10 Most Expensive Destroyers In The World 

Wrong Video wrong time mate

0

Jq

botttt

@@jasiahmascarenas9387 isn't like 90% of comments?

🤣🤣🤣 lookin for that top secret stuff, huh ?

and you didn't even get into the technical problems with it either.

same

I thought the same lol You can get more capable cruisers for that much

Man If we make same destroyer in china then it will be made in less than a billion dollar😂😂😂but dont consider the quality then.

Better start saving your coupons , then !!!!

@@gerardvinet8448 I KEEP ALL MY DESTROYER PURCHASE COUPONS IN A SHOE BOX UNDER MY BED!!!! THANK YOU VERY, VERY, MUCH!!!!!!

'Zumwalt'. Named after Admiral Elmo Zumwalt. Not sure if the Zumwalt class as ammo yet, or if it ever will.

Its like 14,000 tonnes, and is geared towards surface-surface combat. its not even a destroyer anymore its a heavy cruiser

Good for ramming speed , lol !!!!

Indian destroyer looked the nicest IMO

@@bradz9413 Hobart class would be 900 mill if made in India. Fuck we bought there trains ,,,

Aussies are ripped off in a way that rest of the western world can not imagine.

@@hujiaming6151 I have a few contacts there, it is sad the conversion rate is shit

Named after the youngest Admiral

The 55 has a rail gun???? I dont think so unless you mean its on rails?? That would be a great mix up if china hacked the US and just seen the words RAIL GUN, after a quick refit has put there deck gun on a ten foot rail then rolled it out all proud that they had first rail gun on a destroyer before those pesky yanks and on a quarter the defence buget, in fact the chinese were that proud of the acievment they put the full price of the new rail which in dollars only cost $1000 bucks whereas the US couldnt build a rail gun for less than $1 billion dollars on there stolen data by the chinese!!! Another win for communism before realising there huge blunder 2 years later when a real rail gun destroys 3 type 055's in a row during WW3!!! "O SHIT THATS WHAT THEY MEANT ABOUT A RAIL GUN!!!!! GET THAT FUCKING DESIGNER DOWN ERE NOW SO WE CAN STRAP HIM TO THE SIDE OF THE SHIP THEN RAM THOSE FUCKING COCKY SMART ARSED YANKS!!!" said captain SweetnSour to mid shipman Prawntoast!!

china ships were assembled using GI steel sheets! chinese were such copycats...even their latest J31 were a perfect copy of F35 lightning!

@@daianzapanta6411 but it depend on the quality which mean J-31 is match to nearly all the 4th gen aircraft but useless against 5th

Most countries have R&D budgets. China has Espionage and tech theft budget instead.

Well Yeah!!!!!!! they steal the Tec and plans then build them ....

@@incredible_facts Thank you very much and keep up the good work, guys.

Follow the German lead, phasing out PCs for corvettes; the little tubs can't carry the power or weapon loadout 2 face today's emerging deathblizzard.

Hmmm so you see a Chinese destroyer and call them allies? Yes trolls will scream 'most powerfull'. But that is proven fact propaganda, lol! Guess you missed that video of US sailors down on their knees crying and calling for Commander Mommy? Two US warships captured without a shot fired by a ... goatherding 'navy'? And you think the world missed it all? ;-) Remember my 7yo called Avengers assemble and beat Captain Kirk. Even the most famous US captain cannot even win against a child, lmao!

In your mind

@@joshuaanagbonu5632 In my mind too, pal.

U need a new prime Minister get rid of the horses face commie. tell her Mr ed wants his teeth back

Mate, your government should try to order some hunter class frigates, the ANZAC frigates are getting old. The Hobart class destroyers would defs be too expensive for nz.

NZ navy is fine, why waste so much money on things that would never be used in combat also might want to look up what a commie is

Japan's culture has really mellowed out since WW2, so they are no where near as aggressive as they were pre ww2. So unless they can magically start popping out Coordinators and Gundams, they are really a remement of what they used to be. This is the result of any country that has lost a world war, and forced to demilitarize for half a century. Another prime example would be Germany. Imagine if Germany didnt go to WW2, and just tech'd up. They would probably have space ships and orbital space cannons had they not have gone to war, and just tech'd up.

They would be nuked again, by USA, Russia, and China, perhaps.

At port. So in essence they can fire everything they got at once then have to rely on other things like cannon etc. Destroyers are over gunned for their class and don't have alot of staying power due to limited armour and limited ammo, designed to fire then get away which is why they are normally fast for their class.

@@Dazzxp Thank you for that answer. It just seems like a bad idea. Enemy could send decoys to trick a captain into launching.

@@rapidsqualor5367 Possible yes, but the last thing you want is to be hit in the Ammo stores, WW2 had a good amount of fireworks because of a hit on or near where you have ammo stored. Besides it is an option they don't have to fire everything, but the option is there. Reloading takes time and you don't really want to do that in the middle of a battle cause a lot can happen in mere seconds.

