补充，反驳 Jian Zhang 的回复： 我认为是有于敏结构的，以下是我找的外网资料中的原话： 1. “H-Bomb design of both USA and USSR was based on Teller-Ulam's designing structure, while China followed its unique design which was very different from Teller-Ulam's. “ errymath.blogspot.com/2015/02/first-generatioms-nuclear-weapons-from.html#.XIkkwyhKiUk 2. “The People's Republic of China detonated its first H-Bomb using a Yu-Deng design June 17, 1967 ("Test No. 6"), a mere 32 months after detonating its first fission weapon (the shortest fission-to-fusion development in history), with a yield of 3.31 Mt.“ military.wikia.com/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon 3. "Unlike the initial American, Soviet, and British tests, the first Chinese detonation-on October 16, 1964-used uranium-235 in an implosion-type configuration that yielded 20 kilotons. " www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-weapon/France 还有些是巴基斯坦防御网站上的我就不列举了。。毕竟中巴关系摆在那里。。 维基百科英文版里直接说中国用t-u构型是没有任何依据的。。在维基百科“History of the Teller-Ulam design” 中 提到 “The People's Republic of China detonated its first device using a Teller-Ulam design June 1967 ("Test No. 6"), a mere 32 months after detonating its first fission weapon (the shortest fission-to-fusion development yet known), with a yield of 3.3 Mt. Little is known about the Chinese thermonuclear program, however. ” 但没有任何来源链接证明 中国用 teller-ulam design. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Teller%E2%80%93Ulam_design 反而在维基百科介绍67年中国首次氢弹爆炸("Test No. 6")提到“but by 1960, the rift between the Soviet Union and China had become so great that the Soviet Union ceased all assistance to China.[2] Thus, the Number 6 test was indeed an independent endeavor,” 也就是说中国的这次氢弹爆炸来源于自身的努力(independent endeavor) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_No._6 能够所查的关于中国氢弹的结构很少。。所以很多人吧中国的氢弹结构归类于teller-ulam 结构型，但是，中国的第一颗氢弹设计结构理论上应该是不同的。
