They don't age well, that's the problem. OTOH, it would be silly for something that revolves around, say, videogame or popular culture and not reference popular icons.
Agreed. Especially with superhero films like Deadpool & the Marvel films you’d think they’d excel in using the art of the Easter Egg, but instead the majority of their jokes and references in the films are just to other movies, music, celebrities, etc as opposed to the actual comics they’re based on or just more subtle things that they average viewer wouldn’t pick up on.
Apparently movies don't have to revolve around stories anymore. They should never produce a movie with a rushed through or poorly written script. Why throw millions at garbage; is that a good investment? Like trying to put lipstick on a pig. Maybe all the CGI will beautify it up, and make up for the lack of storyline. Apparently, we are all like ADHD children.... if they don't show us a continual array of explosions and flashy things, they think they will lose us.
Stinger430 Bloody Spielberg: he used it to show the horror, intensity, and confusion the soldiers went through during the Normandy Landings, and now every two bit Director thinks: I’ll use shaky camera, like Spielberg did, because I want the fight between these two giant lumps of CGI metal to look realistic... ...I’m looking at you, Bay: you talentless bastard!
@@ThisCharmingMan1984 I think he means the shaky camera when two characters are having a calm conversation in the afternoon while drinking tea. CAM SHAKE
I don't get it..? Whether Rotten Tomatoes is your preferred review site or not, people will still need somewhere to go and read reviews. Otherwise, we'll just inadvertently indulge all kinds of shit, by buying tickets to things that don't deserve it.
I rely quite heavily on RT. However, I don't rely on the scores alone to tell me whether to see a movie or not. If there are bad reviews, I read them to see what the critics actually say. I'll weight certain critics more. If either audiences or critics have good things to say, I'll usually give a movie a chance. The only time RT stops me from seeing a movie I am interested in is when both critics and audiences clearly hated it. I tend to think most consumers are like me and I don't see that as a bad thing.
Uninformed viewers? I beg your ****ing what now? Are you oblivious to the fact that stories are subjective and that certain things appeal to different people? Blair Witch got a sequel. Eminem sells records. Doesn't mean it isn't ****, just means some people like stuff you think is ****ing awful.
I think the biggest problem is that, to a large extent, they have simply stopped writing interesting stories in favor of mindless action and explosions. I. for one, don't go to very many of those kinds of movies.
It reminds me of the SCTV skit, "Farm Film Report" where the main topic is, something blowing up in a movie at the end of the segment something, usually the guest, blows up and they yell "Woooha she blowed up real good!"
Agree as well. I'd even say not only is there very little story telling but also a lack of character development, weak dialogue and severe loss of original content. If only people would stop flocking to theaters on a weekly basis to see the next movie...then perhaps the movie industry would change.
@@seanhaase2128 My understanding is that, given the high cost of such movies, their profit margin is declining, and they are even suffering substantial losses.
Kyle Campbell maybe you'll be lucky. I thought the same thing and got a response from the creator of the fairly odd parents, Butch Hartman, and also got responses from quite a few youtubers. So maybe you can get a response from them!
Kyle Campbell So true! Whenever somebody manages to actually make something original, companies then try to copy the idea without realizing how it was able to work on the first place.
I can give you multiple movies like that just from this year. But first you have to define, what you mean under a thinking adults. Do you want the movie to challenge your emotional intelligence, your beliefs or simply your intelligence? You don't need too much intelligence to understand Shawshank Redemption, yet it's an amazing and really adult movie.
I'm not sure whether to upvote this or downvote it. I vehemently agree and I vehemently disagree. I think "thinking adults" are part of the problem. Movies have bifurcated into "thinking adult" oscar-bait garbage and mindless ridiculous action. I think it's because "thinking adults" don't want to think about adult things any more than Michael Bay fans do. So instead, they watch movies that make them feel like they're being intellectually stimulated when they aren't. Then the hoi polloi think "I don't want any part in that crap" and embrace ever-stupider movies just to avoid becoming pompous asses. It's really just both cultures desperately trying to prove they're not the other.
