चार्वाक दर्शन (1) Charwak Philosophy _ Brief Introduction _ Dr HS Sinha | The Quest 

*"चारबाक दर्शन" भारतीय दर्शन का प्रमुख अंग था लेकिन यह मनुष्य जाति का दुर्भाग्य है कि मनुष्य के लिए जो सर्वाधिक महत्वपूर्ण चीजें थी। उन्हीं को हमने दुश्मन समझा।❤❤❤*

Good explanation of charvak philosophy...Hamare desh mein jo log is philosophy ko maan te hai...aise sab log milkar ek society establish karna chahiye... yeh meri raay hai.

आज तो नहीं, लेकिन भविष्य में चार्वाक दर्शन सबसे अधिक प्रासंगिक होना तय है.

सभी लोग कर्मकांड और जातीभेद से बाहर निकलकर चार्वाक दर्शन का अनुपालन करे तो भारत जलदगतीसे दुनिया का सबसे प्रगत और सुखी लोगोका देश बन सकता है.

My father named me after 'Charvak'.... Proud to be carrying this name today !!!

चार्वाक दर्शन यथार्थवादी दर्शन है.... वैज्ञानिक और तार्किक है.... पाखंड का खंडन करता है.....

आप ने चार्वाक दर्शन को सरलता से समझाने का प्रयास किया है ।चार्वाक साहित्य पर एक पुस्तक ' भारतीय लौकिक चिंतन और चार्वाक' लेखक देवीप्रसाद मौर्य की नेशनल पब्लिशिंग हाउस द्वारा वर्ष 2005 में प्रकाशित हुई है।

मैं सारे तर्कों को मानता हूं लेकिन ऋण वाला कांसेप्ट प्रैक्टिकल नही है क्योंकि अगर सभी यही मान ले तो कमाएगा कौन , कमाने वाला नहीं तो कर्ज कौन देगा। इसकी जगह काम करके कमा कर शारीरिक सुखों की प्राप्ति की जाए।

This means people from ancient world have not blind faiths , they were more intellectual than today's average people , they see spirituality through real human eyes

चार्वाक दर्शन है कि स्वार्थी बनो ! सच्चा स्वार्थी वही होता है जो स्वयं को सुखी रखने के लिए इस लोक में सभी को हर संभव तरीके से सुखी रखने का प्रयत्न करता है ताकि स्वयं तक किसी भी माध्यम से या व्यक्ति से दुख ना पहुंचे !! कारण कि -- दूसरों को दुख देकर मनुष्य कभी स्वयं भी सुखी नहीं रह सकता है !!

चार्वाक दर्शन उत्तम विचार है🙏 निश्चिंत जीवन जीने के सूत्र हैं❤

l love ❤ charvak philosophy, this is Reallity of human existence..

Dil chhune wala darshan....i love it

Charvak- a great and brave philosopher.

चार्वाक बिल्कु ठीक बात किया है, सुंदर, अति सुनदर

बहुत अच्छी speech दी अपने।और सच्चाई भी है।

बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद आदरणीय गुरुदेव इसी तरह निरंतरता बनाए रखे तह दिल से प्रणाम

चार्वाक नास्तिक नही बल्कि सच्चे आस्तिक है जो आज अस्तिव्त है उसमे जीता है और अपनी यात्रा जहां है वहीं से शुरू करता है जो अभी हमारा अनुभव नही वो हमारा सत्य नही मात्र कल्पना है गीता और सारी ध्यान विधि वर्तमान क्षण के सत्य में होने को ही अभ्यास करने को कहती है और ये मन भूत भविष्य में भटकता रहता है स्वर्ग होगा या नहीं होगा हमारे लिए तो एक कल्पना है या कामना है और कामना ही आत्मज्ञान को ढकती है ऐसा कृष्णगीता कहती है तो वर्तमान क्षण में रहना ही चार्वाक दर्शन है जो पाया नही वो कल्पना मात्र है मन का जाल है इसलिए हम जहा है वही से यात्रा है वरना सिर्फ मानसिक विचारों और संघर्ष .... कौन सही कौन गलत बस इसी उलझन में जीवन समाप्त🙏 अगर आज खाने को भोजन नहीं भूखे मर रहे पीने को पानी नहीं प्यासे मर रहे और अगले जन्म में भरपूर भोजन पानी मिलेगा .......ये जीना धार्मिक सोच है या आज भोजन पानी को उपलब्ध करने का प्रयास करना धार्मिक जीवन है मैं तो दूसरी बात को मत देता हूं वैसे जीते हम चार्वाक की तरह है वरना मर जायेंगे परंतु धार्मिक होने की बाते राजनैतिक होकर हम दूसरे जन्म लोक के प्रलोभन में करते हैं

You are good sir, without any biase.

