Timestamps: 01:24 Alex talks about himself and the study 06:58 What got Alex into this field of research 09:38 Alex talks about the processes of hypertrophy 33:36 Similarities to fat cells and cellular memory systems 37:43 Alex on the theory on hyperplasia 40:59 What people Alex is looking for. Furthermore, he talks about steroids and sarms 45:13 Alex shares insight into people who took steroids in the past and competitive advantages? 51:30 Anabolic use, its side effects and adverse health prevention
I worked out hard for 5 years including taking 2 big cycles of steroids. I stopped working out for 5 years and lost all gains. When I started working out again I made gains fast I feel I do have an advantage from the cycles I did
@Eugene Stoner 1st cycle was anadrol tablets and 1.5 cc test enanthate and 1.5 deca I only did 4 weeks anadrol and then the test and deca was for 3 months then I took nolva and clomid to come off then 4 months later did test and tren for 4 months I didn't know what I was doing.. i wouldn't recommend any of this
Steve "Kinda" Hall 😂 Just busting your chops, Steve. This has gotta be one of the most informative podcasts I've ever had to pleasure to listen to. Very smart guy this Alex, thanks for putting him onto our radars!
Very interesting love to know the results of the study as I think that athletes who have used gear in the past but are now deemed drug free will have an advantage over life long natural's
How frequent does the steroid use have to be for them to produce any noticable long term benefits? Just a random example: would 52 doses of an oral steroid spread out over the course of a year (taken once a week) produce any long term changes at all vs. taking those same 52 doses every day for 52 days and then nothing for the rest of the year? If the total dosage over the course of a year is the same, would there be any relevant long term changes in the body that would benefit the otherwise natural athlete even though the doses were spread out way more, or is there a necessary compounding effect that occurs by taking them every day that simply doesn't occur with infrequent use?
@Eugene Stoner it was a theoretical question about how past AAS use leads to advantages long after cessation. If those effects needed saturation of the drug or if it could be seen even with infrequent use. Nothing to do with blasting and cruising, brah.
