12 Years Later, I Finally Understand Django Unchained 

Woa......

Hes cracked the code

Profound.

what about steven??? i tell u what he is.......chocolate

Hahaha with bad teeth too! Why didn’t I see that.

I think he was also trying to wash off his own guilt, after all, he was the one who denied Schultz the possibility to safe D'Artagnan, just so he wouldn't endanger the plan to safe his wife.

It was a real good beat.

@@DoloresLehmann how could Schultz have saved D’artangian? They’d just gotten there.

​@asmodiusjones9563 Schultz was going to buy him but Django stopped him because it would blow their cover.

@@tristanpotter2183 "We aint payin' a penny for that Pickaninny"

Wisecrack is just another Breadtube now

@@charles___ That's bad?

Yes I stopped watching wisecrack as it became boring and preaching not a mind opening content platform.

I thought I was a fan of Wisecrack. Turns out I'm actually a fan of Jared (and Thug Notes).

@@RomanPhilosopher yes. When you claim to be philosophical or intellectual but only "argue" from one side and narrative and don't do it well, you've lost your way.

I like the way you comment boy

​@@thac0twenty377I like the way you reply boy

@@chiefblacklung1120 I like the way you don't have typos boy

@@thac0twenty377 I like the way you appreciate good grammer boy

🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀💀

this is very superficial vignette's that are drawn on a basis level...

Comic book violence spread thin like veneer over a shallow story.

@@godzillazfriction sure is..

Parallelism is a thing which can help you make your point clearly.

Sadly, the right wing would call this movie woke now too in the online and cable news media culture wars. This is why I don't go to the movies anymore. Everything is now a woke or anti woke culture wars piece of art/propaganda in winning elections in our country now.

Never underestimate the power of self hatred. She was consistent though, refusing to have any children of her own. Many people believed you could fight for the better treatment of disabled people while also denying them the right to have children, many still do. One of the great tradagies of the eugenics movement is how it actually stagnated science, hard to research hard questions when you to busy defending the subjects of your research from bigots who would rather they not exist at all, similar fights are going on in lgtbq+ communities even today, things that might be interesting or even helpful to know but dare you ask for fear the research will be misused or misinterpreted .....

Not sure if lgtbq needs more research. It really not that difficult.

She prolly didn't want anyone else to be Helen keller

Hellen was a political activist with many nuanced and extreme political views and beliefs. it is however not something we know for certain, as there are some who believe it was her caretaker who held these positions and who just used Hellen and her fame as a mouthpiece of her ideas.

@@Iamlegend1987Yes and no. Yes we know what it is and how it shows but the whys are iffy. We know that some genetics and biochemical factors are the background on queerness but it isn’t the whole picture. We don’t think there is a “gay gene” but factors could be the cause of it. A mother could have 3 boys and 1 of them could be gay and it would be interesting to know why. The problem is that approaching it is iffy because it could be interpreted as you trying to find out to delete it or prevent it.

Body positivity isn’t about ignoring possible health implications of obesity. It’s about dismantling fatphobia that leads to harm in all facets of life. Medical doctors often don’t give fat people adequate care and blame EVRY ailment on weight. They often dont bother to look any deeper leading mis/late diagnosis.

"Body positivity isn’t about ignoring possible health implications of obesity." ...It very often is though.

​@nyanuwu4209 yea 99 percent of the time, the body positivity movement is pathetic.

That happens to everyone. Doctors don't know anything. Poor people get mental disorders instead of eating ones.​@23ahndra

@@nyanuwu4209because you saw a fat person on instagram not hating themselves? 🙄 get a life

i bet he is set for life after selling Wisecrack....but i don't know

I think Jared is a pretty cool guy, eh makes wisecracks and doesn't afraid of anything

...and watching movies, which he seems to do a lot, too. I want to be like him and make a living doing cool things, too!

Only one of those things is cool

@@pyropulseIXXI the pizza, right?

They had theater shows and a field for sports at Auschwitz

​@@pyropulseIXXI How very progressive of them.

​@@GeneralSamov The Nazi-Party was very progressive. It loved to use new and modern things for it's goals. Being progressive doesn't make you automatically good or right.

​@@pyropulseIXXI Yeah... for the guards. Not the prisoners.

You'd be surprised. The Orchestra, cinema and brothel wasn't limited to the guards.

#cakewalk It's has a different meaning now but back then, cake was given to slaves for going above and beyond to please the master.

