Codex Alexandrina, 02 (A): that is a theta, not an omicron. You did not mention the horizontal line through the the omicron, but only mentioned the bar above. Codex Claromontanus: the faded horizontal line through the theta can still be clearly seen. But you did not mention that either.
You are alleging confirmation bias while describing trinitarian believers rejection, under pain of death, texts that support their view... There are thousands of errors we can see thanks to the enormous amount of ancient texts we have access to examine which Erasamus didnt. Many of the contested texts do support the trinity due to the fact that the truth of Christs devine nature is so pervasive in scripture.
The father is God to Jesus. Jesus is God to the Father. Jesus is the Lord, the Father is the Lord the Holy Spirit is the Lord. YHWH is one who created all things by himself. Jesus created all things. Jesus accepts worship while proxlaiming only God should be. We dont know what all of these things mean but they are true if the Bible is true. The truth of the trinity is clear. The nature of it will become clear when we are as he is.
@@adamh5153 God is the GOD and Father of Jesus Christ. PPlease check John 17:3, I cor 8:6, 1Tim 2:5. I kept it simple. It is verified by the Spirit filled preachers in ACTS when they told people who Jesus is. A man.
It requires also to be explained for the benefit of the same English reader,-(and it will do learned readers no harm to be reminded,)-that mystery (μυστήριον) being a neuter noun, cannot be followed by the masculine pronoun (ὅς),-who. Such an expression is abhorrent alike to Grammar and to Logic,-is intolerable, in Greek as in English. John William Burgon CCEL I Tim 3:16