It's good to consider potential negative consequences of disclosure, and to manage them. However, in all fairness, some level of attempt to quantify the harm from non-disclosure is also critically necessary. I'd love to know, for example, if anthropogenic climate change could have been averted, or drastically mitigated, if disclosure had occurred a tad more urgently. In the end, if there is something pertinent to disclose in that regard, then I'm sure history will judge those who withheld said pertinent information in the most negative light possible. Right now we can only speculate about what we're destroying, i.e. losing. Eventually the tally will be known. The value, lost or squandered, will be known.
Dark Matter is a fiction, I have always thought that creating imaginary products to support a theory where observation conflicts with it was poor science and with the data coming from JWSTthe call to dump both dark matter and dark energy is indeed increasing.
Many thanks to you and Dr Curtin. So, 80% of the effects of gravity needs to be explained and the theory of dark matter provides a possible candidate. The anomalous cosmological observations are involved with gravitational lensing, and with the awkward fact that spinning galaxies don't fly apart. The initial dark matter model to cover these observations, based partly in Super Symmetry, would give us WIMPS in a non-collapsed, non-interacting, spherical cloud of dark matter around a galaxy. However a later theory holds that the observations could be just as well explained by a model in which another 25% (say) of the 80% is not WIMPS and does collapse into a galactic disks containing the dark analogues of the observable universe (in which we liiiive). I very much like these ideas from an SF point of view but it seems to me that the cosmologists and particle physicists supporting dark matter and dark energy have too many angels dancing on the head of a pin and William of Occam might have something to say about it.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago and the cancer will go away - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today May 18, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 122 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Anyone who does not believe that the climate changed for the reason I mentioned should wait for cancer to disappear very soon because of this reverse movement, I will explain: the human body's immune system will be stimulated, activated and stronger as a result of this reverse process, which results in the disappearance of the cancer. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory.
Those 3 questions will now haunt me: * Is this valid science? * Is this a valid pursuit? * Is this a waste of time? What if... Could it be the answer to _all three_ is *'Yes'?*
AAWSAP &AATIP USODNI&S, DIA, tied to DHS TS//KB//NF KONABLUE Classified TS/SCI,SAP Dr Sara OToole Chief of Science Dod,UFO Crash Recovery LEGEND Programs cia,OGA, USAF 12 Crafts of Non human origin Facts Reverse Engineering Programs AAV's 200,000 Dod has TS/SCI,SAP
Stephen Mihalich Falcon Lake Who seen Two flying saucers 1 landed near by he walked up her clicking sounds the door closed like an iris rotated counter clockwise vent of exhaust hit him his shirt caught on fire Radiation Exsposure cases 1956 and Terry Love Lace Devils Den ,AR Triangle Abductions Physical Alien implant In his left knee 1977, Betty& Barny Hill white Mountain NH UFO Abduction case 1964, 1980 Dayton,TX Betty Cash & Vicky Landrum, Son Colby Radiation Exsposure, burns ,Dehydration, Hairr loss Dr Michael McClellon UFO Diamond shaped Craft Anti gravity Infer red or Ultra Violet Non Isotopic Radiation Exsposure Retinal scaring ect effects
I'm CERTAIN that one of the reasons that Przybylski’s Star is under-known is because "Przybylski" is super difficult for a native English speaker to pronounce.
That was a truly mind-blowing episode, I am listening this for 4-5 times already while going to sleep and it is so advanced science that it is truely amazing. Absolutely fascinating. Awesome guest, I would love to hear him again! Thank you for the awesome content!
Maybe ET is so clever he/she/it/ is so clever it could fling in a probe, to our solar system so deceptive it totally mimics a totally natural object? 😱👽
I've been waiting foe some noise about the lsst it's going to be amazing. I thought that we would have a citizen science software package available which was suitably advanced to be able to assist the user and flag significant discoveries for further analysis by qualified astronomers
Hi John. My wife and I never miss an episode. Been with you since almost the beginning. This is my first comment and question. Do you think the Vera Rubin observatory will be able to see or identify objects that could be technological in nature? Maybe uap's in space? Keep loving your job John! We love your work.
Well, it would really depend on a few things. If the object accelerated and changed course, oh yeah, it'll see that. What else it might be able to determine is unclear, but what it can do is tell us such an object is coming. It'll catch them on their way in and give us the lead time to potentially catch it with a dedicated spacecraft.
In the 1960's an astronomer who specialized in comets (prime discoverer of several) gave a talk I attended. He gave his definition of a comet -- verbatim to what I'd read in most astronomy books as the definition of an asteroid. During the question/answer period, I asked him what he thought the difference was. He smiled (as if thrilled to be asked) and then insisted asteroids and comets were two extremes of the exact same thing, with the same variations, and concentrating on their differences blinded us to their similarities. Since then, with our better telescopes, many more "in between" objects have been discovered..
@@avishalom2000lm The definition was verbatim the one used "The Music of the Spheres", at the time my favorite general astronomy, which I checked out from the city library numerous times & read cover to cover each time. After just discovering a larger than average very long range comet, the professor gave talks at several universities, including MSU, Bozeman. where I met him. Wish I could remember his name It was about 50 years ago.
very bold claims on life or death issues from a guy who doesn't know what "ineffable" means and says it anyway (he intends "inerrant" or "infallible" as far as i can tell lol)
*Seems to me - that the definition of what is a Comet - is becoming increasingly blurry* --- Comets that out-gas --- Comets that don't. Asteroids that out-gas - (like Paethon) & others that don't. What are the maximum & minumum sizes for comets ? Are they defined by their composition - or their orbits - etc ? *Can Comets travel as Binary's ? Or does that relationship shift their status to that of Asteroidal bodies - Lots if interesting stuff*
Luvv to hear details of planets and moons ...including mining interests and how makeup creates space bodies relationships, interactions and paths in space.
@@EventHorizonShow oh my fault, I thought Eryn helped you line up guests and provide the intro where I always say, “that person works for a very prestigious university.” I take it Ross as producer is doing your cuts and visual accompaniment then. You’re my favorite two channels on RU-vid, so I try to imagine who handles the loads to make such great content on a regular basis.
Man I wish I was a little older when Haley’s came by. I was awed by it, but my memory from that young is very faded. I also got to thinking about something wacky, a comment grenade. Highly sublimate able materials, with a dense shell. Heat radiates in, and bam, 💥 firework. This probably couldn’t work with natural formation physics as I understand it, but it would be really cool. Maybe we should make one!
