Тёмный

Solving a septic equation 

Prime Newtons
Подписаться 232 тыс.
Просмотров 58 тыс.
50% 1

In this video, I solved a septic equation by considering a pattern of factors in the difference of polynomials of higher degrees
Get your t-shirt here:
shorturl.at/HNUX1
The Quality of this shirt is impressive. You will also be helping me a lot!
Colors: Black, Navy Blue, Gray, Red.

Опубликовано:

 

30 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 134   
@SpiroGirah
@SpiroGirah 5 месяцев назад
Algebra is the king of mathematics. I wish I truly spent time developing that aspect of my math before calculus and other things showed up.
@ernestdecsi5913
@ernestdecsi5913 5 месяцев назад
I am 70 years old and I am just now realising how much I have always been interested in mathematics. It is a pity that when I was young, RU-vid did not exist and the beauty of mathematics was not so visible.
@MrJasbur1
@MrJasbur1 5 месяцев назад
Yeah, except when algebra has a rule that says that you have to pretend that an equation has more solutions than it does because of multiplicities. They should get rid of that rule. Imaginary numbers may be useful, but I’m not sold on multiplicities being the same.
@pedrogarcia8706
@pedrogarcia8706 5 месяцев назад
@@MrJasbur1 it's not that deep. multiplicity just means when you factor the polynomial, the factor is written twice. for all intents and purposes, the equation has 4 solutions, but it still has 6 factors, 2 of them just appear twice.
@SalmonForYourLuck
@SalmonForYourLuck 5 месяцев назад
​@@pedrogarcia8706So that's why he wrote the Imaginery solutions twice?
@pedrogarcia8706
@pedrogarcia8706 5 месяцев назад
@@SalmonForYourLuck yeah exactly, if you were to write the factorization of the polynomial, the factors would be (x minus each solution) and the solutions with multiplicity would be repeated. You could also write those factors squared to only have to write them once.
@wavingbuddy3535
@wavingbuddy3535 5 месяцев назад
Guys look at my cool millionth degree polynomial: x¹⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ = x¹⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ + x-1 😂
@Simpson17866
@Simpson17866 5 месяцев назад
I just solved it in my head :D
@adw1z
@adw1z 5 месяцев назад
@@Simpson17866 sorry to be a killjoy but ur polynomial is technically 1 degree only 😭
@Simpson17866
@Simpson17866 5 месяцев назад
@@adw1z ... That's the joke.
@the-boy-who-lived
@the-boy-who-lived 5 месяцев назад
After hours of work through trials and errors and using qudralliontic equation and almost proving Riemann hypothesis, I figured out it is 1-x=0
@AverageKopite
@AverageKopite 5 месяцев назад
@@the-boy-who-lived👏👏🙌😂
@renesperb
@renesperb 5 месяцев назад
It is easy to guess the two solutions x= 0, x = -7 , but one has to show that these are the only real solutions.
@mac_bomber3521
@mac_bomber3521 5 месяцев назад
10:39 "Those who stop learning, stop living" Is that a threat?
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
Only if you feel threatened.
@mcvoid7052
@mcvoid7052 5 месяцев назад
Better get to learning.
@MangoMan1963
@MangoMan1963 5 месяцев назад
"Those who start learning, stop living" ~Avg JEE/NEET aspirant
@t-seriesgaming7408
@t-seriesgaming7408 Месяц назад
😢😢​@@MangoMan1963
@kornelviktor6985
@kornelviktor6985 5 месяцев назад
The easy way to memorize 49 times 7 is 50 times 7 is 350 and minus 7 is 343
@NotNochos
@NotNochos Месяц назад
Or do 28^2 - 21^2
@pojuantsalo3475
@pojuantsalo3475 5 месяцев назад
I suppose sanitary engineers need to solve septic equations...
