I just got used but almost new , an SE Electronics Z5600A ii mkii tube microphone it cost me £195 . For this price i don't think i can get a better sounding microphone. I do have the Blue Reactor that i really love
Hes literally mixing and eqing them completely different. Dont you hear the massive change of Reverb from the first to second? I wouldnt be surprised if hes also making the cheap mics sound worse then they are since this is his entire youtube channel is making mic comparison shorts. The mixing is so obviously different to the seasoned ear.
@Linky_dinky I kinda get the logic, but you can make almost any mic sound half decent. It would have to be really scuffed to sound terrible if you've set it up right
@@Kwaarq i make music for a living and work on vocals. i have turned shit mics into ones that sound professional just using presets and whats disposable on fl studio. but some mics cannot be saved.
I like the 2000 the best. It sounds like full, breathing. And I closed my eyes when listening that I like the last part the most then watched again with eyes opened
Hands down to the 2000 dollar mic, it is much cleaner and the overton is warmer, I find it really nice sounding. You also sing very nicely. Do you sing your own songs?
The cheapo sounds very thin and nasal, but it could be used for a certain color in some cases. The other two mics each sound substantially better, with the hi-end Blue definitely sounding best.
Love Blue microphones , the old models made in Latvia/USA their quality is amazing . The Spark is great and the Kiwi is the one i hope have one day . How would be the comparison without all the pre amp , compressor, chorus, delay efects? 🤔
$20 mic sounded ok in that mix, but I honestly thought you had a chorus or something like that mixed heavily into the vocal until you moved to the more expensive ones. I liked the $200 one the most. Is that a Blue Spark?
$20 sounds like a cheap radio thing, sucks in my opinion, unless you do some music like the first song of kings of leon or so,$200 and $2000 mic sound nice (surprised by the $200 mic), but the most expensive sounds a lot better. Btw, loving your singing since forever lol
Good review Bro. To Me I love that 20$ mic because it sounds warm and crispy, followed by 200$ mic and the 2000$ has too much high frequency, pros don't like such mic as far as I know that it's a little trouble for mix.
One of the biggest disparities you've shown in these tests. The 2k shines, but the 200 is very good, and even the 20 is perfectly acceptable, with a little tweaking it could be fab.
The reverb makes a diference too. Try dry for more objective experience. I don't know what are the settings on your EQ or reverb. You may be just fooling us.
@@cassandrahuskey8866 there isn't. Im talking from my own experience. I once had a $60 mic and couldn't adjust the vocals no matter how much i paid for presets and mixing, but the minute i bought the Rode nt1 a i got perfect vocals. I mean it's your thing if you like it, but my personal opinion is to stay aside of those mics if you have a higher budget.👍🏾
@@tephofficial207 I mean sound is subjective, but we can definitely say that the higher price microphone has a better clarity to them compared to the $20 mic. It also depends on the song being sang as in this case the $20 sounds great as it gives a nice effect to the vocal.
The last Mike's is always a tease they don't show the full😂 but that second Bluebird is killer though never mind that third one is killer it gets a little bit more clearer but that second one was cold though the first one can do some damage you can do a whole Banger with that microphone to
