33:10 the lux is so ready to talk shit because of the almost ace, then the next teamfight you turn it around completely and she instantly blames her team for the loss, lmfao
Good night pekin yesterday i dreamt you were going on a car drive with me and we stopped on a ice cream shop and you were mean and took my ice cream from me can you apologize for that?
Can't believe the perma splitting J4 actually pulled through like that, insane last fight, the whole match was so tense, one mistakes too many and you guys would have lost! It's a really good thing you were fed enough to trim their team at times, otherwise I think it was gg way earlier. Also on that soul fight for you when they got second drake, the way your back line go deleted by lux+skarner+rumble was absolutely disgusting, I was grimacing there, Rumble is really a horrible champ to verse imo.
Thanks for doing some Galio games, Galio is my favorite champ, great comeback in game 1. I think that ability to make comebacks happen through his utility is a big reason he's doing well right now.
@@luctapia J4 intentionally froze when all of his teammates were going to Rumble, and then there's the bad ult, along with his score I also immediately suspect win trading like Pekin XD
I find the games where you're behind far more educational than those where you're ahead: as an iron noob I'm more likely to not dominate my lane and it's good to see how you and the team can come back from it, the wincons, etc.
That first match was so intense. I really thought you were gonna lose, and to tie it together with the J4 finally coming to join for the final winning ult combo is nuts???
I miss chemtank Galio. Was so satisfying having to build up the charge and then combining it with Galio Passive for BIG BONK. Then you could use the active for W...
actually Skarner E overpowers even Ezreal E its crazy, I tried to buffer it and it literally disappeared like my E went on cd but the dash didnt go off
What if instead of "Galio carrying unwinnable games" it was "Galio freaking freaky games" and he just sucked toes and ate ass throughout the laning phase
PtA now grants the user increased damage instead of putting damage vulnerability onto the target. So the icon appears over the user's head. not the target.
"This Galeo build literally lets you carry unwinnable games. Even when 10k gold behind" This new title fits the vid a lot more though IMO since the first game was definitly a 1v9. Saving the nexus with barely any hp left and pinging his J4 off of bot wave and to come group instead of keep pushing bot. Also this is kinda hindsigjt but i think TPing to mid or bot wave both were about equally ok since his whole team was in his top jungle and they woudl've had to all rotate through the whole map pretty much. @@tristanridley1601
Just dropping my usual rant against the community normalizing the term "1v9" because at no point, and especially at this level of play, someone can win a game where the teammates are actively trying to make you lose by working with the enemy. Not blaming Pekin for this, that's how the RU-vid game works. But man do I find this expression toxic and insulting. That being said, what a comeback! I actually forgot the title of the video mid game so that nexus save blew my mind. What a clutch!
If 1v9 is not realistic as a concept, what's wrong with using it as an exaggeration, you know what it means and what it implies every time, it is kind of like being annoyed when a metaphor is not used for it's literal meaning
@@boba7288 I see your point, but I still despise this behaviour. "Int" literally comes from "intentionally" doing something wrong. "1v9" means you have to fight your teammates, in a team game, to win. We've even come to the point where "smurfing" is, at worst, an insult, and at best, a compliment disguised as an accusation. I am the type of people to be somewhat annoyed by "one-shot' being used liberally when a full combo is used to kill a champion, but even I can admit this is relatively harmless. But using terminology where any bad game state is always the fault of teammates, any good play is the result of someone buying a new account, or making a comeback is the result of one single person actually not sucking so bad at the game they look like they do it intentionally... That is extremely toxic. (Wow, big shock, LoL is a toxic game, who would have known...) So I'm not blaming any specific person cattering to the community by using these terms. But that does make me sigh very loudly. I don't expect to change the whole community with one or two rants, but if one person starts questionning the actual meaning of their words I'm happy. Also venting is great. :P
pekin was in base. his wave was slow pushing to enemy side. J4 happened to be far closer to wave than pekin. best to collect that wave cuz pekin wouldve missed at least half of it before he even made it. For reference: slow pushing is the fact his wave has more minions than the enemy wave, and both waves are in the exact middle of the lane. since waves crash at the same time at that point, and his wave has significantly more damage, his minions will kill the enemy minions super fast. every minion lost is gold and experience that just disappears. so even though J4 taking it put pekin in an awkward spot, it was still the correct play on his part.
@@slademmxii8759 I mean he was still top lane when he started to rotate mid after any fights had happened, is that really "far closer" or just in general is it correct to go that far just to fix a wave? I can see how he'd see it that way now, he has nothing top quickly go fix mid but is it really correct