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
😂
@adw1z
@adw1z 5 месяцев назад
Technically it’s a hexic (or sextic??) equation as the x^7 on both sides cancel, which means there should be 6 roots in C including multiplicity, as u found
@dayingale3231
@dayingale3231 5 месяцев назад
Yesss
@alwayschill4522
@alwayschill4522 5 месяцев назад
yeah i saw that too... its giving clickbait just kidding we love!
@erenshaw
@erenshaw 5 месяцев назад
Thank u I was so confused in why there was only 6 solutions
@plutothetutor1660
@plutothetutor1660 5 месяцев назад
Factoring an x leads to a quintic equation too!
@shinjonmal8936
@shinjonmal8936 Месяц назад
I write it as "Hectic Roots" because it is indeed hectic to find them
@5Stars49
@5Stars49 5 месяцев назад
Pascal Triangle 📐
@Siraj-h4t7x
@Siraj-h4t7x Месяц назад
That's a lengthy process because power is too big (7)
@dougaugustine4075
@dougaugustine4075 2 месяца назад
I watched this video twice because I like watching you solve problems like this.
@mircoceccarelli6689
@mircoceccarelli6689 5 месяцев назад
( x + 7 )^7 - ( x^7 + 7^7 ) = 0 49 x ( x + 7 )( x^2 + 7 x + 49 )^2 = 0 x = { 0 , - 7 , 7 w , 7 w^2 } x^3 - 1 = ( x - 1 )( x^2 + x + 1 ) = 0 x = { 1 , w , w^2 } , w € C , w^3 = 1 😊🤪👍👋
@miya-w2o
@miya-w2o 5 месяцев назад
(x+y)^7-x^7-y^7=7xy(x+y)(x^2+xy+y^2)^2  ; why (x^2+xy+y^2)^2 It's not a math formula, but there's no explanation.
@donwald3436
@donwald3436 5 месяцев назад
The only septic I can solve is figuring out what happens when I flush my toilet lol.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
Now you have one more
@raivogrunbaum4801
@raivogrunbaum4801 5 месяцев назад
@@PrimeNewtonsisnt it too obvius. by fermat big theorem a^7+b^7=c^7 isnt (positive) integer solutions unless some member is equal to zero.hence x=0 and x=-7
@RyanLewis-Johnson-wq6xs
@RyanLewis-Johnson-wq6xs 29 дней назад
(X+7)^7=X^7+7^7 X=-7 ,X=0,X=(-7±7Sqrt[3]i)/2=-3.5±3.5Sqrt[3]i
@mitadas9961
@mitadas9961 5 месяцев назад
Can anyone please explain why the imaginary solutions are written twice?
@sadeqirfan5582
@sadeqirfan5582 4 месяца назад
But what is the point of repeating it if the two repetitions are the same?
@timothybohdan7415
@timothybohdan7415 Месяц назад
Since the imaginary solutions get squared, you should also be able to use the negative of those imaginary solutions. Thus, the four imaginary solutions should be [+/-7 +/- i sqrt(3)]/2. Note the plus or minus in front of the 7. The other two (real) solutions are x = 0 and x = -7, as the speaker noted.
@trankiennang
@trankiennang 5 месяцев назад
I think i have a general solution to this kind of equation: (x+n)^n = x^n + n^n ( n is natural number, n > 1). Divide both side of equation by n^n. We will have (x+n)^n / n^n = x^n / n^n + 1 which is equivalent to (x/n + 1)^n = (x/n)^n + 1. Let t = x/n, then the equation will become (t+1)^n = t^n + 1. So now we will focus on solving t It is easy to see that if n is even then we just have one solution is t = 0 and if n is odd then t = -1 or t = 0. The main idea here is show that these are only solutions. So let f(t) = (t+1)^n - t^n - 1 Case 1: n is even f'(t) = n.(t+1)^(n-1) - n.t^(n-1) f'(t) = 0 (t+1)^(n-1) = t^(n-1) Notice that n is even so n-1 is odd. Then we have t+1 = t (nonsense) So f'(t) > 0. Thus f(t) = 0 has maximum one solution. And t = 0 is the only solution here. Case 2: n is odd. We have f''(t) = n(n-1).(t+1)^(n-2) - n(n-1).t^(n-2) f"(t) = 0 (t+1)^(n-2) = t^(n-2) Notice that n is odd so n-2 is odd Then we have t+1 = t (nonsense again) So f"(t) > 0 which leads us to the fact that f(t) = 0 has maximum two solutions. And t = 0 and t = -1 are two solutions. After we have solved for t, we can easily solve for x.
