Perhaps some of your critics need to take a chill pill, your's is just an opinion, you're open about that. Keep up the great work and challenge our thinking.
Hassan Goldstein Umm yea nice straw man argument... Since most of them were not even around for the internet revolution... Now CURRENT God photographers like these use social media and have websites. Shoot, even Art Wolfe has all social media covered and books, and movies on Netflix. If all those Gods you listed were born in the modern era you bet they would be using social media to spread their ability and fan base. dmimaging.net/top-modern-photographers/
For all those who bashed me when this video came out regarding the video functionality of the A7Rii.......the just announced Nikon D5 records 4k for only 3 minutes long. EPIC. FAIL.
+Jason Lanier For the serious video producer they are not going to spend 6 grand on a dslr. I'm a video producer and frankly I wouldn't even use a dslr for my work - perhaps 5 years ago, but not now. Conversely, this Nikon is for the professional photographer who could care less about its video capabilities.
+Alan Mauro yet it's amazing how nobody said the same for the A7Rii. My point is the hypocrisy is astounding. Nikons epic failure on the 4K video end is excused away while everyone and their mother made it the main complaint about the A7Rii...and the A7Rii exponentially better than the D5 for 4K video. It truly shows the bias in the industry.
You guys are kidding right? . This guy literally said that he loves the camera and these are his opinions about the camera. Why are you all crucifying him for loving this camera? It's his opinion. If he wants to think it's the best camera is the best camera in the world then let him lol. It doesn't mean it's fact. What does it matter if you don't agree? Don't shit on him for stating his opinions. Geez lol.
for the title. thats why we "crucify" him. i didnt even watch the video. its pointless with a title like that. the title should explain whats in the video.
?? It says review by Jason Lanier. Do you think review means the word of god or something lol? Its a review which means its based off of his experience. And his experience tells him that it is the best camera in the world.
GreyCanvas word of god?.. wtf are you talking about i was criticizing his opinion OBVIOUSLY. his opinion is retarded because OBVIOUSLY it isnt THE BEST CAMERA because IT CANT FUNCTION AS A WILDLIFE CAMERA GET IT?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!~?!?!??!?!?!
Well that is what you are criticizing. You don't speak for everyone else. Read the comments. People are mad because of what he thinks and they are treating it as if it is the absolute truth. He never said it was the truth. He said it was his opinion. Thats the only point im trying to get across. Everyone doesnt seem to realize, in his opinion it is the best camera in the world. All I am saying is why are these people in the comments butt hurt about some random guys opinion about a camera that he thinks is the best? Disagreeing is fine but literally threating the guy because of what he think is ridiculous in my opinion. I never referred to only to you. My original comment was a blanket statement.
i agree. im a professional photographer in Texas. i started with Nikon then moved to Canon, and now Sony. I think Sony is by far the best camera and with their new Master G series of lenses they are ahead of the pack.
The amount of anxiety these videos induce in certain people is amazing. No really, a photographer just expresses his opinion about his favourite camera and lots of people become unglued, unstuck, irritated and completely moronic in their reactions. Let's face it, Canon and Nikon really have no clue whatsoever what to do with the current camera market. They keep on going the same way while the biggest part of the market is going the other way. Don't blame Sony. Blame Nikon and Canon because they clearly don't realise that they will disappear unless they clean up their act.
I had the choice between the D810 and the a7R II but I chose the D810 many because of the focus speed/tracking, the battery life, and the ergonomics. I can go an entire day's shooting with only 1 battery. Also, the Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 is much better than the Sony 24-70 (and it is a f/2.8 instead of f/4, but the a7R II's ISO capabilities offset that difference). Also, it has the same autofocus system as the Nikon D4s, Nikon's top of the line sports camera. Lastly, this is more of a personal choice, but since I have really big hands the D810 felt much better in my hands. I love the idea of having an EVF though. Love your videos Jason, keep up the good work!
jim miller I know that I'm going to switch to Sony at some point, but as of right now I am getting the same awesome sensor performance with a much better autofocus system and a much better lens selection. The only thing I am missing is an evf.
I was Sony user, no doubt Sony cameras are amazing but here are two reasons why I am not one anymore: Warranty and Batteries -Sony won't give you a fair warranty support. -It doesn't really matter how great the camera is, if the battery can't even last one hour.