The problem is that the supposedly intelligent adults have no idea where to find those types of movies and no desire to look for them, so they instead expect the standard blockbusters like Transformers and the MCU to become more intelligent.
Because the companies paid the film-makers to show their logo in this scene? If I pay to see a film in theater, I don't want to see logos of companies desperately trying to sell their shitty products... There is enough of advertising in the real world, but for most people movies are some kind of escape from the real world... Or at least they want them to be.
"it's satire bro" You're missing the point, that's specifically why the scene was happening there. Not only is it written to be a commercial it was written without the knowledge that the stadium wouldn't keep anyone out and if you've ever been to one they have at least 4 entrances into them. When you write a scene just for product placement you lose any kind of grasp on actual logic.
Beef Bastard welp and here im me an my simple mind thinking. Well you know what? Magnito lifting an entire motherfucking stadium to trap the president in it was a pretty fucking badass scene.
I'm sick of studios packing movies with A list stars and no character actors. All the stars are hoping they've signed on to a hit multi sequel franchise. The studio hopes so too. In the end we end up with a lot of films that turned out to do so-so business, a lot of films that come & go in a blink because they didn't do 100 mill the first week and the only thing we have to look forward to are sequels of animated Disney films , more Marvel films, and tons of remakes, reboots & re-imaginings.
Shakey cam only makes sense in the found-footage genre, and even than it only works if you can still SEE WHAT'S GOING ON. Using shakey cam to prevent getting a good look at the monster until the end SEEMS like an good innovative idea on paper, but Cloverfield proved that having that severe of a shake as to keep us from getting a good look at the GIANT SKYSCRAPER SIZED MONSTER WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SEE FROM THE START is just a vomit-fest and many viewers won't even make it to the end. Using shakey cam to mask jumpcuts, pulled punches, and stunt doubles during action sequences in films (looking at you Marvel and Michael Bay) is just lazy and rather than making the scene flow more smoothly, it just leaves the viewer confused about what's going on, and instead of being pulled out of the film by an obvious jumpcut, they are pulled out as they try to figure out what just happened, who is where, is that the bad guy or the good guy, wait someone just punched him who was that, WHY ARE THEY ON A TRAIN NOW?! All shakey cam does is block you from seeing clearly in the most frustrating, confusing, and literally sickening way possible.
@@breanntheartist1989 I like MCU movies but I wish that they would tone down the humor. I haven't seen Thor: Ragnarok but I heard that they went overboard with the humor.
You cant keep originality in movies forever, is "like you born and lived most of your life in USA and you want USA food that you never ate" You Talk like originality, innovation would be a better thing, anyone would proof that: coolbond.in/timthumb.php?src=coolbond.in/news_imgs/fifteen-super-funny-then-vs-now-truths-about-life16.jpg&w=645&q=50
Standalone movies were alright I suppose, but I always used to feel a crushing sense of isolation, especially when watching comedies. Not to mention getting terribly achy legs.
You mean prank telephone gags and yo mama jokes don't belong in a star wars movie? In the words of Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker... NOOOOOOOOOOOO! Actualy the movie draggs itself down pretty well on it's own. You can't even count the number of cringe moments in that film. The jokes would be forgivable if it had a better plot that actually led somewhere.
Death By Design Graphics the comedy is only a small part of the problem with that disaster, unfortunately. Many reasons why that movie sucked. Among them: not continuing the story, plot holes galore, a Mary Sue main character (sorry but she just is), forced & awkward politics, treating one of the most famous & beloved characters in all fiction like dog crap, introducing horrible new characters....the list goes on
Glenn Canning Yeah and the hyperspace ram manuver that pretty much destroys all star wars cannon before it. Some people let it slide because it looks cool, but it does ruin previous plot points in star wars. Theres no reason it wouldn't have worked on the first and second death stars.