@knownuser_bs
@knownuser_bs 5 месяцев назад
also good way to solve brother
@Blaqjaqshellaq
@Blaqjaqshellaq 5 месяцев назад
The complex solutions can be presented as (7/2)*e^(i*2*pi/3) and (7/2)*e^(i*4*pi/3).
@sajuvasu
@sajuvasu 5 месяцев назад
U can say complex solutions.... Anyway very informative 😁😁
@mahinnazu5455
@mahinnazu5455 5 месяцев назад
Nice math solution.. I see you video everyday. It is really so helpful for me. Thank you my Boss. Mahin From Bangladesh.
@mahinnazu5455
@mahinnazu5455 5 месяцев назад
Sir I hope u can support me to learn Mathematics.I love to do Maths.
@bobbun9630
@bobbun9630 5 месяцев назад
I would have to go check my old abstract algebra textbooks to find the exact way it's described, but if I remember correctly, for any prime p, you have (x+y)^p=x^p+y^p for all x and y when considering over the field Z_p. The trick is to realize that for a prime, all the binomial coefficients in the expansion of the left hand side are a multiple of p, except the first and last (which are always one). Since p~0 in that field, all the extra terms simply disappear. Granted, the solution over the complex numbers given here is the best interpretation of the problem when given without a more specific context, but it's nice to know that there really is a context where the naive student's thought that (x+y)^2=x^2 + y^2 actually does hold.
@AlexMarkin-w6c
@AlexMarkin-w6c Месяц назад
Alternative Solution for real roots only. Consider the function f(x)=(x+7)^7 - (x^7+7^7) First, compute the derivative: f'(x)=7(x+7)^6-7x^6 Setting the derivative to zero to find critical points: f'(x)=0 (x+7)^6=7x^6 Taking the sixth root on both sides: |x+7|=|x|. This implies x=-3.5, which is the only extremum and minimum point of the function. Since f(x) monotonic and continuous, it intersects the x-axis twice. Additionally, x=-3.5 is the axis of symmetry for the function derived from the binomial expansion. Given this symmetry, the second solution is 3.5 units away in the negative direction from the axis of symmetry at x=-3.5, which gives x=-7. Therefore, the real solutions are x=-7, x=0.
@dujas2
@dujas2 Месяц назад
I don't like how you have to explain how to solve 49x=0 but not how to simplify (x+7)^7-x^7-7^7. Here's how I would have done it. Being able to cancel out the x^7 and constant terms is too good, so I would expand the polynomial. Don't want the coefficients blowing up? Substitute x=7t and the problem reduces to (t+1)^7=t^7-1. After the expansion, subtraction, and division by 7, we get t^6+3t^5+5t^4+5t^3+3t^2+t. Factor out the t, and factor the rest by grouping terms with the same coefficients. t^5+1+3t(t^3+1)+5t^2(t+1)=(t+1)(t^4-t^3+t^2-t+1+3t^3-3t^2+3t+5t^2)=(t+1)(t^4+2t^3+3t^2+2t+1)=(t+1)(t^2+t+1)^2. Solve for t, multiply by 7 to get x.
@zyklos229
@zyklos229 Месяц назад
I would say (x + 7)^7 = sum i=0..7 binomial (7 over i) x^i 7^(7-i) Leaving us with 1 x=0 solution and polynomial of degree 5 equals 0, so 5 more solutions, none of it positive. (-7) seems a solution, dividing leaves us with solveable 4th degree. The shown factorization makes sense, but appears little bit abitrary 🤔
@akshatbhatnagar9333
@akshatbhatnagar9333 12 дней назад
why not just expand using binomial and then cancel out the x⁷ and 7⁷ terms you can factor it out afterwards easily....