Pranam गुरुदेव, आपके video सुनने को बार बार मन चाहता है। I am very very lucky to get this opportunity 🙏

चार्वाक दर्शन ठोस तर्क पर आधारित है। उसमें ईश्वर, आत्मा, स्वर्ग व नर्क का कोई स्थान नहीं है।

I follow Charvak one of the most Practical and logical Philosophies.

धन्यवाद गुरूजी , चार्वाक दर्शन को संक्षिप्त में जानने का बाद यही प्रतीत होता है की एक देश को चलने के लिए यही दर्शन उपयुक्त है। विकसित देश इसी फिलोसोफी पर चल रहे हैं। व्यापर बढ़ा रहा हैं , लोगों के जीवन को बेहतर जीने के लिए तकनीक का सहारा ले रह हैं और जीवन स्तर सुधार रहे हैं। दूसरे तरफ आध्यात्मिकता की चरमोत्कर्ष पर बैठे भारत देश में बदहवाली है आम जनता के मूलभूत आवश्यक्ताओं की पूर्ती को ले कर। भरता जैसे देश को पूरी शक्ति के साथ अपने संसाधनों को विकसित और संपंन्न करने में लगाना चाहिए।

Har baat ko kitne acche se samjha dete ho aap my respects 🙏

"तीनो वेदों के रचयिता धूर्त है,पाखंडी है,राक्षस है"😂😂😂😊😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 वाह चार्वाक जी वाह।।।।।।।

चावरक दर्शन मतलब विज्ञान दर्शन

Great philosophy

Om Shanti, Gurudev hs Sinha, Amar rahen

Much before western existentialism, Charwak had given this realistic and positive philosophy.

Thank you Dr. Sahab for sharing your knowledge in easy way. Really, it was a amazing experience to listen you.

Charvak is a real philosopher

विजय माल्या व नीरव मोदी ने इसी दर्शन का अनुसरण किया है

Charwak is realism.

Aadarniy sir dhanwaad🙏🥰🌹

चार्वाक दर्शन जीवन जीने की एक कला सिखाता हैं, यह एक जीवन दर्शन हैं, लेकिन विरोधी लोगों ने चार्वाक दर्शन को गलत ही साबित करने का प्रयास किया हैं,

Guru jee charan sparsh. The great professor.

चार्वाक के तथ्य निराधार ही हैं, अब से सात आठ साल पहले इनका दर्शन पढ़ने व समझने की जिज्ञासा थी, तभी मार्क्सवाद का भूत चढ़ा था। आहूति व यज्ञ का ही उदाहरण ले लो तो यज्ञ पूर्णतया वैज्ञानिक व प्रकृति के रक्षार्थ किया जाता है। कर्ज लेकर सुखी रहना यदि सभी करें तो अराजकता सामने खड़ी हो सबके।

चार्वाक दर्शन ही विज्ञान है।

KEEP IT UP FOR THE SAKE OF HUMANITY LOVE KINDNESS WOMEN POWER PROSPERITY DIGNITY AND HAPPINESS

This is the only philosophy India should adopt.

Charvak is a rational saint 🙏 .

आपके हिसाब से कौन सा दर्शन सबसे बढ़िया एवं अच्छा है, मानवता एवं पृथ्वी एवं ब्रह्माण्ड के लिए।👌👌👍👍👍🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🤔🤔🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

मगर गजब का दर्शन है उनका सच के करीब

चारवाक दर्शनका एक ही मतलब है सार्थक बातें , वेद का मतलब बे मतलब या नी बेकार की बातें l

Guru ko pranam...🙏...

