10 Years of Intel CPUs Benchmarked: i7-930, 2600K, 4790K, & Everything Since (2020) 

Still waiting for the mousepad with the modmat design on it

Nice that u use a i7 2600k. Personal I use the e3-1245 (I7 2600 but 100mhz lower clocks). And I do see that the I serie Just have a big hit after ddr4 memory . For the rest almost the same by years

Someone let Lyle know to tell Kyle he can replace the one he sliced and diced doing an unboxing.

Thank you so much for all your hard work, this is an awesome video and crazy useful, I'm on a 2080ti and a 4790k so have been keeping a keen eye on the 10900k. My main game is DCS World so I'm long overdue this upgrade!

Y no 3770k?

Hahahaha that was a good one

haha

holy shit, nice one

Well played lmao

If by "flattening the curve" you mean by aquiescing to globalist oligarch overreeach.. by allowing them to throw nearly 30 million new voters into unemployment causing all kinds of unecessecary death to age groups not at dire risk to secondary health conditions, also allowing government to trample over sovereign inalenable rights? then well done, you are just the kind of lemming they're looking for?

Steve: I can show 10 gen on intel core processors

haha its actually really good when you figure out the weird ways it overclocks. its the only CPU here that has L4 cache and when utilized correctly it can be very effective. Hopefully we'll see Steve check back on it overclocked to 4.2GHz on the clock and 2.0GHz on the EDRAM (L4 cache). I'm surprised they got it on 2400MHz as i was having trouble getting it to be stable as the 5775C memory controller isn't quite as good as the 4790k and isn't a fan of running at 1.65V. They probably have better/more sticks of ram laying around to try on it than i did. But i am glad to finally see a video with my ol 5775C in it :)

@@mattb6001 I just wish it was supported on more motherboards, I'd buy one to use in my older LGA1151 mobo to replace the Xeon in the board so that I don't just pitch it.

I owned one. It was decent

@@mattb6001 I had a 5775C OC'd to 4.2ghz and OC'd RAM at 2400mhz. It was not a bad system, but I felt I had to upgrade to a newer platform. 4 core 8 thread is starting to look pretty low end, so I upgraded to a Ryzen 3700x.

I've bought the 4790k and still to this day i regret going for it over the 5775C which was acctually cheaper when i bought it...

I'm also still gaming on my 2600k at 4.4ghz, paired with a 1070. Only game that has given me trouble is Kingdom Come Deliverance. Every other game I can max out easily

My 2600 (non-k) still going strong as well. The legacy bios is the only thing making it tempting to upgrade.

@Jeffrey Grindle i have an x58 rampage 2 with 990x until 2020 paired with titan v and is insane the value of "future proofing" of the plataform. today i have an evga sr3 and maybe in 2030 i change again.

@@KyriaxWitch Even though it works, I think the 12100 would bring a significant amount of more fps

Yeah or lock it to 4 c/4t

Voss Li why not just do a single thread run of CB then? That is a feature of Cinebench. You have to click Advanced or something for it to show up.

@@AgentSmith911 That's what Intel did to us for over half a decade.

@@depth386 it won't be accurate as a single core run of each processor will run at different speeds thus locking each processor at 3ghz for example would give a more accurate ipc measurement for a single core run from gen to gen even if not 100% accurate.

The situation would've looked far worse after Haswell. Much of Intel's gains since then have been from higher clocks and now more cores. Of course, these tests don't show power efficiency, which was steadily improving all the way from sandy bridge to skylake. Even further on mobile, where Intel had less pressure to push clocks to stay at the top of the charts. The 10 series is the first where Intel is loosing on both performance and efficiency in mobile in a long, long time.

But you need a new chipset anyway.

This didn't age well.

@@Xrey274 Uh why? Even when AMD went back on their promise which is by itself a OEM problem because they refuse to ship bigger VRM, AM4 supported Ryzen 1, Ryzen+, Ryzen 2 which adds to over 20+ cpu. Skylake barely changed anything about Kabylake and forced users to get a new motherboard.

AMD: we aren't gonna do that anymore. Time to milk consumers.

@@FeralFlare zen+ is basically zen, the performance difference isn't as drastic as from Zen to zen 2.

Especially at 2x speed.

To be fair this topic is pretty boring and full of alot of words. He doesn't have much of a choice.

Someone should set it to a hip hop beat for a sick mixtape.

