10 Mind Blowing Aviation Moments Caught on Camera 

16000 feet is pretty high for a regular skydive, usually its closer to 12-14K feet, so he had plenty of time to regroup..

I watched the dropping plane again , and indeed , awesome actioncam!!. The tricks while their plane just drops almost to 0

If I remember this story properly, it was the divers fault this happened as they all piled out at once and caused the plane to stall by increasing drag at such a slow speed.

Amen brother thank you

74gear did a good breakdown on that. Took him 2-3 tries if I remember correctly

The G's he would have experienced is crazy

Probably not.​@@BrazyUK

his allowing a VMC roll in the first place is also unbelievable

SOUTH AFRICAN skills training for you at its best

I would never.

Definitely not a military trained rotary wing aviator.

Don't say anything derogatory about South Africans

@@MrSimonw58 ok Karen, TY

@@MrSimonw58 Shut up Meg.

To be fair from a pilots point of view the cables are almost invisible ... but still completely and utterly incompetent ! . He/she should if known where they were landing ahead of time . . . . He she they them it lgbtqt+!++ or whatever other genders they have nowadays 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤪👈

I was gonna say the same... it's my beautiful Budapest 😍

Absolutely Budapest! Malev used to complete the same demonstration flight. I got to witness their 767, August of 1993.

americans and geography…

@@generalrodcocker1018 😂

His viewers now probably believe that Budapest, the capital of Hungary is located in Bulgaria 😂

And you might wanna remember to check the wind direction before deciding on which edge of the field you want to start 😅

@KanjiasDev I hear you. I used to fly early in the morning and see them out there. They had a few running into power lines.

​@KanjiasDev best not to launch or land close to building tower powerlines etc.

He said near

Maybe in an alternate universe it is

Ssshhhh! It's a SECRET facility in a secret location.

Um...he never implied it was? First, he said "Near Area 51". Second of all, on the map that was shown, the red marker (which indicates where this took place at or near) was clearly situated in Nevada. You could even see the dots that signify as the state border that the marker was within Nevada.

I believe that whole area is called bumfuk Egypt

If I have a parachute there's no way I'm staying in the plane.

Love this comment 😂

You need the good old Bell.

They even got a big bang on arrival 😅 Ok but seriously the pilot did a good job recovering from that!

And now the whole country is crashing with Biden at the wheel.

🤣🤣😂😂

(*Affect)

@@daveogarf no spell check. My device is a paper weight. No # check

Have done and this is accurate.

@@Spooky_Platypus The turning vertical high G thrust spray over water is just awesome.

@ 10:45 planes, trains and automobiles….

👍

What?

@@TheAnonymousOnes he announced the pilot stunts as being performed in Bulgaria (in the announcement at the beginning of the video.) He later explained the flights were being performed in Budapest.

And we all know that Budapest is in Hungary 😊

@@sawolaja65 At least we should

@@sawolaja65 Not in 'murica they don't. You'll be lucky if you can find someone that can point to their country on a map.

Maybe because they edit it? Use your brain?

@@imana3808 I think your copyright lawyer just threw up. The fact that you wrote that shows your ignorance.

@@imana3808 sorry.. I just realized you’re an attached account for the guys that stole the video originally. You know the people that understand how RU-vid works can find your fake accounts, right.

@@wcolby fake accounts? Buddy I make my own content. And it gets way more attention than your attention seeking ass

You'll love it when he's the President again soon!

@@12345678bobsternot gonna be trump 😂

@@12345678bobstersay what? Why are you talking about politics here? 😅

@@Spooky_Platypus Americans gonna American.

@@Jmvars hey dont stick all americans in with the loons that support the cheetoh 🤣

That is very inaccurate

The ejected pilots fell safely he meant

You are overcomplicating it with layers and layers of speculation. The pilot simply let it get too slow. There is ample aileron control, and you could turn both engines off and still have control of airspeed and roll, you do not let it get too slow. There may have been some amount of elevator and/or rudder blanking. It was pure pilot error

@@jayc4283 I agree with pilot error, since he/she is ultimately in control - however, there are factors outside of that - such as the massive build-up of weight. That's like, almost, 1000lbs of human all on one side of an aircraft that may not be configured for it. But I agree.

