10 Unusual Weird And Rare Engines 

It's the British way of doing things ;-)

__34% eficiency is very little__classic fuel the must give power 100kw==140hp and this is with randament 50% and move_power at 5litters fuel_gaz_motorine_gazoline_ __actualy randament 30%_40%is very bad__ __archaicxn lord

@@luigiionascu7056 34% For a GASOLINE ENGINE is very good...the MOST Efficient engines in the world are Low Speed Diesels...and they are around 55% so IDK where you get 30-40% is "VERY BAD" unless you don't understand HEAT EFFICIENCY? (I believe the higest gas engine is 45% in 2019 and has a LOT of technology in it, so 11% change in 70 years is NOTHING!)

@@misters2837 _mister mister s power eficiency at randament is a lot necessary minimum 10% because at a engine motor of tank abrhams american with power 1000 horse power is grothw with 100 horse power and for a tank is imperios necessary_at hunter patrol plane avion millitary of 1 megawatt 1360 horse power is neceesary for ++ speed fast with identyc consum combustibile_the fire combustie at motor the must complet at dioxide carbon and water not smoke _at motor ellectric eficiency is from 95% at 99% __archaicxn lord_the lost samurai

@@luigiionascu7056 I could hand my 4yo nephew the phone and the gibberish he would type, would make more sense than your response, that leads me to believe....that you STILL don't know what you're talking about...

@@misters2837 _you are idiot full imbecill and etc_i m sory_arch lord

l)rl

Amazing...awesome...wonderful ideas..👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

and a 7 cyl 2 stroke is good for what, right leg exercise

Dames know too much about cars these days

Those engines were super smooth runners.

@@darrenwebb5334 for sure

Joel Seim + Thank you sir ! :)

Main advantage is higher efficiency, compression stroke pressure reduction, results in less power, Prius electric motor makes up for power reduction.

Usually a 350 in there. I think you’ve swallowed a few valves or some coil packs have gone.

Like popay's half hours power car 😂

fack yeah

It hurt, glad they shut it down.

Wow Really? They ran it free (no load) from COLD for what? A minute or TWO? Without a fan/prop...BIG DEAL!!! - I guess you don't realize that an air-cooled engine can run several minutes from HOT with no air movement...I mean think about EVERY Big-Twin Harley to 2013 would come off the freeway at full HOT operating temperature, and STOP (i.e. NO AIR MOVEMENT) at a traffic light for anywhere from 30 seconds to 2 minutes waiting for the light to change, idling (i.e. Not Under Load)...and the funny thing is, if you have a CHT gauge they get COOLER as they sit there than when they were running down the road UNDER LOAD!

@ Mister S Yeah... comparing a supercharged engine with multiple rows of 18 cylinders that is designed to run on 145 octane fuel to a shitty v twin bike engine that’s 35 times smaller and designed to run with no load and separate fools from their money. Leave this to the experts. You’re out of your league. You never run an air cooled aircraft engine without a prop or test club.

@@Bartonovich52 It is better to be silent and thought an idiot, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt... I have ran more Air Cooled Aviation engines on my "bench" than you have seen in your life... It doesn't need 130 octane (that's what it burned) fuel, or a COOLING FAN if it isn't ran UNDER LOAD... AirCooled V-twins are just a section of a radial, they have far more in common than you know...Learn before you open your mouth...or Go Hump Someone Else's Leg...Muttly

The "Connie" as they called them in the 50's was a beautiful airplane.

Be the BEST fishing pole in the world, mate.

and it actually sounds good too 😍

@@jtangen98 There's a 5 and a 7 turbo truck in Thailand

I love the look and sound of that thing.

@@morypal oi

Yes babe

I thought radials always had an odd number of cylinders per bank. Wouldnt it have been 6 banks of 7 cylinders?

@@morypal oilida

Life & Live In Cambodia + Thank you :)

seems they built it for torque and there's a lot of it.

Flemming Veggerby with a nearly nonexistent stroke, it doesnt have a lot of momentum. Its a rotary after all..

