💥 Why Amanda Knox Shows Guilty Knowledge 

any chance of doing Ed Walters on Oprah when confronted about his past crimes. UFO famous guy that Bruce Macabee said was legit with stereo images from a polaroid.

Do the Shane Dawson beauty community drama pleeeease

Very interesting video, thank you for taking the time out of your busy lives to do this channel

Today i'm trying to keep up with what you all are saying about her and keep getting pulled into watching all of your reactions to each other. I love the look Greg gets like he's the cat that's gotten the canary at times. Scott you look monotone and matchy to your background today not jaundiced but definitely sepia toned (like outside looks today, you match that (california). I think i see the reason that Mark is good for the wrap up (besides his charisma and maybe being more comfortable in front of a camera) and this is just my opinion but just watching between Greg Chase and Scott when you all are speaking the you can see thinking going on on each other's faces. Greg will get the bird and Chase will smile and Scott will nod. While Mark seems to just absorb at that time. Once you all are done picking it apart that's when the ball gets tossed to Mark to take it to score (which is when you three seem to have had your say and seem to just absorb what Mark is saying) Very fun to watch and learn and a way better way to learn about people who lie than to learn from the liars themselves. Thank you all for all your work on this and I look forward to more.

Since the COVID shutdown, I’ve had to record videos for my church services. I found The Behavior Panel a couple of weeks ago. After that, I had to watch my church services to try to figure out what my body language was saying that my words weren’t. It’s crazy-making! Lol! But I’m hooked on your analysis. Fascinating every time. Thanks for sharing!

(Scott here) Nailed it.

Exactly, I agree, I just miss the context to THIS interview HERE.

even to the police? The world expects her to talk, and to defend herself against an accusation of murder. I think she will be giving interviews, both public and private, for the rest of her life! And no one will be any wiser for it, some will think she's guilty and others that she is innocent. That's her life now and maybe she feels compelled to keep trying to persuade those unpersuadable!

@@annereidy7981 I never said she should not talk to the police. She is hanging herself by giving interviews to the media. Any attorney worth his salt would tell a client not to do that.

@@l.r.norris6519 sorry. I didn't put it very well, what I was trying to say is that once the police had made the accusation of murder it would be natural for her to see any interview as a chance to explain/exonerate herself, even though. as you can see from this, it will never happen, she just can't help but try. For her, the first interview was the police, and she is still trying to get that right. Second point, not related to the above, if you don't interview, that's also seen as a sign of guilt.

Seriously! They are fantastic!!

They only like it when they can hear their own opinions said back to them.

I love that! It's so good!!!!! 👍👍👍👍👏

I love all of them and I love that Mark shows a slightly different angle.

@@deemb9945 I am intrigued by the fact that you picked him out. Perhaps he is more used to communicating with the public at large. He reminds me of a very popular and friendly radio host.

Mark's awesome

@Inv Smith Podcast she lied!!! Patrick Lumumba spent 2 weeks in jail because she claimed he did it. He lost his business and had to move to a different country so that nobody could associate him with Meredith's murder.

@Inv Smith Podcast She said "see you later" to Patrick. She was just saying that to end the phone call. The cops thought that meant she would see Patrick later when they would get together at Meredith's apartment later to do a satanic ritual involving a human sacrifice.

@@pipinato His father was a well respected Prime Minister.

I think so too, but she does not appear to be a very likeable person...but then again...

Look up what happened to the guy who actually stayed in prison and took the fall for this, he's being taken care of now

@@bluetoad2668 Snort. Do you mean the guy whose DNA was all over the crime scene? The only DNA other than the victim's in the entire crime scene?

@@raff723 ok,so why is he out already and in a job for life? He's keeping quiet. How could there be no other DNA at the crime scene? It was shared accommodation.

(Scott here) Yay!

Thanks very much, Carol!

Each one of you Guys have Impressive Credentials.

@@genavieveshaw5654 that's why I'm watching. Profiling is very valuable :)

This panel is clearly part of the problem. They "detected guilt" in someone *after* she was already exonerated after a horrifically inept investigation, led by an idiot lead investigator who would be a natural fifth panel member.