​@@CaveyMoth Always watch Steve vids at 0.75 speed, sounds about right xD

@@Silent_Shadow To be fair, 10bucks for a i7-2600K is a steal

same bro same.

still running it all day @5ghz for 10 years still no need to upgrade 👌👌

mine was a sandy (i2500K) aswell, she left me this spring.

I still got a first gen i7-920. I don't use it anymore but it still works fine if I were to use it

Sandy Bridge-E xeon still strong (3930k equivalent)

same here well 3570k which is more or less the same thing but with a bit less consumption

A N I M E N I M E

i keep mine 5.5ghz on water

The graph would look like a high dive board

AMD's history has been very empty since Bulldozer came out. Unless you want to add in APUs...yeeesh

still, ARM crushes Intel and AMD, no contest

@@JohnSmith-pn2vl lol in what?

@@JohnSmith-pn2vl was that a sarcasm or you really believe that??

like texting with my crush

After watching a video about Honda K series ...I don't feel so good.

would still be cheaper per shot than buying a 9900k

I'd rather not die of alcohol poisoning.

Guess I'll die.

undocumented feature of the standard 3770 is that the multiplier is actually locked at x41

@@lolman123401 Actually you can go 400 MHz over the boost clock, that is 4.3GHz. You can have about 4.1 in games on all cores which is not bad at all. I am running a 3770 non k. Good K's are hard to find these days.

@@lolman123401 So that's the reason. I though I got luck or something. Oh well, upgraded to 3600 already.

@@lolman123401 that is not correct. Fully unlocked. I actually type this from a 3770k with the muiltiplier set at x44, running stable @4532 mhz with the PCH running @ 1,12v. And it has been working hardcore like this since 2012, almost with no interruptions. 0 manteinance on the rig&cooling since 2016. Cooled by a Noctua NH U12P. I've never had such a long livin CPU. All mounted on a Z77 sabertooth mobo from Asus, very decent VRMs imo.

Every one gangsta till real legend showoff - i7 4790k

2500k was and is beast. Overclocked it held its own against even non-k i5 and i7 processors from the 6000 and 7000 generation!

I’ve had the same motherboard and CPU since November 2011. I use the 2500k in a MSI P67 C43-B3, with a Hyper 212 cooler. I’m using Cryonaut and recently replaced the paste as well. In the last couple years, I have decided to push the chip as hard as I can recently and find it’s max “stable” overclock with my setup. I run 4.4Ghz at ~1.3v and I’ve never seen the CPU go over 65c under load, synthetic and in games. I’ve only pushed it this far recently and wish I did earlier. According to CPU-Z, this is a STABLE 33% overclock. I was able to do 4.5 “mostly” stable, but it would BSOD in PUBG and that’s what I’m really trying to squeeze performance for. I love this chip so much. Sometimes, it’s hard for me to imagine how a computer could even be faster because this thing STILL meets most if not all of my needs. For a mid range computer from 2011 ~$780, with

still on 2500K, glorious part. Considering r5 3600 but fearing that vermeer will be even better :)

I have 2500K at this moment and i have to say its meh... the difference from Q6600 (when i changed a long time ago) was so low... it was like 10% Thinking of buying 3600 too, the x570 motherboards are a bit pricey and the last few months were a bit weird... so I still dint bought a Mobo, CPU, RAM and an NvME

I'm still on a (non-overclocked because heat = bad in the current location) 2500k, and... I still don't have a good argument to make on upgrading the darn thing.

yea, probably best bought CPU for 200$, could hold decently almost 10 years. Never in history was that time... Imagine, in 1990 bought 486 25 Mhz... and had it in 1999. Impossible. :) Not to mention, that price of 486 in those times was like highend now. In midrange, it was like buying 386 SX in 1990.

@@warrax111 Almost, mine went out October 2020, so 3 months before 10 years. It was fine for GTX 1070, but upgrading to 2060S it started to show its age. But single core performance on 4.8 GHz is still good. CPU-Z score 477 and 3700X @4GHz has 489. I guess the minimum it needs are 4 additional threads the 2600K has, that could take it to 11 years of service. 10600K is a really nice upgrade, though I don't want to repeat the 10 years, upgrading hardware is so much fun after all.

