I'm female and I have listened to Tate, if you actually listen to what he says, he isn't misogynistic at all. Why aren't we also tackling Misandry? The hatred of men? The absolute attacks on the male of the species ??
It’s amazing isn’t it? It’s like they deliberately cherry pick what they want you to hear from young men. Never mind that their actions keep pushing young men to listen to views from figures they don’t liken
@BadmanBlaze can you expand on your statement please ? What actions are they doing that are making men look to Andrew Tate? What is the driving force ?
Go watch diary of a CEO about relationships it's by a couple who have been researching for 40+ years the lady says I hate to admit it but 80% of failed marriages are caused by the lady in the relationship I'm lucky I'm in a good marriage as we work together no unfinished disagreements don't ever let iy fall into an argument and balance is the key!
Societies failure have been cause by weak men. Have you never heard the statement “weak men create hard times and hard times create strong men”. Strength comes in the form of support and gentle care. Not violence, not exploitation and certainly not by walking around shouting about how you’re an “alpha male” 😂 nothing more beta than that, if you have to scream about your supposed masculinity, you never had any to begin with, just like Andy tate.
One of the most poignant comments I’ve seen on this thread…. The children are spending more time with these teachers than with their parents. I’d argue they are radicalising the kids and not Andrew Tate.
@Sjoldschool you'd be arguing bullshit. What children learn with teachers is maths, literature, history, science, DT, physical education. What boys learn from rape suspect Tate is contempt for women. I know which is more wholesome.
@@lewisblight-bp1dt My main concern is that teachers that lean towards the far left are being used to undermine the family values that we’re used to by promoting their beliefs on social justice and equality on our children without any consent from the parents.. issues like the transgender debate and racism are being raised in classrooms from a young age along with sexuality, some would argue that the nuclear family model is being pushed aside in favour of a more progressive Marxist model with a hint of satanic worship thrown in. I grew up with very different values from my parents and their parents before them and what I’m seeing now disgusts me to be honest. It’s like theirs a hostile takeover taking place and people of my age who have known different times can see it clearly but the younger brainwashed generation can’t see it.
I would have thought a bigger problem would be the misogyny on the young women of Romford, Telford and other towns over many decades by a certain demographic.
@@jacklyons2088 ridiculous but not surprising. Any law that’s treats men and women differently should be appealed non stop in every court in the land and at the various courts of human rights!
@@jessicasinmas Who hasn't lived in the UK in years. Its amazing how the british government is trying to psyop the public that a man who lives in Romania is the biggest threat to their country. Talking about the guy like he's some supervillain LOL.
The trans-ideologues and certain sections of the Muslim community better be very careful not to fall foul of Yvette Cooper’s new proposal. Or are they to be a protected class?
They won't even be looked at and they will be protected classes under the other laws laid out by the Labour party, this law will focus on male conservatism, basically the future political opposition.
@@Ribbitpleasethey're are all the wrong type, I have never heard of single good relationship from any of my friends besides the ones that were with their girlfriends from highschool
he just chose a trending topic to monetize on.....i personally dont like his courses he sells, but he speak facts which are truth, thats why he was banned many times
more controversy more money =he saw that..even google trending 1 he showed/// jordan wolf of wll street: when someone goes up, there will always be someone to pull em down... good or bad both lol
I don't hate him. I think he talks a lot of sense, maybe because I'm in my mid-60s and believe a mother should look after her family ! instead of leaving to someone else
@DanBeech-ht7sw you carry on being brainwashed !! His for family and the government don't approve of that !! they want someone else bring up your children
@@DanBeech-ht7swHe's never been convicted. That's the point. Innocent until proven guilty. It's feminists and MSM that make click bait money out of clipping him out of context to create outrage from things he never actually said as well.
It's heading in that direction, the problem is actually multiculturalism, this happens everything. Governments become authoritarian when a society is multicultural.
Freedom of speech is enshrined in our constitution. We defend it till death in the US. Tyranny and authoritarian governments wouldn't last long, and neither would this lady.
There's irony to your comment. You wana defend the English but your way of defending the English is to defend the actions of a Muslim man who was trafficking white European women. Make your mind up mate
No it won't , they will be a protected community under that law due to it's open for interpterion concept. There religious practice and attitudes being questioned will be Islamophobic and there religion lays out the roles and position women are allowed so they will be fine. It will be the traditional roles of the western male that will be under the spot light, which is ironic considering it's only ever been western society in which women have had full rights as a human being.
There are so many examples of laws and regulations that govern how people act in society today in comparison to, let’s say 50 years ago. Human behaviour is constantly legislated
On the money, labour refuse to lift to 2 child cap, which plung millions of children including men, boys, women and girls into property.... but that cannot be classed as terrorism.