Great video, thank you. Very good points on: - shooting video. it's not a video camera. neither is any photo camera. - battery. why do people expect it to last 10 days? buy multiple, problem solved.
I owned the a7r2 and a6300, both wonderful. But I ended up doing my best work and enjoying my Samsung NX1 and NX500. I hope Samsung comes back, it's INCREDIBLE. In the meantime, I also really like my new fuji xt2, and will be getting the Fuji gfx 50s. I'm set for life. The way I see it, for amazing photos and 4K video, my Samsung cameras easily trump the new 5d4, so will definitely last more years than that.
D R I started off with the NX1 and had all the premium lenses. I just sold it all off recently after a year because of the rapid decline in value. So I got out while I could and just went Sony last week. I think we can agree Samsung probably screwed up abandoning something with such potential but given their recent problem with exploding phones and washer machines, maybe this is how they're paying for ditching their NX1 users. To my knowledge, it's still the best 4K video camera - unfortunately I never touched the video being that I'm only into stills.
hi jason few years back i bought the A7Rll it works like day 1,,thanks to you ,,,i bought it with 24 70 ZEISS f4 ,,, and few Months ago bought the 85mm 1.4 GM .....very happy with the gear,,,,like to ask a question, you think the A7Rll its a Camera to last as long as my MINOLTA 9000 AF i steal have it with all the gear~~~~~~Lenses,,,,do you remember when you shot theMinolta lens 70 210mm beercan and the 50 mm attached to Sony A7Rll that did it for me,,,,,,sintese then i am an happy person TY..
Before people go buying mirrorless cameras I suggest you try one and try shooting with live view or the EVF i find it a much less enjoyable experience compared to an ovf. I might point out that seeing in real time what your exposure will look like is great but only if you shoot JPG as most raw editors will open the files up and it wont look like what it did on the camera even if you use the camera calibration profile in lightroom. Even the output from Sony sponsored capture one express is drastically different to what you get in camera previews. My opinion if your going to buy mirrorless make sure they will take returns as if your used to dslr you could very well hate the experience of EVF and Liveview.
+Stephen Gibb Its true but one you try some sony a7sII you will be stunt by the magnification and all the information the finder. It will become a real standard soon.
+Stephen Gibb Honestly speaking, I have used both OVFs and EVFs, and I prefer (high quality) EVFs. That's just my opinion, but I'm just saying that I did what you suggested and that's what I came away with.
+Rationalific I shoot football with a Sony A77 II which has an EVF viewfinder. The problem with the EVF is that when you are shooting a runner zig-zagging down the field, the viewfinder only shows the last captured image until you shoot the next image. At 8 FPS, it is difficult to follow the runner although 12 FPS is much better. This is a real problem for fast moving sports. I've been using Sony EVF for several years and after shooting with the OVF in Nikon bodies, I still can't get used to the Sony EVF for sports. I do prefer EVF for general shooting though.
Anyone else coming in behind Sony for mirrorless will in my book be just wanna bees. I saw that Sony had what was to become the top system. I still use my Sony A7R and even with the much slower focusing system it is still a killer camera. I have beat mine up and it keeps on tickin. I too have not removed my Zeiss Battis 85mm 1.8 lens since I got it last month. That is one incredible piece of glass. I still use my A7R as my studio video camera as I record off camera onto my computer so I can record for hours as long as I have a large enough drive. As for single cards? I for the life of me can't see an issue. I have had my original 64gig card since I first got it two years ago and it has not failed me at all. I have thousands of images through that card and I always remove and replace it when I download images. Never once have I had a card hiccup on me. I do have an extra one because I feel that two years of hard use on the card is pressing my luck. I also have 4 new 1950mAh batteries for my Sony. Double the original Sony battery. I did over 70 minutes of straight on camera recording in full HD at 30 frames per second in quicktime format on one of the new batteries. I now have four of them. For the price of one sony battery you can have 4 of these puppies. www.ebay.com/itm/2X-1950mAh-NP-FW50-Battery-for-Sony-A7S-A7R-a6100-NEX-6-5R-5N-5T-3N-NEX-7-Camera/371383273989?_trksid=p3693.c100102.m2452&_trkparms=ao%3D1%26asc%3D20140212121249%26meid%3D9e9b2a955bf3422ba00d0906622825c5%26pid%3D100102%26
+Enrico Benites There are great camera makers outside of Canon and Nikon. If I didn't have Nikon then I'd probably choose Fuji. Also, he's a paid sponsor by Sony so of course he's going to say Sony is the best.