First tone I am introduced this type of thought.thanks

सर,अपने बहुत सरल शब्दों में चार्वाक दर्शन को समझाया इसके लिए बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद ।लेकिन इस दर्शन को आप विचित्र बताया जबकि जो भी बाते चार्वाक ने कही काले सच से कम नहीं मानी जा सकती?

Very nice And usefull video🙏 🙏 🙏

SHAT SHAT NAMAN

Great and bold philospher

I understand the simple hindi, but he spoke some complicated hindi words, I got lost in some parts... I wish english translation was available.. I love the examples he mentioned, it'd be great to discuss philosophy with him.

ऋण कृत्वा घृतम पीबेत् का मतलब घी ही नही समझ लेना चाहिए आज अधिकतम विकास कार्य ऋण लेकर ही तो किए जा रहे है जो सुख के लिए है ।

सही कहा आपने सर🙏🙏🙏🙏

Namskar... Aapnne charan muni ka bhut sarl bhashame parichay diya aapka dhanyvad....

चार्वाक मतलब वास्तविक विज्ञान।

Real mean नित्य-नियमित-निरन्तर हर क्षण टाॅप अभिनव-एडवांस-अपडेट सुरक्षा-शान्ति-खुशहाली, Fake mean हर तरफ बर्बादी-विनाश-सर्वनाश की शुरुआत-वृद्धि-विस्तार,

what i concluded is janani janmabhoomischa swargadapi gariyasi ( mother and motherland are superior even to the highest heaven) its true put your country and its people first bcz no god will come to protect you in the time of adversity.

महाशय पहली बात चार्वाक दर्शन की रचना चार्वाक ने नहीं बल्कि ब्रहस्पति ने किया था। इसलिए इसको ब्राहस्पत्य दर्शन भी कहते हैं। और दूसरी बात ये जो आपने श्लोक सुनाया- यावज्जीवेत्सुखं जीवेत् ऋणं कृत्वा घृतं पिबेत् । भस्मीभूतस्य देहस्य पुनरागमनं कुतः ।। इसका अर्थ घुमा के क्यों बता रहे हैं। इसका तो सीधा अर्थ ये है कि- " जब तक जियो सुख से जियो उधार लेके घी पियो। एक बार ये शरीर भस्मिभूत हो जाने के बाद दुबारा थोड़े न आने वाला है।" मतलब की खूब उधार लो खूब ऐश करो फिर मर जाओ क्योंकि एक बार मर गए तो फिर कौन आने वाला है। क्योंकि चार्वाक दर्शन स्वर्ग-नर्क, भगवान, वेद, पुनर्जन्म इन सब बातों को नहीं मानता। और आप इसको संसारिक् सुख बता रहे हैं।

Excellent explanation

Plz sir puri philosophy ki video upload kre Apki video bht help kr rhi philosophy ko smjhne me

Rational thought of boudha and charvak shared by you

Thank you so much 🙏 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹

charwak is the best darsan

Most impractical philosophy

त्रयो वेदा: बुद्धी पौरुष हिनांनां जीविका..चार्वाक

Looks like Charwak's philosophy was critique to the bad practices of the society that time. Heaven hell, good bad etc. But he didnt knew that one can never be always happy unless or untill he or she realizes the true nature of themselves. True nature can be called as Aatma, Brahman, consciousness, awareness etc. Tat tvam asi. You are that.

Very true,great

beautiful

👍👍🌹🌹 बहुत ही शानदार

बहुत अच्छे🙏🙏🙏

Million Thanks 🙏

You are right

Pure logic se duniya nhi chalti sahb. Warna hame Dil na Diya hota

चार्वाक दर्शन अनूठा है और धर्म पर किसी व्यक्ती समुह पुरोहिताई के एकाधिकार को तोड़ता है,, अद्भुत है और इसका और भी सकारात्मक विशलेषण आपसे अपेक्षित है,, भारतीय दर्शन की नितांत अनूठी अवधारणा को व्यापक दृष्टिकोण से समझने की आवश्यकता है,,, वेदों के ज्ञान से परे चार वाक और लोकायत को समग्र उदार और बिना पूर्वाग्रहों से रहित होकर समझना आवश्यक है, अगर गोस्वामीजी तुलसीदासजी महाराज भक्त परंपरा के वेद है तो चार्वाक दर्शन भी आध्यात्मिक और धार्मिकता के खोज के कबीर दास जी है,,, उचित मूल्यांकन ही कपिल मुनि की दर्शन परंपरा को आगे बढ़ायेगा,,, आपको बहुत बहुत धन्यावाद आपने प्रकाश ड़ाला इस पर और क्षुदा को और बढ़ा दिया,,,, धन्यवाद लो जलाने के लिए,,,,,