@@thomas-marx Why? All Guede does is lie about the case. He's still claiming his ridiculous "Meredith invited me over and she was attacked by people (I can't name or I'd be sued for defamation) while I was in the bathroom, I tried to save her" lies.

@@thomas-marx 1) "significantly more information is shared other than what the court allowed or what was in the press." The court records are quite extensive: depositions, forensic result reports, pathology reports, police records, police notices, testimony transcripts, phone logs, texts, prison and phone intercepts, scientific articles, motivation reports, cell tower coverage etc. If you have a link to this "significantly more information", I'd like to see it. But I have to wonder why all this information is not in the official court records? 2) "And then you can come to your own conclusion" I came to my conclusion based on the evidence from the sources I listed above plus the opinions expressed by other experts such as Prof. Peter Gill and Prof. Greg Hampikian. I first believed in Knox s and Sollecito's guilt until it became clear, through educating myself on the evidence, that they were not guilty. 3) "My opinion is that he was an easy scapegoat and she is guilty as hell." Based on what evidence? If he was an 'easy scapegoat' then why did Knox tell the police, in writing, within a few hours that she doubted what she had said really happened and that her memories seemed 'unreal' and 'more like a dream' than reality? Why did she tell them the next day, in writing, that her mind was more clear and now she knew it never happened and that she "couldn't know who the real murderer is because I never went back to the cottage"? I suggest you read up on 'coerced-internalized false confessions'. 4) "I was a psych nurse for many years. And i got a good feel for being manipulated by masters. She's not that good, but she's good. She just has no feelings of guilt." Police tend to believe they are better than most when it comes to detecting lies but studies show they are no better than anyone else. I'm sure you do think you have 'a good feel for being manipulated' just as police think they're good at detecting deception despite the studies that say otherwise. OR they and you are examples of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Putting aside your belief that Knox is a manipulator, exactly what EVIDENCE places either Knox or Sollecito in the cottage that night, much less in Kercher's bedroom? Unless you can answer that, all the presumed "good feels" in the world are irrelevant.

Psychopathic tendencies. It's called manipulation. Not saying she did it, but she most definitely obstructed justice.

@@memi4586 "Psychopathic tendencies" ? There are psychopathic TRAITS, not "tendencies". By the way, Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, who is a cognitive psychologist, gave Knox a psychopathy test and he concluded that her "...psychopath score is extremely low" and that she is "actually not a psychopath...not a psychopath according to my test and (she) actually came out "strongly tipped toward the light side..." "... this is a scientifically valid test. It's not just like the Meyer Briggs which isn't." Dr Kaufman also said she "scored very high in faith in humanity" and scored "very, very low in psychopathy ". She also scored "very, very low (in) strategic exploitation and deceit." Note the last sentence: manipulation is "strategic exploitation and deceit". So a cognitive psychologist who tested Knox disagrees 100% with your claim. Dr. Kaufmann discusses this starting at 43:42 on The Psychology Podcast interview with her titled "The Real Amanda Knox". As for "obstructing justice", that's nonsense. Obstruction of justice is intentional. A coerced false confession is not obstruction of justice. Besides, she recanted the statement about Lumumba and going to the cottage in writing within hours. Are you aware that Knox's conviction for defamation against Lumumba was annulled last fall by the Italian Supreme Court because her right to a lawyer and an impartial interpreter were violated? She was granted a new trial which begins on April 10 and the ;prosecution cannot use those two signed statements from the interrogation because they were obtained illegally by the police.

I got an it was the moment reality finally set in kind of feeling. She seems to have completely disassociated from the scene, the crime and the victim. It might mean she can't believe she did it and has completely compartmentalized it, or it might actually be a coping mechanism. From the bloody footprint onwards, all the key details are like a vague dream that she's never quite connected to. Even as it was happening she was disconnected from it.... ignoring an unlocked door and a bloody footprint, asking her bf if she's crazy or not to be concerned etc. But that scream woke her from her slumber and made it real.

Ditto - she is odd and I’m not a fan.

She lied to the police that her employer or ex-employer was involved when he wasn’t. I haven’t heard her publicly apologize to him and his family, instead she blames the police. Regardless of what the police did and said, Knox owes the gentleman a public apology (in my opinion).