Still on a 2500K today since April 2011. GOT Myself an LG 38GN950 ultrawide for Xmas so Picked up a 2070 Super and will probably upgrade to a 3080 Ti next year once the supplies ease and scalpers die. Plan to upgrade to a 10900k or 11900k after the 10th year anniversary :) I love upgrading, makes me recall my first build in 2001 with an AMD Athlon 500 and GeForce 256 DDR!

Yeah!

would be boring because 10 years ago FX series launched thats about it, 15 years ago you got athlons, phenoms and phenom II

The Phenom II x6 was released just about 10 years ago, maybe plus a few days. But from there it's basically a long wait until Ryzen. The semicustom and APU parts of their business were more interesting than the enthusiast part during this time frame.

@@jowarnis Phenom II in 2005?? Ya wot mate?

@SmashStomp Inc Flatline wasn't it.

Was? It still is bro! Especially if you're gaming at 4k with a powerful gpu. Well, assuming you have it overclocked to 4.7g like me :)

Kurtis Rinker if 1080p medium with a 2080ti is an average of 95, i really want to know what you get at 4k on shadow of the tomb raider

@@packerman1203 Well I only have a 1070 in it now (until nvidia releases 3xxx series) but I usually play SC2, diablo 3 and HOTS at 4k@60 maxed settings. It's my backup rig so I don't use it much anymore sadly :(.

I have a 2600k and an rtx 2080ti I have uploaded some 4K benchmarks, and guess what the 2600k isn't bottlenecking the 2080ti at all.

I've only just replaced a 2700k with a 3900x - and mainly as everything else was showing its age. No problem with the CPU.

My Phenom II is still going strong ;)

Joe Cool Nice, I personally have a 3700x as of now.

@Kenn Honson X Absolutely, just keep in mind it runs hotter than a 5600x of 5900x, it has a full 8 core ccd instead of a 6 core and 8+4 core respectively. It will clock extremely high and it has great core to core latency and pretty good memory latency, so yes I would say so, just like I said it runs a little hotter than the rest of the lineup so make sure you have an adequate cooler

Realtime1501, given what Steve is known for; I was expecting this, actually

It's not really that accurate. We could do it as a feature test, but it's not perfectly accurate to measure IPC that way

@@GamersNexus Werk excuse

I think you would want to fix the clock and work with a Quad core setup for testing IPC. Windows now is so used to running on multiple cores that the OS itself would probably take too big of a chunk out of the performance if limited to single core. It would be cool to see an IPC improvement rating for processors though.

@@HVDynamo Maybe limit it to four cores without hyperthreading?

Good choice, 2500K > 3700X was a big jump for me, very smooth and fast.

2600k 5ghz 24/7 no problem.

+Erik Tomliston Hehe funny , I am on Q6600 from those times still to this day. OCed to 3,3ghz most of time, but decreaded it to 3Ghz, I fear for that 10 year old motherboard. But its true, i've stoped playing demanding games after Crysis 1. and for non demanding, Q6600 is still enough. Thinking about upgrading it to Q9650, that was my dream CPU back in day, but waas always too costly, and didnt upgraded so much. But now it's for 20$, so I'm thinking....

With inflation, but that is another topic at itself

Yeah. Crammed on space. We had the prices in the Blender charts.

@@GamersNexus You could use some small font and put the prices on the left-hand side of the screen, in the empty space before the name of each CPU (see 15:00). Just to give an idea of launch price.

i paid mine 2500k 180 euro when it come out, 5,5ghz on water loop allmost 10 years.

Would be kinda flat tho. Generational improvements have mainly ridden off of frequency increments.

CPU architecture is very important, clock is not very informative on its own.

Hardware unboxed did it

Why has this become a joke? As a Total War player for 15 years that 6X more soldiers claim is the biggest news to the franchise since ME2TW. IDK why it's a meme now it's pretty sad seeing that I'm usually the only TW player in the forums when that slide came out :(

@@JABelms I'm also a total war player and already play with max soldiers on existing CPUs. That's why.

@@GamersNexus Strange, my 8 core i7 5960X seems to have a very large FPS hit when there are 8 stack battles on Campaign or 3v3 or more ultra size multiplayer battles...this is on Three Kingdoms which is a multicore optimized game. Other TW games before that performed like ass even on 2vs2 ultra. I would've hoped that the performance hit would've been gone by this new CPU guess I was wrong.

