"人民不会忘记" - The People Will Not Forget (Chinese Tiananmen Square Protest Song) 

it's ok

You are not a hanjian, plus this song slaps

@@Tian2zi4huang2di4 ive cried to this to be honest, though not bc im super moved by the lyrics or the history but just bc i had a *lot* going on lol

*[comedically thick breathing]* H-H-H-H--H-H hh Dear Evan Hanjian!!!!!!!!!!!!

@@doodoofartman dear evan hansen lmao i had to sing one of the songs from the musical for an elementary music class (i forgor which one tho)

only rule here: no pro-japanese content lmao

@@zhonghuaxiansheng Why is this channel so based omg

@@zhonghuaxiansheng based

大跃进 文革 疫情清零

Only 4 out of over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, and the Americas have entered developed economies in the past 40 years, and none of them were Western style democracies during their rise. The Han River miracle that created the rise of South Korea was led by authoritarian warlord Park Chung hee, the political powerhouse Lee Kuan yew who helped Singapore soar in Asia, Chiang Ching kuo who helped Taiwan's economy soar, and Hong Kong was governed by British inspectors who relied on China's import and export trade to soar. Why is it easy for a strong person to govern a country and make it rise? Companies in latecomer countries lack funds, technology, and complete competition to win over multinational corporations. Political elites extract funds from the bottom through strong national power to invest in industrialization. Large chaebols such as Samsung and LG in South Korea were supported by Park Chung hee, and the government provides low-interest loans to help key enterprises develop. Park Chung hee even used a gun to force chaebols to invest in South Korea's future pillar industries. The top ten construction projects in Taiwan, as well as semiconductor industries such as TSMC, were established during the Chiang Ching kuo era. If we fall into endless wrangling in a democratic government. In 1952, India's per capita GDP was higher than China's, and now China's per capita GDP is 5-6 times that of India.

Not sure about you but I value economic growth and for the safety of the nation and protected cultural values (looking at you ROC under DPP) and a socially conservative society with a mixed economy leaning more towards capitalism with some government protectionism then the if you ask me bullsh** of Social progressivism which threatens the stability of the nation which then threatens foreign investment. But I don't know it's just me. A typical Lee Kuan Yew fan (a benevolent dictatorship)

@@theoriginalcornisgood2.0 most of which gave great results, but don´t justify tiananmen.

@@user-oc4pi6ls9r so the government killing thousands is ok? how exactly did this massacre help the country at all?

@@Blicero88 Justify what had happened or not. I personally see it as a necessary evil. This comes down. Social progressivism and major economic rush which could have caused what happened later to Russia when it got independence which if happened to China would have been much worse then what had happened to the Russian federation with Boris Yeltsin in power (I don't excuse Putin for anything so this is not a pro Putin statement) Or Increasing the economy gradually and slowly making sure all sectors can take time and modernise instead of rushing which would obviously cause many problems. Mao is a great example of rushing to modernise china since he started a famine. And keep in the socially conservative cultural thinking. Something if the protestors had their way mainland China would just be like how the ROC is under the DPP with all this woke acceptance liberal bs. This really comes under which you'd prefer. I'm a typical socially conservative person from South East Asia of Chinese decent with a centre right capitalist economic thinking. I'll go with the later so what happened at tiananmen was a necessary evil. To quote Lee Kuan Yew as a supporter of him and his ideology of Asian Values, "He took over and he said 'if I have to shoot 200,000 people to save China from another 100 years of disorder, so be it'"

是这样的，近64了，有很多水军新号在骂抗议者

Communism ruined china!

Rest In Peace, or Rest In Power?

You ask me, Sherlock.

they should not rest

None of them should. Misery caused by the dictatorship has not ended.

What you talking about?

True communists are opposed to the capitalist traitors of the the current Chinese gov

​@@RedBird7you stupid

Yap goes hard

Only 4 out of over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, and the Americas have entered developed economies in the past 40 years, and none of them were Western style democracies during their rise. The Han River miracle that created the rise of South Korea was led by authoritarian warlord Park Chung hee, the political powerhouse Lee Kuan yew who helped Singapore soar in Asia, Chiang Ching kuo who helped Taiwan's economy soar, and Hong Kong was governed by British inspectors who relied on China's import and export trade to soar. Why is it easy for a strong person to govern a country and make it rise? Companies in latecomer countries lack funds, technology, and complete competition to win over multinational corporations. Political elites extract funds from the bottom through strong national power to invest in industrialization. Large chaebols such as Samsung and LG in South Korea were supported by Park Chung hee, and the government provides low-interest loans to help key enterprises develop. Park Chung hee even used a gun to force chaebols to invest in South Korea's future pillar industries. The top ten construction projects in Taiwan, as well as semiconductor industries such as TSMC, were established during the Chiang Ching kuo era. If we fall into endless wrangling in a democratic government. In 1952, India's per capita GDP was higher than China's, and now China's per capita GDP is 5-6 times that of India.

