Probably because there is a massacre going on. Stop the massacre first so innocent people stop dying, then negotiate the hostages. Now do you understand?
@@BudelaikaAnnana Go talk to an actual leftist and you’ll see that most of them are against hostages, it’s clear that hostages don’t deter Israel from genocide. Quit listening to your friends. Plus, it’s disturbing that you don’t even deny that Israel is committing mass genocide, you just think it’s justified genocide. You’re the one who doesn’t care, and I don’t need to guess for that.
This Professor calls the students “children” actually the majority are legal adults 18+so they need to act responsible and be held in the same manner.As should she at 63
Lol you think they were trying to convince Israel of anything at all? They're turning our public further against Israel and it is working. Over half of Americans now are opposed to Israel. Israeli citizens need to get ready for the boycotts and divestments. If the Israeli public are hit financially they will have to choose between miserable poverty or giving the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank equal rights to Israeli Jews. Like South Africa, they will eventually give up.
If you mean the government of Israel, I'm inclined to say, not completely. If the student protestors become a force that makes the corporate media start to cover the atrocities of Gaza and what truly led up to Oct 7th, then the older generations in the US who buy what Fox/CNN/MSNBC hook, line, and sinker; if the students get through, then the Israeli government and the U.S. congressional enablers start to look a lot more like the forces that led to the Holocaust.
We don't care what Israel thinks about the demonstrations. We want the colleges to divest from israel, which would cost the Israelis billions of dollars - tank their economy. They cannot ignore that. We are also winning the public debate. Over half the country thinks disapproves of Israel's massacres in Gaza and 40 percent of Americans now think they Re committing a genocide. That is an incredible change in Americans' approval of Israel and will have serious effects on Israel in the future. Biden is sweating too about the protests because his election is coming up and he could well lose over his support of Israel.
This is what happens when you foster anti semitism on your campuses. Georgia residents are sick of this hatred for Jews and Israel being encouraged on our campuses by radical professors and admins. Protest is one thing, but this is dangerous, hate speech being spewed on liberal campuses.
And the administration is also a bunch of lefties. They are having their own fellow travelers arrested. At the end of the day, the administration answers to their Hebrew money changers. Don’t forget it lefties!
She obviously can afford to buy a plane ticket to visit Hamas and do some door knocking and request that they return the human beings they stole. Get to it, lady. Earn your 99% approval rating.
They had to bring in the violence to wreck what could have been a meaningful event, so that attention wd be drawn away from the reasons for the gathering. Those kids would have been able to work out their differences among their peers; the jewish voices for peace would not have been ridiculed and denigrated, but for the intrusion of idfcia counter-protestors and their (war-chem) Skunk spray tactics, bitter invective and hateful, spit-ful stances. Had the cops (& agents) not been brought in, the protest would have gone smoothly enough, and wdn't 've brought nearly the attention the affair has garnered in the press. But Yahu wanted All Ears on his warning (read threat) of "Terrible Consequences" if the students (especially the jews) don't stop all their (idfcia-incited) 'antisemitism'; and no-abidin Biden echoed, condemning the 'antisemitic' protesters and everyone that "doesnt understand what's going on with the ppPalestinians"... There’s video of the professor being arrested and thrown to the ground and having her faced pushed into the turf, by two hefty idf-trained pigs, one with his knee on the base of her neck while the other might have dislocated her shoulder putting the wrist-ties on. Where's the follow-up on that? I heard They charged HER with assault on a p-off; she oughta at least sue. All she did was ask them why they were doing to a student what they did to her moments later. The Homeless Nakba is happening simultaneously across the nation. The yt thumbnails look very similar to the Campus Nakba liberation camps. The homeless are being shuffled around and arrested like so many students & Pals... A common thread runs through all these 'movements'--- The Right To Exist , , ,
"You're fine if you're engaged in a protest movement aimed at the United States government, but the one thing that you can't do-the one line you can't cross unless you want to promote a paramilitary response-is criticizing this foreign government of Israel." -- Glenn Greenwald
so she was four feet from the officers as they struggled with arresting a protestor....cop told her to back up..she said NO...well that is disobeying a direct order from an officer....
It's true, but a weak violation. She'll have the charge dropped before tea time. It's important to note, had the president not pressed for arrests and then the protest got out of hand like they did later in the day to the point of violence, the university president would be held liable. It's sad that everyone thinks that the angry and self-identified victims are the only ones making difficult choices.
An ignorant buffalo soldier kid arresting an old lady professor at her university and you are justifying it. No wonder society is spoiled when the elderly are treated like that. She wasn't wrong in her position and even if she was, an old woman can't be treated like that.