Tecnically, Sony is the best in major items. Compare it in www.dpreview.com And about Jason Lanier, he says so many times, he isn't payed by Sony. I love and work with sony before I knew Jason. I bought one because it was better than it's concurrents (Alpha 77) at the time. I commented here, because where I live (Brazil), people don't have acces to brands or models, just a few...And always it's Canon or Nikon! People here don't search about the tecnichal details of the equipment. They don't compare. They just buy one or another, because "X" ou "Y" said it was "the best one"...This makes me mad! Just it...
+Enrico Benites so he does all that publicity, websites, and workshops for free? if so, Sony is the king of getting free publicity from good photographers.
As I said, I really don't care if he is paid, or not by Sony! I use knowledge and information to compare products! Repeating: I'm mad about people that don't search information, don't compare characteristics about products, acting like "monkey see, monkey do", like the majority in Brazil! If you are acusing him, he is lying or he is a fraud, contact him and tell this directly...It doesn't make a difference for me. Period.
+kalel33 If you understood SEO you would understand why Jason tags Sony, Nikon, Canon or mirrorless on anything he does. He's delivering valid content, developing a following and increasing his internet presence. He doesn't need Sony's money.....Sony doesn't need his marketing. It definitely doesn't hurt their advertising campaign either. Don't hate, it's business. It's strategic marketing that anyone can do. You don't even have to be a great photographer! BTW...free websites, free publicity, but workshops are fee based. If I could travel around the world teaching my passion and charging a fee I would. www.southbayexposure.com
There have been many unjust comments from those who have not tried this masterpiece of a camera. I agree with Jason in everything that he describes about this camera - I have just bought this camera and, together with a Zeiss Batis 85mm, images of people are just SO sharp and, without any post-processing, images look like they are out of a magazine - SO professional-looking. I am about to buy the new Sony 24-70 f/2.8 G-Master ... a perfect match ... and this then completes my perfect setup. I am tempted to buy the new Zeiss Batis 18mm when it comes out next week. Fabulous camera - absolutely great!!
It's an EF MOUNT, and I ordered it to use with my CANON EOS 70D, and for the Blackmagic Design URSA 4.6K Camera with EF Mount, 4.6K Super 35 Sensor With up to 15 Stops of Dynamic Range, Large 10" Fold Out Monitor, Dual CFast Recorders, Scopes, Audio Meters camera that's yet to be released. Thank you for the quiCKEST response time.
This video is clearly biased: just because the A7rII is the best camera in the world, Jason made a video to tell us that it's the best camera in the world. Wait, that didn't sound right.
+白海塔 "im a professional shooter who has shot all over the world""i have travelled all over the planet""i have done more wide variety and probably most shutter actuation than any person on this planet" "best photographer in LA, much bragging rights? but looking at his photos, im convinced he's bs. all his followers are novices
I had one and hated it , sold it a week later got myself a D810 and I love everything about it. the A7Rii was not for me far to slow and far to small , and the lens I had was a pile of sh*t too. give me a D810 with a 14-24 on the front any day over the Sony plaything.
+Michel Pichel I do not know about anybody else with regards to the Sony paycheck. As for me I am getting paid around $12 million (US Dollars) from Sony to use their gear. ;)
As much as I honor that other people are entitled to their own perspective, I do not understand how people could have the audacity to tell a professional photographer that his "opinion" is wrong. Jason Lanier is a professional making a living from photography for a reason. How the hell could he be "wrong," especially after the fact he has specifically stated that all of this is only in his opinion? Haters seriously need therapy because they are all so seemingly unhappy or unsure with themselves and their own choices in life that they need justification by constantly attempting to prove people "wrong." Every professional I have followed or met always states to "do what's right for you" because photography is an art and it's all subjective, even down to the technicalities of equipment. Course, this is only my opinion. Jason Lanier, thank you for your insight.
