15 Year Old Kentucky Lady Marries 30 Year Old Teacher - Stand Up Comedy - Geoffrey Asmus 

seattleseattleseattleseattleseattlefuckspokaneseattleseattleseattleseattleseattledoublefuckportlandseattleseattleseattleseattleseattlefuckingbend?!seattleseattleseattleseattle&yeahibrokedown&subscribedseattleseattleseattle

JERSEY ?!?! Ugh I’d like to say I’d go but I never see bands or comedians I like anymore since I had a baby , I just stay home with my daughter lol

Yeah i would.. just not up for the 10h flight ;)

Bless their Hearts

@@danielfernandez1129ooof pedo alert. Fuck and you put your actual name too. daniel fernandez the pedophile who’s dream is to marry a child

Geoffrey was so good, that he managed to open for himself.

It hasn't been "regular" for like 100 years. Age of consent was 16 in 1920s.

@@VitaKet if you are trying to suggest that women have been sufficiently protected from child marriage since the 1920s because of age of consent laws then you are not looking at reality.

@@Lasercatssjesus😂 lay off dude, the video was dark enough.

What when dammit probably sold out

Temporarily

I feel like I have cringe burnout and maybe we should have used the last 30 minutes to give the grief councillor speaking to this group more time than usual.

So there was a second alpha with him?

@@Mr.Cupcake yes, Chris Higgins 😆

"Alphas" are confused little men who everyone except other "alphas" hate

Well this lady said 1975 is when they married. I hope this is the same case with your aunt. If you say "No. They married in 1985." I might die 😂

Still gross

weird

@IHJello 1973 but it still cracks me up how Normies can't figure out this is how it has been done throughout history. Women waiting later in life is a new concept, and look at what a mess society has become. Look at all yhe children born with Asbergers, Autism, etc now. Normies will Normie!

@avataraarow Geoff, I got the Normies engaged for the algorithm! 😄

Contemporary discourse surrounding childhood sexuality frequently centers on safeguarding children from potential harm, resulting in the dominance of a victimological model that characterizes children primarily as potential victims. “The paradigm of child sexual abuse, as we know it today, forms part of a historical process, of which David Finkelhor’s texts are an integral part, in which resorting to the culture of victimism by the social sciences became prominent, perhaps even preeminent. This allowed for the establishment of a new moral order, as well as the rise of the ‘‘psychological industry’’ (Malon, 2009). Children’s sexual experiences with adults are daunted by inappropriately interpreted events as applying to all childhood sexual experiences. These assumptions discourage research into the full range of the characteristics of such experiences. We should encourage unbiased investigations showing that such factors as reactions, effects, power, and motivations are much more varied and complex than the narrow views found in victimological assumptions, which are unfortunately accepted uncritically by professionals, the media, and the public. The victimological model tends to portray male figures as potential threats or perpetrators, which can reinforce harmful stereotypes and biases. By emphasizing children as victims, it inadvertently fosters an environment where toxic masculinity rhetoric becomes more prevalent. The characterization of all adult-child sexual interactions as inherently harmful can contribute to a perception that men, in particular, are prone to sexual predation. In this context, discussions surrounding toxic masculinity may perpetuate the fear and distrust of men, impacting how society views childhood sexuality, gender identity, and relationships. By challenging the victimological model's oversimplified approach, we can also question how it intersects with toxic masculinity rhetoric and whether this rhetoric is influenced by misinformation and fear associated with childhood sexuality. It's essential to explore how these two phenomena interact and how they collectively affect public perceptions, policies, and attitudes toward men, children, and the broader discourse surrounding these complex issues. By acknowledging the capacity of children to understand and engage with their own sexuality responsibly, society can transcend the limitations of the victimological model and work towards a more balanced, informed, and responsible approach that considers the complexities of childhood sexuality, toxic masculinity, and their interplay. A significant variable to consider with childhood sexuality are their ability to express their feelings, thoughts, and interests, particularly in public. Contrary to what people like to believe, children do act on their own desires and are erotically interested in sex. Children are actively collaborating in sexual relationships with their peers and with adults, despite discrepancies about the age of consent. Thus, the conundrum becomes clear: how to acknowledge a child’s developing cognitive capacity for sexual activity while also allowing them the chance to make autonomous decisions in their own best interests.

