Leon Unity is the Leon Films Creative Community, a place for filmmakers, storytellers and visual artists to come together and learn about the creative storytelling process. We have two currently running series "Leon Unity Lessons", which go in-depth about a subject on filmmaking or storytelling and "Minute Tip Monday" a new tip every Monday designed to help creators hone their craft specifically with relation to visual storytelling.
Leon Films is a production company based in London in the United Kingdom. We're trying to bring you new interesting content through Leon Unity to help other independent creators.
We've created our own original action-comedy series "MY LIFE AS A VIDEO GAME" after funding it on Kickstarter for $32,000 about a guy who gets sucked into the world of video games. We're also co-producing "SISTERS OF HOUSE BLACK" with Kelsey Ellison.
Join our community today and get a free interactive screenplay structure cheat sheet 👉bit.ly/2Ii8Ve9
As a lens, this is a much better one than any kit lens. It really depends if you want the full frame look at the end of the day. I don’t regret buying the FX30 and staying with APS-C, but I’m a video guy mostly.
@@LeonUnity tbh I’m happy with my 1.8 35mm prime and the quality it gets. I’ve just struggled in low light conditions with dim lighting but those occasional instances maybe doesn’t mean I need a full frame
And I was 25 when I made it. I’ve always been sad that we never were able to finish it the way we wanted to. We had really big plans for a second season and some amazing guests lined up for it. It would have been a lot of fun exploring genres like Platformers, Survival Horror and Fantasy RPGs.
17-70 is good, and has a further range but it’s also much bigger (119mm v 75mm) and heavier (525g v 290g). Sigma is also much sharper, often sharper than Sony’s own lenses, based on my experience. Maybe I’ll do a video comparison some day.
funny I learned this by mistake on my own years ago when I first started. something didn't feel right in the transition. now I have the actual explanation lol.
Generally with action, you have to either shoot with multiple cameras or repeat the shots with a single camera from different angles. It’s usually a good idea to cut in action then go back a frame or two before in the next shot to give the eyes time to catch up.
No, that’s not accurate. It’s 2.8 equivalent in terms of light let in. The amount of light doesn’t change, only the ability to move closer and change the bokeh size. The 2.8 is the opening regardless, the light is focused onto the sensor, a 2.8 full frame has a wider spread to cover a larger sensor but the amount of light per pixel on the sensor is the same as it’s an even spread. The equivalency is for focal lengths based on sensor size and bokeh if you move to an equivalent field of view. It is not the same for amount of light.
@@LeonUnity yes ok it's 2.8 but in the apsc sensor the equivalent of light that let in is equivalent of a 4.2 in full frame. In fact if you take an f 2.8 full frame lens and compare with apsc you can notice that the amount of bokeh will be the same only when the full frame lens closed at 4.2
@lb_projekt No, again. It’s a common misconception. The AMOUNT of light is the same. Exposure will be the same at 2.8, whether aps-c or full frame, the light is focused to create a larger image circle to meet the size of the sensor. Otherwise 2.8 on a 50mm would be brighter than 2.8 on a 24mm regardless of sensor size. As f/ stop is just a measurement of how wide the aperture is based on focal length (unlike T Stop that measures specific light Transmission) The bokeh size is affected by: amount of light, focus distance and focal length. Sensor size can mean one can get x1.5 closer to a subject on an equivalent focal length (say, 24mm aps-c to 24mm FF) so it makes the background more out of focus and thus increases bokeh size.
@@LeonUnity ok and so again..why f2.8 is equivalent on 4.2 if you put side by side full frame and apsc camera? I mean, I would like to have full frame lens with f2.8 so tiny but why they're double the size? Sigma 18-35 F1.8 is the only lens equivalent of f2.7 and you see how big it is
Hi sir, I wanted to buy this lens but I don’t know if I can use it with an adapter EF - eos R on my canon R50 ? And if yes do you think I will have some allow around the picture ?
@Quentin-ss2qs the EF one should work with the R50 when adapted but not the E Mount version shown here. Older DSLR lenses like EF Mount can be adapted to mirrorless but unfortunately most mirrorless can’t adapt to each other.
upgrading FX30 with version 2.0 works with V60 UHS-II 128GB SD card: up to 130MB/s write speed and 250MB/s read speed Lexar SD 128GB 270MB/s 1800x Class 10 UHS-II V60? with these two sdxc version 2.0 does fx30 work?
I'm not sure I understand the question, but any SD card of any format should work with the FX30, I use a UHS-II V90 on there to be able to record almost any format. V60 is basically everything except 4K 120 (though it can still do that in XAVC-HS)
Updating FX30 to Version 2.0 Works with V60 UHS-II 128GB SD Card: Up to 130MB/s Write Speed and 250MB/s Read Speed Lexar SD 128GB 270MB/s 1800x Class 10 UHS-II V60? with these two sdxc version 2.0 does fx30 work?
That is technically impossible. Remember, the protagonist is just the person the story follows, they can be hero or villain. The antagonist is the person standing in the way of the goals of a protagonist. Antagonist simply means “against the protagonist” rather than villain.
I'd like to point out that the problem with Skyler is that she's also a genuinely atrocious person, but where other characters are atrocious in big villainous ways, she's atrocious in the smaller petty ways we all experience in our lives. It's sort of like how Dolores Umbridge is the most reviled Harry Potter character when she isn't nearly so big a villain or even antagonist as many other characters... it's that we all know an Umbridge. We all know petty bullies, people who seek authority to direct cruelty to others. We all know holier-than-thou racists. We all relate to her existence, and despise her traits in real world people we know. Skyler is the same. It certainly helps that she's an antagonist in the story, but she's consistently shown to be a petty narcissistic manipulator, from the very first episode, before there are any actual "bad guys" in the story, right through to the end. Not only that, but she's never shown to have any redeeming characteristics, whereas basically every other major character does. Some argue she cares about her family, but I disagree with that interpretation. The only time she "cares about her family" is when it serves her ends. And I think this is actually kind of central to the kind of story Breaking Bad is... it's a tragedy. It's a story about how people destroy everything good in their lives as a result of their character flaws.
Fun example: Iceman in Top Gun. Maverick is the protagonist and is a flashy flier, but super reckless. Iceman is the antagonist, but champions safety and remaining cool-headed in conflict.
The antagonist is never the main character, this is the point: antagonist and villain are separate terms. An antagonist is always the person who stands in the way of the goals of the protagonist (the “main” character). A protagonist an be a hero or a villain, but they are always the main character as they’re the ones the story is centred around and driving the events. They’re usually the point of view the story is told from (with some exceptions).
I've written 4 screenplays. The first drafts all sucked. The first draft is for discovering. M. Night Shyamalan says he writes 10 to 11 drafts. Antwone Fischer wrote 100 drafts on his first ever screenplay and was made. It's okay if the first draft is bad. Because if you can see that it needs improved then you're a good writer