@@nomiddlenamenmn427 they settled on 40k. The cops did push her to make up things including a false confession. This discussion read too much into her expressions and not consider the facts of the case. It’s the premise of the show but if I know nothing else, I still find her believable. Her voice is genuine.

Yes, bcuz Amanda is NOT the LEAST bit sorry this poor MEREDITH was slaughtered!!!! Amanda is luv'n Alllllllll HER camera time & Her "perceived" RIVAL is dead!!! Wow, what luck AMANDA thinks! 😡

@@WWG1WWGA I don’t feel sorry for the dead either. They no longer feel themselves. If one is alive and suffer, that’s different! Imagine you on trial for horrible crime you didn’t do. Having to fight it for years to gain freedom. Why would you have feeling to spare for others but your own fate! I d i o t?!

She does it to buddy up with the interviewer and to make them believe she is giving them the 'unedited' story, letting them in on info because she wants them to believe she trusts only them. that they are special, then she can manipulate them (imo).

Satan inside her is happy.

@@a-nannymouse6742 listen MOUSE, your "friend" is a PSYCOPATH!! A modern day satanist WITCH. Even AMANDA has just become AWARE of this TRUTH & she is in WONDER!!! of her newfound satanist spirit friends!!! She is clearly IMPRESSED at THEIR power!! Better believe it. Have YOU EVER wished someone dead? 🤔 ASK AMANDA

Why? What evidence convinces you of her guilt?

No one mentions Meredith Kercher. It seems strange that Amanda studied Italian, went to Italy to take classes taught in Italian, yet she didn't understand Italian 🤔 nor could she speak Italian. I don't believe a word that comes out of her mouth😶

(Scott here) LOL

There is a reason this kind of analysis is not allowed as evidence in a trial. The same reason a polygraph isn't. I'ts not science. Interesting, sure, but nothing that should be used to convict someone of a crime.

@@Mawa991 body sign language is a useful tool in interrogation & communication and always conveys something to the audience. It's a part of discovery, not part of evidence in court. That's not it's purpose.

@@sjm7518 @SJM Greg, Chase and Scott are very clear at the start of the video on this point. Greg highlighted the value of body language analysis as a tool to inform the direction an interrogation. And a skilled interrogation can result in a confession. Detecting deception in the Knox interview is therefore quite a far stretch from proclaiming her as guilty of murder.

@Marvin Seifert The fascination is in the 'what' and 'why' of the analysis and learning from four expert perspectives on the body language displayed in the interview. Given that they are very clear about not trying to establish or comment on guilt or innocence, I think maybe you have attributed sufficient personal emotional attachment to the case for the point of the analysis to have bypassed you. Showing signs of deception is not the same as showing signs of murder, it merely helps an interrogator to decide how to extract maximal information from a subject.

Lol ikr. Same here.

I agree! I don’t know that Amanda killed her but I can almost 100% guarantee she really did not like Meredith. She talks about her and her death like someone she really had distaste for.

It's because she has low empathy it's an autistic trait, which roughly means, empathetic, but low res. psychopaths have no empathy at all. Autistics just don't display very well and commonly are too distracted to empathize which is why theyre so hated. Becuae the vast mjority of people can't figure them out.

She said was sexually assaulted before forensics confirmed it.

When people don’t know a fact firsthand it’s normal speech to say “I understand that” or “it’s my understanding that”... so why would that be suspicious? If you don’t believe her, okay, but the meaning of those words is straightforward.

@@mintwally7200 Yet at the police station she was ringing up all her friends telling them loudly that she had found the body. She crudely told Meredith's friends, 'she f^%king bled to death' and that 'she had her throat slit' before even the forensics and pathologists had determined cause of death. Her playing innocent shows just how wicked and manipulative she is. She fooled Mark, for example, into believing the body really was found wrapped in a blanket and in the closet. He said he saw no look of recognition there. Of course not! The body had been dragged away from the closet and wrapped in a sheet covered by a duvet.

@Kris G. I see you had a broader point here, sorry for nitpicking.

True that!