Jason I am watching your video on your rebuttal to people that feel you are receiving some kind of remuneration from Sony Corp. for being one of the Sony Artisans. I look up to the photographers who have achieved that honor. And it never entered my mind that the Artisans are being rewarded with gifts of cameras, money or photographic gear. I am glad that you are a member of that prestigious group of artists. You have achieved that on the merits of your photography. I know of many photographers who have made the change to Sony for the same reasons that you have listed.
1700 dislikes? Jason is one of the most competent guys out there. I guess most of the dislikers are some of these Old-School-I-Saved-So-Long-For-My-Cannon-Nikkon-Haters
GH4 records unlimited video, up to the potential of your memory card and battery life, and does not shut down the sensor at 29:59, unless you are ordering in Europe.
+Ben McCartney . We're talking about photography here. Anyway, I own GH4, together with A7r2, A7m2, A7s, A7s2 (just saying about Sony). Believe me, GH4 is a good camera, but very far in IQ from A7r2.. Not speaking about High ISO then..
+Alessandro Caporale Jason Lanier was discussing video in detail so Bens comments regarding video are totally fair game. If you bothered to watch the video, you would know exactly why Ben commented because he directly addressed one of Jason's points.
+Ben McCartney Yhea , but he's right about it being a tax classification issue. So how does the GH4 able to do that, is it classified as a video camera?
If memory serves correct, it's classified as a "hybrid." Legally, that very well might be enough to get around the tax issue, but I'm not a lawyer so don't hold me to it.
+josh h I believe there is a 29:59 min limit on cameras sold in Europe because of the tax. Everywhere else in the world there is no limit on recording times of the GH4 (or its predecessor, the GH3).
I saw a video of RX1R ll the Sony A7R2 has better Quality video then the RX -(A7 looks more rich compared to the RX washed out -But that was only one video that I watched) Photo Quality idk
Whether you're sponsored or not people accuse you of taking handouts, getting paid off, money under the table, etc anytime you put out a positive piece on gear. People have a hard time believing that a person actually likes something. Strange.
Jason Lanier Don't get me wrong mate, I love your work. I probably should have articulated that a little better, sorry. You being an ambassador for Sony camera's would naturally lead someone to believe that your video was a paid announcement. I have followed your work for a long time, as I have many togs, there was no disrespect intended :)
+Superformance72 fair enough..:). All I know is that people were accusing me of being bought out long before I was a Sony Artisan. So the fact that I've heard it no matter what I do leads me to believe that people will always accuse you of being disingenuous when discussing gear. So you just have to assume that's part of what people do and stop giving a crap.
I don't have this camera but I know more than enough about videography/photography to follow along with what he's saying and I totally love this camera. I am more into video but I love photo too so this camera really appeals to all my likes. Sony did a great job with this camera. Also, you don't have to be sponsored or paid to say nice things about something. This camera is a beast
Jason, you're such an awesome photographer! People should really follow you. Forgo all these bulky DSLR and its lagging tech. Sony is really the way to go for now.
Bruno Lazaro How often does the general consumers would actually need that 1 set start up? not that often. Even people just leave the power switch on pretty much all the time.
+Intel & Nvidia SUXXZZZ!!! I need fast focus on low light situations constantly. Also need to swap focus modes, white balance and other options etc quickly and frequently which the Sony requires digging on the menus and most full frame dslrs have dedicated buttons to.
Bruno Lazaro I can recall clearly that you can do similar functions with the Sony too. You can set certain buttons to do that specific functions as well. What excuses are you coming up this time.
Bruno Lazaro But let's just say that DSLR and Mirrorless has their own target audience. You don't come and comment shit about tech. Oh and BTW, tell me if most DSLR has WiFi and NFC for convenient connectivity. I make use of those to share photos to my friends if they really like the quality photos when most DSLR don't have one. And also the durability of the actuation is almost double than a pro DSLR rated at. Go figure...
I like your Enthusiasm, always have, but a lot of us are average Joe's who can only buy cheaper or second hand image boxes.. I on personal note that even if I kept my lenses and sold camera and all my flashes and remotes would have a shortfall of $1800 US just to own bodyI owned a a7 II had to get rid of it ,I shoot wildlife ,too many missed shots ,maybe wait a few years and pick up a second hand I hope.........Keep your content coming I'm a big fan....
+Ivanovich Biggenden There is a proverb: Better is the enemy of good enough. In photography, this is good advice for your wallet. Get what meets most of your needs. You can rent better when you really need it.