Freedom to protest does not include disobeying the laws associated with private property. Freedom to protest is not include threatening other students.
They think that the cameras don't matter, but they do, in court. Sad for them. Have fun being stripped of badge and gun and thrown in prison as a dirty disgraced cop.
It been becoming a joke for years, - seen when students protesting the elitism of banks and corporations 15 years ago. The world gasped as they saw on News what US Police doing to silent, seated students. Then of course the shootings of bl..k people.
@@judigrumm7190 Even if they were trespassing, at what point is it ever ok to beat someone repeatedly? The entire point of teargas is to be a non-lethal and mostly harmless in the long run way to get people who are impossible to arrest to a point they can be arrested. Why in the hell are students and professors being beaten and their heads slung into pavement for protesting? If you or your children were protesting something you or them believed was wrong and were treated like this would that change your mind? Would the rights you're supposed to have under the law that are being violated suddenly matter to you then?
@@user-xs3lc4ky4h this is where most people fail to understand how police enforce laws. You must obey an officers command. Once you do not, they use means to make you comply. In this world of self absorbed children raised by bad parents who cave every time, they morons have to learn the hard way. In high school they should hold a class called, how not to you @ss kicked by the police.
Personal safety should always be above free speech. Parents are now considering emory for college education because of the way University handles antisemitism by calling in state troopers. Good job. 👍
1:00 - "And I made sure to stand 4 feet away" Well lady, the courts have decided that spectators need to stay 20 feet way when police officers are conducting a arrest. The reason? Officer safety. With just 4 feet distance, the officer does not have sufficient time to react in case of an attack. 20 feet gives just enough time to react and ward of an attack.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in ACLU v. Alvarez, said spectators have to stand a "reasonable distance" away. It might be 20 or 30 feet, it might be closer. That could be a matter for the jury. Was the cop concerned about his safety, or did he just want to keep witnesses away because he was using unreasonable force? It is true that Indiana recently passed a law setting it at 25 feet, but that means that in other states it isn't 25 feet.
In the late 60's and 70's protests sit-ins marches were peaceful. When the police showed up I was smart enough and fast enough to leave. The police caused the chaos and violence! I'm glad these professors have articulated this for the media. Our children should not be abused and arrested.... The right to protest needs to be protected.
@dreamcake9069 It doesn't include vandalism, kidnapping, and blocking students from classes and assault others. And I still don't know what exactly they were protesting. All the answers were different and most very uneducated.
If it public funded or given grant they should allow the public to also participate. If you don't like it go to israel then. This is American land of protest.
They acknowledged that there were 8 non-Emory protesters in the morning event, but decided it wasn't justification to stop the protesters that same day, from what I read. The morning protest ended up triggering the encampment restriction that the president said was not to be violated. The protesters did so and the president had the local and state police arrest them. There was no violence until the afternoon demonstration at Cox Hall. Despite that, the police nor the university pressed charges at that time and NO arrests were made. According to the president, dropping charges then was to lower tensions.
@@Viconius Again, they made up the no encampment because their donors and politicians don't support their speech and want the speeches ended as soon as possible. They're playing with laws to clamp down on their speech. The war on drugs was also a law, but it was partially to break the student movement and to arrest people and to try to stop the idea of young people questioning the government. That disturbed the politicians. This is an echo of that. This is also why they want to ban Tik Tok. The no encampment is a tool, distraction.
Well, your friends and family now know you won't have their back. Some people can't stand up for anything and will let others fight for our freedom. I even think the January 6 roiters have backbone.
Who would have thought that deciding who and who cannot protest might lead to bad outcomes. To paraphrase this professor with a similar example. People have conflicted views about abortion, trump, etc. Those who oppose the "left" are not considered to have the right to express their opinions Now giving authorities the right to suppress has come around to bite back. You get what you vote for, this is standard Dem modus operandi. Anything that is politically damaging to them is squashed.
Been around protest before. Never seen a middle-aged woman arm twisted behind her back taken down then another cop knee her in the back. For something so trivial I wouldn't even blink an eye at. Strange
09:03 - "I PAID for this microphone." - R W Reagan . . . They are beating the workers who pay for the place _________ You can't charge professors with criminal trespass because they work on the Univ. _________ Since students pay to keep the place open & don't do any work, they can be beaten & jailed _________ W T F ? For learning to occur , the LEARNER MUST DO THE WORK
Such a large influx of protesters from the United States would likely draw significant international attention to the Palestine-Israel conflict. The presence of American citizens could amplify media coverage and public awareness globally. Of course there is the possibility of that this would stimulate public discourse with Israel and Palestine
American politicians, many of them funded by AIPAC, who forget that there job is to prioritize America, and who seem to have blind allegiance or loyalty to Israel. By having such behavior the put at risk Americans who dissent with their pro-Israel stance.