@@JABelms It's only a 5960X bro

@@metallurgico Which only means modern CPUs like these are needed to run an ultra 4v4 smoothly...if what intel claims is true. The IPC/single core is NOT that far from current intel CPUs, I have that CPU at 4.8 Ghz 1.34V , 290ish watts on all 8 cores under open loop

Ive finally retired the my 2500k yesterday. It can still do 5.1ghz stable on air with an Asus p8z68 board ... crazy good cpu. Lets see how long this R5 3600 lasts me.

Still rocking my 3770k, plan on getting Zen 3 later this year

Still rocking my 2500K right now. Been running it almost nonstop for since 2011 folding proteins and it's been rock solid from day one. Finally replacing it with a 3700X based system.

That's interesting, my 3570K lasted me until last week when I got a 3700X. Same upgrade cycle as you xD

@@dilet1114 Get an e3-1230v2, or v1 for 50 sheckels, at least you'll have HT lol.

Same here but i doubt the 3600 will last as long as the 2500k lasted due to competition and where the consoles are going.

Sebastian Contreras I just went from i5 6500 to r7 3800x.

@@GrozdanGR I think it will last as long because Moore's law is no longer a thing. Generational gains aren't that big anymore.

@@GrozdanGR that 3600 will last a few years, but you can always go to 3800x or whatever ryzen 4000 flagship is after that.

I went 2500k -> 4790k --> 3700X All the CPU's have been great for overclocking.

Joke's on them, Ivy was actually better than Haswell (Haswell lost more OC headroom than it gained back in IPC)

I feel ya. I've got one as well and it always seems to get overlooked.

I feel your pain as I am typing this on my 3770K rig.

@@LoftySkinner Hence Devil's Canyon. Brought back the OC headroom lost with Haswell through a process optimization. I got both my 4690Ks to 5.1GHz stable.

Paxmax I had a 3770u, so couldn’t never OC (easily). Recently built a new rig around r5 3600, but don’t really know what sort of jump I made bc I can’t find any recent benchmarks lol

Agreed!

Kevin Ellis hope we can see that again. Don’t think it’ll be the 10th gen probably the next gen after that as it will be on a new nm process

@jvalex18 I agree there is a bottleneck but a minor one with a high refresh rate monitor and a good overclock on the 2600K.

With a new seat "motherboard" every new pull of the titty.

yeah unlike nvidia, they still research for new tech.... if intel keep researching for future after they earned a lot of money, we could have supercomputer now.

@@dilet1114 3950x is the fine wine!

Died with what? AMD would not top this chart.

Well you can't blame them, that's what happens when you have no competition, What do you expect AMD would do the same if they were in yhe same position

Really dont know why i would switch too

How do you figure? The 3700x is thrown in there and it's often in the middle of the chart lol

@@Code-n-Flame for gaming they are still in a low year for that matter. Only the 3950X comes close to the 9700k, but the price difference is massive.

The FX series of AMD was horrible, I owned an fx8310 and fx8350 machines back in 2013: "octa core of shitness". I was a broke student back then, couldn't afford Intel.

@@usoppbarbosa981 You can make up for it by having some decent ram tuning. Ryzen is so much memory dependant in gaming and people tend to forget that

@@A.Froster you can't make up for it, actually. you can make it better, but intel is still a lot faster for high framerate gaming (intel benefits from fast RAM as well, btw).

I'm still on that CPU, now for almost a decade lol

I am using 2600k for the last 7 years. I don't know if it's still time to upgrade ..lol

The 990x outperforms the 2600k especially today with its 12 threads.

I've been on X58 since 2013. Since 2016 I've had a Xeon X5670 6c/12t @ 4.4GHz (22x200). In Cinebench R15 you would need over 5.6GHz on the 2600K to get similar score as the X5670 (or 980X/990X) @ 4.4GHz. Of course for gaming back in the day the 2600K was similar because games didn't use that many threads. But for video rendering etc. the 990X was a lot better

@@SuzukiRider93 I can distnctly remember reading the reviews during the time, and I'm almost certain that the 2600k overcame the 990X in IPC enough to overcome the thread deficit.

Its pretty hard to read on mobile. Gotta squint hard. How about putting the graphs vertical instead of horizontal? It might be easier to see left to right rather than top to bottom especially when the screens are wider but not really taller.

J MuGurr it’s harder to read product names that way. By a long shot.

