100 Years of airplanes history | KSP 100% Stock 

SuperLegacySabi it really was a masterpiece of engineering

GaelCar07 Concorde was, I think

GaelCar07 all is masterpiece. Just some different way to be it

I don’t know why modern planes don’t have this great feature

wasn't it's first flight in 1930?

Yes) This is true)

me lol

I was like "Looks like a pretty basic bipla- Okay why is it flying backwar- Oh, it's supposed to fly that way. That's strange."

War gaming WG everybody

SPAAG WG me

SWDennis hey dennis

dennis?

SWDennis hi...

SWDennis hi

SWDennis i just saw your stream about 100000 kerbals walking around

Who* But yeah

Brazil

Is a Brasilian and creat the first airplane in the world

Vai Brasiliam Brasil 🇧🇷

Mentiroso esse mane.O Santos do mon,foi o primeiro a inventar o avião. 14bis

i think the creator of the chanell is rusian

@@naltlan7651 yea

@@naltlan7651 YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT CYKA? here, DA TICKET TO DA GULAG

That's cos he's a teacher for all non-russians. Поверь, я знаю о чем говорю

The Tupolev TU-114 (correct me if I’m wrong on that) was, and could still be, the fastest turboprop plane ever made.

B-17 at least

killer ninja skipped the first double deck plane, Boeing 747

RascallyGoose49 Playz don’t know if 3 story counts as 2 but the Dornier Do X in 1929 was pretty good and was 3 stories

killer ninja and Samuel codys plane

RascallyGoose49 Playz Go google it its not the First double deck plane

True

FadingGaming and 747, harrier, B-2, and the a-10

Well Me 262 is replaced by the Vampire in this video. I could complain he missed many planes such as the Spitfire, Zero, Hunter, Sabre, MiG-15, MiG-21, Me 163, etc... but it's better to have a plane of each period.

I actually thought that Yak-28 was a Harrier, but I found out it was a Yak-38 (Yak-28 was not a VTOL aircraft). (Edit, I now saw the description, and that it was only a typo in the latin translation)

I think these are just planes he has made rather than the most significant/important planes

Well yeah because a peicewent to mars on ingurninity

TheDuckLord22 neither did it have twin engines.

that's what i was thinking.. it was backwards hmm

It had two props, but one engine.

and it didn't have wheels

2 backwards facing props ran on one engine connected by Bicycle chains (they worked at a bicycle shop) and it was launched off runners

Nossa jaum pensei q era o unico hue br do bagui

Sim man

O Wright Flyer não precisava de catapulta, ela só era usada para auxiliar a decolagem.

@@Isegawa2001 ou seja, precisava de cataputa

Ikr? Great video, but the music ruined it for me. Had to mute. Not complaining about the content tho, good stuff

@Gaming Champ you didn't like the planes or something?

Could'nt agree more

@@WrektSK p

Toilet Paper. Your the one ruining it by posting a useless comment.

O_0

Não fazem mais que a obrigação. É história, tem que citar.

I know you might already know this, but The Yakovlev Yak-38 (Russian: Яковлев Як-38; NATO reporting name: "Forger") was the Soviet Naval Aviation's only operational VTOL strike fighter aircraft in addition to being its first operational carrier-based fixed-wing aircraft. It was developed specifically for, and served almost exclusively on, the Kiev-classaircraft carriers (heavy aviation cruiser in Russian classification). The Harrier, informally referred to as the Harrier Jump Jet, is a family of jet-powered attack aircraft capable of vertical/short takeoff and landing operations (V/STOL). Named after a bird of prey, it was originally developed by British manufacturer Hawker Siddeley in the 1960s. The Harrier emerged as the only truly successful V/STOL design of the many attempted during that era, despite being a subsonic aircraft, unlike most of its competitors. It was conceived to operate from improvised bases, such as car parks or forest clearings, without requiring large and vulnerable air bases. Later, the design was adapted for use from aircraft carriers. >>The Hawker Siddeley Harrier, developed in the 1960s, is the first of the Harrier Jump Jetseries of aircraft. It was the first operational close-support and reconnaissance fighter aircraft with vertical/short takeoff and landing(V/STOL) capabilities and the only truly successful V/STOL design of the many that arose in that era. The Harrier was developed directly from the Hawker Siddeley Kestrelprototype aircraft, following the cancellation of a more advanced supersonic aircraft, the Hawker Siddeley P.1154. The British Royal Air Force (RAF) ordered the Harrier GR.1 and GR.3 variants in the late 1960s. It was exported to the United States as the AV-8A, for use by the US Marine Corps (USMC), in the 1970s. >>The McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) AV-8B Harrier II is a single-engine ground-attack aircraft that constitutes the second generation of the Harrier Jump Jet family. Capable of vertical or short takeoff and landing (V/STOL), the aircraft was designed in the late 1970s as an Anglo-American development of the British Hawker Siddeley Harrier, the first operational V/STOL aircraft. The aircraft is primarily employed on light attack or multi-role missions, ranging from close air support of ground troops to armed reconnaissance. The AV-8B is used by the United States Marine Corps (USMC), the Spanish Navy, and the Italian Navy. A variant of the AV-8B, the British Aerospace Harrier II, was developed for the British military, while another, the TAV-8B, is a dedicated two-seat trainer. Source: Wikipedia

OptimalOptimus50 Eh. He’s Russian. And it’s just a showcase. Don’t need to get angry over some missed jets.