Good positive natural

बहुत खूब सिन्हा जी ।🙏

So great surely narrated the evil effects of Btahmanic hindu religion.

Sir.. Your last some words shows what type of you had a knowledge... This is lac off the knowledge toworads the other philosopher.

Great दादा जी को प्रणाम

Bhut acha kha he sir . 👏👏👏🙏

बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद आदरणीय

New view on charwaka.

Intetest

सही बात है।

us how deep runs the idea of purity and casteism). The chief gate of Vithoba temple, Pandharpur, with the shrine of Chokhamela on the steps outside, as he was never allowed inside. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons). In the 16th century, there were five poet-saints (pancha-sakha) in Odisha who identify themselves as servant-sages (shudra-muni) and wrote poems about Krishna in Odia, challenging the might of the brahmins who control the temple, and restrict their access to the temple. Even today at the gateway of the Puri temple, there is another image of Jagannath meant for “lower” castes, who were not allowed to enter the temple. Around the same time, in Udupi Karnataka, Kanaka was not allowed to enter the temple. So he sang songs from behind the temple and we are told the east-facing image turned to face the west and wall breached so that Kanaka could see the lord (darshan). Until 100 years ago, in many villages of India, in Kerala and Maharashtra and Gujarat, there were some communities who were not just allowed to use the village well, they had to wear a broom to wipe away their footprints, carry a pot to spit so that it did not fall on the ground and contaminate it, and a drum to announce their arrival. All this because their family vocation was to clean toilets and deal with animal carcasses, a vocation they were obliged to perform as per “jati” system. In other words, they could not change their vocation, and at the same time deprived of dignity for it as they were seen as impure by birth. Despite great progress in the past 70 years, many people still avoid sitting with “lower” castes, and letting “Dalit” women cook their food. The argument is fear of “pollution”. The idea that Brahmins through “commandments” of Manusmriti created this system from the top is a very simplistic understanding of a system that is acknowledged and even followed by “lower” castes and Muslims and Christians who even today are highly selective about who their son or daughter should marry. Reformers argue they suffer from “Stockholm Syndrome” and reject the idea that they are using their own agency and thus support the system. Equally simplistic is the idea that positive discrimination and reservation system will create a fairer society. In fact, it creates a violent backlash and a further hardening of boundaries. Some people believe in “trickle down” effect; others believe in “instant revolution”. Neither really works entirely. So the situation remains complex and volatile with no simple answer, but a lot of self-righteous outrage on every side. The idea of purity is what established casteism in India. Purity has been manipulated by many Hindus to create a draconian hierarchy, despite opposition by other Hindus, especially the poet-sages. Academician-activists tend to focus on the former as “real” Hindus and ignore the latter. They ignore the idea that purity pervades all of human society in various forms from taboos in ancient tribes to fascism in modern times. The “visa” system of nation-states was designed to keep out poor and unskilled people from “developed” countries, hence the rage against immigrants. People argue that when immigrants come, they “pollute” the value system of the land. For example, many Muslim immigrants reject the idea that women and homosexuals have rights. Likewise in India, non-violent Jain communities use their political power to protect themselves from the “pollution” of meat-eaters. Muslims in Pakistan and Iran reject the “pollution” of liberal values, including Sufism, that is seen as idolatry (shirk). Marxists see capitalism as pollution. Maoists see development as pollution. Dalits of India are being told Hinduism is pollution and Buddhism is purity. Vegetarians insist that meat-eaters are impure, heterosexuals insist homosexuals are impure, monogamists are convinced polyamorists are impure. The doctrine of purity hence cancer of casteism in India began 2,000 years ago and consolidated itself 1000 years ago. Now this doctrine of purity is spreading around the world. It takes the form of discrimination and a yearning for pure “homogenous” paradise with no diversity. You see this in the speeches of politicians who want to exclude everyone except those who subscribe to their party politics. This is neo-casteism.