@@YTHandlesWereAMistake well hardware unboxed make the graph just about ok for mobile. These are really small for mobile screens even for big phones.. this needs to change since a lot of ppl watch videos on mobile.

a n i m e n i m e

The top of the chart is hard to read when you pause the video too because yt puts crap up there.

I did the same last december, prices of old Intel hardware are super ridiculous in my country - I sold i5-4590, 16GB of DDR3 and some budget mobo added another 150$ and bought Ryzen 2700x, X470 mobo and 16 GB of DDR4. Best part of that is: I sold mine 4x4GB DDR3 1600MHz memory for more than I paid for 2x8GB DDR4 3200MHz :D

I'm typing this on my trusty 4.8Ghz 6600K, but im looking at the Ryzen 3600 sitting on the desk next to me and can't freaking wait to finally build a new system next week.

@@Scytian1 funny part is, that my system was an i3 and I sold it for... 150$... with 4GB of RAM... Oh well, someone has to exploit the dummies lol

burntjoint You are in for a treat! Welcome to AMD "Cores for cheap". Don't forget to stop by reddit's /r/AMD ! Couple of months ago I built a 3600X and 3900X for the kids, and three Threadrippers TR 1920X, 2950X, and 3960X for myself.

@@MichaelPohoreski I can't wait for AMD to raise prices. For the amount of products that AMD supposedly sold their profit stinks! The shareholders have taken notice too. Intel could bomb the crap out of AMD with pricing and make em squirm a bit

Bulldozer lol

2600 was a good choice. 9900k not so much. could have waited a couple of months more for the 3rd gen ryzens. i mean you've waited 9 years before upgrading

@@basshead. "faster" gpu makes gaming not cpu

@@marcos14223 WRONG

@@basshead. yup and still slower in any productivity task

@@basshead. who the fuck only play games on their PC?! They should have bought PS4 or XBOX Instead. Many of us do multitasking.

basshead and AMD has better prices on better cpus that do just that!

Easy, just crank it up. I had my 2600k running DDR3-2133 with the cpu at 4.95GHz. I did however get greedy with the voltage to get it there...

@@noxious89123 How much voltage? I need 1.4v (minimum LLC, 1.328v during CB) with 4.4Ghz no HT OC 2133Mhz RAM.

Fugboi i just realised I’ve degraded my 3930k by running it at 1.395v static at 4.7ghz for a few months, either that or me trying to run it at 1.2v system agent and memory controller. So be careful

Also still runnin a 3770k @ 4.8 with 2400 cl10 :) But degradation is killing it slowly. This year has been the third time I had to increase the voltage slightly

@@MarshallSambell I had the 4930k running at 4.5ghz with 1.396v for a couple of years and no problems. I was running 2400mhz Dominator memory too but I only had to take the SA voltage to 1.0v. No biggie. I upgraded to the Xeon E5-1680 v3 which has 8-cores and an unlocked multiplier.

Then get a 7nm amd chip? :-)

@@M00_be-r Another AMD salesman!

@@wysetech2000 w/e ever floats your boat man, have a great day ;-)

Bohdan Lvov my 2600k is running strong in my HTPC

@@fizzkhas6653 and probably still will for a while

Eh... I think it was the westmere gen, especially because they had 6core 12thread parts, and could reliably overclock to 4.5-5ghz, cooling dependent, you can still use westmere with only a percent difference in a frame rate between Sandy bridge and westmere with both overclocked, and if you use a 6core westmere and a top end 4 core sandybridge the westmere if more often then not ahead. Especially in modern games

My 2500k is still being used by my younger brother

@@fizzkhas6653 In an HTPC? Yeah, that's gonna be fine for ages.

I loved my Phenom II..but it was really struggling for a while.

@@CaveyMoth Yeah, Phenom II was a good chip but only slightly better than Core 2 chips and came out right as Intel started moving into the i7, etc series. I remember wanting a Phenom II X6 for a long time though, but by the time I could afford it, it was too late.

If you choice intel you should wait another couple month because z490 will support 11th gen Intel along with pci-e 4.0 10th gen seem useless now with no future proof because it will only support pci-e 3.0

There's no evidence to support that Intel will release an 11th gen CPU only months after a 10th refresh. And even if they did, the upgrade from my first gen would be so phenomenal that I wouldn't even care. I'm upgrading to 10th gen because it's a new LGA 1200 socket, which Intel will use for the next several years. So when a 7, or possibly even a 5nm chip comes out five years ago I'll get that if I want it.