Mushy Pork I could disagree with that statement, is it really bad writing when the public likes what is being shown at the screen? Bad writing has a lot of definitions but maybe what you're talking about is that the public has been brainwashed to like poorly written movies.
A script that is being made is seldom not written well. (Except for most Syfy originals...yikes.) The producers will see a script and despite liking it will still want mad changes. The major reason for this is to take credit. So many producers in Hollywood have no real reason to be making as much money as they do so they have to make their bosses think they're useful so they make changes they believe will make the movie better. The second major reason I see is that producers want to make a film that hits all the major notes on cliche. This is because cliches are essentially popular ideas. The more an idea resonates with the audience, the more ticket sales, right? Well, it seems to be working because cliche films have taken over for decades now. The writer (the original script writer) is the least valuable person in the room when a film is being discussed for production. The script is a guideline and nothing more, and once it has been bought the script can be chopped up, dissected and morphed into an entirely new piece. It's sad, but absolutely true and Hollywood writers actually EXPECT it now. They're just glad they sold the script at all and aren't waiting tables anymore.
@@charleynewman5057 The IHOP scene WAS funny though I will admit. I'm okay with some pop culture Easter eggs as long as they're not every five seconds. The Dark Knight Rises had a CSX freight train pass by in the background.
This may just be me but product placements in movies have never really bothered me, unless they’re verbally drawing attention to it, if it’s just in the background it doesn’t bother me
I agree. It's actually more immersive for me to see a character drinking from a can of Coke rather than an can "Cobra-cola" or some other similar but legally distict knockoff. It makes me feel more like I'm watching something happening in my world. If they do it right, the product feels like it naturally belongs there and I don't even realize I'm looking at product placement when I first see the movie. Excessive placement, such as too many instances in a short time (Fast and Furious franchise: "Corona Corona Corona? Corona Corona. Ah Corona!"), lingering the camera on the product logo before moving on, and placement that breaks physics to draw attention to itself (like the Coke can in the background changing position when the camera angle changes so you can still see the logo) is when it gets distracting, and unfortunately all lot of big budget movies do this.
Agreed. I don’t know why they’re talking about the product placement in the Magneto scene being distracting. That scene’s from a climactic part of the film so I hardly noticed the signs, and even then it uses Pepsi’s old logo which fits in with the 1960s setting of the X-Men film. It’s only like you say if the dialogue crudely mentions the brand name, if the camera lingers on it or if the logo is overtly seen in an unnatural way then I find it distasteful. Especially when they try to play product placement for comedy like in Jack & Jill or in the new Power Rangers. It’s just annoying. If you promote a product, do it as subtle as possible. Do not draw attention to it expecting the self-awareness to be funny.
They cant. Shakey camera allows you shoot a film cheap because no one notices the mismatched cuts. You dont need a perfect or artistically beautiful take, which just makes the corporations less money
These are good 'big picture' problems, but I'm a writer and the thing I always notice first is bad characterization. Like... -Stories being so bloated that the only dialogue they have room for is unnatural-feeling expository dialogue. -Scripts written by people who have never experienced anything beyond college life, so all their characters are entitled and catty. -Dorks who only know how to make female characters "strong" by making the male characters incompetent. -SMART CHARACTERS WRITTEN BY STUPID PEOPLE.
