25:48 ಬೆಳಕಿನ ವೇಗದಲ್ಲಿ ನಾವು ಹೋದಾಗ ಇಡೀ ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಾಂಡದ ಅಸ್ತಿತ್ವವೇ ನಮಗೆ ಇರಲ್ಲ ಅನ್ನೋದಾದ್ರೆ, ಈಗಾಗಲೆ ಬೆಳಕಿನ ವೇಗದಲ್ಲೇ ಹೋಗ್ತಿರೊ ಬೆಳಕಿಗೆ ನಮ್ಮ & ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಾಂಡದ ಅಸ್ತಿತ್ವ ಇರಬಾರದಿತ್ತು! ಆದ್ರೆ ಬೆಳಕಿಗೆ ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಾಂಡದ ಅಸ್ತಿತ್ವ ಇದೆ, ಬೆಳಕು ಈ ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಾಂಡದಲ್ಲೇ ಇದೆ, ಬೆಳಕಿಗೆ ಭೂಮಿ ಮತ್ತು ಇತರೆ ಆಕಾಶಕಾಯಗಳು ಎಲ್ಲ ಇವೆ. ಬೆಳಕಿಗೆ ನಾವು ಇದೀವಿ: ಅಂದ್ರೆ ಬೆಳಕು ನಮ್ಮ ಮೇಲೆ ಬೀಳ್ತಿದೆ ಅದರ ಪ್ರತಿಫಲನದಿಂದ ನಮಗೆ ಎಲ್ಲ ವಸ್ತುಗಳೂ ಕಾಣ್ತಿವೆ. ಆ ವೇಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾಲ ಸ್ಥಗಿತ ಆಗುತ್ತೆ ಅನ್ನೋದಾದ್ರೆ, ಕಾಲದ ಒಂದು ಘಟ್ಟದಲ್ಲಿ ಬೆಳಕು ಸೂರ್ಯನಲ್ಲಿ ಹುಟ್ಟಿ ಇನ್ನೊಂದು ಕಾಲಘಟ್ಟದಲ್ಲಿ (~8 ನಿಮಿಷ) ಭೂಮಿ ತಲುಪುತ್ತೆ, ಅದು ಹೇಗೆ!? Twin Paradox & Time dilationನಲ್ಲಿ ಹೇಳುವ ಹಾಗೆ ಕಾಲಕ್ಕೂ ಬೆಳಕಿಗೂ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಅಷ್ಟು ಹತ್ತಿರ ಅಲ್ಲ ಅನ್ಸುತ್ತೆ!
ಮಲ್ಲತ್ತಹಳ್ಳಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬಸ್ ಸ್ಟಾಪ್ ಹತ್ತಿರದಲ್ಲೇ, ಮುಖ್ಯರಸ್ತೆಯಲ್ಲೇ ಕಲಾಗ್ರಾಮ ಇದೆ. ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರದರ್ಶನ, ನಾಟಕ ಇನ್ನಿತರೆ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮಗಳು ಸದಾ ನಡೆಯುತ್ತಿರುತ್ತವೆ. g.co/kgs/Wq69xR
I think space and time are equal because neither the space nor time can not exist on it's own...finally both of which we can not be touched and seen....but to some extent can be felt.... It's just my opinion
It is quite illogical to say that there was no space and time in the big bang, yet this speaker say it was in the size of 'bindu' (atomic). Isn't it the notion of 'bindu' itself unit of size? So, it is oxymoron to hold contradicting notions.
Brother there was no space no time in the beginning of this universe brother bhagavath clearly states there was only complete darkness when lord narayana the creator was in sleeping mode then he awakened let out his breath that us the bindu or atomic level if creation.brother the atoms multiplied created space when space was created worlds brahmandas were created in.those Anantha koti brahmandas one brahmandas our earth. The sun the 9 planets brothers I and you micro cosmic particles brother our time only atomic and short in universal brother understand the speaker is highly intellectuals you talk about bindu you don't know the meaning of bindu means the central point of creation from which the circle of creation is expanding that bindu is lord narayana brother when ge withdraws his breath brother the creation will collapse back into that bindu lord Narayana brother understand
@@vasudevakolar4091 your saying "there was no time and space in the beginning" itself is self contradiction. Both the notions "no time" and "in the beginning" in your statement are opposition to each other. Isn't it "beginning" a measure if time? When there was no time, where is the notion of begin or end cone from?
@@vasudevakolar4091 I agree Lord Narayana Willed this creation. So, the correct understanding is that in Lord Narayana' kaala (time which is eternal) the time and space of this creation started. So, time and space should be understood as nested notions.
Srinivas Kotekal Based on this speech by ಡಾ|| ನಾ. ಸೋಮೇಶ್ವರ and the PBS video, “Did Time Start at the Big Bang? I think your assumption may be incorrect. This begs the questions like, “What is to the north of North Pole?” You’ll hear that question in the below video. They say that in the video Einstein as well. Good video. This talk by ಡಾ|| ನಾ. ಸೋಮೇಶ್ವರ is awesome too. Hope it helps. # Did Time Start at the Big Bang? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-K8gV05nS7mc.html
@@ratipati2007 brother kala or time and space from inside lord almighty narayana okay then you are in agreement on thus point with me now coming to your counter that quote in the beginning there was no kala contradicts quote my statement there was no kala my answer is at the end of kalpas meaning the end of vhaturyugasll lord narayana in whom all creation resides outside whom there is no universes withdrew his expanding breath and creation collapsed like a deflated baloon absorbed back.into the Lord and he slept that situation is explained in bhagavat as complete darkness no space no time comparable to.modern scientific theory of black jokes which swallow whole universes into s compact atomic size so now the bhagavat comes into.picture where saud lord narayana without a beginning ir end eho is not controlled by time or space but the creater of time and space which give rise to.motion.the five elements the earth the combinations conducive to.creation.of life that narayana when he breathed out at tgat instant there was no time from.that Bindu narayana one of his naMes galore the creation.started and with that expanding increasing space time started to be counted there is lot still further to be said but suffice to counter your argument brother but what I am stating us nit my own.your acceptance of narayana is creater is not your own but our common hindu religious beliefs so in conclusion brother what u can say is we are after all dumb human beings but our faith propels us to believe in hinduism a n infact a very rational scientific religion not based on.mere blind faith but allows free thinking re examination.of our religion from time time so you have the free thinking right so do I have so has every body else my hindu b re other we both believe in. Om namo narayana god bless you brother evolve further dir thank you