+Moko Arlyana Thanks I Agree Moko, at the moment there is nothing I can not shoot with my D810 or my 5D3 I guess what I was saying is that it would not be financially viable to change systems , Peter Adams Wrote Photography is not about cameras gadgets and gizmos its about Photographers, a camera doesn't make a great picture any more than a Typewriter writes a great novel....
Jason, I agree with you. I have a A7, A7R and now the ARII. A long with the A6300. My Nikon equipment now sits on selves in the studio. The only Nikon I use is the D800 when I shoot products in the studio because of the glass I have and the way it tethers to LR. But you are dead on I love the Sony equipment.
I switched from 5D3 to A7R2 back in August when it was first released. I never regretted the switching decision. I absolutely love this camera especially with the batis lenses. though I find canon lenses sometimes don't focus well when used with Metabones adaptor.
I was thinking of switching from 5D3 to a7R2 as well. How do you the shooting experience differs? Some people have told me that the Sony is slower to shoot with and less responsive. Also, I've heard that the Eye AF doesn't work with metabones adaptors.
its not about having the best camera in the world. It all depends who is the photographer behind every camera that take breathe taking image quality with the right equipment/lens.
Love the camera. I got the A7s when it came out and I shoot video. Shot so many events with it (video) and the A7r i shot stills with. Shot in different places around the world. Now I have the A7rii and I shoot video on that as well as stills. Battery life is not too bad since i have the grip. In my view its one of the best mirrorless cameras so far and I have shot every brand. :)
Nice presentation Jason! I'm definitely keeping an eye on the Sony line... just took delivery of the D5, so I'll wait awhile before snagging a Sony to see how it compares in the work I do. I don't want a bunch of extra batteries in my pocket and don't mind the large size of the D5, maybe when I'm older, or have wrist problems, the size/weight will also become a factor. I'm impressed by what you're sharing here. I'll buy any tool that improves my end product, even marginally. Keep us informed, we're watching and learning. The style of work I do makes 3 minutes of 4k more than enough for me, my grabs are generally only a minute or less when story telling. For those who video entire presentations or events with speeches, that 3 minutes isn't enough, not even close. Low light focus acquisition (candle light wedding reception) the Sony hunts for focus a little more than I can take a chance on... the D5 locks it in instantly. In daylight scenarios, you're really onto something. Thanks again...
+Frederick Dunn Afterthought... I'm also one of those who feels the "need" for double card slots, for two reasons, one being capacity and two the image security. Though I have not personally experienced a corrupt card (hundreds of weddings covered), I've had friends who had career-ending failures when a card failed. Maybe it's just me, but I need that peace of mind. I agree that the buffer wouldn't impact me, but faster frame rate has been a huge bonus for stop action. You are absolutely right, the lens investment is probably the number one reason that people like myself just get comfortable with one brand and stop looking beyond Nikon (in my case) or Canon... we all think our lenses work best on the bodies they are designed for.
+Frederick Dunn I agree with everything you say. Especially with the security of having double card slots. I would never want to be put in that position were i have to explain to someone that the whole days worth of shooting just went down the toilet because of memory card failure...
HogbergPhotography I'm a photographer too, and I hate when my subject is a stop or two underexposed. Seriously, take a screen capture into photoshop and adjust its exposure. These highlights are nowhere near blown out.
Honestly I don't think he was paid for this video. And even if he was, he did a damn great review of the camera and it helps a lot of people watching this video make their own decisions when on the fence purchasing either this camera or a different brand. Personally I'm a Canon 1Dx Mark II user but I know nothing about the Sony A7 RII and I need a second body for my own reasons. I know nothing about the A7 RII and this is exactly why I appreciate people like Jason Lanier putting up a review like this one.
How spoiled we've become. That we can criticize a camera that would have had our jaws on the floor just a few years ago really says something about our state of society.
Cool video ! I found it honest and interesting to watch ! = ) The DSLR is dying and people are getting angry. It's like the switch from film to digital all over again ! Heated discussions that go nowhere.