@@GuildofThunder The airplane was still wings-level even with the weight on one side. So there was adequate aileron authority. Trimming would not have changed anything, merely relieved the pilot from having to maintain a control force on the yoke. Also, cross wind is no factor when the airplane is not about to touch down. And all the jumpers were aft of the wing and would have little to no affect on the airflow at the wing. The open door and jumpers protruding into the airstream would have increased drag substantially, maybe not beyond the engines' capability but more than the pilot anticipated.

@@petep.2092 Ill go with that, but I would say, however...without seeing the attitude indicator (artificial horizon) we cant be 100% sure the wings were level. Though, with that said, ill say chances are good they were (wings level) since they were evacuating jumpers. So...I can see your point quite clearly. All in all, its still 'epic' that the pilot was able to recover all the same.

Came here to say the same thing

If they were to do the stunt again, it would have to say Biden 2024. 😂😂😂

Your TDS will keep you warm for years to come

Are these moments a showcase of pilot expertise or risky behavior?

Fore and aft stick response is reversed - push forward to gain altitude, and pull back to lose altitude.

The pitch control is not reversed if the pilot flies with reference to the lead airplane only, but is reversed if he flies with reference to the horizon, which he needs to do on breaking up the formation.

The sound barrier is 762 mph so yes , that's possible. F16 can fly 1300 mph .

@@larryc8607 Flying stunts at that speed is both risky and unnecessary. And they didn't. Just check the footage.

Add the privilege of seeing the Blue Angels several times. I'm always amazed at the skill and technology Involved. As an over taxed dude in a blue state, the demonstrations help with an attitude adjustment. GOD BLESS.

You're right. Lucky it wasn't a delorian.

​@@larryc8607That's the stated speed but I don't buy it have you ever watched them up close

Here in South Africa if you are a paraglider or skydiver and there was an irregularity during a jump/flight that could have caused a greater accident you have to report it to the CAA (Civil Aviation Association) failing to do so and a bystander makes a call could cost you, your licence. So what happened here at Mossel Bay was that the pilot had an intermittent prop torque issue he was still monitoring, nothing severe enough to warrant scrubbing the jump when the right-handed prop violently feathered itself, throwing the plane and the jumpers. The pilot landed safely, the last jumper was thrown out the open door because he couldn't hold on any longer and bailed. On the ground, the pilot got all the jumper's details, and they made a collective report to the CAA. Cause... Mechanical failure due to part defect. Nobody was held liable.

Maybe they called a Code Brown!

If there's anything that goes wrong on a plane it needs to be reported to the FAA or there will be huge fines

Hey we just saw our pilot and friends nose dive and disappeared into the clouds. Probably all dead… let’s still do our stupid little tricks and shit.

@@johnellisonarmadilloconstr7966 Well, they were up at 16,000 ft. and in good condition. What do you think they should have done instead of "stupid little tricks and shit?" and why?

The pitch control is not reversed if the pilot flies with reference to the lead airplane only, but is reversed if he flies with reference to the horizon, which he needs to do on breaking up the formation.

These moments spark debate about safety regulations and risk management in aviation.

The plane wasn’t an F-111, it was a Soviet MiG-23 “flogger”. If you ever wondered how the pilot of an F-111 ejects, the entire cockpit ejects, not the seats. If you wanted to see for yourself look for F-111 ejection.

yea

There was a YF-23, an experimental aircraft that was up against the YF-22, in which the YF-22 won the comeptition, whichlater gave us Lockheed Martin's F-22 Raptor A little nerd story for you to enjoy Haha

unless you actually belly land on the river then its cool

@@handlesarethelaststrawiquit They didn't exactly belly land but we'd have collectively OOOFED if they did, lol! 🌊✈🌊

@@isabellind1292 I think the reference is to the US Air flight that belly landed on the Hudson River in January 2009 after both engines ingested Canadian geese and failed soon after takeoff from La Guardia airport.

@@petep.2092 Yes, I'm just saying it did not drop vertically out of the sky and hit the water. (*Canada geese).😊👍👍