@BRYANCHONGYOUCHIANMoe
@BRYANCHONGYOUCHIANMoe 14 дней назад
can you answer my questions i send to your email 🙏🙏🙏🙏it's secondary school problem and really need your help. Thanks
@ThePayner11
@ThePayner11 5 месяцев назад
I generalised this for n is odd. Tried doing it for n is even and couldn't get anywhere 😩 Solve for x in terms of n if (x + n)^n = x^n + n^n and n ∈ Z^+. Case 1 - n = 1 : →x + n = x + n There are no valid solutions for x. Case 2 - n is odd and n ≥ 3: →(x + n)^n - x^n - n^n = 0 After looking at n = 3, 5, 7 and so on, we notice a pattern: →(n^2)*x*(x + n)*(x^2 + nx + n^2 )^((n - 3)/2) = 0 →x = 0, x = -n For x^2 + nx + n^2 = 0 , where n > 3: →x = (-n ± √(n^2 - 4n^2 ))/2 →x = (-n ± n√3*i)/2 If anyone can provide a generalisation for n is even, then please reply to my comment 😊
@PaulMutser
@PaulMutser 2 месяца назад
Surely for case 1, all values of x are valid solutions?
@someperson188
@someperson188 Месяц назад
Your formula: (x+n)^n - x^n - n^n = (n^2)*x*(x + n)*(x^2 + nx + n^2 )^((n - 3)/2) doesn't work when n = 9. It does work for n =3, 5, 7. I used Symbolab to compare ((x+9)^9 - x^9 - 9^9)/(81x(x+9)) and (x^2 + 9x + 81)^3. Symbolab says they are different sextic polynomials. I was too lazy to do the calculation by hand.
@maharorand507
@maharorand507 5 месяцев назад
That s a rly cool explanation but the third is wrong to me : if ( x2 + 7x + 49 )2 equals 0 then x2 + 7x + 49 equals square root of 0 so 0 and x2 + 7x + 49 is ( x + 7 )2 so we replace and then we take out the square of ( x + 7 )2 so x + 7 = 0 and we get the same answer than the last one
@joshuaharper372
@joshuaharper372 Месяц назад
But (x+7)²=x²+14x+49
@SidneiMV
@SidneiMV Месяц назад
7(7¹x⁶ + 7⁶x¹) + 21(7²x⁵ + 7⁵x²) + 35(7³x⁴ + 7⁴x³) = 0 (7¹x¹)(x⁵ + 7⁵) + 3(7²x²)(x³ + 7³) + 5(7³x³)(x + 7) = 0 x[(x⁵ + 7⁵) + 3(7x)(x³ + 7³) + 5(7²x²)(x + 7)] = 0 *x = 0* (x⁵ + 7⁵) + 3(7x)(x³ + 7³) + 5(7x)²(x + 7) = 0 x³ + 7³ = (x + 7)³ - 3(7x)(x + 7) x⁵ + 7⁵ = (x + 7)⁵ - 5(7x)(x³ + 7³) - 10(7x)²(x + 7) x + 7 = a 7x = b (x + 7)⁵ - 5(7x)(x³ + 7³) - 10(7x)²(x + 7) + 3(7x)[(x + 7)³ - 3(7x)(x + 7)] + 5(7x)²(x + 7) = 0 a⁵ - 5b(x³ + 7³) - 10ab² + 3b(a³ - 3ab) + 5ab² = 0 a⁵ - 5b(a³ - 3ab) - 10ab² + 3b(a³ - 3ab) + 5ab² = 0 a⁵ - 5a³b + 15ab² - 10ab² + 3a³b - 9ab² + 5ab² = 0 a⁵ - 2a³b + ab² = 0 a(a⁴ - 2a²b + b²) = 0 a(a² - b)² = 0 a = x + 7 = 0 => *x = -7* a² = b => (x + 7)² = 7x x² + 14x + 49 = 7x x² + 7x + 49 = 0 x = (-7 ± 7i√3)/2 *x = (7/2)(-1 ± i√3)*
@kdipakj
@kdipakj Месяц назад
What is the simplification of (x+y)^n -x^n -y^n??