You are allowed to protest. You are not allowed to camp out and block Jewish students from accessing their campus and spewing hate to them. She hit a cop. I learned in kindergarten that you dont hit people. Take some responsibility.
Why is Enory not protesting about the Genocide of Ughyirs Kurds Ahmedias or the slaughter of millions of people in the strife in the ME , are they not human beings , didnt the mother in Eniry not activate then or maybe there were no cameras around ?
Protesting to the Emory faculty isn't going to help solve any of those problems. Waste of breath. Study, graduate, go into the world, make a difference.
This is all completely out of character for Emory. Protesting in Berkeley, comparatively, is a right of passage. The Atlanta PD weren't dealing with violent criminals here.
So what she's saying is American universities are de facto police states. This is sickening. Americans who have nuance and right ethics like this professor are rare.
It seems that the police forgot that they are hired and paid for by the tax dollars of the people they just abused. It is a sad day in America when someone like this fine professor is treated like this just because she questioned authority when they were abusing their powers. These demonstrations will not stop and these actions by authorities will only make them multiply.
She committed a crime. She was detained and arrested. Don't commit a crime and you won't be detained and arrested. She's a school employee. Hopefully she will lose her job at the school. But since she is in favor of the rioters and is anti-USA, she probably won't be. RESPECT does not enter her brain matter at all.
You respect people who interfere with legitimate police work? Well then please keep your trash off of my block since you destroy wherever you live. Maybe you should get a job and learn how to contribute.
Who said that in America you have the right to protest peacefully or to speak freely; America is like China , like Russia; Saudi Arabia, all countries are the same.
As Prof. McAfee said at the beginning, the important issue is not the cause that they were protesting about, but the right of students to peaceably protest for *anything*. That's their right under the First Amendment. Good thing you're not in her class.
@@norman_5623 And they did, but they intentionally ignored the the no encampment requirement set by the president which isn't their right and they got arrested. Thank God only a few people are in her class.
@@Viconius The question is, "Did the president have the right to set a no encampment requirement?" At Columbia University, professors are arguing that the president didn't have the right, because she had to get approval from the faculty senate. It's as if the President of the US made a law without approval by congress. Does the president have that right at Emory?
@@norman_5623 I understand that they don't agree with the Emory university president, we're seeing that very discussion in the Trump cases in NYC. Most executive powers recognise critical decision making that are often time sensitive allowing for executive action. In his first 100 days in office, Biden signed more than 60 executive actions, 24 of which are direct reversals of Trump’s executive actions and policies. Presidential actions have become very common in the last 40 or so years. My guess is that the president of Emory would have such power without requiring senate approval unless there was some establishing of university policy. Encampment is a much more deliberate action than assembly or gathering. He clearly felt it was an emergency whether it was or not. Without a trial, we won't know if he had immunity or overstepped his authority. It's definitely a court issue to solve. An angry protester, disgruntled professor or even us won't have the last word. This is a chain-of-command issue and enumerated powers granted as the university president, it's not about 1st Amendment Rights, it's about consequences of acting upon that right. One last point, inciting violence has been clearly established as NOT being protected speech. A mob chanting from "the river to the sea" is a genocidal threat just as Hamas intended the chant to be when they created it. That chant has/was used by the protesters many times. If you can be arrested for misuse of pronouns, you certainly can be arrested for inciting or promoting genocidal violence.
Clearly, this adult doesn't understand what trespassing means. Some lessons are learned the hard way. When you interfere with police and you choose not to obey the police you're a criminal, not a peaceful protester.
Israel government try to influence the opinion of the public by filling up the comments section with comments in favor of genocide and polices oppression while a majority of Americans stand against genocide we could see an impresive majority of comment who are clearly at the opposite of the oppignon of the citizens
Anyone that doesn't agree with you and the terrorists are Israeli operatives? Do you not hear how stupid you sound? They are citizens that oppose your opinion, period. Grow up.
Proisrael said in front of media cameras: "We are afraid and feel unsafe about this demonstration😢". but they stood watching at a close distance and even broke through the pro-Palestinian demonstration😂😂😂😂vc
When people in authority tell students they're unsafe and should be afraid, they will feel unsafe and afraid, even if they are safe. It's not a crime to make somebody feel afraid and unsafe. At Columbia, the pro-Israel Rabbis and congressmen were telling students they were unsafe, they should be afraid, and should go home. In fact, the police captain said that he saw no violence or illegal activities among the demonstrators, and a CNN reporter checked with the police and found that there were no complaints from Columbia University about violent attacks. As McAfee said, there was no good reason to call the cops. The police or the university could be liable for false arrest charges. We'll see if they go to court.