And Leo actually cut his hand sawing and breaking the skull apart, but was so in the moment he didn't stop. That's his blood right there.

@@NobodyC13no I believe not. Rather, They paused to clean and tend to the wound. They talked about adding it to the scene, got some extra movie blood, and then they talked to Kerry Washington about wiping her face with fake blood. But yes, the idea of all that came from the incident of cutting his hand during the performance.

​@@TickleHellmohe smashed a glass with his hand and smeared his real blood on her

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

A movie about slavery that ends with a slave becoming a badass. Truly a genius achievement

You have obviously no idea what you’re talking about. The “most anti racist movie ever made”?? 😂😂😂😂😂lmmfao

Its not anti racist. It's just black revenge fantasy.

@@greatsol2444 "the most anti-racist" was definitely a bit too much. Its just a well written movie. We are too obsessed with media being "the best" and "the greatest". Being a good movie is good enough.

People tend to have a huge issue with the word. On the other side you have those upset they can't use it. They usually also complain that they can't say Christmas. Both are equally ridiculous. The Iraqis became sand n-s. And now the Palestinians. That's the very problem with the word. It's used to denote something beneath contempt. The whole white people should be allowed to use the word is a bad faith argument. Mel Brooks was once told you can't make a movie like Blazing Saddles today. He replied that you couldn't make a movie like that back when he made it either. The persecution and victim complex run deep in some people.

Because in Europe it is _all_ about culture. I mean, the were talking „Gaulish“ (French) vs „Germanic“ (German) vs „Anglo-Saxon“ (English) as races.

@@LarthV You still get that in the US. It's just that the American style of racism is to fit as many groups as you can sway into the category of "White" when it serves a purpose, and then slowly tighten the circle as the targeted groups get oppressed and then create new targets of the people who get pushed out. At one point Irish weren't considered White, until it was beneficial to pit the poor Irish against newly freed slaves. Conversely, there were times where North African Muslim people were considered White. Jewish people have basically been slapped back and forth over the "Are they White?" line for generations. More often than not, American racism is about wealth control and pitting the poor "White" people against other poor people of darker tones. That's arguably similar to racism in most of the world, but places like Europe also tend to have hundreds-thousands of years of interactions that might have led to animosity, not just 250 years or so of American history

The other day, I saw this Ghanian woman talking about her Lithuanian husband online (nothing bad). There were a whole bunch of comments from Lithuanians saying that man ruined his bloodline by marrying that woman I paid no mind to it because I’ve actually done some research on some European cultures. I knew responses she’d get Meanwhile, so many people were shocked people were saying that. They were even more shocked because it was Europeans saying it

@@blackblack1167 That is sad, but not unexpected. Though to be fair, I would also expect the same if that woman was of another European background (in a Lithuanians case, Russian in particular), and from people in Ghana and any other place in the "old world" in reversed roles. That kind of thing is, if not mainstream, so at least pretty common in all old world cultures, I assume - I could easily see a (say) group of Polish, Moroccan, Tutsi, Tamils, Iranians or whatever make the same supremacist comment w.r.t. their culture. Things are still quite "tribal supremacist" here...

​@@blackblack1167there was a lot of outrage couple of months ago when an Albanian woman married a Pakistani man. Also the "ruined your bloodline" argument

Tarantino often does this... Takes scenes from other films and recontextualises them to imbue them with meaning. In one sense, the whole of Django unchained is like this, he took the classic Django movies and recontextualises them to be about slavery.

And Brittle's blood splattering on cotton was a reversal of "Strange Fruit" and its "blood on the leaves."

okay, so he did leave Wisecrack? Did he mention why he left?

I can only think of 2 Tarantino movies where he says it. The other being pulp fiction.

Hitler was coming for most of the world. America as a big dog couldn’t allow that. It’s always over resources most cases especially if it’s large scale.

Excellent point

What Hitler did wasn't eugenics simply because DNA was discovered only in 1950s

Same here. I need to watch the video of why he left wisecrack because apparently his content was the only real reason I was watching it.

Me too. Chuffed.

The he would win best supporting actor over Christoph Waltz. Dr. Schultz had some of the best dialogue ever. Especially that opening scene. And the marshall/sherrif scene.

