@@COUNTVLAIDMIR Where is this "offensive" crap, besides from you non-Japanese people? Also, the Yasuke issue is the main thing. When Japanese devs put in Yasuke as a Samurai, you guys didnt complain. But now, its all of a sudden a problem. Not only am I defending, I will still buy AC Shadows, and Ghost Of Yotei as well. Screw you hypocrites.

​@@Walt_Xander94 Ubisoft stealing the banner design from the Sekigahara rifle corps? Using One Piece merch as their own merch? Specifically zoro's sword? using a destroyed Torii gate (which is tied to the atomic bombings of Japan_ as a feature in a figurine? using a lamp design WITHOUT permission from the temple where design originated? How are you not aware of these issues? if Ubisoft was "innocent" why did they pussy out of Tokyo Game show?

@@COUNTVLAIDMIR What merch? I just checked, Funko pop-looking things. And katana merch, but considering the various looks that Katana sheaths have, that seems coincidental. UNLESS Tite Kubo himself, said something. And all the other accusations certainly haven't been the talk of AC Shadows that has been going around. Just the Yasuke bitching is. If merch based on the Torii Gates is taboo, youre a little late because there's TONS of merch on those. And the gate you're talking out, SURVIVED the nukes somehow. Seems more like a positive image, still standing after tons of destruction. And a goddamn lamp? That one seems like nitpicking. Lastly, if it wasnt for all the Yasuke bitching, Ubisoft wouldve shown off game at that show. But you people wouldve been looking for something to complain about. Heck, if most complaints Ubisoft got today were all legit, I'd take those claims seriously. But its just alot of bitching, on TONS of franchises today. Im just sick of it. I'll wait until AC Shadows is actually out, to judge it. And I swear, all this bs is gonna make nearly all Western devs stay away from making any ancient Japan game. Samurai, Ninjas, the various Japanese periods & their conflicts, etc. If that happens, don't ask why no one besides Japan, makes such games anymore.

@@Walt_Xander94 a positive example is GOT. The devs did their homework and research and the game was received very well in japan and SP even became ambassadors of Tsushima. The game itself had no historical accuracy, but respected the japanese culture and traditions so well. And UBI on the other end just f up all the time. Either they are full of incompetent persons or they do it on purpose

@@Walt_Xander94 besides, UBIs "research" team is a woman who wrote a book about monks making love with boys and Thomas Lockley who made the whole "Yasuke was a samurai" story up

@@czemuniestawiaszoporu Yotei is still FICTION. So its silly to complain about the protag being a woman. You people are the ones not listening. Japan made that Yasuke anime, had Yasuke be a Ni-Oh boss fight & be playable in Samurai Warriors 5. The Japanese Government & Historians had no problem with those. Its just you non-Japanese people that can't handle that there was one black man in ancient Japan & tell yourselves that people are changing Yasuke's history. Assassin's Creed always been Historical FICTION. The games even had that disclaimer about such works of fiction being INSPIRED by historical events & the dev teams being multicultural and having various beliefs. So saying that AC represented real history is a goddamn lie & you obviously didnt play AC since the start. If you did, you wouldn't be saying that past AC stuff like Leonardo building a BATTLE TANK, represented real history. Lastly, people didn't complain about Tsushima's female characters because THEY WERENT PLAYABLE. You can't talk about things being well written when Yotei will have the same damn good writing. Yet all those AC Shadows complainers became hypocrites real quick.

@@luciferverone Theyre not. Yasuke was a REAL person that was a Samurai, and when Jaosn puts him in their games because they love the guy, who are "gamers" over here to say otherwise? And those people damn well arent AC fans either. I'll tell you what they are, racist & hypocrites. How tf is it nonsense for Yotei to use a female warrior? Hell, I didn't play Tsushima yet because I hated all the stupid comparisons people were making to AC Shadows(as if there werent many Samurai games in the past), but I do know that Tsushima's protag was FICTIONAL, and goes with the Ghost mantle. Not exactly loyal to anyone(except his uncle). So Yotei is just another "Ghost". Nay-sayers just hate black & female Samurai, yet they were cool with a white man being a Samurai.