You're going to jump from a Pinto to a Lambo....prepare to freak.

@@MakoRuu LGA1200 won't be supported beyond Rocket Lake, which will be released later this year, considering Rocket Lake will be Intel last 14nm+++. 10th is just a stopping gap for Intel to compete with AMD, same old achitecture since skylake, unlike Rocket Lake. So I still suggest you should wait a couple month.

Similar situation myself, went from the 2500 non k to Ryzen 3600. Took a lot of work and ended up needing to change my tower due to standoffs not quite lining up anymore, but it was worth it

The i5-2500K was really good! 6 years of use is excellent and really shows that you built a strong system back in 2012.

Jesus, dude, are you an alter ego of mine or something? I have exactly the same story to tell, even years are matching!

I still use it, it's a great cpu. I'm planning to switch to a ryzen 3700 eventually, but it's still sad to see that Intel just can't come up with anything interesting for those prices

@@GamersNexus same here ... upgraded to R5 3600 but my I5 was never below 4.8ghz its entire life ... crazy good silicone i got it can still do 5.1 on air on Asus p8z68 board.

My 2500K and 2600K still going strong. Actually may have killed the 2500K the other day when I switched motherboards. Put the i7 in a Z77 and the i5 into a P67, 2600K working fine thankfully.

you can also buy something like a x5675 for cheap and get a good 6c chip

@@DunhaCC I was talking about buying a consumer PC in 2008. And not upgrading it (excpet for video card) until today. Makes no sense buying 930 or 965 or even x5675 ( year 2011) today. You can buy a better and cheaper CPU today.

A lot of people who had X58 systems did upgrade to a 6c/12t Xeon around 2015-2017. I've been on X58 since 2013 and I bought a Xeon X5670 in 2016 and I'm still using it overclocked to 4.4GHz.

me2

same - I really don't see a reason to upgrade... yet

Wow, broadwell is pretty rare nowadays, i'll keep it for 2-3 yrs from now if i were you

Buy a 20$ x5670, oc it to 4.2Ghz or so, you will bring back a lot of life to your system

or for 10$-60$ you coulda just gotten yourself a 6c/12t Xeon x5650 (10$) / x5690 (60$) which easily oc's to 4.3Ghz with a good air cooler (Noctua D15 / Cryorig R1 Ultimate) and in terms of performance its more or less between 6700k and 7700k but would do better in software that knows how to utilize more than 4 cores.

Same here ... that CPU has been rock solid to me for years. I'm not much of a gamer except for a few strategy games and the 4790K performs perfectly for those.

@@Mr_Spock512 I'm still running a 4770k but overclocked to stock 4790k speeds to eek a little more life out of it. It seems to do really well for me in most cases, but it's definitely starting to show its age when I start trying to multitask now. But if I am only doing one thing at a time it's still pretty quick. I am thinking about updating to Zen 3 when that comes out later this year, or I might just stick it out a few more years for AM5/DDR5 to come out. It has certainly been the longest I have ever waited to upgrade a CPU, but it's just been a beast of a chip. It worked out well for me timing wise since I bought it right after it came out so I had a good few years of it being top dog with intels struggles to get to 14nm/Broadwell.

I upgraded from an i5 4670 to an i7 4790k for $150 recently rather than upgrading my whole system and its quite a noticeable jump in performance and can still handle all the latest games really well, don't think I'll be upgrading anytime soon either.

I finally took the plunge and upgraded mine last month, the performance gains from a 10600k are very noticeable, but yeah if you're not really pushing it past its limits it's still a great cpu

@@martinarscott3524 In what sense do you feel the upgrade? I play mainly CSGO and so on

Good, love Nehalem too. Hate compound under IHS, so love Sandy Bridge too, but not later.

Didn't realise that could be overclocked...interesting

Exactly, timing is everything with technology. Look at the "there's always something to wait for" types who bought just before Sandy bridge! I bought in at X570, PCIE 4.0 and Ryzen 3700X.

for how much he bought 7700k?

Rocket Lake will come at the same time as Ryzen 4000 and will be better for future proofing because of the PCIe 4.0 support.

Or allowed to (NSA front group)

@@kesamek8537 Do you really believe all that crap? If you do you should know that AMD has it too. Google it!! It's all there but likely isn't the truth.