We know that social division is at the heart of racism, but Candy believed noble traits were physiological, so Dumas is a perfect example for Schulz to use

@@jacobdane wasn’t arguing that I was attempting to give a little historical context on Dumas given his highly unusual background

First of all, his grandmother was a slave, not his mother. The man was the biggest fraud in French litterature. All his life he exploited unknown authors, stole their manuscript then publish them in his name. He was always broke, left all the women he went with debts, he was a libertine with no responsability. He died in misery.

Also he lived in la Reunion. Isle of la reunion is certainly not Haiti. Dude. You're trying to get historical context or are you straight up inventing stuffs??? Dear god!!

@@MidnightatMidian you got me I mixed up Alexandre Dumas with the Haitian General Thomas-Alexandre Dumas I’ll edit

the duality of germans

@@slakerfiftytwo3932 as played by an austrian.

Besides the fact that he's an amazing actor with a delightful mastery of accents?

@@slakerfiftytwo3932ppl in general

Having this discussion requires seeing the film of Django for what it is. It's not an empowerment film. It's not a revenge film. It's not even a movie about Django. It's a move about Schultz and how it takes "whìte good" to conquer "whìte evīl." He's the main character. That's why Django's story only begins when he is freed by him and taught how to do everything he then goes on to do. The story isn't Inglorious Basterds, but with sIavery, it's a whìte savior complex story about a "good" German who steals someone's sIave that he needs, uses that sIàve as his own, and then repays him by teaching him skills and failing to rescue his wife and endangering the plot to save her because of supposed principles. Schultz is meant to be the white audience. His imperfect allyship is exactly the level of care the viewer is meant to have about Aměrican SIăvery. Surface level, while feeling their own participation of and reaping of the benefits from the institution, is fine so long as they openly declare they think it's icky.

@@leonfrancis3418 These are the same people shouting "My Khaleesi!", so I'm not shocked. Day 1 trash and they were surprised when leopards ate white faces.

Sadly I've seen this example so many times in the construction world. Main reason I don't trust ppl on the job no matter how nice they come off being

Is that why I'm still waiting for my Uber??

i just gotta love the superficial, polarization regarding the labeling of 'black ppl' as viewing 'Black ppl' as separate entities & holding your labelling to a pedestal for what the movie achieves at...

@@godzillazfriction you have similar discourse around Schindler’s list. Is that polarising?

And how would you know how black people feel?

@@Thedarkknight2244 keep informally distorting... you'll get there.

@@godzillazfriction I don’t think you realise Quentin has done this multiple times. Inglorious B is the obvious example. Kill Bill has Quentin quoted as saying: I want young girls to see this and feel like they want to kick ass and not let anyone keep them down. Much to the dismay of the critic interviewing him for the perception of promoting violence among young children. To some extent, Jackie Brown speaks to Black people also. Specifically in the casting of Pam Grier who was massive in the black cinema scene, an entire film industry made for black people. So yes, different group do think and feel different things when watching these movies. As, believe it or not, every human being is different

An amazing video! I was going to comment about it, it's interesting to hear someone analyze Tarantino's language (which he obviously fixated upon) more in-depth.

Well now I have to find this channel and check out some of their videos.

It's Just another Breadtube now

@@JubeiKibagamiFez I especially liked how the slave Bible removed the book of Exodus. In case the slaves got any ideas other than the natural desire to be free

@@davidcombs3617 Yes, indeed. That was the most egregious thing for me. And The New Testament was heavily altered as well.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

💯

I was looking for Candace 👀

Ok the dude that was falsely accused of sexual misconduct when he was nominated for Supreme Court justice? Whatever you fucking say man

Okay the dude that was falsely accused of sexual misconduct when he was nominated for Supreme Court justice? Whatever you say bud.

Seconded

Same!

Oh give me a break, Commie.

No, it didn't, in my opinion. It went different, but I have space in my heart to differences.

​@@Padtedescoit did, you can keep simping but wisecrack still 💀

Ahh some who thinks beyond the surface level.

Ppl don’t wanna understand this they wanna feel special. They also don’t read enough.

@@Iamlegend1987 WHO WAS GETTING LYNCHED ?

​@@DjComplex72 You're exactly who we're talking about

​@@DjComplex720:01 Thank you for cutting through the BS with a simple question none of them can answer. Everyone wants to downplay what was done to BĪăck Americans. It's sick.

Same level?

???

@@g7924 Watch the Tale end of the video about how Candy thinks he's a progressive thinker like the IRL eugenicists of his era.