But 1979 was before the Tiananmen Square incident

自由派和毛派都来了？😂

@@blb992 热爱自由的人和自由主义者是不一样的

​@@blb992you ldiot

极大的讽刺。这是高级黑，低级红的结合体。

❤

6 of the 9 songs are Kuomintang songs, which are hardly anti-authoritarian.

@@user-uh8fu3mb9l oh yeah, that can totally be the case. I was just talking about these protest songs like this one, "They" or "The people don't need freedom"

Very true, I just thought that was the best name to use. Frankly I don’t think this even in violation of the Communist philosophy. 《世界是你们的，也是我们的，但是归根结底是你们的。你们青年人朝气蓬勃，正在兴旺时期，好象早晨八、九点钟的太阳。希望寄托在你们身上。》

The Red Song playlist is also quite miscellaneous. Some are sincere revolutionary songs, while others are government propaganda.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other.

谁愿意为自由而战并且以事实来证明其决心，谁就可以算是革命的民主主义者，必须力求与这样的人共同进行准备起义的工作（当然是在对这个人或这个团体完全信任的条件下）。必须把其他一切“民主主义者”当作假民主主义者，当作自由派的空谈家而严格地区分开来，对这些人绝对不能依靠，信任这些人对于革命者来说就是犯罪。 --列宁《革命军战斗队的任务》（1905年10月16日）

@@user-uh8fu3mb9l列宁就是一个恶魔。

极大的讽刺。这是高级黑，低级红的结合体。

两个人都对文化和经济社会不利。

两个人都对文化和经济社会不利。

As far as I know, those on the Square were nationalists, too. Maybe a different bunch of nationalists from today's?

@@user-uh8fu3mb9l It's hard to tell, but there's one thing that's for certain - they wanted the best for their country, same as any one of us

​@@curtiswong7280 And yet, to whom does the country belong?

To allah ​@@user-uh8fu3mb9l

俺也知不道

my apolochinese

香港加油 🇭🇰, 台灣萬歲 🇹🇼，人民不會忘記

支持在香港以民主跟自由的名义，烧杀抢掠？乱港份子，其心可诛😂

"They marched on Beijing, just like in 1989." "The government was bad." "Who cares, thats what they did!" "They resisted the Japanese they did! They were brave anti-colonialist warriors! And in this house, the May Fourth movement students were heroes, end of story!"

​@@zhonghuaxiansheng Meanwhile... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_ChHGX2_fw4.html

But at the same time, the June 4th movement is always being talked more often out in the west and little does the west pay any attention to the May 4th movement.

@@zhonghuaxiansheng 五四运动里学生领袖可没拿CIA的脏钱

有人上传了

@@RomeoCanary 我传的

真假的 b站搜什么😊​@@RomeoCanary

传了吗​@@RomeoCanary

传了吗​@@RomeoCanary

Unfortunately, money corrupts. Many mistake democracy as some institution; worse off, there are some who even see it as some sort of ideal. No, democracy is not some madame in fur, nor some damsel in distress, but a Valkyrie of revolution. Democracy is people's power, and the people should wield it on the streets, against their enemies.

@@user-uh8fu3mb9l Democracy is not just an ideal for a revolution, though in the past to transition from a traditional feudal outdated society to a new modern one, a revolution is needed to install one. To me a democracy is basically an idea of giving powers to the people, to allow them to decide on how their nation should be run by electing politicians who will represent them & that the politicians should do what’s best for all people and the nation as a whole. However it’s a power that the people should know how to use it in the right way to elect better and competent leaders, who will actually bring good changes to the nation and protect the nation from foreign threats, not a leader who will always lie to the citizens as a way to be elected, and later on in power failed to meet the goal that they promise to the people and always accept bribe for their own personal need.

