Yeah, that was so stupid act, like the position and the shove act gave the opponent a very wide range: A,(2-K): K,Q/K,J/K,10/10,9/8,9 and pairs like 22 - QQ... and KK,AA most cases just raise not goes all in. So it was a pretty stupid play, almost 60% percentage chance winning the situation. Bad scenario is only: AA,KK,QQ,JJ... others are flip, and A lowers and smaller pairs is good win ratio.
I was watching the video calmly as I do with all your videos when I realize the kind of player that you are, one of the best MTT players of the world, sharing this content for free and also sharing educational videos, it is just unbelievable. Thank you really much Ben
I love this guy because it is impossible to tell if he won a monster pot or if he got busted on a runner runner, lol. Dude has his emotions on check and simply plays on. Love his style!
Guga DFT 110ANI I disagree. I know myself that I would never make those plays, because they are obviously not good. I still have huge respects for both and I know how much they have won in live tournaments, I’m just saying that such incredible players make those ICM punts.
Checking how much extra potodds villains bounty give ben. Usally a starting bounty is worth 1/3 of a starting stack. So if some1 has 3x starting bounty u add a starting stack to the pot(u get better pot odds and need less equity compared to a non bounty mtt
I ran the spot. K7s is a call. Q9s. JTs. QTo, K9o and A4o. 55+. Probably the PO structure is so shallow that it results in such a wide calling range. Bencb can jam 99.7% there btw.
@@marcelmattern7722 when I say I ran the spot, I mean this exact spot (these exact stacks with these exact blinds and these exact positions and these exact payouts) Without ICM SB would not jam 99.7%. And if he would nobody would ever think K8s is a fold. The reason for such a result is the very shallow payout structure. Ofcourse it's surprising to pretty much everyone. But that's why you should run these spots to get better at understanding the implications of ICM.
Bonomo and DPeters too rich I guess? Or they just think Ben is crazy? I’m a midstakes regular and those seem like very obvious mistakes on the FT under ICM.
32:45 how come you have a 50.3% chance to win with the same hand as the other dude? I thought it was just knew what the flop was gonna come but it isn't that because your equity changes to 51.8% on the flop. So weird!
