😱 What a speed? I tested new

Подписаться 2,2 тыс.

50% 1

✅ To use SciSpace visit www.typeset.io...
I tested one of the trending GPTs on the GPT store, developed by SciSpace against to the newest and the most advanced model of ChatGPT, ChatGPT 4 Omni.
Both are doing for finding academic sources now. Watch for more...
BUT HERE'S THE PROMPT I USED IN VIDEO (you can modify and use it as per your wishes):
"Give me the list 5 articles published after 2015 on the impact of climate change on human mobility. Put the results on a neatly organised table. Do your best since it is vital for my academic project."
******************************
I had also created a couple of dedicated tutorials on SciSpace, which you could find the links below. SciSpace features a very specific academic literature review tools on its website.
Tutorials on SciSpace:
1. ChatGPT for Academics: How to Write a Literature Review with AI (Full Tutorial 2024)
• ChatGPT for Academics:...
2. Do FASTER Literature Review with this NEW AI Tool (NOT #ChatGPT), Step-by-step Easy Guide
• Do FASTER Literature R...
******************************
Want to learn Pro AI Tools for Academic Success?
Check Our 3-hour Webinar (Participants Love it):
offers.lennart...
With Prof. Lennart Nacke, we covered different strategies, tactics and prompt samples, as well as clear use cases of AI tools with live demos.
#chatgpt4o #openai #chatgpt #chatgpt4 #chatgptsolutions #chatgptplus #ailearning #education #artificialintelligence #scispace

Опубликовано:

2 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 5

@vugar_ibrahimov 4 месяца назад

Want to learn Pro AI Tools for Academic Success? Check Our 3-hour Webinar (Participants Love it): offers.lennartnacke.com/ai-academics-webinar-recording With Prof. Lennart Nacke, we covered different strategies, tactics and prompt samples, as well as clear use cases of AI tools with live demos.

@MathAtFA 4 месяца назад

Can you do us (researchers) a favor: ask for 100 most relevant original articles (not reviews) and count the percentage of hallucinations? If you know how to adjust prompt to get clickable links, this should not be too hard, just mildly time consuming. It will be better approximation to systematic review then just checking top 1. Thank you.

@vugar_ibrahimov 4 месяца назад

Thank you for your comment and suggestion. I think 100 will be too much, I will definitely consider doing another tutorial on ChatGPT-4o cince it is faster and generates better results. And you are right I already tweaked the prompt and ChatGPT can give clickable links.

@MathAtFA 4 месяца назад

@@vugar_ibrahimov Systematic review with just 100 references is actually pretty small. My problem with AI tools, like chatPDF (which is supposed to use chatGPT inside) is this: I asked it to summarize 25 papers and it did 4 and then simply stopped. I had to paste the same prompt for each paper separately to get the job done.

@vugar_ibrahimov 4 месяца назад

I meant 100 is too much for any AI tool (for now), of course not for academic literature review. I would never ask any tool to give me the summary of 25 articles at once. They mostly miss the huge parts of the papers. I even trained a custom GPT for that and it failed to summarise multiple sources at once. And would never rely on the summary of multiple papers and I should check each result in a conventional way from the original source. The best and more safe scenario is just upload one article/paper, analyse, double check and then move to another one.