It is Amazing how Spec Technical Design Engineers can Improve on something as Simple as Wiring! Premium Quality and Price Jay! I used MIT Cables in the 80's with Spectral 360 amps! Keep Shaking the Ultra High-End Tree!💪
My theory as to why speakers wires can make a difference is because electrical power doesn’t flow thru the metal in the wire as most people believe including me as an electrical engineer until a few years ago. This goes counter to the LaPlace transform formulas they taught us in engineering which not only work for electricity but also for fluids aka water running thru pipes at different rates and pressures. You have to look at Maxwells equations from physics to get the real picture. There’s an excellent RU-vid video about this that asks how fast a light 3 feet away from a simple switch and battery would turn on if the wires that connected to it were 1x10^8 meters long which is the distance light travels in 1 second. MIT professors validated the concept and a 2nd video verified it experimentally but with a much shorter wire. It is real. I think this is why raising up wires from the floor matters because power travels thru air and cables on the floor do not have a uniform air gap 360 degrees around the wire. Now for the pivotal question. Does it matter enough to be heard? IDK. Perhaps it can be heard and is more noticeable at higher power. Perhaps not. At some level it does make a difference. Might be 5% or could be super small like 0.0001%, could be psychological. Regardless it is a factor.
With complex frequencies, the timing errors become magnified with high end equipment. My view. Electrons travel on the outside of the wire. Therefore, different diameters of wire transfer frequencies differently. I use Kimber Kable variable strand. Different diameters.
My speaker cable cost me -$15.99 a meter. It replaced my previous cable costing $6.99 per meter and, frankly, made no notable difference. Can you honestly tell me, hand on heart that your $100,000 cable will out perform my $15,99 cable by a factor of times 6253 or out perform my $6.99 by 14300%. What’s more, can you prove it in a blind A-B listening test? There’s a challenge no one will accept. What is it they say? ‘What happened when the gullible fool met the con man’?
@@jeffreymercado4155 so, why does he not per form that blind test live on air, in properly controlled, scientific conditions? It’s all very well claining you’ve done something, validating that claim is a whole different ball game.
Well this certainly convinced me! I can truly hear how these cables create sound more accurately than any other speaker cable in the world. I know because I have tried the all... every last one... and my tonal memory is perfect. I'm going to mortgage my house and get these cables RIGHT AWAY!!! Better yet, I'm going to sell my kids. That way I won't incur any debt
Well said!! Pls Don't forget to sell your kidney as well. Lol. People would pay for cables under a voodoo of self addiction or lack education in science!!
Why not increase your income by getting a better paying job? (or win the 100 million dollar lottery.) It's rather obvious that the audio equipment Jay features is not for the middle or lower middle class income workers.
A lot of these so called audiophiles need to take a class in elementary physics 101. 😂😂😂. There is no magic copper that should cost more than 30 to 300$ . 😂😂😂
You're so right about the price of these cables, nothing justifies the prices that are being charged for them. It's not just cables but everything audio. It seems the industry has decided people have got large amounts of disposable income to be relieved of so they are accommodating people who don't mind
My speaker cable cost me $15.99 per meter. It replaced my previous cable costing $6.99 a meter and honestly, made no notable difference. Can you honestly, hand on heart, tell me that your $100,000 cable will out perform my $15.99 cable by a factor of times 6250. More to the point, could you prove that in a A-B blind listening test. Yes, that is a challenge I guarantee no one will accept. What is it they say? ‘When the fool met the con man’!
While I agree 100k is nuts imo for speaker cables, please do yourself a favor and* make an appointment * at a High End dealer in your area to blind test cables. Bring your cable and put the dealer to the test. Btw, you don't have to spend a fortune to get cables that improve the sound considerably. The State of the Art is pricey, most people don't need that. If you can't hear any difference between the dealers cables and yours, yer done. Easy peasy. Have fun with it!
@@jaysullivan9545 I am fortunate in that within a 15 minute walk I have 3 ‘bricks and mortar’ hi-fi dealers. Within a 20 minute drive that number goes up into double figures. I am at a time in my life where all my off-spring have grown up and are self sufficient, I am also mortgage free. I have at my disposal far more disposable income than I’ve ever previously enjoyed. So, in recent years, I’ve made multiple visits to multiple hi-fi retailers and seriously upgraded my hi-fi set up. Almost sparking a divorce in so doing. Of course I blind A-B tested speaker cables, everything up to $350 per meter. My conclusion was that providing you use a good gauge cable, with solid terminations I found no benefit from cables any more costly than the $15.99 per meter cables that I purchased. Yes, it could be argued that as you ascend the price ladder with speaker cables, more attention is applied to reducing inductance, capacitance, RF and EMF interfearance and there may be some mileage in that if your set up dictates that lengthy cable runs are unavoidable. My speaker cables are no more than 12 feet long and all interconnects 3 feet long. When making decisions on cables, my philosophy has always been that the shorter the better. The thing is, you ask 100 so say experts their opinion on any given topic within the world of hi-fi, likely you’ll get 100 opposing answers. It’s like Amir from ASR explains:- when you conduct a blind A-B listening test, you automatically look for differences. Psycho acoustics can play havoc with realism. Do a blind test in a controlled listening environment and successfully identify the expensive cable at least 10 out of 12 trials and I may become more convinced. You also mention that if I couldn’t hear a difference with more expensive speaker cables, then all is good. Your implication is that either my hearing is defective or my hi-fi system is not sufficiently resolving, or both. That is extremely dismissive and is frequently used to validate the unvalidatable. Yes I know, I’ve just invented a word, but it’s appropriate! Anyways, we’re all here to appreciate music the way we each like to hear it reproduced. We are all entitled to our opinions as to how that is achieved and are all hopefully mature enough to respect the opinions of others, even if it does differ from our own. Most of all, enjoy the music.
Somebody doesn't know that the speed of light through precious metals is 50% the speed of light through a vacuum whereas fiber optic is 69%; your audio is latent.
@@chipsnmydip tell me you know nothing about how properly done blind tests work without telling me you know nothing about how properly done blind tests work
@@Mark-lq3sb my headphones are specifically corrected to match diffuse field with a 10db tilt.... They are tonally perfect pretty much. "beTtEr CheCK yOuR sPEAkeRS". It's either the recording or jays speakers and knowing hifi manufacturers, it's probably his speakers
@@niccster1061 Your magical headphones can not reproduce the exact same "sound" that Jay's speakers produce. Also, you will never hear the "sound" that Jay hears as he is listening without the "sound" going through internet to your source. It's not that hard to understand, common sense.
@@Mark-lq3sb RU-vids compression algorithm does NOT change the frequency response of the recording. Given my headphones have a perfectly flat frequency response, and jays recording gear is decent, I absolutely CAN judge whether or not his mid bass is anemic, WHICH IT IS. Use your common sense. You dont know what you are talking about. You are just a rich audiofool who knows nothing about sound
@@Mark-lq3sb RU-vids compression doesnt change frequency response. What a sad defense for complete BS. Clearly your common sense isn't that knowledgeable. Typical rich audiofool behavior
The otger cheap way tooo gain this is use spectrum graphic equaliser . The 1hz bass to 500khz, You will modify tinker with over 5000 frequency response. This is beyond ripoff.
Still not good, all i hear her voice is much forward, its not flat . Tge original recirdibg done in the studio was flat respinse were the singers and musican were at sane line level balnced . This is absolutely fake Her voice overpowers the instrument and is way to forward.