+shadowjfd I don't think they had a hard time with it per se, I think they just have more stringent requirements. As a matter of fact, the ending comments were quite favorable, there just seem to be shortcomings when using the system for sports. Just like there are shortcomings when using it for video. "While many of our sample images are usably sharp by sports photography and news publishing standards, the issue at hand became more about what was in focus - and why the camera chose which target it tracked. There is no doubt that the a7R II delivers exceptional autofocus performance relative to the mirrorless market, but given the drawbacks of AF mode / area implementation, a lack of direct AF point control, cramped ergonomics and distracting screen blackout, next time I shoot the Seahawks, I'll take my trusty DSLRs.
+kingalias it's exceptional focussing relative to the whole camera market. You do have control over AF point, though you just have to press one button before you get to move it around. You can configure the controls on the camera to your own needs. It's also possible to do back button focus.
+Alan Newman the fact of the matter is the issue is for a very niche market. Sports photography is a very demanding, expensive and small market. Focusing of the A7r II is amazing, just not amazing when compared to the D4s or 1Dx. They noted that you could control your AF point in the review, and said it didn't work as nicely as smoothly for tracking as a DSLR does, and to get good AF-C tracking, they need to use wide-af, but that led to less precision of what target was going to be chosen (often the closest subject, which might not have the ball). It's like comparing a high-end laptop to a mid to high-end desktop computer. Sure, you can edit video on a high-end laptop, but you're going to get better results using a mid-range/high-end PC to get the job done. overall, the review seemed rather unbiased, and he even noted where DSLRs would fail in similar situations "Sadly, the repetitive color palettes of player uniforms, overall flat scene contrast and the underwhelming reach of a 200mm from NFL sideline distance meant an impossibly difficult scenario for the a7R II's 'WIDE' autofocus mode. It really struggled, moving around the frame apparently at random as it tried to identify a subject. WIDE mode only uses distance information to subject track - which means it can be easily confused by other subjects at a similar depth as your initial target. To be fair, many DSLRs work similarly, but pro-photographers will rarely use a complete 'auto' area mode out on the field. Instead of sports, the a7R II’s WIDE autofocus mode is probably best used in a scenario where a single subject fills a majority of the frame, and where you don't need pinpoint precision."
+Alan Newman www.dpreview.com/articles/5684109129/lucky-number-7-shooting-pro-sports-with-the-sony-a7r-ii read the review if you haven't. It seems like a pretty fair review, and consistent with other non-biased reviews I've read of the A7r II. The A7rII is an awesome camera, it's just not perfect in every situation. I look forward to seeing what Sony brings to the market next year (both lenses and/or bodies).
Seeing the photos you produced with the A7Rii is such a huge motivator!! 🤩 I've been playing with mine for a little under a year now, but my shots still turn out pretty grainy and amateur. I can't wait to learn how to produce images like some of the ones in this video!!
I repect your opinion, and I have nothing against sony or you. The one issue I have about what you have said, is that crop mode is a cut not a magnification. The only sense in which it is magnification is in regards with the viewfinder, not the resulting photo. If you take a full frame image and crop it in post, OR take a full frame image and use a magnifying view finder and crop in post you will get exactly the same image as if you shot in crop mode. Crop mode is not magnification its cropping (or cutting out) the unwanted portions of the full frame image. The way you could say it is - I use crop mode to get a closer view through the viewfinder, knowing I wont need the area of the full frame image I am cutting out.
As a Sony shooter for the last 10 years or so I was always mocked at and told to "Buy a Canon". When I told those folks how far behind Canon was in IQ they would act ignorant. I am glad you put up a video which shuts the mouth of all Canikon fanboys. Get over it guys, Sony innovates and for us, this is a great time to enjoy technology. Wish I had the money to buy an A7R II though, for now its going to be the trusted A6000 :) GREAT VIDEO!!
i think this camera is a better option for almost every kind of photography instead of those huge dslr cameras , except if you need to shoot with medium format cameras and that's a different story .
I came from a Canon 35mm film camera. I researched all camera brands for months. Then I came across your video about why a mirrorless was the way to go. Coming from a 35mm film camera and the reasons in your video, the Sony full frame was the best choice. The A7 is my first digital camera! I wanted the A7II however Sony couldn't decide when to release it. After watching this video, I'm so glad I didn't get the A7II. Instead I want the Sony A7RIi. Thank you so much for your opinions.
this video is really misleading, since when a 70-200 2.8 with metabones has the same bahavior has a native setup?? how can you speak of the a7R2 focusing and action capabilities without mentioning its viewfinder lag and far inferior accuracy in all focusing points?
your video just doesnt mention the pros and cons of both systems its obvious dslrs will be history in years time but still mirrorless cant match the simplicity, ease of use, processing power, ruggedness of a dslr, you have dedicated talor made dslrs for each kind of user nowadays and the very best glass in the market. the a7rii is still a very expensive hypster toy with too much bells and whistles.
