacement parts extremely expensive
Serviceable batteries would be a huge game changer, I agree. I think GMs Ultium batteries are kind of built that way with replaceable modules, at least. But it's not always a mechanical problem when they go bad. When cells can no longer move electrons, they're done, and the whole battery needs to be replaced. There aren't many recyclers because it's a very expensive process, so there's not a lot of money to be made, and no one will do it simply "for the planet". It's simply cheaper to make new batteries....which kinda cancells out the sustainability part of the EV argument, imo.
There's equipment and training needed to work on EV batteries. When some are failing it's likely that others are going to failing soon. Resealing the case is another issue. Whatcha Rich rebuilds to get an idea of what's involved.
If you are driving a car powered with petrol you might be "F"d These ice cars catch fire way Way more than EVs, However, EV fires are big news whereas gas car fires is not reported because it is not news and often are reported as EV fires (True) EVs are safer than ice vehicles, period
I disagree. But I've never said ICE engines don't catch fire, but they're not prone to catching fire just sitting in a garage. And, in my opinion, the huge difference is an ICE fire can be dealt with. When it's put out, it's out. An EV, on the other hand, needs to be put in a container and buried in sand for a week to make sure it doesn't reignite on its own.
You vill eat zee bugs and be happy! U2oob: 60,000lb Lithium U2oob: US 95 Lithium U2oob: Columbus truck fire Lithium Google: Cyndertruck Houston Google: Harlingen fire hydrant U2oob: giant CATL billows U2oob: Owners detail Tesla fire ... [for extended play] U2oob: Tesla unsuccessful boat launch U2oob: Tesla White Plains three others U2oob: "Hummer EV catches on fire" ... [include quotes] U2oob: Rivian fire normal U2oob: Tesla @ Playa U2oob: Climate the Movie The Real Truth
Great vid Jim. Mines same as yours but 6 spd. Couldn’t be happier. Do miss the leather but I have it in the Tahoe so we are good. I will say I adjusted my audio (bass treble etc) and got it sounding decent but I didn’t buy that jammy for the radio I bought it for the exhaust!!! Love ya man stay real bro
Thanks. I guess I failed to mention the other thing I might have done differently: get the 6sp. Would've freed up money for those other things I might have wanted, lol.