Sir himmat ji se bhaot sa gyan plz leke upload kariye taki hum yuva ko smj ka gyan ho.

Charwak darshan ko agar hamne mahatwa diya hota to shyad ham bhi darvin, Einstein, mark's paida kr paye hote.

Charvak needs India badly

मुझे खुद को नही पता था कि मैं चार्वक दर्शन के रास्ते पर चल रहा हु।

Sahi kaha charwak ne

Excellent explanation 👍

❤❤❤

👌👌👌👌👍👍👍👍

Which means almost every one is a charvak today..

Kya Charvak ek Religion hai.. Kya India me hai inke Followers...?? Mujhe Charvak ka Scientific drustikon bht accha laga.. I Loved it .❤

Now indian society is living like what charwak said in his philosophy.

The casteism, as we know it today with strict rules of purity prohibiting inter-caste marriages, started 1,900 years ago, became common 1,500 years ago and rigid 1,000 years ago. We know this because of recent genetic studies. Note: the word caste is a European word for clan that is used for the Indian system of jati. The word jati, in turn, is confused with the Vedic system of varna. Vedas speak of a theoretical four-fold structure (chatur-varna). In reality, India has thousands of jatis that are crudely mapped to these four varnas, leading to much chaos and confusion. There is further confusion on the issue by equating caste with class, or caste with race, or caste with tribes. The British claimed that Hindus are essentially casteist. That the idea comes from a verse in the Rig Veda that describes society as an organism made of four groups (chatur-varna) of people. They argued “white” Aryans invaded India and turned “black” Dravidians into slaves located at the bottom of this four-fold hierarchy. Their argument was based on the translation that “varna” means colour. This theory has been disproved based on genetic studies. All we know is that a linguistic group which spoke proto-Sanskrit entered India 3,500 years ago and they mingled extensively with the rest of the population; there was no endogamy. We also know that Hinduism is not “commandment-based”, and so scriptures merely reflect (smriti) on social reality; they do not inform it as in Islam, Christianity and Judaism.  The Vedic reference to “varna” is probably not physical. It is metaphorical, referring to the nature of human society. Every society in the world has divine mediums (brahmin), land-owners (kshatriya), product producers and merchants (vaishya) and service-providers (shudra). In practice, Vedic society, 3,000 years ago, had common people (vish) ruled by chariot-riding warriors (rajanya) who depended on mantra-chanting divine mediums (kavi or rishi). Brahmana texts say that a man is born “shudra” until he is initiated into reading Vedas after which he becomes “brahmin”, revealing that “brahmin” was a position to be attained through education and contemplation, not a condition one is born into. Following the rise of Buddha, 2,500 years ago, we find writings that refer to many communities (jati) that followed a single vocation. There is reference to guilds of potters, weavers, metal smiths. They secured their knowledge systems by preventing inter-jati marriage. However, this was not a strict rule. In Buddhist literature, we find two divergent ideas. One that karma determines the kind of jati we are born into: those that dominate or those that serve. As per Jataka tales, good karma of past lives enables Siddhartha Gautama to become Buddha. However, we also hear Buddha stating (something that is repeated in Mahabharata too) that a true “brahmin” is determined by deeds not birth. Thus, we see tension between birth-doctrine and deed-doctrine in matters related to jati and varna. In Jain stories, we hear how the Tirthankara’s embryo is transferred from the womb of a Brahmin woman into the womb of a Kshatriya woman. So Jains, who were monastic, also recognised a society made of multiple communities. In Hindu epics, we find stories where men are denied choice. Karna is insulted for learning archery as his foster father is a charioteer. Shambuka is beheaded by Ram for abandoning his trade and becoming an ascetic. Krishna tells Arjuna that his duty is to do his role determined by his family. Bhagavad Gita seems anti-monastic with Arjuna being told not to give up the world as monks do, but do his duty as a warrior and member of a royal family. Note: the only choice here is to either to follow the family vocation, or become a monk. You could not really choose a vocation, as per Hindu, Jain or Buddhist lore. Vocation comes from the father. In all these stories we hear of a “chandala” who lives in crematoriums, is surrounded by dogs, and generally shunned by people. Who are these people? The “lower” castes? Shiva is called a god who lives with dogs in crematoriums, who is feared and shunned by “brahmin” leaders like Daksha. Daksha is obsessed with purity and Shiva mocks ideas of purity. Is this the clash of ancient Hindu “conservatives” and Hindu “liberals”? With the rise of Puranic literature, something shifts. This is roughly 1,500 years ago, when temples were being built, Buddhism was on the wane, Tantrik Hinduism that values the body was on the rise, and dharma-shastras, including Manusmriti were guiding principles. All of society was based on jati-system. Every individual belonged to a community (jati). Earlier, marriage within jati was preferred, but it was not obligatory. From this period onwards, as genetic studies show, the rules became increasingly rigid and draconian. Why? Some people speculate that arrival of foreigners into India - first Indo-Greeks (Yavana), then Kushans, then Scythians (Sakas, Gujars), and finally Muslims, made Indians increasingly inward looking fearing pollution from outside. If caste became rigid 1,000 years ago, so did the prohibition of sea-travel. All things that increased chance of pollution were forbidden. Pollution meant contact with “lower” caste, especially marriage that could mix castes and herald Kali Yuga. Like all societies, the Hindu society also had many communities that were located in economic and political hierarchy. All “jatis” mapped themselves to the theoretical four-fold “varna” model. The veda-controlling and temple-controlling jatis were seen as brahmins who had access to divinity and so had spiritual power. The land-owning jatis were seen as kshatriyas and so had political power. The market-controlling jatis were grouped as vaishyas and they had economic power. The service-providing shudras had neither spiritual, political or economic power. They were servants of all, like serfs in other feudal societies. However, there was something more that make the Indian caste system unique. It is the doctrine of purity (shuddhi). Some communities were labelled “impure”. In the past thousand years, villages and cities were designed so that the purest, not necessarily the wealthiest or the most powerful, stay in the centre next to the temple, which is the pure navel of the settlement. The less pure stayed at a distance. And the least pure stayed at the margins. And the tribal communities, stayed in the forest. The people who lived in the margins were “ritually unclean” owing to their profession, which involved dealing with dead bodies and excrement. It all sounds highly logical: but it dehumanised people, denied them human dignity, and access to common resources like water and education. Who set up these cities? In all probability brahmins who were given this power by kings. Thus, we have many copper inscriptions in Odisha, Deccan and Tamil Nadu, since the past 1,500 years, detailing land grants to brahmins who set up new villages (brahmadeya settlements), and created an administrative structure to collect grain-tax on behalf of the king. Adi Shankara who lived in the 8th century once met a Chandala and asked him to move aside and the Chandala argued, “You want my impure body to move or the pure soul?” This story has been interpreted in many ways and shows the gap between idealistic Hinduism where knowledge of soul (atma) helps us rise above caste hierarchy and practical Hinduism where caste hierarchy thrives. Around the same time lived one Nandanar, a Tamil Shiva-saint (nayamnar), who was denied entry into the Shiva temple at Chidambaram. Some claim he passed through fire and turned into a Brahmin and only then was allowed entry, thus reaffirming the idea of keeping impure people away from the temple. In 12th century Karnataka, we hear of Basava challenging the caste system and being thrown out of his job in the king’s court for encouraging inter-caste marriage. In 14th century Maharashtra, we hear of Chokha-mela who was not allowed to enter the temple of Vitthala in Pandharpur, and so his shrine was built on the temple steps where it still stands. Marathi poet-saints like Dyaneshwara and Tukaram and Eknath were also persecuted for writing about God in local languages, rather than Sanskrit, and for promoting idea of equality before God. Similar songs of equality were sung by Ravidas, whose verses are found in the Granth Sahib of Sikhs, a religion that emerged from the rejection of the caste system (though today the divide between Jat Sikhs and Dalit Sikhs is deep reminding

चार्वाक दर्शन को समझने के लिए कुछ किताबें जो मददगार हों,किसी को पता हो तो बता दें। 🙏🙂

Osho always there

🌹🌹🌹🌹