Just a clarification. The Aperture does Not change because of the Sensor size. f4 = f4 - Same amount of light hits the Sensor. But, the Look Changes. That is true. f4 looks more like f6.
This creator needs to stop confusing people by multiplying the aperture by the crop factor. Yes, by multiplying the crop factor, you get an equivalent depth of field, relative to a full-frame camera. But in terms of exposure, do NOT multiply the aperture by the crop factor. For exposure, the aperture is the aperture, regardless of the sensor size. This reviewer should stick to reviewing the camera. He shouldn't be diving into technicalities that will just confuse the viewer.
Its like that awkward camera that can be really good yet missing features. But honestly if someone wants to start shooting with mirrorless, this might be good enough
Hi Teppo, I used to create content on my channel with the original ZV-E10 but now after 3 years of experience in video editing and creating content I finally decided to upgrade my gear and your video make me get the ZV-E10 Mark II as a fresh start, I decided that it'll be a good new start since I deleted all my "noob" videos from the past on my channel and will go full time on RU-vid creating professional content from now on.
I'd love to get it as a small travel camera for both video and stills if it had a mechanical shutter. The electronic shutter alone renders it useless for photographing anything in motion. I understand that including a mechanical shutter would likely make it too competitive with Sony's own A6700, but it's still a pity.
Learned something new today, didn't know you also had to multiply the lens' aperture on a crop sensor camera! I'm considering picking up the ZV-E10 II, I love the FX3 but I find it too bulky to travel with and it gets in the way of enjoying the trip sometimes.
@@michealpersaud6718 f number is a characteristics of the lens, it's focal lens divided by the lens pupil (or "wide open aperture") - so for 50mm lens with pupil of 25mm the F number will be 2. It's a measure of light gathering ability of the lens only. [Edited] removed incorrect information where I confused exposure and aperture in my head
This creator needs to stop confusing people by multiplying the aperture by the crop factor. Yes, by multiplying the crop factor, you get an equivalent depth of field, relative to a full-frame camera. But in terms of exposure, do NOT multiply the aperture by the crop factor. For exposure, the aperture is the aperture, regardless of the sensor size. This reviewer should stick to reviewing the camera. He shouldn't be diving into technicalities that will just confuse the viewer.
Can the ZV-E10 II do recording directly to a USB-connected SSD ? Will the recording work up to 4K30, or what are the limitations ? The large V90 version SD cards are very expensive. If the answer is yes, can you then afterwards connect the SSD to a computer and read the files directly, or will it be in another format, or the SSD is formated differently ?
This creator needs to stop confusing people by multiplying the aperture by the crop factor. Yes, by multiplying the crop factor, you get an equivalent depth of field, relative to a full-frame camera. But in terms of exposure, do NOT multiply the aperture by the crop factor. For exposure, the aperture is the aperture, regardless of the sensor size. This reviewer should stick to reviewing the camera. He shouldn't be diving into technicalities that will just confuse the viewer.
Please stop confusing people by multiplying the aperture by the crop factor. Yes, by multiplying the crop factor, you get an equivalent depth of field, relative to a full-frame camera. But in terms of exposure, do NOT multiply the aperture by the crop factor. For exposure, the aperture is the aperture, regardless of the sensor size. You are reviewing the camera. No need to get into technicalities that may confuse the viewer.