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar 5 месяцев назад
Would your experience solving this septic equation qualify you to repair our nasty, leaky, smelly septic tank? Nice job on choosing a relatively obscure term like septic as it could possibly enhance Search Engine Optimization(SEO), resulting in more page views from wordsmiths!
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
I use that knowledge to fix my septic tank too 😂
@williamdragon1023
@williamdragon1023 5 месяцев назад
x = 0 ez
@spandanmistry4806
@spandanmistry4806 5 месяцев назад
Bro u got to be the best Maths teacher
@ElAleXeX
@ElAleXeX Месяц назад
Could this mean we can express (x+y)^n as x^n + nxy(x+y)(x²+xy+y²)^((x-3)/2) + y^n where n is an odd positive integer?
@tommc1425
@tommc1425 Месяц назад
The pattern in the video falls apart after n=7 I'm afraid. You can substitute in x=y=1 to see that it doesn't equate at high values of n
@jjjilani9634
@jjjilani9634 5 месяцев назад
Why couldn't we use the Pascal triangle for the first part (x+7)^7 ?
@thecrazzxz3383
@thecrazzxz3383 Месяц назад
You mean Newton's binomial probably
@thecrazzxz3383
@thecrazzxz3383 Месяц назад
You don't necesseraly use Pascal's triangle to develop binomials, there's a formula for the binomial coefficient
@noblearmy567
@noblearmy567 5 месяцев назад
I have a septic infection 😂
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
😂
@thecrazzxz3383
@thecrazzxz3383 Месяц назад
For x in Z/7Z, we always have the equality : (x+7)^7 = x^7 + 7^7
@thecrazzxz3383
@thecrazzxz3383 Месяц назад
For those who are wondering, we can prove that with the little fermat's theorem (that states that for all prime number p, all x € Z, x^p ≡ x mod p) Just for those who don't know, the ring Z/7Z is just the set of remainders from 0 to 6 with the addition, multiplication mod 7 To simplify things, saying "For all x in Z/7Z, we always have the equality : (x+7)^7 = x^7 + 7^7" is exactly equivalent to "For all x € Z, (x+7)^7 ≡ x^7 + 7^7 mod 7" In fact, you can prove more generally with little fermat's theorem this lemma : "For all prime number p, for all a, b € Z, (a+b)^p ≡ a^p + b^p mod n" The demonstration is really simple : Let p be a prime number and a, b € Z By fermat's little theorem : (a+b)^p ≡ a + b mod p ≡ a^p + b^p mod p, still by fermat's little theorem
@echandler
@echandler 2 месяца назад
Nice problem. Note that all of your solutions are multiples of 7: 0*7,-1*7,w*7 and (w^2)*7 where w and w^2 are complex cube roots of unity. This corresponds to your factorization.
@anestismoutafidis4575
@anestismoutafidis4575 5 месяцев назад
(x+7)^7=x^7+7^7 (0+7)^7=0^7+7^7 7^7=7^77=7 x=0
@timothybohdan7415
@timothybohdan7415 Месяц назад
Since the imaginary solutions get squared, you should also be able to use the negative of those imaginary solutions. Thus, the four imaginary solutions should be [+/-7 +/- i sqrt(3)]/2. Note the plus or minus in front of the 7. The other two (real) solutions are x = 0 and x = -7, as you noted.
@Viaz1
@Viaz1 3 месяца назад
Because x^2+7x+49 is squared can -x^2-7x-49 be used to solve for two other roots rather than repeat?