@@Walt_Xander94 You are wrong already. Yasuke was never a samurai he was a retainer. Having a title of samurai doesn’t automatically make you one. Just because he was real doesn’t mean you revise history to portray him as something he wasn’t. Let’s be honest here he wasn’t important at all to Japanese history. And with all the hot water the author is in I’d say it’s revisionist history at its finest. Why isn’t it nonsensical for Yotel to use a female ronin? Since when were there female ronins in Japan? Let’s be real here it’s another unnecessary push for ideology and nothing else. Anyone who says otherwise is lying. Its very easy for people to write off fans complains and concerns and label them as “Not fans” when in reality its the people who are quick to dismiss them the fake fans, majority of them never buy the game. “Cool with a white man being a samurai” I’m sorry are you new here or did you miss the articles written about Niohs protagonist? Hell in this culture which is being pushed in games having a white male character is considered bad and there is backlash against it, Nioh protagonist is one, next is Cal from Star Wars, let’s not forget devs going out of their way to advertise that their game does not have a single white male in it, as if that’s something to boast about. I mean you cannot ignore all this and just focus on people pointing out blatant flaws and revisionist history.

@@luciferverone YOU are wrong. All of ya'll use the Retainer excuse, but you clearly don't know what it means & you never explain it because if you did, there goes your point. I went over that in my other video that I mentioned, but I'll answer it here: Retainers provide MILITARY SERVICES! Theyre given a sword, retainter armor that is just Samurai armor(or just one type) & a house. But here's one thing I didn't mention in that video, in that ancient Japan society, guess who were only ones allowed to carry a sword. The SAMURAI CLASS. Yet you people still want to say otherwise? It was more than just a title Yasuke was given. He was Oda's bodyguard & he later fought along side him. It was more than a title for William Addams too. How was anything revised when JAPAN SAYS YASUKE WAS A SAMURAI? Japan even made that Yasuke anime. That should end the argument right there. Unless youre Japanese, you cant say shit. Onto Yotei, for f sake, look at all the anime & manga alone that have female warriors. Kunoichi, Onna-Musha & Samurai. Oh, and Geishas, the ones that can assassinate tf outta you & you wouldn't know until its too late. Look at Bleach, Demon Slayer, Samurai Champloo, Afro Samurai & Blue Eye Samurai. I've good things about that last one, an Onna-Musha thats half-white & is hunting for vengeance. She mustve been an outsider for having blue eyes, yet she's a badass. So why is Yotei having a female warrior protag, an issue now? How come the female warriors in the first game didn't get complaints? Oh right, they weren't playable. And Ghost Of Yotei is Historical FICTION. A female ronin existing at the wrong point in time to you, doesnt matter anyway because that "Ghost" wont be in the history books. Like all the Assassins in AC. And Ni-Oh, William Addams did not get the controversy that AC Shadows & Yotei are getting now. That did not happen. Heck, its a Souls Clone, so its not like the majority were playing to even see William & make that complaint. I certainly would've known about it, because I tried out the demo, that was before the game released. And Star Wars' Cal didn't get complaints. Unlike Outlaws' protag did, mainly because its another situation were the model actress looks beautiful, but the game character is purposefully designed to look unappealing as most Western games do right now, and Male characters NEVER put up with it. And which game advertises no white males in it? I'm sure Dustborn & other ACTUAL woke games did it. But AC Shadows & Ghost Of Yotei arent that.

@@luciferverone "Another unnecessary push", so you people just turn your backs on SuckerPunch? You people werent really fans of Ghost Of Tsushima? Or just leave after the devs go a different direction YOU dont like? You mofos would call Kill Bill vol 1 & 2, woke if they came out today. All this harping on Historical Accuracy in FICTION, I doubt ya'll bitched about The Last Samurai either. The Tom Cruise film based off a novel of the same name. And that film made money at box office, so ya'll didn't about that white Samurai. Who unlike Willam Addams, is completely made-up.

@@Walt_Xander94 Turn our backs? What is this nonsense. If they make good games then we will play them, if they make bad games then we will leave. We don’t owe them anything.

Ubisoft said that Yasuke in Assasin creed shadows is historically accurate so its not like we called Assasin creed shadows historically accurate its ubisoft xD (after a backslash from real historians and even japanesse goverment ubisoft said sorry we didn't know he wasn't a samurai xD)

@@czemuniestawiaszoporu given that a lot of japanese entertainment depicts him as a samurai i think is somewhat forgivable but im out of the loop and did not know they claimed this to be accurate.

@@josephstalin7044 Pardon? Youre definitely commenting on the wrong video?

@@draatrom What disrespect? You say that as if the setting is wrong, or Japanese society doesn't match the time period. And the game isnt even out yet. In fact, I found out the game is set 3 years before the Honno-ji Incident. So its safe to say Yasuke in ACS is a Samurai because of Oda Nobunaga, and he AND the Assassin wont be able to save him.