@@Dazzxp WWI British has best fire work display against Germany.

@@Dazzxp well put thank you

Dude you just said what I wanted to say.

?

What do u think the bushmaster is? It's a cannon that will do just as much damage or more then the legacy weapons of ww2

@@blumie006 It's small, I like big cannons :)

Don't stuck in 19th century come back to 20th ...

But big cannons are cool :))

Are there gattling guns on destroyers they sound cool

take some time to research this white elephant,its failed in many areas and is basically scrap metal,waste of money,dont diss me really do some research

It does.

The most expensive and yet the most underwhelming, 32 planned 29 cancelled says it all really. The principle and idea behind it was sound but reality had other plans

Its barely even a destroyer, its huge and geared more to surface-surface combat. Its a cruiser

Darren Rushworth-Moore I’m pretty sure there was a lot of unanticipated scope creep involved compared to the Marine Corps EFV program.

@@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 you could said same of chinese ship, since its air defense missile has 180 pounds warhead.

Yamamoto would never see these ships, they would all sink his whole carrier group before they even knew they were under attack.

or he would lead the Japanese fleet to victory and Yamato wouldn't have been sunk

Never give any of the ads a thumbs up, in fact give them a thumbs down so that it discourages advertisers and always skip the ad when that option is available. You can always get the premium option which I recommend and once had but had to discontinue during this covid-19 period but will resume when I financially recover, I highly recommend it, it's well worth it, I believe it's thirteen dollars.

Yh, course. Little did they know there's a team of SBS on standby to immediately paint those Yankee ships if it ever comes to it.

@@gangstar8652 Nah America has the most dominant and powerful military in the world my guy, your Queen and all her tea drinking plebs would be annihilated into oblivion.

yeah until the Bismarck sunk the hood then the Bismarck and soon after tirpitz was sunk ;)

@@mvretro2148 but look at their glorious beautiful and heroic history

@@radioactiveboi842 yeah, some of the most famous things in history, sabaton feeds them too.... Bismarck ect! Ugh love it so much man

and it chinese quality it gonna break soon =))

PAPER STOLEN TECH DESTROYER TO BE MORE SPECIFIC -.-

It'd make a good budget anchor for the Zumwalt

Yeah it is so advanced that it has no anti-submarine missiles, no land attack missiles and no effective anti-ship missiles (the Harpoon missiles are pretty much useless against any modern ship). The Type 45 is only good for Air Defence, nothing else. It's not a multi role ship. And even in the anti air role it isn't really that much better than most other modern frigtes and destroyers either. It carries only 48 missiles, so in a saturation attack it will quickly run out of ammo. Many other ships have just as good or even better Air Defence capability but with the addition of also having powerful long range anti-ship and anti-submarine missiles too (and in some cases even Land Attack Cruise missiles) None of which the Type 45 is having

@@militaryanalysis5028 this was from 7 months ago calm down

So one Japanese ship becomes 'so many destroyers'? Yea they sank most of the Japanese a long time ago. Now they are not allowed to have any military. Just a defense force. Meaning they cannot use offensive firepower. You say easily done. So you have in person built a ship with vertical launch cells? Odd then considering you are asking why for easy basic questions ... Most of Europe's navy operates frigats? Not destroyers? You can say:'can be regarded'? But who is regarding it? I see only you. Do you know anyone else? Meanwhile we know for a proven fact that the Lynx helicopter in the video is a light to medium scout for the Koreans. Which is a British export versions. Meaning it does not have full capability but is downgraded for export? Just like Tier countries to the F35 get the full capability? Non tier countries get a downgraded less capable versions? Knowledgable people know one full medium or heavy helicopter more then doubles the capability of a light scout helo. You think a small helicopter can be compared to the big boys? Yes let's compare the Lynx which can carry ... 5 tons? CH-53K King Stallion ... 35+ tons? That isn't double at all is it? That is how many times the weaponload capability? Can you do this amazing math? ;-) If I built any ships in my backyard that would go down from 35 tons to a mere 10 tons? I would be out of a job. Now I would simply suggest automating naval helicopters as drones taking out all the systems that support pilots and troops? Then one single helicopter could easily carry 50 tons of weapons. Yes that is 10 times more then those light Lynx's. Sorry we are not going to do the same. No way.

@@MrFlatage well put😅😅

Jonathan Enggdept capsizes really easy.

Who said kolkata class has low performance

Unless math is wrong washington DC to China under 4 min. / moon and BACK 3 hours! WT....!

Defense Update posted a video on May 26 of this year on the subject.

It's an Aircraft Carrier pretending to be a Destroyer lol

Um this is the list of the most expensive, when was the last time Russia put a new destroyer in the water? 1991?

Not applicable, Just like a Bostok watch

Russia only build destroyers for India these days, they do build frigates for themselves, not destroyers.

That’s the idea

And they are that expensive because the unions have shit kickers on 150K PA !