You must have watched that made for TV movie on LifeTime. In that movie Knox was in the apartment when the murder happened, that was fiction, she was in Sollecito's room when it happened. Patrick was Black and married to a white woman. The cops were 100% sure he did it.

after a cop has investigated many murders he watched people do a grief reaction. Jon Benet Ramsey's parents did a grief reaction the cops thought was not a good one. This made them suspicious but you need more than a subjective feeling, or lack thereof to prove a murder.

even After 4 hours of investigating them her boyfriend Raffael’s admits that she left the house in the night , and she told him to lie about it , what makes him to say that’s , anyway I don’t think he’s an innocent too

🤣🍸

@22:06 , for anyone wanting the exact TC

(Scott here) Thank you. 🙂

Thanks!

@@chasehughesofficial hey, I didn't learn of you guys till a month or so ago. I've been enjoying your videos when I can take the time to hear them. I bought a book of yours. I did have a comment on this case I'd love for you to consider... :)

That's not ringing a bell. I'll have to check my pictures. I'm a picture NUT

@Kdot oo you almost got through a statement without being racist... so close

YESSSS!!! Not nearly as much though. That other chick had that look ALL the time where as with Amanda it’s only at certain times.

@@heathernikki5734 wheesht that was a million years ago..

@@heathernikki5734 🤣

Same. She was wrongfully set free. They Italians disliked her because they knew she did it.

What do you know? I've never understood how people dare to judge her as if they had been part of the interrogations.

@@onetrickpony2236 It's called an opinion, apparently you think only you should be allowed to have one. Hoe arrogant if you!

@@onetrickpony2236 It's because these people don't like her - or more precisely, they have this fixed idea of her and what she's really like, and that's who they dislike, distrust or even hate. I notice how so many people project certain qualities onto her - things like she's a spoiled rich girl, but her family isn't rich at all and it doesn't sound like she had any more of a spoiled life than all these other ordinary middle and lower middle class people in America, or other countries. Another thing they focus on is her looks and how she manipulates people with her looks etc. Personally, I think she was attractive back then when this case first broke, but nothing special. And nor do I think she really capitalized on her good looks as she could have, and I've seen other women do (and even women not as attractive as she was). I just don't feel jealous of her looks but I sense that many are jealous and seem to resent that. Really, she just seems like many students or young people staying abroad or on holiday abroad. I sense that a lot of the people who seem to hate her or are convinced she's guilty, have little experience of being abroad, haven't met a lot of expats, haven't lived abroad as a foreigner etc.

Agreed

She’s living with other individuals who are expected to pull their own weight and clean their own messes. She helps Rafael because she’s romantically involved with him and wants to care for him more than one would expect for a friend.

@@zesiro1826 she cares for rafi because he’s male, she’s not interested in female friends

I didn’t understand Amanda at the police station doing cart wheels, while she waited to be questioned it’s on video!

The mop story is ludicrous. So after returning to her home she found the door open, blood on the floor, faeces in the toilet and then grabbed a mop and went back to boyfriend's flat to mop!

I can't get past it either...the devil is in the details.

She saw the bloody footprint after the shower. I believe the "blood everywhere" comment was about Meredith's room?

I've seen people tell stories like that before. One of those was an extremely manipulative person but others were not. It's still a manipulative way of talking, but in a way that I see people do subconsciously some times.

I can see how she completely weirded out the Italians. I believe her father when he said he was worried about her studying abroad as he felt she was too immature. She seems like a pretty normal person now, which in itself is odd.

Just because she lacks empathy doesn't mean she's guilty.

And actually if you look at the physical evidence. It points to Rudy Guede. Do research before judgement. Word of mouth and opinions is just that. Rudy's DNA was discovered at the crime scene. and he admitted to breaking into the apartment. So keep making judgements about people with 0 physical evidence... see where that gets you, js 💁‍♂️

Lol 😂 Stephanie Lazarus eyes 👀. Oh that’s good 👍

After being questioned repeatedly for 7 years, over and over and over, why do you find it strange that she would have statements memorized? Who wouldn't? You have to remember that according to Chase, in the panel's first Amanda video, they are PRETENDING that this was one of her very first interviews right after the rape/murder occurred, not an interview 7 years later. Quote from Chase: "We're gonna pretend like we're the ones that watched this video right after everything happened." So of course their results are going to be very different from what they would be if they were not pretending that the video is something that it is not.