@@Walt_Xander94 things like mixing up buddhism and shintoism, like mixing up architecture with chinese and myanmar architecture, like effing up family symbols, like using banners of modern groups without permission. they can craft his story as a time travelling samurai who was granted samurai rank as soon as he arrived in japan because fictional oda liked the eel in yasukes pants, how they want, i dont care. but it doesnt change that he behaves like a barbarian oni

@@draatrom Time Travel? That's not how Assassin's Creed works. Not in the traditional sense. Also, Yasuke was a freakin' slave that ended up in Japan. Its crazy how people can't handle that a black man was in ancient Japan. Yet they can handle a white dude bring there back then. And if there were actually symbol errors, then a 5-month delay is actually warranted. But to be fair, alot of Japanese & Chinese symbols look similar.

@@Walt_Xander94 your reply shows me you didn't understand what i meant, but it's fine. Look, if they make slight changes to him and the other aspects i mentioned, then everybody would be happy and japanese people would also stop complaining. the only remaining to complain would be racists, but their opinion doesnt matter

@@Walt_Xander94 you said it yourself he was a slave in japan not a samurai thats the problem people have with him in assasin creed (assasin creed shadows WAS advertised as history accurate) and if they really changed the symbols of familys like draatrom said you can't defend it with: but but they are similiar! I won't change Maria's (Maria Skłodowska-Curie) last name to only Skłodowska or change it to something else and say: but polish is similiar so its okay xD (instead of Skłodowska something like Śklodovska so making it more Russian or something like that)

@@IS-hk6cw No hist...why that info a amound then? Plus, we do know why he would've took Yasuke into his services. He saw this tall beast thats straight out of a folktale, and wanted that on his side, in his army. Samurai Yasuke is not a change. For f sake, I used examples of JAPANESE games he was in. Why would 2 Japanese devs have Yasuke whoopin' ass? Why was Yasuke a Samurai boss fight in Ni-Oh? Why was his playable in SAMURAI Warriors 5? How come people didn't complain then? Speaking of that, look at Dynasty Warriors. Those Chinese Dynasty eras arent exactly real. Its not clear if periods like The Three Kingdoms happened the way China retells such history. Yet no one complains about all those playable warriors like Lu Bu. Especially China themselves, because the Three Kingdoms is all over Chinese Pop Culture. One more thing, Assassin's Creed has ALWAYS been historical fiction. Just like Ghost Of Tsushima & Ni-Oh. So what are you talking about? Not once has Ubisoft treated the AC games as non-fiction history. Those games are alwae set AROUND historical periods. And there's always that disclaimer at the start of every AC: A work of FICTION thats INSPIRED by historical events. And the dev teams have multiple beliefs, culture, etc. So, where have ya'll been? Yasuke is part of Japan's history & Ubisoft just used that. Just like they used Leonardo DaVinci, but had him build a goddamn Battle Tank in the 1500s.

@@IS-hk6cw Also, look at that Yasuke anime. Who helped work on that? A JAPANESE people. A Japanese director AND animation studio. Nay-sayers of Yasuke being a Samurai are either racist or dont know shit about him. And all despite what Japan has said & done with the guy in their pop culture.

@@Walt_Xander94 I’m confused. So you’re saying that assassin’s creed is a fictional game but Nioh, samurai warriors & yasuke’s anime aren’t historical fiction? Or you’re saying all these games and anime are 100% historical accurate? Did you even look up primary source documents like Shinchō Kōki, Ietada Nikki and Jesuit documents? I did and also listened to what actual historians said about him. Except the Honnoji incident, there’s no historical record that he fought. The honnoji incident was a coup d'etat to Nobunaga. Yasuke didn’t fight with Nobunaga at the honnoji temple. He fought somewhere else and we don’t know for sure how he fought. Also, Nobunaga had more than 1400 retainers and some regional warlords as his ally. My point is that assassin’s creed has been historical fiction. People don’t need to change history to have Yasuke as a samurai in a historical fiction game.

@@Walt_Xander94your whole argument fell upon itself when you talk about historic fiction. ubisoft specifically came out to say this is authentic japanese history in an interview or q&a, i find it weird that they have to specifically state it. if they just kept silent on it i doubt anyone would care and now there’s zero mention and it’s all historic fiction from their side. i mean i probably wouldnt even know about this whole drama until it was blown so out of proportion plus yasuke being a samurai isnt even the biggest issue here

@@Mickle1011 You have a no-life issue. I can't believe someone defends such a poorly designed boss fight.