@15121960100
@15121960100 3 месяца назад
is there a general formula for factoring (x+y)^(2n-1) - x^(2n-1) - y^(2n-1)
@bobajaj4224
@bobajaj4224 Месяц назад
My Ex was septic..
@jceepf
@jceepf 5 месяцев назад
A septic equation turned into a sextic equation..... I never thought that algebra so "dirty".
@rishavsedhain8547
@rishavsedhain8547 5 месяцев назад
why only six answers? shouldn't there be seven?
@glorfindel75
@glorfindel75 2 месяца назад
the starting equation is sixth degree: it has 6 solutions, not seven
@edouardbinet7893
@edouardbinet7893 4 месяца назад
Fermat conjectures
@lukaskamin755
@lukaskamin755 5 месяцев назад
Interesting to do the factoring, I'll try. But I'm curious how such things are obtained, I'd guess that can be done by synthetic division , if you have a clue what to obtain at tĥe end. Not quite obvious. Especially with the 7th degree, that incomplete square squared, looks overwhelming, I'd say 😅
@aurochrok634
@aurochrok634 5 месяцев назад
septic… hm… 😂
@tobybartels8426
@tobybartels8426 5 месяцев назад
The 7th root is ∞.
@FishSticker
@FishSticker 5 месяцев назад
At the very end you say that 49 - 4(49) is negative 3 but it's negative 3(49) aka 147
@xCoolChoix
@xCoolChoix 5 месяцев назад
I actually got the first and last term thing right, I just didnt know how to get the numbers in the middle lol
@himadrikhanra7463
@himadrikhanra7463 5 месяцев назад
Eulers equation (a +b)^n= a^n+ b^n....for n=1,2....
@ИринаРзаева-ф2с
@ИринаРзаева-ф2с Месяц назад
Ответ один, а и 0 тоже...
@frozenicetea3494
@frozenicetea3494 5 месяцев назад
I wouldve just said by fermas last theorem x can only be equal to 0
@jumpjump-oz2pr
@jumpjump-oz2pr 5 месяцев назад
Don’t do it like this just brute force it and then synthetic Devine it Trust me man trust me
@maburwanemokoena7117
@maburwanemokoena7117 Месяц назад
This is definetly an algebra's student dream.
@hayn10
@hayn10 5 месяцев назад
Septic ?
@ayaansajjad6855
@ayaansajjad6855 5 месяцев назад
isn't that equation more simple using pascal triangle ?
@diegoretosanchez2129
@diegoretosanchez2129 Месяц назад
X=0 😂
@googlem7
@googlem7 5 месяцев назад
multiplicity solution at end has been repeated
@sarahlo5084
@sarahlo5084 5 месяцев назад
Medical person me reads “septic” 🤒
@sonicbluster3360
@sonicbluster3360 5 месяцев назад
0
@tebourbi
@tebourbi 5 месяцев назад
Its more like a hexic (is that the word for 6?) Rather than septic because the x⁷ terms cancel each other
@ThenSaidHeUntoThem
@ThenSaidHeUntoThem 17 дней назад
Sextic
@mathyyys8467
@mathyyys8467 5 месяцев назад
Its true for all x in Z/7Z
@sea1865
@sea1865 5 месяцев назад
Couldnt you just 7th root the entire equation and have all the exponents cancel out?
@harley_2305
@harley_2305 5 месяцев назад
That doesn’t work because on the right hand side you have x^7 + 7^7. You can’t take a root in this form because that would basically be saying root(x+y) = root(x) + root(y) and we can test that doesn’t work by just plugging in numbers such as 4 and 5. root(4 + 5) = 3 but root(4) + root(5) ≈ 4.236 so by counter example the root of the sums is not equal to the sum of the roots hence you can’t cancel out powers of individual terms by taking the root of the whole thing, the whole thing would need to be raised to a power for you to be able to if that makes sense. Sorry if this didn’t explain it well
@Danish53879
@Danish53879 5 месяцев назад
Mei muslman hon hindu nhi hon
@marksandsmith6778
@marksandsmith6778 5 месяцев назад
put some TCP on it !!!😅😃
@marcelo372
@marcelo372 5 месяцев назад
Tús es o cara. Thank you
@JSSTyger
@JSSTyger 5 месяцев назад
To me its clear at the start that x must be less than 1.