Colin Zoubek yup

*1913-1914

In 1917 they would have a syncronized machinegun in the front of the plane, but still in the same war, in 1914 they would have to use pistols in the plane and would drop bombs by hand in enemy lines.

Yes a concord in KSP would be pretty cool

Not!!! 14-bis is the first plane to fly on its own without any other force than that of the plane itself

MoltenSkies Terminus yeah. Like where was the AV-8 Harrier. That thing is a beauty

No but write flier flew with roll and pitch and catapults are used in aircraft carriers

There were no differences in the names.

1: don't use the hooks on a carrier as proof, they are there but the planes don't require them to take off 2: proceed to fuck yourself

+Gabriel 1. Carrier aircraft use catapults to help them so they don’t end up in water. 2. Chill

@@ingen6051 the hooks are actually for landing, not take off (it catch a wire to permit shorter landing distance), catapults use other systems, notably steam pressured pistons.

treekangaroo. Also the Hurricane.

How about the dehavilland mosquito

oH yEa WhAt aBoUt tHe SPRUCE GOOSE

The video is just aviation history in general, not the most well known parts

How about F19

Ultralagger R.E.V elevons

There's a tutorial for that, just look it up

How about the f-35 he totally missed that too

This was from 1903 to 2003 [i.e. 100 years (see title) the F-35 first flew 2006]

I mean it wasn't necessarily innovative but what about the A-10?

what about the 737? A huge revolution, but never mentioned, nor was the 707!

TheGBGamer You forgot the Spitfire

Same here!

IKR and where's the A280!?

Asian Potato besides the Cessna where's all the American planes in WWII era LITERALLY NONE

cristian rosales *A380

I would say "No Boeing Airplanes?"

Го на спейсджокера, реальн, тоже хочу полетать

А, он залил

уже

Makc Gordon, увидел, плюсик влепил.

Gordon's workshop крутое видио!снимай ещё!а как пропеллер сделать?

See the*

Its not a drooping noose its a droop snoot get your facts straight

jordan brown what did the fw 190 do?

And I think he forgot The Spirit of St. Louis *cough* totally not one of the most famous flights in history *cough*

Errol Tietjen WHAT DID THE 190 DO?

Я иметь лапки. имею, Т9!

It was designed in the 90s but yes it entered service in 2005 lol

Cole Smith lol it is

The Cessna

Diamond Hawk74 did you even read the comments

@shagyuor7447 pusher propellers exist

black magic

kurpingspace productions i would say it is a mod, but that would make the title clickbait

You can look up stock prop engin ksp and you can find tutorials for it

its like a bug exploit thingy that the devs kept in because yay

Its not nesarally a bug / exploit but I don't think the devs will ever "fix" it

Cheeki breeki

The years are based off the first flight, not the year it was adopted, but the F-22 was still wrong.

madlyawww blog it.

Your are wrong! If you pay attention to the dates it is off of first ever flight of the plane.

No Name the first jet was actually the he 178 made in 1939

*No Name* do more "Reviews" please... this is ksp.. meant to make those what he made.. not for research.. otherwise the devs of the game did research too.. sorry *M9199bro it's actually adapted, u had be confused there xD

hohladych because ksp is better?

better? In terms of creating aircraft, the rocket designer is better than the airplane designer? Are you drunk?

Space........

ksp still features real life like aerodynamics and simple planes still has alot to catch up on in terms of graphics and more functionality in general, ksp int about building rockets all the time, why do you think we have turbofans to our disposal?

hitman22 why do you fly in one from the 60's? They still update them and make new ones.

It's the most produced plane EVER for a reason :)

hitman22 The AR15 was developed in the 60's and it's the standard issue rifle of NATO countries today. The 1911 has been used for 106 years now, etc. This is because a good design, like the Cessna, lasts well after its introduced.

Boeing 747-200 was designed in the 60’s.

Ah yes, a media snob thinking old planes are bad. Many Cessna designs that are 'outdated' work just fine.

уже есть гайды, гугл в помощь

Gordon's workshop там есть на англ а на русском нету (пропелер делать получается а как его запустить чтобы самолет летел непонимаю )

Так скачай Infernal Robotics мод и не парься.

скачай мод для лопастных двигателей. Не мучайся с етими. Ведь замучаешся строить стоковые лопастные движки каждый раз и да и контролировать их мощность практически невозможно.

Traduzam

Henry Zhang I like lo fi.

I like 60s music

Neil

Ошибочка вышла, годноту*

French/British one. The Russian copy had canards

Oh thx

The only Concorde was the british and French alliance created one. The Russian one was called something different

and electric planes

Sir Mark *cough* dornier do x *cough* PBY *cough*

Alex Monamochamuch Those weren't the first seaplanes. I think the first seaplane that ever took off was in June 1905, I think the dude's name was Gabriel or something? He took off from towed glider and flew around 140 meters. But the first ever successful seaplane flight was in 1910 by Henri Fabre.

Егор Комиссар please learn english first, it is also *World* lanuage soo, it would be better for all of us if you do

this video is made by a Russian, so the creator can understand him, thats why u better fuck off and ask for that on english videos.

Michael Anthony haha didn't even notice. i guess so!

привет

I'm not the first Not the second, But, video cool!