+Simão Ribeiro I've used DSLR and film cameras for 25 years. I've used Mirrorless for the past 2 years. You're clearly just reading specs off a blog. Seriously man, you don't know what you're talking about.
Answers: have you used the 70-200 f/2.8 Canon with the metabones adapter? No, I'd venture to say you haven't. Lag? Imperceptible. Auto focus? Works awesome. What else?
I still don't get the mirrorless deal yet... with pro glass (especially with an adapter) it makes for essentially the same size and weight when you are carrying around a bag of batteries, but then you've got the drawbacks of crap battery, idiotically narrow mount, evf, and most importantly severely lacking native lens situation. Just not worth it yet. So unless you are shooting with pancake lenses the size deal isn't so much of a deal. I sure love my A6000 for toting around as a toy, but for work I'll stick to my 5d III at least for now.
Used the Nex 7 back in the day, still using it. Iam glad to see, that sony really pushed their e-mount format. At the beginning of the Nex line the lens selection was quite limited. Also its nice to see the professional 35mm sensor Film cameras by sony using the e-mount. I would love to get a A7rII, but its extremely expensive for a normal consumer, but I might pick it up secondhand in a few years. I feel like the upcoming improvments for the Nex 7RIII might be as follows: 1. Better noise performance, 2. Faster burst mode, 3. second memory card slot (cards are quite small, iam sure they might be able to fit one more into the body, without making the camera much bigger). Lets see how long sony takes, to update the product. Sony has always been quite fast with these updates I feel.
I have all the big Nikon stuff and the Sony a7s a7II and will be jumping to the a7r II or a7s II. In the mean time I just picked up the Sony rx10 II and in my opinion this is the best camera in the world. 1300.00 dollars of pure magic. For this price, for what it does and can do is just amazing. I'm with you on Sony and their cameras. They are going for blood in this industry and are killing in the video market too. Can't wait for the next 18 months to see the Sony a7r III.
+이런저런 its a digital camera dude. a machine. only our eyes can get close to "natural colors" maybe in the year 2400 (if we don't end up killing our selves) we might have a device that can record better.
This video is so ridiculous. The a7rii isn't a bad camera, and has it's place, but you are trying way too hard to convince people of its greatness....almost like you are trying to convince yourself. If it works so great for you, and is the best camera in the world, why try to beg people to believe you? Just shoot with it and not worry what everyone else thinks? Unless you are trying to sell it to people, then this video makes sense.
+Brian Rangel Should take some of your own advice. If you don’t like the A7r2, be happy with your camera. Jason says repeatedly throughout all his videos that if you don’t like his personal choice of camera, be happy and rock what you like. You don’t need to convince him that you disagree.
Thank you for sharing your review. I am a hobbyist photographer that loves taking pictures. My husband blessed me with this camera a few weeks ago and I am so excited to learn to use it and capture the best beautiful memories I can.
#1 reason to buy it, it overheats and its awesome when that happens. Listen, its ONE big advantage is its video low light, otherwise, its not the best. Update* - Now owners are reporting lots of firmware issues, operational issues, and shutter issues plus its terrible battery life make it not a great camera. Overheating HAS been fixed with a firmware update.
As a Nikon user & a Sony User. I believe that Photography, Cinematography, Videography, what ever your passion is, is SUBJECTIVE. If your a photographer shooting landscape's or your a cinematographer shooting a movie, isn't it subjective to a mood, or a feeling your trying to portray? The only thing a camera is, is a tool. If you like Canon use it. If you like Nikon, use it. If you like Sony use it. Most of these post's are from over bearing Narcissistic Views. It all boils down to this. If you have the knowledge and the tools all you need is the material to make something. If everyone used the same camera it would all be boring.....That's why we have variety in everything. Ford, Chevy,Toyota, Nissan, Dodge......ect. So get over it!