:(*

Ok pedo

Germany, where they've never made any mistakes.

don't know why my comment got deleted (cmon geoff) but thats cringe of germany

@@biuliu7157 RU-vid auto-deletes comments like crazy. You can no longer do swears or call anyone names. And if you continue with it, the AI will ban you. 2024, what a time to be alive! All hail our glorious robot overlords!

It is

Is this your way of saying you don't see an issue with it?

4 shows in July at Sisyphus brewery

Me first with the paragraphs 😊 Contemporary discourse surrounding childhood sexuality frequently centers on safeguarding children from potential harm, resulting in the dominance of a victimological model that characterizes children primarily as potential victims. “The paradigm of child sexual abuse, as we know it today, forms part of a historical process, of which David Finkelhor’s texts are an integral part, in which resorting to the culture of victimism by the social sciences became prominent, perhaps even preeminent. This allowed for the establishment of a new moral order, as well as the rise of the ‘‘psychological industry’’ (Malon, 2009). Children’s sexual experiences with adults are daunted by inappropriately interpreted events as applying to all childhood sexual experiences. These assumptions discourage research into the full range of the characteristics of such experiences. We should encourage unbiased investigations showing that such factors as reactions, effects, power, and motivations are much more varied and complex than the narrow views found in victimological assumptions, which are unfortunately accepted uncritically by professionals, the media, and the public. The victimological model tends to portray male figures as potential threats or perpetrators, which can reinforce harmful stereotypes and biases. By emphasizing children as victims, it inadvertently fosters an environment where toxic masculinity rhetoric becomes more prevalent. The characterization of all adult-child sexual interactions as inherently harmful can contribute to a perception that men, in particular, are prone to sexual predation. In this context, discussions surrounding toxic masculinity may perpetuate the fear and distrust of men, impacting how society views childhood sexuality, gender identity, and relationships. By challenging the victimological model's oversimplified approach, we can also question how it intersects with toxic masculinity rhetoric and whether this rhetoric is influenced by misinformation and fear associated with childhood sexuality. It's essential to explore how these two phenomena interact and how they collectively affect public perceptions, policies, and attitudes toward men, children, and the broader discourse surrounding these complex issues. By acknowledging the capacity of children to understand and engage with their own sexuality responsibly, society can transcend the limitations of the victimological model and work towards a more balanced, informed, and responsible approach that considers the complexities of childhood sexuality, toxic masculinity, and their interplay. A significant variable to consider with childhood sexuality are their ability to express their feelings, thoughts, and interests, particularly in public. Contrary to what people like to believe, children do act on their own desires and are erotically interested in sex. Children are actively collaborating in sexual relationships with their peers and with adults, despite discrepancies about the age of consent. Thus, the conundrum becomes clear: how to acknowledge a child’s developing cognitive capacity for sexual activity while also allowing them the chance to make autonomous decisions in their own best interests.

In the face of age-old taboos and the fear mongering of child abuse, it is hard for educators, researchers, and politicians to be nonjudgmental about intergenerational sex and marriage. Nevertheless, we're obligated to recognize the larger field of inquiry and not limit our conceptual base to the inferences belonging to the victimology model, because it operationalizes sexual behavior using only negative terms, that are limiting, and often lead to convoluted results. In dealing with this issue, we should keep in mind that the viewpoint of mainstream society can not simply be taken as correct by default. Instead, each situation should be analyzed in terms of its historical and ideological roots. Only after such an exercise can we begin to address the more practical questions of ethics, the law, and social policies with regard to sexual contact between adults and children. A significant variable to consider with childhood sexuality are their ability to express their feelings, thoughts, and interests, particularly in public. Contrary to what people like to believe, children do act on their own desires and are erotically interested in sex. Children are actively collaborating in sexual relationships with their peers and with adults, despite discrepancies about the age of consent. Thus, the conundrum becomes clear: how to acknowledge a child’s developing cognitive capacity for sexual activity while also allowing them the chance to make autonomous decisions in their own best interests.