The ignition system is the only limitation for rpm on a rotary.

theravedaddy فارسی

Called a rain cap

I don't know what the car is but the engine is a Wankel rotary engine. Each rotor is 1300cc @80bhp. Mazda RX8s (7fd-7fc ) have two rotors producing around 210bhp, the two rotor rotary engine is half the weight and half the size compared to a 2000cc straight four.

@gteaz every rotor is about 654cc every set of two is 1308cc for a total if that 6 rotor is based off the 13b of 3924cc. But in reality since we weren't told it's size could be from 2946-3924cc's

The single engine you hear is called a pony motor. It's used to start the rest of the engines. There are other videos that will give you a better understanding.

it's called a pony motor cats used them for years

@@trapperbill4962 Called a donkey motor in New Zealand.

@@markcarey8426 And in the UK!

Joshua Ballew it’s called a rain cap.

i think it's much bigger, got his facts wrong...

Rick Drysdale its a whole bunch of kh250 triple engines slaughtered to make that crap

Sounds like I imagine a dragon would sound. Glorious.

Ambrose Leahy I

That one looked like it had a gallon of oil in the cylinders. Good smog making machine though............

So did Willys-Knight car engine. Late 20s IIRC

No, but your Honda will fit in that m-503 !

Boing?

omepeet2006 Boeing the plane company

Ah. Thanx!

Terry Horton T

@Ryan Plethra they do it to Buick some in the aftermarket. The supercharger doesn't supply much boost to an engine. Maybe a few pounds on a stock engine. If you add a turbo making 7 psi your supercharger will add a few more than than. Look up notoriouslesaber on Instagram or Facebook. He has a 3.8 that is twin charged.

It's because he steals the videos.

Collateralcoffee He removes the watermark and then credits the original channel. Iffy but possibly legal

Mark Edwards o

6v53 is one hot little number .Set it up in T.T.A.T . and listen to her scream

Only one crankshaft methinks. The "top" pistons actuated rockers that worked on the crank. Heapsa bang for the buck: about 130 bhp from 3.5 litre displacement.

Andrew Wilson catfish

Nope! Is zvezda m-503 , star engine, 7 banks ,6cyl per bank.

Oh yeah. She sounds nasty don't she? Bad ass!!

If you are refering to 18 and 14 cylinder radials, the are twin row engines, each crankpin has 9 or 7 cylinders.

Rick Drysdale twin and four row radial engines have the cylinders slightly off set from one row to the other to allow air to cool all cylinders evenly.

No It is not a requirement, there were some inline radials that were 24 cylinders, for example, the Junkers Jumo 222 which was a radial with 6 rows of 4 cylinders, water-cooled, it was a problem engine. Every time Junkers go it to run at the required power, the spec was increased. The 222 was the reason that the entire Bomber B program was a failure. Others used an odd number of banks of inline cylinders, some air-cooled, some water-cooled, none went into production. The only advanced engine to go into production (say, at least in the thousands) during WWII was the Napier Sabre, a sleeve valve H24 of between 2200 and 2450 hp during the war and 3055hp after the war. This also was a problem engine (difficulty in mass production, specifically sleeves and the plain bearings in the crankshafts) and was almost cancelled a couple of times. All the advanced engines were problem children, the designers were pushing the envelope and the engines were not properly developed. Gas turbines were much simpler and faster to develop than advanced piston engines. And, using German numbers much cheaper to make, according to Junkers the Jumo 004 axial flow turbine cost less than a quarter of what it cost to make their Jumo 211 V12 piston engine.

It will run other fuels, but not well. It's only if it's mission critical and you don't mind overhauling the engine or scrapping it afterwards.

Daan Bos + Thank you :)

@SubvenioArguo it was the donkey engine they were using to start it.

The Zvezda M503 was built in St Petersburg and it was used in Soviet missile boats (kod NATO= OSA). This boat used three engines.

Well considering it never started I'd say yeah it's not practical.