Places being dirty has nothing to do with so called air pollution, my home town has been described as quit high according to the WHO, I do wonder if anyone from the WHO has ever visited, the town may be dirty, but the air is very clean.
Watching from Guwahati city in India /Mother Kamakhya temple City/ Every day 3/4 thousand people visit this temple /Even English people /Australia people / Amarican People this temple
places being dirty is influenced by the behaviour of people who live there( and sadly by some of the people who have moved to UK...spitting in the streets for example)
Liverpool isn't as Dirty as it used to be in the 70's and 80's i don't think it's fair including it on here the city is full of Tourists these days and is classed as the capital of the north
One thing that many of these places have in common is a deficiency of wide open spaces and deciduous trees. I'm assuming that's why London is not on the list, as it has plenty - as do Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds, Bradford, Birmingham and Edinburgh! The latter has also made a conscious effort to limit high-rise developments too, which will affect air quality as pollution is less liklely to become trapped in these areas; although there will obviously be good and bad pockets everywhere. The positive air-filtering effect that trees and other managed plants have upon carbon dioxide and other harmful pollutants - especially within densely built-up and high-rise localitikes simply cannot be overstated.
@@Bingo-zd1gp I thought it was being read by a piece of software, but listening again I think I might be wrong. Certainly it's not being read with a pleasant and natural narration.