@JSSTyger
@JSSTyger 5 месяцев назад
The reason I say this is that (x+7)^7 = x^7+7^7+positive number, which is greater than x^7+7^7. So really, I could also argue that x can't even be greater than 0.
@matheusespalaor1757
@matheusespalaor1757 5 месяцев назад
Amazing
@Bertin-q3y
@Bertin-q3y 5 месяцев назад
X=0
@dankestlynx7587
@dankestlynx7587 5 месяцев назад
x=0
@Coyto3
@Coyto3 5 месяцев назад
Believe it or not, I have made a summation for this exact problem but for all n not just 7
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
I would be glad if you can share 😀
@antonionavarro1000
@antonionavarro1000 5 месяцев назад
¿Lo has demostrado solo para los n impares? ¿Has demostrado lo siguiente?: Si n es un número natural impar, es decir, n=2m+1, con m un número natural cualquiera, se debe cumplir que (a+b)^{2m+1}- ( a^{2m+1} + b^{2m+1} ) = (2m+1) • (a+b) • (a^2+ab+b^2)^{2m-2} Por favor, escribe la demostración. Sería de agradecer que lo hicieras.
@Coyto3
@Coyto3 5 месяцев назад
@@PrimeNewtons I would have to send you the picture. I wrote it out on my board. I think it has one slight error that I need to fix. I can probably send it in a desmos link.
@ernestdecsi5913
@ernestdecsi5913 5 месяцев назад
I really like this one!
@Alfi-rp6il
@Alfi-rp6il 5 месяцев назад
Do me a favour: Don't call the non-real solutions 'imaginary'! They are called 'complex', ok. Nevertheless, the 'number' i ist called the 'imaginary entity'. Furthermore, there are 'imaginary numbers'. These are complex numbers without a real part or having zero as real part respectivly.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
I'll do that. There is that argument that every number is complex. What do you say? Also consider the argument that if a number has an imaginary part, it is altogether imaginary.
@Alfi-rp6il
@Alfi-rp6il 5 месяцев назад
@@PrimeNewtons Don't play tricks with words, ok. Mathematics is a science, not part of rhetorics.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
You did not address my questions. It's no wordplay. You should at least say something about the validity of the claims. Let me repeat then here: 1. Every real number is a complex number with zero imaginary part. 2. If the imaginary part of a complex number is not 0, then it is an imaginary number. Not necessarily purely imaginary.
@Alfi-rp6il
@Alfi-rp6il 5 месяцев назад
@@PrimeNewtons No. Concerning 2.: A complex number is an imaginary number, when the imaginary part is not 0 and the real part IS ZERO.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
I'm going to pose this question in the community. I need to learn more.
@KramerEspinoza
@KramerEspinoza 16 дней назад
Далее
Number of digits of n!
16:40
Просмотров 17 тыс.
pumpkins #shorts
00:39
Просмотров 19 млн
Катаю тележки  🛒
08:48
Просмотров 597 тыс.
Evaluating a series of factorials
16:24
Просмотров 10 тыс.
Can you solve this equation?
11:00
Просмотров 66 тыс.
Solve the equation   sin x +cos x =1 | IB Math
5:43
Просмотров 20 тыс.
Is x^x=0 solvable?
9:55
Просмотров 170 тыс.
A Diophantine Equation  @pkqualitymath1234
14:11
Просмотров 14 тыс.
USA Math Olympiad question with @PKMath1234
16:33
Просмотров 54 тыс.
Amazing Math Problem
10:24
Просмотров 133 тыс.
Methods of Functional Equations
7:40
Просмотров 229 тыс.