Flight Of The Intruder is my secret shame. It got destryoed by critics, but I still love it. The point is that the character of Camparelli, the skipper, was played by Danny Glover and they even gave him an awesome line about there being a "wop in the woodpile..." The GREAT part was that there was no SJW culture (or really even much of an internet) so nobody was saying how awesome it was that the movie had diversity. Obviously, Camparelli was a white Italian in the original novel by Steven Coonts. If it came out today, there'd be articles everywhere talking about it bring the "FIRST" movie EVER with a black man being so high ranked in a military role, which it wouldn't be, but the SJW's love to retcon history for their regressive religion. We are doomed to a whole generation of nostalgia pushing, and unless SJW "culture" disappears by then, cinema will be officially dead. We gots a LONG way to go. :/
Chris Bingley that’s why I prefer what I call the classic old school Hollywood actors and actresses who are there for the work and don’t become involved on the casting couch
Right? People are too picky about product placement. Everyone gives Jurassic World shit like "look at all the product placement like restaurants and food and shit in the main part of the park ugh" and I'm like "um have you ever been to a theme park before?" Double frustrating because they miss the point of how Jurassic World (the park) is being portrayed in the film as over dependant on funding from (and contracting out to) external sources, from investors like Verizon Wireless, to on site restaurants like Margherita-ville, and this is not only thematically relevant but also plot relevant. It demonstrates how the non-sciencey and non-militaristic members of the park's higher ups (especially Claire and to a point Masrani) allowed the creation of the Indominus Rex to happen. I went on a bit longer than I meant to I'm sorry I have strong feelings about this movie
@@zorkmid1083 Circular Reasoning ..... In "real life" there are no X-Men so if You can suspend Your belief in that fact the signs don't even have to be there ......
Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true .....
The other day I called my friend, and I said let's see a movie. He said "Okay." I said "But we will see only something original. That means No sequels, prequels, remakes, reboots, or comic book superheroes." He laughed and said "Good luck." Of the 18 (eighteen, not a typo) movies out at the time in our area, only TWO filled our requirement, and we had already seen them both. ANOTHER trend, that wasn't mentioned, is that movies more and more are looking like X-box games. The texture, look, feel, action, sound, directing. All very x-boxy. I remember, when I was growing up, before CGI was a thing, movies had to have something... what was that called? Oh... oh yeah a STORY; an actual story. Yeah, those were great. You can still have special effects, but have a story to drive them, and not the other way around.
Its hard to explain it but also films back in those days had a very sort of ... organic look to them? I guess you can say. Like Substance over spectacle was clearly the driving force for cinima where as now its the apposite. Also and I think this needs to be said and Im surpirised it was not considered in this video but my god. I am SO SICK and tired of Political agenda's being pushed into movies. It is ruining the culture and art form of the medium in such unbeliable ways. I think this is probably one the worst modern trends that is distroying film.
i guess im randomly asking but does anyone know a method to get back into an Instagram account..? I somehow forgot my login password. I would love any assistance you can offer me!
@Bruce Emmett I really appreciate your reply. I found the site thru google and im waiting for the hacking stuff now. I see it takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
I like Marvel's tactic for fixing the revealing trailers problem by straight up lying in their trailers. Let's look at some details from the MCU trailers. *** SPOILER ALERT *** - In the first Infinity War trailer, Banner has turned in to the Hulk for the Battle of Wakanda. - From the scene with Thanos fighting Iron Man post-Star Lord ruining everything, he is seen putting the Space Stone in the gauntlet and having only those two stones when he proceeds to whoop on Iron Man. - In the second major Infinity War trailer, Thor is still wearing his cloak and the eye-patch while on Nidavellir with Rocket and Groot. - Also in that trailer, during the scene where Rodgers grabs the hand with the Gauntlet, he only has the power and space stones in it. - Several pieces of monologue by Brolin in the trailer are not even in the movie - In the Ragnarok trailer, Hella breaks Mjolnir in an urban landscape with no Loki around - When he drops down on the rainbow bridge after rediscovering is command over electricity without the hammer, both of his eyes are glowing And I'm sure the list goes on
Yeah, Legendary Godzilla was actually quite "light" compared to the original 1954 Gojira or its sequel in 1956, Godzilla Raids Again. Even Shin Godzilla, while his *appearance* may be darker and such,. the overall movie is still not that dark like that of Gojira or GRA. Gojira and GRA actually showed some people getting killed by him during his big rampage (at least as best they could given the time), and even afterwards, we get close-ups of the aftermath in that shelter, seeing so many injured / dying (largely from radiation poisoning from being too close to Godzilla) / dead people. Compared to that, the stadium shelter at the end of Legendary Godzilla was bright and happy with the family reunion and such. So Godzilla really *started* dark, then gradually turned light during the "superhero era" of media, then went back dark at first with his first reboot in the late 80s with The Return of Godzilla / Godzilla 1985 before turning a bit more neutral in the 90s, and then somewhat fluctuated in the 2000s with the Millennium / X era, with some films being more neutral while ones like GMKG went more dark, with Final Wars being more light overall.