@@Walt_Xander94 I beat it in about 10 minutes an hour ago

@@Mickle1011 So, luck.

@@schmenfleor9050 Isn't good? My point is that Ni-Oh's protag was based off a real person too. That's the one positive thing about the game I still remember after all these years. Also, the game's setting was 1600s Japan. The late Sengoku Period, just with a fictional story. And here's one thing about the game I didn't know, the final boss: Edward Kelly, also based off a real person of that same name. Yet no one complained about a white Samurai. That is not any different from Ghost Of Tsushima using the real Mongol Invasion of Japan from the late 1200s, but with a fictional character & his own story. We dont know what real historical period Yotei will use, but its a fictional character, but such female warriors did exist. The first game also had female warriors, yet no one complained about them. And the whole Assassin's Creed franchise used various time periods & real historical events, and had fictional characters & stories set around them. Yet Assassin's Creed gets complaints NOW? Forget Yasuke, remember back in AC2 when Leonardo was the Lucius Fox for Ezio? Making weapons & gear for him? And a freakin' TANK in the Italian Renaissance era? Only sketches & notes of that existed, Leonardo never actually built that. Point is, no one complained about a 1500s Battle Tank built by Leonardo DaVinci. Not to mention, the rest of Yasuke's life, after the Honno-ji Incident where Oda died in 1582, is unknown. Fictional stories can do anything with him at that point. Heck, AC Shadows is set just 3 years before Oda's death. So we know where that game's past story is going. Lastly, female Ninjas are Kunoichi. Thats a different thing. They seem to date back to the 1600s. Onna-Musha date further back to the 1100s. So the Onna-Musha existed BEFORE the Mongol Invasion. Yotei takes place way after that, so you can't say those warriors arent accurate.

@@Walt_Xander94 That's great info that i didn't know. But i think another factor that i personally have been affected on are the people making these games. Ubisoft is just a bad company and is continuing to produce mediocre games while sucker punch is in my opinion so much better. Though i do recognize the blatant sexism and hypocritical takes being made especially being led by people like asmongold I'll still be trying out both games though i don't expect much from assassin's Creed.

​​​@@schmenfleor9050 There's nothing mediocre about Assassin's Creed. It became a franchise for a reason. And what's funny is that AC was originally supposed to be a Prince Of Persia game, but it became its own thing. I know Star Wars Outlaws & xDefiant are flops & the Tom Clancy series hasnt been good in decades. But no one can say Assassin's Creed & Far Cry are flops. At best, people bitch about Ubisoft's open world, which I'll never get because its just not broken & there's no need to fix it. And I recall the newest Prince Of Persia being good. Then there's Rainbow Six Seige. And its not sexist to prefer to play as a male character like Asmongold does.

​@@Walt_Xander94 cool, I'm not trying to drag this out or whatever i just genuinely want to broaden my mindset or become more "mature" as a kid but i have 2 questions sir. How are they not mediocre when they've recently swayed from the previous generations of games like valhalla? maybe there's an argument there or maybe the game just doesn't feel like ac to me but everything doesn't feel GOOD to play for me so i call it "mediocre" which is of course opinion based. Another thing is how is it not sexist? i understand what sexism and preference mean. But maybe i just haven't experienced much of it? "Sexism is prejudice or discrimination based on one's sex or gender. Sexism can affect anyone, but primarily affects women and girls. It has been linked to gender roles and stereotypes, and may include the belief that one sex or gender is intrinsically superior to another" i genuinely have a hard time understanding, maybe because english is not my first language and i don't live in america but refusing to play a whole game just because of the gender of the character is not sexist? especially since the game is about warriors. I'd just like to genuinely understand more about this topic because u seem like an older person. Also isn't preference means just liking something over another thing? Or does it mean disliking the other thing and liking one thing. sorry for the bad example

​​@@schmenfleor9050One, they didnt stray. They went BACK to AC's roots. Also, Valhalla is the highest selling AC to date. That being said, the RPG AC trilogy: Origins, Odyssey & Valhalla had bs bitching over the open world & RPG style gameplay. Those people wanted AC to be linear again & they got it. I havent heard any complaints on Mirage. Heck, I don't mind AC games going back to the old stealth style. At least it'd be perfected nowadays, no flaws like in AC3 alone. If you think Ubisoft strayed, you need to play AC 1 or 2. Either would do, really. But there is an AC 1 through 3 collection these days. Two, if you prefer to play male characters, or female, neither is sexist. That's just your choice. By that logic, its sexist if you create a male custom character & not female, or vice-versa. I'm cool with playing either since the PS1, but I wont bash on others for having a different preference than my own.

