100 THEN and NOW PHOTOS 😲🏞️ 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 

Photography is like a time machine...

31:23 Definitely NOT Hitler at the Arc De Triomphe. It’s De Gaulle after the liberation of Paris in 1945.

I do not like those blended photos. I'd rather see a complete one placed next to another complete one. Didn't stay to watch til the end.

I love this!! I've always liked seeing distanced photos like these. (Not so much the composites). I like the ones that barely changed, and the ones that change drastically. Splendid content.

The churches are always there! Love seeing the difference in these pics - if any. 14:15. Very interesting! 18:09. York, building in middle goes back to 14th c. Thank you! 😊

확실히 외국은.부수고.새거.잘안만드네요.원형자체를.나두네요.너무나도.멋지네요.한국은.다부수고.새건물.짓는거.좋아하는데.이래서.외국은.유네스코건물이.많나봐요.너무나도 부럽네요.🏚🏠🏰🗽🏯

3:10 The growth of Dubai in that amount of time is INSANE, that one blew my mind.

Helpful suggestion: 1) Make side by side pictures bigger, to the limits of the screen (without clipping sides or top/bottom of either photo, of course), (2) Assume that people will stop & restart the video at will to compare the side by side pictures, & suggest that viewers do so, & therefore radically shorten the period of time each image is shown. This will make the video much shorter, which will make it easier to decide to watch it. I actually turned the speed way up, since I stopped the video at every interesting looking picture(s). But turning the speed up ruined the beautiful music, although it got me through the video quicker. I always stop this type of video at each picture. The only trick is to not make the interval TOO short, which some channels do, which makes it hard to stop each interesting picture in time. I'm not sure what the time interval should be. But it should be long enough to "think about & decide if you want to stop the video", but not anywhere near enough to do a comparison between the pictures. Just assume that if people are going to do a comparison, they'll stop the video momentarily. Nobody likes to feel rushed when they're comparing. So I think most people stop the video so they can relax & think deeply. I know I do. 😊

That is not Hitler in Paris in front of the Acc de Triomphe in 1940, it is Charles De Gaulle in 1945.

31.33 is De Gaulle's return to Paris in 1944 NOT Hitler 1940. De Gaulle (centre) was 6'5" whereas Hitler was 5'6"

Could you please tell me what was the beautiful first piece of music? Thanks! This is fascinating!

Images should be shown separately afterwards, as most is covered by the other image.

Man the side by side are cool a time machine

1:22 RIP to all the people killed by the 1955 Giant Bird attack on Manhattan. 😭

Love the pictures.

At 1:07 I'm sure the city of Athens it's not even close to that today.... The photos are probably: early 1900 left and '54 right...

와 100년의 세월이 무색하네요

The only difference is everything is more modern

Interesting.

31:22 : De Gaulle, not Hitler 🤨

6:08 the American government said challenge accepted now there are not enough of my people left to have the option to have it their way.

More than 200 years old, Oxford seems not to change much on that angle.

❤️❤️❤️Vi siete chiesti come appaiono gli stessi luoghi esattamente 100 anni dopo?

16:20…Russians reduced to using T34s again after Ukraine took out their best hardware.

traffic warden still on the right I see.

❤❤❤

That goes 2 ways.

The proof that the world has gotten worse.

We know from scientific studies that the glaciers in the Alps over the last 3,500 years reached their maximum in 1859/60. The 19th century and the period preceding it were quite cool (called the Little Ice Age), it is remarkable that in most old photos the vegetation, even in rural areas, was less lush than it is today.

❤.🇮🇩

Unwatchable with all that interference on the screen.

The Colombia Country ?????

ДУБАЙ СИЛЬНО ИЗМЕНИЛСЯ

The music....was too much.

The only difference is everything is more modern