I remember when the first Star Wars movie came out......it was in theaters for over a year...a YEAR....I can't imagine a movie nowadays that could capture the imagination and attention of people for that long. By the time I decide to go see a new movie, it's already gone from the theater. I know I'm getting old, but I don't take THAT long to make up my mind😁
Another bad trend in modern movie is.. when the villain going all power on the heroes and there is no hope suddenly a powerful hero comes and destroys the villain.. Justice league- Superman entrance Infinity war- thor entrance Avatar- return of animals lol Many more.
Yeah, but Thanos won still and isn't dead(?) , so what are you talking about? Also, the Wakanda fight was never truly won either, it was more of just a stalemate with the Black Order haivng a slight advantage. If anything, you could say Thanos' arrival is ore what you're complaining about since when he came in the fight was truly over and he destroyed the Avengers. You should've said Captain Marvel cause next year Captain Marvel is coming and they are going to kill Thanos.
Not sure if the Avatar reference belongs. Sully told Eywa what would happen without help and Augustine was already a part of Eywa so it had direct knowledge of humans destroying their own world. Eywa sending the animals as support was perfection in movies, and Avatar is as close to perfect as a movie can get... like other JC (James Cameron, not pretend jesus) offerings like T2 and Aliens, and even The Abyss. JC knows how to deliver the heroes journey and does setup/payoff better than anyone ever has... or maybe ever will.
What about the "marvelization" of movies? Now most of the movies must have "jokes" every five minutes, even in the most tense moments as if the viewers were stupid and would get distracted otherwise. That also happened with Justice League (they hired one guy, don't remember the name, that had made some Marvel movies to end the movie and add reshoots because Zack Snyder had to leave)
+m94h The reshoots apparently improved Justice League. Word is that Snyder's original cut would have been depressing the the point of being completely unwatchable
m94h I agree, look at Thor: Ragnarok, last 2 Thor solo movies bomb so lets have a joke every minute, people say iit was a good movie, I say it was stupid.
m94h Joss Whedon. His style didn’t really go with the whole DC world. He’s great writing and directing Buffy, Avengers and Firefly, but the clash of two directors / writers in Justice League led to the problems. The jokes aren’t necaccarily bad but some examples (slightly in Thor Ragnarok) just ruin the tense moments.
This is because of the wider demographic audience marvel is reaching for. Making it at least PG-13. I was extremely disappointed when I first saw the first Avengers movie. Too childish and immature and not serious enough.
I find it telling that you chose to highlight studio interference at Marvel, where it has occurred in a meaningful way exactly ONCE out of EIGHTEEN films, and not DC, where almost HALF of their paltry FIVE films show obvious signs of franchise baiting and studio meddling.
Joss Whedon also was having issues with Marvel when doing Age of Ultron as well. Also Alan Taylor, director of Thor 2, also butted heads with Kevin Feige during production of that film. Now to be fair, Marvel has gotten a lot better on letting directors do more of their own thing, like James Gunn and Taika Waititi, but it came after some very negative press after Ultron.
+bryn44 Hopefully the same thing will happen to DC After Justice League. Don't get me wrong I loved that movie, but it could have been way better If the studios just let the director do his job.
The difference is that Edgar has a directing style very suited to comic books and it was a passion project of his. He was the only reason Ant Man is even thought about these days and Disney went and mucked it up and made it one of the worst movies in a very tired franchise.
Have you not seen the original Godzilla? It's about as gritty as they come. Only the films of the 60s and 70s were fun and light in tone. The rest have been fairly serious.