@@catspajamas2961This is pretty much what she said in her email home 2 days after the murder.

​@@lizclark5229 well bar the statements needed to pretend that she knew it was a neck wound and that the body was moved. Dropping those unknown details into her story of events is somewhat the opposite of reassuring.

I couldn't agree with you more!!!

Exactly!!! LIE number 1 😏😌

Sounds to me that AK was obviously much more bothered by the screaming woman than the dead body in the apartment.

Yes! I think she’s a psychopath.

I bet she was really screaming about the unflushed toilet! 😉 I know, right?? The dead roommate was no big deal. The other one was screaming so LOUD!! 🤔

Ya think? 😉

Everything about her is off.

at least in lacking of empathy and decency.

Maybe it has to do with the killer has remained in the same house, unlike someone who would break in and run away they are forced to deal with looking at the body, or seeing the face of the person. That may be something they don't want to be reminded of. Im trying to remember where I read it, but there was something about hiding the face, the eyes in a murder not just for concealment but maybe an emotional attachment, possibly sex crime. You are probably right with preparing to discard the body, but I imagine it would be too difficult to do because someone was bound to come back soon. Maybe there is too much going on in and around where they lived. So they sat for sometime contemplating what they could do, in the end they just covered her up and pretended to find her.

Shit that's a good point. A random invader would have no reason to hide it, but if they knew her they'd have reason to hide her

She wasn't found in a cupboard. It's just Knox's narrative to try and look innocent, like she knew nothing, and still doesn't.

She is married, recently. I can’t imagine sleeping in the same bed with her. I couldn’t stand to listen to the entire interview. The hubby seems a lot like her.

@Nelly Vieira First, I apologize if I offended you somehow. I went into this completely blind and only made observations based on what I saw in the video. I didn’t watch any of the trials and never heard of the case. I don’t see anything wrong with having an opinion based on the little evidence presented in the video especially since I never expressed any opinion on her guilt or innocence nor did I insult her. Only said it was strange. Not much different than what this panel did and is exactly what they said they were going to do. Only commenting on the behavior picked up from the video except they watched pervious recordings for their baselines and not referring to any evidence or even the trial for that matter. Only at the end did they even mention anything about court or the outcome.

(Scott here) Thank you for that. Yeah, it took me 20 minutes to stop vomiting when I first heard her saying all that. Good Lord.

Flat affect?

👌🏼🙏🏼

Right after the murder she was seen laughing and making faces to her bf in the police station. She was not horrified at all. She didn't attend the visual held for Meredith but in interviews she insists she was her friend.

Could be something autistic?

I agree. Knox's language and behavior indicates that she found Filomena's reaction to either be 'annoying' or overtly dramatic, which speaks volumes to her lack of empathy and inability to connect emotionally to other's. It's as though she genuinely cannot understand why Filomena was so emotional and thus screaming hysterically, yet it was just discovered that their roommate was brutally murdered, and IN THEIR HOME. Amanda's body language, repetition in quoting Filomena and her reaction, and the tone and manner in which she reports it indicates a genuine lack of emotional connectivity, making Knox unable to tolerate, let alone understand why Filomena behaved as such, and this is merely one example of her detached emotional state. This complete inability to understand human emotions and emotional behaviors is a hallmark of psychopathy. Psychopaths merely cannot understand or relate to other's emotional responses to sadness, fear, empathy, or anxiety, as they themselves are unable to experience these emotions. Most develop the ability to mimic these emotions, and they understand the social construct, but not the fundamental reason behind it.

@@alabama.worley You nailed it !!!!

