Тёмный

(√1995)·x^(log₁₉₉₅ x) = x² 

Prime Newtons
Подписаться 181 тыс.
Просмотров 5 тыс.
50% 1

In this video I solved an exponential logarithmic radical equation using basic algebra knowledge. This was from 1995 AIME.

Опубликовано:

 

10 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 34   
@allozovsky
@allozovsky Месяц назад
We can add some nice Unicode typesetting to the title: *(√1995)·x^(log₁₉₉₅ x) = x²*
@allozovsky
@allozovsky Месяц назад
I don't know if the "vinculum" in *√1̅9̅9̅5̅* would be visible on all devices, though 🤔
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Месяц назад
Thank you
@narhumo7497
@narhumo7497 Месяц назад
Oh wow the mod was awesome, very well explained sir. This is a great problem to test algebraic skill. I really like how it wraps up to be 1995^2, it gets so simple from something so disturbingly complicated at first glance
@nicolascamargo8339
@nicolascamargo8339 Месяц назад
With square difference it is also possible to calculate 1995² quickly
@dirklutz2818
@dirklutz2818 Месяц назад
@@nicolascamargo8339 Indeed! 1995² = (2000-5)² = 2000² - 20000 + 25, so the last three digits are 025.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons Месяц назад
Smart
@majora4
@majora4 Месяц назад
What I love most about this problem is how generalizable it is. You can replace 1995 with any number y > 1 and the product of the positive roots will always be y^2. Moreover, you can always replace the exponent on the right-hand side with any number z > sqrt(2)* and the product of the positive roots will always be y^z. *If you set z = sqrt(2) there will be only one root... but it has multiplicity 2 and it value is exactly sqrt(y^z) so you can make an argument that the product should still be considered y^z
@toastdog214
@toastdog214 Месяц назад
I tried doing it myself and I got to 1995², and I was stumped on how to get the last 3 digits. I ended up just doing regular multiplication, but wow the solution you have given here is genius! mod 1000 would've never crossed my mind
@nicolascamargo8339
@nicolascamargo8339 Месяц назад
With square difference it is also possible
@marcolima89
@marcolima89 Месяц назад
this guy has genuinely rekindle my interest in math thank you for doing this and please keep doing it.
@Moj94
@Moj94 Месяц назад
I tried doing it myself and I decided I'd rather stay an infant.
@ritwikgupta3655
@ritwikgupta3655 24 дня назад
LOL, nothing scares you, my man! Well done!
@Happycurv
@Happycurv Месяц назад
I'm impressed with how far I got. The question confused me I guess though
@davidgagen9856
@davidgagen9856 Месяц назад
Brilliant explanation.
@souverain1er
@souverain1er Месяц назад
Awesome Prof.!
@YAYAMEDIA-su8up
@YAYAMEDIA-su8up Месяц назад
I love you so much and am from mom Ethiopia
@mudspud
@mudspud Месяц назад
Fascinating
@JEEAspirant1738
@JEEAspirant1738 Месяц назад
sir I didn't understand the part where you put mod 1000. Please explain it to me in the comments.
@souverain1er
@souverain1er Месяц назад
I think the last 3 digits of the product of the positive roots is 1995^2 (mod 1000), which equals (1995 mod 1000)^2 using modular exponent property. You skipped a step.
@SiladityaSen1993
@SiladityaSen1993 Месяц назад
Isnt doing the (2000-5)^2 be easier?
@jamesharmon4994
@jamesharmon4994 Месяц назад
Since you have two roots, both positive, wouldn't you have three possible products? (Root 1)^2, (Root2)^2, (Root1)(Root2)??
@nicolascamargo8339
@nicolascamargo8339 Месяц назад
Dato curioso y sí puede ser
@Arkapravo
@Arkapravo Месяц назад
weird question, cool solution!
@wiafesamuel-xi8cl
@wiafesamuel-xi8cl Месяц назад
Please help me these questions. x to the power x equal to 3 to the power 81 another one is x to the power x equal to 2 to the power 64 and lastly, x to the power x equal to 2 to the power 1024.
@the_real_nayak
@the_real_nayak 8 дней назад
As an Indian, we do this in 11th STD
@spartan246
@spartan246 Месяц назад
This god is a goddam wizzard
@JCSol
@JCSol Месяц назад
crazy
@Ron_DeForest
@Ron_DeForest Месяц назад
How is it you can just say the base is 1995? Isn’t the base automatic 10? If you’re changing the base, don’t you have to do shit to the argument? Am I writing this correctly?
@vojtatheguitargeek
@vojtatheguitargeek Месяц назад
yeah he could have already written it in the first step...he basically took log base 1995 of both sides of the equation, but firstly thought of using regular log and then he decided to change the base afterwards and didn't come back to rewrite it everywhere. as far as i know you don't have to mess with the argument if you choose whatever base you like (as long as you apply the same log to both sides).
@knupug
@knupug Месяц назад
The base of the log function can be anything. It simply asks what power of the base will equal the argument. The ln function is log base e. Log to the base 2 of 8 is 3. Log to the base 10 of 100 is 2. So, to solve this problem, he took log to the base 1995 of both sides.
@sphakamisozondi
@sphakamisozondi Месяц назад
If u introduce log, u can use any base of your choice. If u want to do it the long way around. U can use base 10, then do change of Base, and u will arrive to the same approach but with extra steps. He just skipped two steps in order to use base 1995. But if u are comfortable with the base 10 approach then apply change of Base procedure, u can do so.
@aguyontheinternet8436
@aguyontheinternet8436 Месяц назад
if y=x, then log(y)=log(x), regardless of the base you choose. You can go back and change the base as many times you want, the equation will still hold true
@Adam-pj2qh
@Adam-pj2qh Месяц назад
wow thats clever
Далее
Matrix^2005 from the AMATYC 2005 exam
8:16
Просмотров 5 тыс.
An algebra problem from Ecuador 2009 TST
14:23
Просмотров 7 тыс.
Half factorial using the gamma function
15:21
Просмотров 16 тыс.
Separable Differential Equations
9:58
Просмотров 8 тыс.
(f o f)(x) = x + 1
11:00
Просмотров 10 тыс.
Solving a septic equation
10:43
Просмотров 44 тыс.
Convergent Infinite tetration
17:26
Просмотров 13 тыс.
When a complicated proof simplifies everything
6:22
Просмотров 216 тыс.