@@kzwei2 There is no learning intercepts, because the AI is bullshit. Only Juggernaut makes this fight tolerable(sucks that my video on that, isnt going around).

@@AscendedPotato Yes she is. I selected the tags to see which champs are there, multiple times. Lady D was there in the Size Small & Control: Denial champs.

@@Walt_Xander94you forgot to make "all tag applied" instead of "any"😊

@@lloydkjose9839 I was actually told that on Reddit. Kabam still screwed up with these damn Tags. Why is that checkbox there? Especially when every other time I ever had to search for tagged champs for an Objective, things went fine. Hell, I did the Kree Objective after this video with my R3 Vox, only selected the tag I wanted to see who tf can be used for it & that was it. Kabam didnt learn from Spring Of Sorrow's Objectives mess. Too many tags.

@@TSP-p9l You have no life. You pathetic elitists need to touch grass.

@@Walt_Xander94skills of grass😂😂

@@keekee4522 It is not & you have some bad test in music.

@@Walt_Xander94 I have great TASTE in music I listen to everything I like change but again I said she isn't that great.

@@keekee4522 If you did, why are trying to say otherwise about Wrestling being Rock Music? And if youre gonna start mentioning rap entrance music, then youre further proving my point.

@@Walt_Xander94 wrestling is not only Rock music was my point, but I said her song for the theme song wasn't great. I said I've heard Rap/Hip Hop theme and entrance music before in my lifetime I don't believe Wrestling is in a box as only being one thing for music. I did again mention I didn't like the theme doesn't mean I don't have great taste in music when my taste span decades and genres

@@Walt_Xander94 I'm not going to argue over difference of opinions you have yours and I have mine we can agree to disagree, but you can't determine if I have bad taste because I gave my opinion

@@RickMoren477 No its not. Its Rap Music in POWER RANGERS. They tried way too hard to be hip with the kids & one attempt wasnt enough. Power Rangers & Rap Music RARELY mix. I say that, because the 2017 film had Kanye's Power track in it, and it fit. But every other time, Power Rangers is rock music. The only ones that can even try to say otherwise, are definitely 2000s babies. The ones that didn't grow up with the MMRP era. And I mean Mighty Morphin to Turbo, because whole teams changing every season didn't start until In Space.

@@Walt_Xander94I’d support abortion if we knew if the kid was going to be trans.

I wish Putin would stop going after Ukraine and just go after trans ppl

@@Walt_Xander94real black ppl don’t support trans “ppl”.

@@Walt_Xander94not surprised that only trans Mrbeast member was a pdfile.

@@crackheadgrandad4208 I'm not even all that pissed at this, like with the bs paths in Quest 1 through 5, and past Act bosses. I'm more annoyed by the handicaps, if anything. I didn't even put "F*** 9.1 6 Orochi" as the title like I usually do with the other Act bosses. So if that doesn't show that a boss fight didnt really piss me off for once, Idk what does.

Oh i'm not on about you getting pissed, It's nice hearing you not pissed off and actually having fun with the game. I'm more on about this quote from you; "These boss fights still handicap you to certain things, it's still not just a normal fight" stuff like that is dumb because it's a boss fight. Boss fights are meant to be unique to other fights. no offence ofc.

@@crackheadgrandad4208 There is nothing unique about handicapping the player, which Kabam KEEPS DOING! So its not even unique to their Act bosses. For f sake, Shuri cant be parried in NORMAL fights unless you're using Guardian. Boss Fights ARE SUPPOSED TO BE FAIR! Dark Souls really brainwashed you people. Not to mention, we're talking about a MOBILE game. They're supposed to be simple. No parries & no other way to deal big dmg only serve to make the boss a unit hog. Orochi would be truly fun if it wasn't for the handicaps that hold us back.

@@Walt_Xander94yeah marvel heroes wouldn’t save trans ppl if they existed irl

@@Walt_Xander94they don’t protect evil

@@TheFinalBoss24 The bleed path is the only tolerable one, I did a video on that already. Jane & Void were the only annoying ones though, especially Void.

@@Walt_Xander94 on that path I used Baron Zemo n chee w/nick fury but Zemo carried I just use chee on void n she melted him

@@migueljaggassar1256 How many potions did it take? Especially after Jane, if you had ONE champ handling the whole Bleed path?