You have a legal right under the First Amendment to assemble in a location. The police can't arbitrarily tell people to disperse. They need a legal reason. You're not required by law to follow illegal police orders, and if they arrest you, you can sue them for false arrest. As Professor McAfee said, the police can't arrest a student for trespassing on his or her own campus. A student has implied permission to be there. I expect the charges will be dismissed either by the district attorney, the judge, or the jury if it goes to trial. You are giving away your rights too freely.
@@norman_5623 They didn't arbitrarily tell people to disperse. You have the right to protest, you don't get to determine outcome. Students don't own the campus, clearly not true. They'll all be out before dinner. I'd like to hear them demand the release of the hostages. Israel would be forced to stop. A unilateral ceasefire is just kicking the can down the road and advantages only one side.
Who is the agitator behind these protests? Who is paying for this? Where are the protests against hamas and Hisbollah and Iran ?Why always and only Gaza and Palestinians. What about the victims in Syria under Assad, The Russian agression in Ukraine? Noelle McAffe should talk about these Things.
Well, you answered your own question. Most Americans were on the side of Israel when the attack first happened. Then Israel went into overkill and started killing children. Women and children are always off limits. They no longer get sympathy from me or the world.
what khamas do to be call terrorist ? kill people ? how many ? ..okay just we say they re terrorist bc intentionaly killing civilians ( most of victim killed by IDF apache ) . so when IDF , official israel SOLDIER intentioanly kiling thousand civilians most of them woman children ,,, isnt it they worst than Hamas ? and support by US is to make more horific . No diffrent from NAZI
I can tell you who is paying for the pro-Israel counter-demonstrations. In the Al-Jazeera documentary, The Lobby, they filmed pro-Israel demonstrators. following the instructions of an Israeli government employee, being bussed to a pro-Israeli counter-demonstration that disrupted a Palestinian presentation at George Washington University, with one of them saying that they were getting paid $50,000 a year. I don't know of any evidence that Jewish Voice for Peace or Students for Justice in Palestine has ever paid demonstrators. If you have any evidence, I'd like to see it.
the youth (young generation) have good intentions towards them. In fact, their hearts and souls are very subtle. So, indeed, when God sent His messangers to bring good news and bring a warning. It was the younger generation who welcomed and supported them, while the older generation opposed and was hostile. Then the time (of life) that their tyrant leaders have passed is too long, so that their hearts become frozen and rough. Indeed, arrogant and tyrannical leaders never learn from human history, that it is the youth who will destroy your throne of injustice
That is exactly what they want. Freedom of speech is one thing. They absolutel have the freedom to chant "Death to America", it is their right, but they should expect that to not go over very well and accept the consequences of that free speech.
The professor should have de-escalated by not confronting and further aggravating the police. She doesn't seem to know that academic freedom gives professors the freedom to determine the content and form of their teaching--not to speak freely about anything. Students are clients in the university, which is not a public space, and they are not entitled to free speech--especially when it is intimidating to others. The encampments are organized by outsiders (where do students get the expensive tents?), who are agents of foreign regimes like Qatar. Not antisemitic, professor? Have you heard the chants? Have you seen how Jewish students are surrounded, harassed, attacked at campuses from Harvard and Yale to Berkeley? At least the professor understands--as she more or less admits the students don't--that the Middle East issues are complex (Israel commits genocide and the babykillers and rapists of Hamas, who have fired many thousands of rockets at civilians over the years do not?). Time for education. Sophomoric students need to grow up a little.
During the incident, she hit an officer in the head who was making an arrest. She clearly admits this later in the video as they were taking her away.. That is 100% an arrestable offense. Then, she resists her own arrest. If you resist arrest, the police can use reasonable force to gain compliance, and this is exactly what happened. Professor, you are not a victim, nor a hero.
Her dishonesty does not do well for her leadership responsibility and nice salary as a college professor. Maybe Emory will evaluate who they are enabling. If this was a marketing video for this school, I would avoid which is a shame because I know there are hard working people at this school. This lady should be ashamed to be defending kidnappers.
it's not over dramatizing. American police are not known for restraint. See: Georgia Floyd protests A bunch of high school low-performers wearing a badge
@@alexbaro I don't hang around with people who appoint themselves as "mom" over adults who pay tuition. Nothing good ever comes from this type behavior or activity.
@@alexbaro Let's just say I was "there" for more than half my life since I was born and raised in the neighborhood. I don't appreciate these hoodlums making mayhem at the school, which is also a major hospital in case you are so completely clueless to not know this.