@@codyshi4743 Democracy is not about "giving" powers to the people; it's about we the people seizing power for ourselves. It's not about finding some good masters to rule us with benevolence, but about forcing our masters to bend to our will, eventually overthrowing them. In this sense, democracy is still vibrant in the United States, not because people get to vote, but because people get to go on streets and participate in political empowerment; in this sense, democracy is inherently anti-government, and its natural conclusion is anarchy.

@@user-uh8fu3mb9l If you say we the people seizing power ourselves, but in the end, we the people would still need someone to be put into power, so they are the ones who will be doing our work and works that would benefit us the people who put them there. There can never be a true democracy like that of ancient Greece, in this modern world, because there always gonna needs to be one or a group of people being put in charge to ensure peace, stability, progress, and order in the society and the nation as a whole, but we can hope that those who are put in charge would do the work to ensure that the government is doing what would be beneficial to the majority of the people that would benefit in the present and the long run. I kind of agree and disagree about what you said about the US still being vibrant in democracy. Because like yeah we do have the right to go out and protest to demand change, but however, some people took this protest too way far and abused their rights, which led to many riots and destruction being taken place in some parts of the nation, which in turn created no safety and stability for business owners and the common citizens. Having the right to protest and express your political opinion is really important, but however, "with many rights also comes many responsibilities" and that is to know how to use them in the right way instead of using them in the wrong way, which in turn would harm the freedom of other individuals.

Sun Yat Sen(Founding father of modern China & Forerunner of the democratic revolution) once said: "An individual should not have too much freedom. A nation should have absolution freedom."

羅曉桐写的

人民不会忘记-罗晓桐

@@ericwong4213 I agree and tbh I might take this video down

愿世上没有战争

1989年，自由民主的幌子，毁灭了世界上所有的民主阵营。 极大的讽刺。这是高级黑，低级红的结合体。

当时中国很穷，毕竟那个年代自行车很少人拥有，家里有自行车算是小康家庭了

and their reason is terrorism. new place discovered for you: prison

笑死我了

首都卫士们还是太克制了

法西斯前途了

@@user-ei3yv1ve2u 你敢反对以色列？你说这话什么意思，是什么目的？谁指示你说的？

确实好似，目田一定不是威权的解药

思想配得上苦难

maybe REDpill isnt the best word to use for this

@@zhonghuaxiansheng can we get this man a true?

"socialist"

@@TheBigWall3284Yeah, I believe the workers should own and manage their means of production Which China doesn’t do lol Being Socialist doesn’t mean your support the red team, it’s an ideology

“Order prevails in Warsaw!” “Order prevails in Paris!” “Order prevails in Berlin!” Every half-century that is what the bulletins from the guardians of “order” proclaim from one center of the world-historic struggle to the next. And the jubilant “victors” fail to notice that any “order” that needs to be regularly maintained through bloody slaughter heads inexorably toward its historic destiny; its own demise.

It's more like in the middle. Because I really doubt the June 1 report that hardliners like Li Peng merely crafted to convince Deng to follow them instead of the moderates. Not every uprising is a CIA plot, sometimes the people are just really pissed off at the leaders.

@@user-uh8fu3mb9l Lol, the rioters attacked PLA soldiers, what were they supposed to do? Act like stoic philosophers?

​@@koikat3708 暴徒是暴徒，人民是人民。＂群众中有坏人＂，并不是空话

@@koikat3708 We may be asked, do we not find a tear, a sigh, a word for the victims of the people's wrath, for the National Guard, the mobile guard, the republican guard and the line? The state will care for their widows and orphans, decrees extolling them will be issued, their remains will be carried to the grave in solemn procession, the official press will declare them immortal, the European reaction in the East and the West will pay homage to them. But the plebeians are tormented by hunger, abused by the press, forsaken by the physicians, called thieves, incendiaries and galley-slaves by the respectabilities; their wives and children are plunged into still greater misery and the best of those who have survived are sent overseas. It is the right and the privilege of the democratic press to place laurels on their gloomy threatening brow. --Karl Marx, “The June Revolution” (1848)

收皮啦，光明正大的华人明白我们国家好事坏事都做过

​@@curtiswong7280han dogs gao nuzai

幽默老保

Did I? Maybe it wasn't approved, I'll fix that now.

@@zhonghuaxiansheng ah okay thanks

@@koikat3708 not there so idk what to tell you lmao

@@zhonghuaxiansheng welp

Creepy my comment was deleted too wasn't censored? was it?