For those of you that are new here, hi there 🌞 my name is Ellie and I'm a Cambridge Part III Mathematics Graduate and current Astrodynamics Software Engineer! This channel is where I nerd out about maths, physics, space and coding so if that sounds like something you're interested in, click the subscribe button to follow along ☺️
Prime = N+(n+1) if n is odd from beginning Prime = n+1 if even and move back 1 place if grater than 3 or discarded if repeated is arithmetic sequencing but if use π by secret classifed formula of whole number in π if new π is multiple of 3.1416 come out even whole when radius increase is mostly prime
Hey just wanna say, can you make a video about how these maths topic works in a real life or why they are essential like trigonometry ,complex number please.
You can add more unsolvable maths: (1) Existence Math, (2) Intelligence Math, (3) Gravity Math, the Squeezon, (4) Theory of Everything Math, (5) Certainty Principle...
I came here in April 2024, and I followed the same structure you have used on your CV, and I just wanted to thank you so much for helping us, now it is June 2024 and I was approved for my masters degree at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Thank you very much ❤
Fun fact: The game with the 2^n tiles is called 2048, but I used to call it 1024 too because that was typically how far I got before filling up all the space.
18:46 in this scene, the stickman used the radius and 4(2²) to make the radius that long and used π to make the are of the circle because the Area of the circle is πr²=π2², then used the ×8 to make it 8 times as long
what I dont understand is why the Riemann hypothesis is considered the most important of the bunch. Like you say, 99.9% of mathematicians are 99.99% sure it's true anyway, and thus working under the assumption that it is. So how is proving it for sure in any way important, outside of the undoubtedly impressiveness of such a proof? It would be like when we got the first images of earth taken from space, showing that it is round. Yes it's a nice feat of human ingenuity, and a nice photo, but in terms of being important it only shows us what 99.99% of the population was already 100% sure of anyway. The only way it would be important is if it showed that the earth was not round. Similarly, surely the only way a Riemann hypothesis proof could be important would be if it was proving the hypothesis wrong. Which no one thinks will happen. So why is it considered so important if it is already assumed to be true by literally everyone?
Hello Ellie, I am planning to go to York university for mathematics. Do you think it's a good place for maths and do you have a chance of going to Cambridge masters Part III from here?
Hello Ellie, I am planning to go to York university for mathematics. Do you think it's a good place for maths and do you have a chance of going to Cambridge masters Part III from here?
My background is in QCD, so the mass gap is closest to my heart, but BSD has stimulated more research and exploration for me. The equivalence between the rate vanishing of vanishing of the L-function and the RHS with #Tor and #Sha and the regulator, the equivalence looks like magic. I don't claim to understand Langlands is any meaningful depth, but there is enough voodoo with BSD to keep me happy about the wonder of Mathematics.