@@alabama.worley this makes sense, and I agree that AK has this type of personality, and it obviously got her into a lot of trouble, but does this make her the murderer? could it be that the enduring mystery of this case is that AK had this kind of 'dissociative' personality and found herself in the middle of this situation? Obviously from the get-go she was 'on trial' because of her odd behavior. Her mother seems like a kook, and then there was a strange family dynamic, her parents were separated when she was an infant, and then her mother later marries a much younger man and has three more children by him (all girls). Amanda is this strange combination of driven, studious, creative, intelligent and even INTELLECTUAL and bookish person, combined with a giddy, childish, almost 'wanton' side. On top of that she was and is very beautiful, so there is the potential for 'high combustion' here! she very well could have hated Meredith, and no doubt Meredith found her very annoying, maybe impossibly so. But does that mean AK MURDERED her? I am inclined to think she is innocent, because, IMO, even though she acts goofy and inappropriate, her actions are not the actions of a killer. Unless she is just absolutely schizoid, which I suppose is possible but then we should have more indications of that in other areas of her life. When she makes the comment in the video about Filomena screaming (and seems to be annoyed by it), I sort of 'agree' with her, because that would annoy the crap out of me also. People react differently in these situations. I think Amanda was and is a very self-absorbed person, who lives life like it is a movie and she is the lead actress. She is not 'naturally empathetic,' she wanted to be a creative writer, not a nurse or social worker. Probably, for her, the whole unfolding tragedy of MK's murder, the investigation, interviews, etc. were a novel series of events and she was perhaps actually enjoying the attention and novelty on some level. She was not naturally empathetic and had not learned sufficiently how to 'fake it.' Next time around I bet she will be sure to scream and cry and act in the socially appropriate way. As I have said in other comments, maybe it is not that she is lying, but that she doesn't know HOW to lie! It astonishes me that people will think she is lying and then they watch the interviews with Rudy Guede and find him believable. My theory is that he is 'believable' precisely because he is a highly skilled liar! He is smooth as silk. Judging from what we know about his life story, he probably learned to lie at a very young age, and lived by his wits and lied on a daily basis, as a drug dealer, petty 'cat burglar,' police informant (or all of the above). Amanda, on the other hand, grew up privileged and lived in this 'bubble' (until her arrest for MK's murder). Right up until the moment they put the cuffs on her, and even AFTER that, it didn't occur to her that they considered her a suspect (she thought they were just going to detain her a few days as a 'formality' for her protection). A shrewd killer does not act this way. A shrewd killer does not lead the police to the murder scene, a shrewd killer does not stage a break-in but forget to steal something to make it look plausible. A shrewd killer doesn't do splits and cartwheels when they know they are being watched by the police. You have to try to get into the mindset of someone who committed this crime. Unless, as I admitted above, AK is a full-blown psychopath (as of course many people believe). If that really is the case, she is one of the most remarkable ones EVER, considering that she mastered Italian (in her prison term as a model prisoner), and then RETURNED to Italy to give a speech for The Innocence Project, showing really superlative poise and courage in even attempting to do this, after what had transpired. There was no need at that time for some over-the-top elaborate 'ruse' to 'cover' her - she had already been exonerated, she was free and clear. Talk about returning to the scene of the crime (if we suppose she is guilty)! It just doesn't add u for me, so at this writing, I am INCLINED to say she is innocent. But it does still seem that she is hiding something, that something is nagging her conscience.

@@charlescushing1 well said. I agree. I think she may be on the spectrum also..

Thank you, Nancy. We just ignore the negative ones. If they use bad language or are trolls, we delete the bad language and send the trolls to the “Hide use from channel” pile and report them. Thank you for the nice words. 🙂❤️

@@a-nannymouse6742 There is a difference between objective (what you can observe) and subjective (internal factors that cannot be observed) behavior. Body language analysis only focuses on what can be observed. They are remaining impartial and only looking at objective behaviors , and it is crucial to remove personal bias and only focus on objective and measurable behavioral cues. behavior is an action, we can see the action happened, and based off of data points we can determine the likely function and/or cause of the behavior. So it’s not that they’re missing anything like that, but they’re just using the information in the clips, nothing else.

@@a-nannymouse6742 They are not saying she is guilty. They are saying she is being deceptive. 1. She forgets to mention in this interview, that she took a shower in that bloodied bathroom before going to Rafael's house. 2. She admitted to the police that she did know Rudy, the man who finally served time for the crime. (Remember in the previous video Scott opining that the smirk when she talks about the poop in the toilet could be disgust at the person who left it there as she probably knows who it was?) 3. She said to the police that she had not seen a need to tell Rafael about the state the dorm was in and she stayed in his house a while before telling him and then they called Filomena to tell her. Filomena contradicted her statement and said Amanda called her while on her way to Rafael's house. Police checked the call co-ordinates and they affirmed Filomena's story. At the very least Amanda's story is suspect. If an expert tells me she is being deceptive, then I get even more confidence in my gut feeling.