I love the gritty reimagining of "lighter" materials. Man Of Steel was fn great. Subtract a few lense flares and it's a perfect film. Come at me bro lol
Both agree and disagree with some here. Trailers spoiling and producers overpowering yes totally agree. Studio interference bloody kneecapped The Hobbit more than necessary. As for sequels I don't mind them if they're done right. For franchises that actually have potential and isn't done just for the money. It's remakes I'm no fan of myself.
I don't have a problem with sequels as long as there is an actual story to tell, and not just grinding out a sequel because. And, I'm not all that into cliffhangers. I shouldn't have to make a lifelong commitment just because I happened to go to the wrong movie.
katymvt yes! That's the same for me. A good movie can end with the promise of a sequel without having people sit on the edge of their seat for a year/two depending on when a sequel shows up.
I agree, why not rerelease a movie instead of remaking it? You could add an actor who was in it telling the story to his kids and cut to the movie to make it work, but yea, a rerelease would be far better.
I don’t know if you mentioned lack of consequences. Franchises refuse to kill anyone due to heir star power and long contracts so there are no stakes. In a marvel movie you know that they save the world because it has to exist for the next movie and you know everyone lives because they are already in the next one.
Nico First of all, I don’t know about Gamora. She looks pretty dead. Second, what you said may be true, but that will not make Spider-man’s death any less tragic.
Kevin Feige interfering is not a bad thing.Just like Comicbooks need an Editor,Comicbook movies need a guy overseeing the continuity. DC tried the whole"we are a director driven studio" andd look where they are.Granted,there are a lot of factors involved,but its a major issue,not having a guy with a singular vision.
DCEU had a guy with a vision, but guess what... "Nooo, I want colours and jokes everywhere, don't make me think, it hurts!" And then Suicide Squad came and give exactly what that public wants, to show how awful it is... Wonder Woman came to show how great is a movie with the director who knows the story, mitology and characters having all the control (especially on the edition, by the way)... And came Justice League with the same problem: Snyder made the movie we need, then Warner take him off and Whedon made the movie that public ask for... Not so good, huh? Well... I hope the studio and the public finally learned the lesson, and Shazam, Wonder Woman 2, The Batman... Anyway, the rest of DCEU becomes more what we need and very less what the complaining people wants.
WB and Snyder didn't really have a vision, Snyder was just the only guy who agreed to make the movie which was only made to keep the rights from the family that created Superman.
They need to remake BAD movies and make them good. There are many reasons a film can fail and why not correct the problems and remake a film with a great idea but didn't work out originally. If a movie is a classic, don't remake it (ie Ghostbusters).
And they are running out of ideas for movies as well. Gone with the Wind set in the year 3000 is still Gone with the Wind. It is rare now days to see a movie that is not a remake or rip off of another movie. So why did this happen you ask. Well it use to be that only a few new movies came out each year. Then they started cranking them out like a belt feed machine gun. Now it is hard to come up with something that has not be recycled a dozen times already.
The Marvel example for studio meddling with Directors isn’t a strong one since AntMan performed well at the box office and the critics. Warner Bros meddling with DC is everything wrong with that idea.
So Marvel then let Taika Waititi & Ryan Coogler have as much creative freedom as possible. I think what WB did to David Ayer was far worse. Hiring new editors behind his back & re-cutting the whole film behind his back.
I honestly wished that they didn't let Waititi have the freedom to do whatever he wants. That way, we could've gotten the epic and dramatic finale that the Thor trilogy deserves. Not that shameless Sandler-esque spoof that tries too hard to be like Guardians of the Galaxy but severely lacks the heart and spirit of those films.
I personally enjoy his brand of humour, What We Did In The Shadows is a great movie. Thor is originally a cosmic character so it does make sense to me. I don't think Taika Waitit is anything like Adam Sandler, watch Hunt for the Wilderpeople, so much heart to it. Sandler's stuff is soulless misogynist unfunny trash.
