This weighs 1oz less, holds 1 additional round, and costs 1/3 of the S&W. And it still delivers all 6 shots in a hand sized target at self defense ranges. So why get the S&W?
@@booliganshootingsports , there's no way it has the same accuracy as the Smith& Wesson there's no way it can actually be fired, consistently and safely with the same level of accuracy as the Smith& Wesson. and if you want to talk about fireballs just for a fun stupid note Smith and Wesson's chambered in 357 not 38.
Correct, 1 less round of 357 which has maybe 5-8% higher muzzle energy out of a snub nose barrel. With the right rounds, this gives you 250 ft/lb of muzzle energy with more than enough penetration and expansion to stop any 2 legged threat. This isn’t built for 50 yard engagements. It’s designed to put all 6 rounds on a hand sized target at 7 yards. This covers you for 99% of historical data on self defense engagements. It’s as easy to shoot as the S&W because both excel at point shooting. Point and shoot and hit your target. So again, why spend 3x on the S&W? I spent it on one because I collect them, but I carry this over that 100% of the time.
@user-xp7ns4vr3y you’re watching the very first test shots out of a heavily frame modified design lol. This video isn’t showing shooting for accuracy, it’s shooting to confirm functionality without losing a hand. Rest assured, I drop all 6 rounds in a hand sized group at 7 yards with this.
Heritage sells the "birdshead" grip frame separately, so you can convert any revolver to that grip style ($30).. and grip panels are available from dozens of sources ;)
This is only about 2mm wider than a Glock 19, arguably the most common concealed carry handgun. And that width is only present in one small segment of the gun (the cylinder) as opposed to the entire frame and slide. Revolvers shape and size make them better for deep concealment because they don’t really look like a gun. This tucked in my pocket looks like car keys. It doesn’t print like a gun.