@@Ade-y7lactually that needs to stay, if you can’t afford to raise a kid you shouldn’t have one. Too many single mothers with multiple kids form multiple fathers using the kids as an excuse not to work. As soon as the youngest gets close to school age they get get pregnant again to avoid going to work. This I’ve witnessed all my life living on council estates. Help should be prioritised for those that have been working but lose the job for whatever reason and those that lose a partner unexpectedly and need assistance n the short term.
@@unionjackjackson4352 on a respectful note. That argument works both ways, if youre working and got layed off, why didn't said person save better. Children do not deserve to suffer for the sins of the father. In a society where starma can cut a 15 billion pound check to Ukraine. There's enough money in the treasury to provision for everybody: young, old, sick ect...
@@Ade-y7l the father? You’ll find most fathers have no say in anything, the women use them to get pregnant then dump them, must don’t even tell the fathers. The kids aren’t suffering as you think. Kids aren’t starving in the uk or going without healthcare or education.
For the record, I'm a woman, and I find a lot of what Tate does distasteful...but he's not necessarily wrong in some of the things he says, and given that the media have suppressed even moderate criticism of third-wave feminism and gender politics, you can't blame disenfranchised young men for being drawn to his message. Stop trying to control the narrative so hard and let the best ideas win out in free debate.
I see some pretty misogynistic things on line, as well as misandrist things. Telling a woman she should only exist to serve her husband and put up with being cheated on, cheerfully, is pretty low.
@@catherineball7584what utter garbage! Whether you like the position of women serving their husbands or not is a personal choice, same as men not being monogamous in a relationship is a choice for a woman to be in that relationship or choose not too, she isn’t forced to be there, but it’s a man’s boundaries if you don’t like it don’t be in that relationship simple! However either way none of this is a ‘hatred of women” stop trying to make misogyny mean” anything any women disagrees with” as men can do that too with misandry and you don’t want to play that game.
@garethm7528 yes I do want to play that game. That attitude from men is likely why women leave. The 'my way or the highway' makes women choose the highway. That's why most men are pissed.
@@catherineball7584 Absolutely agreed. This was a prime example of men not taking accountability. Women DO leave men who do not treat them right. And men are feeling the pinch of it. Andrew Tate is so popular because there is a male loneliness epidemic. Many men are angry with women because women choose to enforce their boundaries. That’s why they so often see feminism as the enemy, which enabled women to have their own agency. They dont like that.
Men (of all ages) predominantly look for fertility signals in women - beauty. Women predominantly look for resource gathering skills in men (wealth) and generosity.
I don't know what the fact and fiction is regarding Andrew Tate anymore. According to the mainstream Media he is the equivalent of a James Bond villain, I expect he can affect global stock markets and owns all of the World Wide Web. He may well have orbiting laser systems trained on all the world capitals. Perhaps he plans to exterminate the Human race and start it all over again... Whatever fits the narrative of the moment I expect.
Counter extremism aka what we dont like at the moment. And if the govt. want to tackle harmful ideologies what are they not dealing with Islam or communism then? That was a rhetorical question.
These things are so subjective. What is exteme misogyny? A religious room a woman can't enter? A rapper that says degrading things about woman? Would Eminem be illegal? Or is this something that will totally depend on your politics?
It's definitely Andrew Tates fault, it's not becuase we have imported millions of people from cultures who have a very low opinion of women, honest. The media is now so patronizing it's almost unwatchable.
@AssadKhalif You are correct. She wasn't mentioning Islam. My point was that it was ironic she's suggesting that we have families where men have all the advantages and can do whatever they like without consequence, and that this is causing a lot of the misogynistic attitudes in the UK. I find it Ironic because over the last few decades we have had a massive influx of Muslims, followers of Islam. From my perspective, Islam institutionalises misogyny. It effectively treats women as second-class citizens. Don't believe me? In the Quran you will find 'An-Nisa, 34'. This verse describes how men are the caretakers or maintainers of women, and that disloyal women should be 'lightly' beaten. This is the Traditional Islamic family structure I was talking about, one where men make all of the important decisions, where women are subservient to men, where they are in a lower social position to them, and are worth less then the men. Now, for your point about Fatima al Fihriya. According to the Wikepedia page about her, it isn't clear is she either existed or founded the university of Al-Qarawiyyin. If she was real, then good for her, it's sorely needed in a Muslim world dominated by men, even today.
So what exactly are examples of societal misandry? Women choosing to be single? Women wanting basic human rights such as wanting the same opportunities to work and survive? Usually misogyny is a lot more dangerous to society. Men always prove to be far more aggressive and violent than females when not checked. Women just don’t engage with men if they don’t like them. Far less insidious. So tell me which is the more pressing issue?