@@a-nannymouse6742 Thank you for this! These were the words I was looking for I totally agree with you. Thanks

Story, yes. Body language, no.

Most people who speak only one language do not know that time and commitment over a long period is required. They think because she had been a student for a few weeks she was fluent, which is really narrow minded in my opinion

Very good point

Another Patriot who was craving the Foxy Four!

@ Kay-I totally get why! LOL! I’m from London, so when these videos get up-loaded I get the notification super early and watch it first thing before I start work! 🤣

@@traveljunkie1324 I heard some great advice years ago: 'Be care what you fill your yourself with before work in the morning, because that will set the tone for your morning'. That applies to breakfast choice, internet, TV, interactions with others, etc. In your case, I guess you went to work and spotted about six liars before your first coffee!

Ah. Yes.

Kay Marham-haha! Love it! 🤣

The rumor is that HRC got her off because otherwise HRC would have the politically unpopular duty to extradite her. Recall that Trump was supporting Amanda with money and public comments -- she later turned on Trump and supported HRC.

@@stereoreviewx Rudy Guede was convicted for being an accomplice in a murder with other participants. Read the sentence, not the Knox PR material

1marcelo Yes Rudy Guede “killed”a body that was already dead drugged and killed by Amanda and Raffaele who framed Rudy

@@DucksDeLucks What is HRC?

I agree 👍

unicornenthisiast | YES! I agree 100%

I can see her being passive aggressive

I worked with someone like that once.

Also have God give you a gut feeling of who’s guilty. That’s what the Italian detective said

These guys are lobbying for that.

same feeling i got

Yes, Isn't Philomena the roommate that is super clean? I was going to mention in the first video about this. Amanda gave me the impression that she was proud of being CLEAN herself, but was jealous of Philomena being even CLEANER than she was. She had no problem talking about Meredith's room being a mess, but she seemed to MOCK how much cleaner Phil was than herself. And then later when she's describing Phil's reaction to seeing inside the bedroom door, Amanda seemed to go out of the way to detail how 'over-reactive' Phil was, almost rolling her eyes about it. Me thinks she doesn't care for Philomena!

@@suzum5689 No Amanda was seen as a slob, she used to leave poo in the toilet without flushing! It was a cause of conflict with Meredith who was more house proud.

@@PatriciaKelly-gz7vg ohh. thanks. How did you hear that??

@@suzum5689 I’m sorry I can’t remember the exact source, I’ve read a fair bit about the case.

The interview is certainly very odd. I suspect she was naive/ irresponsible youth and that the incident severely traumatized her... so possibly I'm looking at Arrested Development. Also I wonder if the odd way of describing things has something to do with the initial interviews being done in a foreign language... but mostly I think she spun up this whole story to elicit sympathy for herself so she does not go back.

I suppose one could be a sociopath, psychopath, narcissist etc... yet still not committed the crime they are charged/suspected of committing. Hmmmmmm......

That's what the physical evidence is for. She is guilty.

IKR!

Agreed 💯

Yep, and we can all make that face. Who cares

I like and appreciate that they do explain themselves. As they said, there’s a reason why behaviour analysis’s can’t be used in court. It is a touchy subject. A lot of people watch things like this then think they’re some sort of expert...which is dangerous when often times even the actual experts themselves are wrong.

@@supernova11711 because the cases been tried multiple times and the killer is sentenced. Yet these guys can’t find her narrative believable. It’s killing me.

@@MugenTJ Well, just because she didn’t do it doesn’t mean she isn’t being deceitful somehow. That’s the thing...this stuff isn’t overly helpful and they certainly can’t be used in court. She could be hiding something that has nothing at all to do with the case but might be acting a certain way because of that. I watch these videos for entertainment purposes only. The best ones are actually when we know they’re guilty because that way it at least always seems to fit lol

@@supernova11711 the point of being the main suspect is not to detect if the person is hiding one or two minor detail. If these guys apply the same comments on the killer vs the innocent, that’s alarming to me and make their case weak.