Martin Snow, Yes he is a good director But Thor should not have been a comedy feast. it's like Marvel/Disney just want fan service and laughs for the generic audience and fuck the long term fans. Fuck the fans that stuck with Marvel when they were bankrupt, Marvel making movies for the Marvel fan is a joke. Making Thor a comedy more is saying we care more about sales than the history of Thor.
Number 1 is dumb. Marvel is a multi billion dollar project and can go very badly if not watched over. If you want to play in the Mouse treehouse, you play by the Mouse's rules. Or you can buy and make your own movie. Everyone has bosses, directors are not different.
I agree....it is franchise that has so many films and they are planned so that they work together as a whole....that I understand some major changes can't be made
Paul Baba Even so, of you have a creative vision that bucks tradition, but could be even better or more unique than everything else in the franchise, then the studio telling you "We don't do that here" is very detrimental to the brand. Black Panther is one of the, if not the highest grossing, Marvel films to date, because it's nothing like the other ones. It falls into the "reimagining" category that this channel complained about. Even though it's not a reimagining, but the characters being morally is NOT a Marvel thing, outside of The Winter Soldier and The Incredible Hulk. Even then, they only dipped a toe in it. Black Panther took the plunge, and I can almost guarantee you it wouldn't have happened if they had the same mentality they did with Ant-Man.
The directors are not some kids to be told what to do, especially someone like Edgar Wright who is a genius. They know what they are fucking doing just let them work their magic and if you aren't confident this director can make something good, then why hire him?
The last Star Wars movie was a perfect example of how to cram everything that kills movies, into one movie. That movie was the absolute garbage. Star Wars is dead!
diversity where it doesn't belong,politicizing,downsizing franchises as well as miscasting is what's mostly destroying not only movies but tv shows as well.
Nowadays, it's just sequels, remakes or something based off a some kind of book or comic-book or video game. It's been a long time since I've seen something original on the big screen... Historical movies don't count
Excessive remakes and the misguided perception that fans of old stuff will make it Hollywood money. News Flash: WE WANT NEW, ORIGINAL CONTENT, HOLLYWOOD
anthony cheesman it's all about taking risks. You never know what's going to become a hit. No way anyone knew something like the Godfather or the Matrix would catch on.
How about giving into the "Twitter Crowd" when it comes to creating characters? The problem is that the twitter crowd sees protagonists as wish fulfillment instead of their true purpose which is whatever the story needs them to be.
When all is said and done, the film industry would be extremely improved by making a really good story a priority for making the damn film in the first place.
You are being too harsh to Kevin Feige. He's not the "money" producer, but actually a real movie producer. And he cares about the characters. That's why MCU movies work. And with franchise movies, the directors are only "stand-ins", it's not really their movie (though they can make it their own, like Taika Waititi), it's the studio's movie. They're just there temporarily.
I would add an 11th thing wrong. That being movies are becoming waaaaaaay too politically correct. The PC police have all but destroyed Star Wars. And it doesn't end there. It's a industry wide problem.
Reboots and remakes, action sequences with a million cuts, toxic fandoms (looking at you, Star Wars) and Tyrese Gibson. Those are the things ruining the film industry.
I hate superhero movies & have for the past 5-6 years. We started getting a TON of them in the 2000s, but they are like the "norm" now in the 2010s. Hollywood has zero creativity.
Wes Strong No, the problem is that these aren't really good films. Get rid if the hype and they're very bare, but also these big budget movies coming out all year smother smaller movies.
You say SJW agenda but both left and right wing stuff being shoved down our throats is poison. I go to see a movie to be entertained not to watch people's messed up political views. I don't care to see a movie pushing the "women are better than men" agenda and I don't need to see a movie constantly telling me how great The President of The US is. That crap is all annoying and out of place in a movie about giant freakin robots fighting and blowing stuff up.
I guess what he's saying with that is that movies are pushing for a "foreign appeal" that is badly done and for one doesn't really feel respectful to the foreign country, and two doesn't fit into the style of the movie well at all.