Exactly! Legislation against ideas is dangerous as open conversation gets pushed into further radical underground arenas. Being able to openly discuss ideas is much healthier for society.
But you can easily cause hatred with one. Simply spend 40 years persecuting men with laws and tax, to fund women's choices. At no point has any feminist answered the question, 'what do men get out of this deal?'
This is absolutely cultural marxism. I lived through 30 years of 'The Troubles' in Northern Ireland and can tell you with authority that equating misogyny with terrorism is not only insane but malevolent.
So we can talk about young men being “radicalised” online when it comes to sexism but not religious radicalism . Which one sounds more dangerous ? I’ve not seen a sexist blow anyone up .
No it wouldn't resolve the issue but it would lesson the free reign of perversion and the tendancy to treat women as merely objects of self gratification.
Our grandparents would turn in their graves listening to this. Pretty sure most men in their era would have possibly been labelled as misogynistic. But I would also argue that there were more marriages and they lasted longer than most of todays relationships. So is misogyny really the problem. Or is it more to with cultural upbrininging
During that generation, women were not allowed to vote, not allowed to work. Women fought for those rights because they wanted the basic human right opportunity to survive by themselves. Far less divorced because women didn’t have a CHOICE. If that arrangement was so perfect, women wouldn’t have fought for their right to work and vote. Now women have levelled up to having the same rights as men. But are still expected to have most responsibilities at home even though she is also now going to work and contributing financially to the family. Men unfortunately, now have to offer women more in the marriage than just money. Men who just want to give bare minimum in exchange for full access to a woman’s body, soul and womb just don’t cut it anymore. This is why many men feel frustrated. Unwillingness to adapt is one of the core reasons for the male loneliness epidemic.
@@moorshound3243 He does speak truth - sometimes. However, his popularity comes from the fact so many young boys and men have absent fathers and know-it-all single mothers who make nothing but bad choices.
Non stop mate what are you talking about, its absolutely everywhere, even this report is presented by wemen, when was the last time you seen men talking about wemen issues and telling wemen how they should behave???????????????????
What about.. what about… The topic is about misogyny. Not misandrists. To be fair, misogyny is far more dangerous in society, as men prove to be far more aggressive and violent if they feel entitled for women and their bodies. Women on the other hand just complain about men, stay in their own lane and choose to remain single with cats.
@@Ribbitplease 😂 nice try, let's break it down, one of the main reasons for this misogyny is a resentment towards the way wemen are allowed and even incouraged to abuse men, this is the backlash. All they want to talk about is misogyny and men feeling entitled to wemens bodies, what is that you want men to do, that's the way we are wired????? Do we have conversations about setting up laws that go against wemens natural biology????
Where did you interpret “treating women as equals” is now misogyny? It’s funny how you comment without actually listening to the video and what she is saying.
@@RibbitpleaseHe means that we are not allowed to apply the same standards to women as we do to men. When we do that, a lot of women will call that misogyny. Women suffer from lack of accountability and responsibility.
@@Alnivol666 That’s not true. Most women now contribute financially to the household, but men don’t pick up equal responsibility around the house. The cooking, cleaning, chores, childcare are mostly still expected to be done by the women. I don’t see men rushing to correct this standard. Both genders have their flaws, so enough with the gender wars!
So what about mysogyny in other cultures then? Presumably she is advocating that this should apply to "ALL" demographics? Or, is this just being proposed to isolate one particular group of citizens...🤔
Andrew tate may well be at the extreme end of masculinity but why do we refuse to address the real issues instead of the symptoms. Young men flock to characters like andrew tate because of the radical feminisation of our soceity from schools all the way to the wrokplace. Ontop of this masculinity is being treated like a problem that needs to be fixed rather than something that has a true utilisation and value to us all.
There has been a noticeable shift that has happened in society over the past couple of decades which means that women are privileged and centred in society. This law is to stop anyone having anything to say about that.
So taking advantage of emotionally vulnerable young men is wrong by also monetising on it. But what about taking advantage of emotionally vulnerable children confused by their bodies/sex..and monetising that?
Misandry must also be treated as terrorism. See where this goes? I am not a fan of Tate. However I defend his right to say what he pleases and speak freely. As should any and all freedom loving people. Governments monetise lies, deception, death and war. A great man once said let he who is without sin, cast the first stone. Hate like love are natural human emotions. Legislating against either of them. Is to legislate against humanity itself.
@@nbvvc-pi6pi nobody should care. You have just as much right to despise woman or men, as you have to despise kfc or baseball. Not liking something, someone or some group should not be a criminal offence. It really is absurd to make it so.