Excellent video Jason. is the low light capability of the Sony a7s2 worth giving up on the good AF? we intend to use Auto all the time when we shoot videos. Is a7r2 a better choice if we intend to use AUTO all the time?
Shot Canon exclusively for the past four years and never thought otherwise. The Sony a7Rii has literally been the best investment I've ever made. Any argument against it is easily forgotten when you see the quality it outputs. Sigma adapters to use Art series lenses, The new Gmaster class and not to mention you get the legendary Zeiss quality glass from almost every lens. Sadly it is time to see that Canon just doesn't hang for anywhere near the price range that Sony is giving us. I truly feel bad for anyone who thinks otherwise. Nice video, sir! I love that you are a realist like myself and tell people how it is when it comes to the petty squabbles of batteries and irrelevant nonsense!!!!!
Finally someone who thinks really well, of course is better to have an amazing 43 megapixels for cropping well the pictures and not only that, see all the details when you zoom in the pictures. And a 4K video makes a powerful impact as well. What should you pay so much for a camera and have only a full HD?
I like that you announce at the start that this is your opinion not a real review. One point I do not agree, the optical viewfinder will never be too dark and won't have lag. The EVF might have improved over time and I didn't tried the sony a7r2's viewfinder yet, but I never saw a better viewfinder than the optical ones from medium format cameras.
I really hope Sony paid him enough to justify the pathetic meandering he did for 18 minutes, using arguments he knows only the very uninitiated would gobble up. Sad.
+medstud If Nikon and Canon do not make a similar camera to this, they will be like dinosaurs. DSLRs are dead as of this moment. I'm pretty sure once Canon and Nikon do a similar camera, you will be praising ther cameras. Mirrorless is the future.
+Randy Monster Nikon( Nikon 1 something) and Canon (EOS M3)has mirrorless but it hasn't took off. I don't think they think through about their mirrorless.
I returned an A7s and sold my a6000 and got a used Nikon DF and a used D750. It was taking a lot more work to get reliable focus and great images from the Sonys. I really wanted to like them and initially I thought they were awesome but it seemed like only about 1 out of 2 or 3 images was really in focus. I also got used Nikon glass at a fraction of the cost that new sony lenses would cost. I couldn't be happier. Oh did I mention that battery life sucked and the retarded menu system is totally annoying. I get the most awesome street shots in Manhattan driving in my car and shooting through the window with the DF and a $300 lens. Granted you can get great work out of an a7rii or a7sii, tons of folks are doing it. The eye tracking works pretty well also. But there has been so much marketing garbage out about the Sony cameras lately. Do yourself a favor. Rent them for a week before dropping $3k or more. You won't regret it. And after that if you find that the a7rii is really the best camera in the world. Then go for it. But just realize no technology will make you better photographer. Just don't fall for the hype before you really check out results for yourself. BH also has a great return policy.
It's good to hear some one who is honest and upfront. I sell cameras the same way you do your videos... I belive that there are too many " camera technical specialist" ...
i just bought a sony a6000 with two kit lenses , do you think i made the right choice to begin photography? and learn how to shoot raw, landscape, some portraits, and youtube videos?
Most Cocky SOBs ranting with this kinda passion are pixel peeping posers with no portfolio. When you actually look at their work they voice fades into silence to my ears. To me that's the measure - what have they done. This dude can back all his words! Refreshing as hell! You got evidence - say it however ya want bro!
Before you make the switch consider renting or borrowing your Sony model and trying it out for a few days. It takes a while to get comfortable with shooting with Sony from Nikon (I own the D7000 and a6000). I shoot with my Sony when I need something small and light but Nikon just feels more familiar and natural to me.
I have the Sony Alpha 7ii and I love it! I'm not a pro photographer but I sometimes do have problems with focusing on very near close ups. I just wished the lenses wasn't that expensive too.
I don't know who you are man, but I agree with you. Been shooting with one since it came out, fantastic results, it makes me look like a much better photographer than I probably am. It's in an incredible camera. I've used Canon and Nikon both (primarily Canon for the last 7 or 8 years), but I'm blown away by this camera, and I don't see a need for the Canon equipment anymore (same goes for nikon). I did get a Metabones for my compatible lenses and I'll keep those, they're, as you say, basically just as quick, or sometimes seemingly quicker. I'll keep those.