@@Walt_Xander94 4 for the whole path, and about 5 for the boss.

@@REDTHURSDAYDOG How so?

@@joehispanico What? You sure that wasn't a different path?

@@Walt_Xander94 9.1.4 power tech path starts with ice man and ends with domino. Black cat is before domino for me. I added a video on my page. Looks the same to me but with black cat instead.

yup i had blackcat too

​​@@joehispanico WTF?! I had to check mine again, and now Black Cat is there. Kabam's screwing up Act quests now. Good thing I screencapt Ragnarok Thor m.

@@nicksmith8993 "Wasn't that bad", you had to spend units. The fight is bullshit until you have R3 7 Stars, because they can handle entire phases in one go(as long as the AI isn't stubborn).

@@Walt_Xander94 I don’t have R3 7 stars.

@@kR1t1calbatteryOfficial I haven't touched those Scourge paths, so Idk how bad they are.

@@TheFinalBoss24 I won't. Ever.

@@kR1t1calbatteryOfficial To NOT be infuriating? It'd be a change of pace, but what annoyed me in this case is og Storm not being a Glykhan counter as many people have said. Fairness doesn't equate to everything being handed to you. You people have no clue what a fair & ACTUAL challenge is. "You have units & revives for a reason", you did not just say that when bosses are bullshit to incentivize spending. Act 3 way back, WASN'T bullshit btw. It wasnt a cake walk either.

@@Walt_Xander94 Dude, your roster is better than mine and I still beat act 8, I’m still using 5 stars in act 9, and my act 3 comment wasn’t used to compare, it was used to tell you everything ain’t gonna be so easy. For the final time, too, storm does work, there are many videos using storm and she cooks. I’ll be honest, when I first did this, I got demolished, I made it to phase 3 but had to quit out, but when I went in a second time, I did much better. Sure I still used some revives and units but that’s what they’re there for, meant for bosses and fights.

@@zacharyhsieh9358 He has not been nerfed. I went back & 100% it with the team I got now. Things were more tolerable, but it doesn't change that its another P2W gimmick.

@@Walt_Xander94 It's literally not a p2w gimmick. It's the least p2w boss I've ever fought. Bahamet and black widow (forgot her name) were harder than this guy. A p2w boss is one that doesn't have much skill expression and requires a specific counterpick to beat and/or requiring excessive skill to the point where the average player needs to spend a ton of revives. This fight is neither of those things, considering the fact that I'm not even that good at this game and I did fine. I think you just had the wrong strategy because 8.3 was new at the time. striker into special trivialized 90% of the fight.

@@zacharyhsieh9358 NO ONE is doing that fight in one go. Especially in the first attempt. And more so if they dont have Herc. If these bosses were just simple fights & didn't have descriptions that are the length of a Bible page, there'd be no gimmicks. You're guaranteed to die & use revives. The ONLY way revives arent needed, is if you have a team of R5 6 Stars & R2/R3 6 7 Stars. So when one dies, another champ with stats just as high will finish the fight. These Act bosses will never just be normal fights. Look at Act 9, its starting today, the 9.1 boss has FIVE phases & a huge ass description, forcing players to look up guides just to know wtf to do.

@@Walt_Xander94 and that’s fine. It’s a boss and it’s supposed to be hard. Can you improve your skills in the fight? Yes. Again. I looked up guides and did like 15 minutes worth of research. Yes, I had a r5 fantman ascended, but it wouldn’t have made a difference if he was r4 because I lost all my health 80-90% at the end when his intimidate bugged out. Not saying all bosses are easy. I’m just saying that this one is.

@@agares5571 Get a life.

@@Walt_Xander94 lololoololololololooololololololol booty player booty booty booty

@@Suarez23-z1w There's NOTHING fun about these fights taking parries away. Its the OPPOSITE, its unfair. You have no idea what fun is, probably because youre most likely a Souls Masochist.

​@@Walt_Xander94 LOL masochist really🤣. Winning a boss when you die all the time and then beat it makes you happy and you know you became better. An easy boss doesn't make you better and it's just boring so is that fun for you? Or by fun you mean beating a easy boss without trying and thinking you are good when you are not.

@@Suarez23-z1w No it doesn't. Youre just proving my point. When victory is gained, there is only the "About damn time. Fuck this game!", which I certainly had after going back & 100%ing Act 8. By fun, I MEAN FUN! A tough, but fair boss fight(I'd still be trying) that doesn't need to purposefully piss off the player, and doesn't need to be a unit hog. You masochists know nothing about ACTUAL fun.