Race is not real. This has been the consensus of anthropologists for almost a century at this point. You are emotionally attached to a debunked school of thought.

i love the Modernistic, indoctrinated & the prescriptive abstraction that is the concept of 'race'... 'Race' as a Modern concept that was made to indoctrinate the subset that is the Human Rooted Generalisation of the the human existence by differentiating a set of different groups of Humans based primarily on 'skin-tone' - Human Generalisation is something that is completely within 'Human Nature' - and so when something MAJOR happens throughout Human History such as WW2 in which I've elaborated, you'll get the shifted and twisted version of 'Race' as a concept compared to what it initially meant as in the 'Human Race' as in it being JUST ONE, until some Germans wanted to conquer the world by the Ideological factor of setting the 'Perfect Race' which went against Humanity in general - this was based on the anthropology aspects of pseudoscience & the subset of the generalisation & differentiation, which stemmed from the indoctrinated polarization of anthropology/phrenology & the overall pseudoscience, that came along with it to determine what's the absolute differences in the faculties of a Human that's different from the establishment of a common society, based on a group of individuals cultural/Ideological/philosophical beliefs... also, you're not really going into the essence of what 'Race' is in its progressive meanings against a 'Human' - also, there's no such as the superficial, prescriptive abstractions such as 'Psychopath' & any personality disorder, that's made to informally label & categorise regarding the indoctrinated polarization, that's based from a higher set of perceived standards, that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what it should & shouldn't be as; such as what a 'Human' in essence should & shouldn't be as, thus you get allegorical & paradoxical terms such as 'Dehumanize, Humanize, subhuman, inhuman' that's a subset of equating 'Humanity' or a 'Human' to an indoctrinated polarization of what a 'Human' in essence should & shouldn't be as, despite the fact that it's superficial by nature to informally label of what a 'Human' should be.

Except it literally was invented for oppression.

Are you alluding to the civil war? The south had slaves. That’s enough of a reason to go to war. You can try to make it ambiguous but it’s clear as day. Also, no one ever denied the atrocities committed by either side so I’m not sure what you’re getting at.

The "Lost Cause" has been well documented at this point. The reasoning for cessation is both well known and documented at this point(and is in most of the documents from the Confederacy itself). The Civil War had multiple reasons for occurring, and might have occurred even if slavery hadn't been an issue. But the main cause of it was slavery, if for no other reason than how intrinsically it was tied to Southern economics.

He left? :O

It’s literally just communist propaganda now

You still watch wise Crack?

@@sergiootero5904 Sometimes, but I really don't follow its creators and stuff.

This take is stale. Many good movies can be described as "teen social justice fantasy". If you want an in depth take on the dynamics of slavery then read a historical book or watch a documentary. The product is Tarantino which in itself can be associated to nutty p)rn for people obsessed with cliche revenge and/or action

@@GEEZYEA777 Remember context is a thing. Look how philosophical the author of the video is trying to be about, like you very well described, a nutty revenge action film. Btw i think we both agree, the best of Tarantino comes when he is not tackling heavy themes such as the holocaust or slavery. Pulp Fiction, Jacky Brown, Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill, etc. I really dont care when he tries to go intellectual, after all its going to be the same hollywood point of view most american film makers share.

​@@Refreshment01the only uptake, that i have in regards to your post is your utilization of 'teen & Immaturity' - there's no such thing as 'maturity & Immaturity' there's no set in measures of the absolute determination of what to determine what 'mature & Immaturity' is within a Human being in essence, especially towards the age factor based off mentality, which further polarizes against for what to determine 'mature & immature' which just boils it down to being arbitrary; the essence of this progressive meaning is how 'maturity & Immaturity' are just a superficial, prescriptive abstraction thats based for the descriptive nature of how things are when that's self-contradictory (paradoxical) because it all amounts to informally labelling someone based on a higher set of perceived standards, that gets determined in its absolute form of truth to what it should & shouldn't be as; such as what a 'Human' in essence should & shouldn't be as; all of this is a subset to the Modernistic Values through it's progressive meaning that Humans strive (& loathe) for in the end...

I agree. The problem is we don't even get revenge. Who offed Schultz? Django doesn't even get that.

"Nuanced" is the key I think. Unless preaching to the choir, there is little to be gained making a caricature of the other side. I have to imagine they came to their conclusions at least as thoughtfully as I came to mine. Even when I disagree, there is something to chew on here.

@@quintessenceSL Yep yep! I don't have to agree with people's conclusions. Just make me think.