176  

@@user-iz4nm7oi2t Yeah, the things Stalin did to his own people was awful.

uk cities were civilian targets.....moral high ground.?..where were the german morals when jews were being sent to extermination camps.???.....I find it bizarre germans preaching about right and wrong .

Not from Mohammeds

"Germany is an occupied country and it will stay that way" - Barrack Obama 2009

of the soviets

Lol this wasn't act of aggression, it minimized causalities for both sides.

@@georgevasilev9571 ...of the Western liberal values. Liars.

@@apophisRO ????

Zum Glück fiel es nicht nur mir auf.

Genau mein Humor !

What is this? Axis sentiment?

I doubt you know anything about fascism. You know NOTHING about fascism. Pure ignoramus.

Sabe usted nada sobre fascismo en alemania. La historia del XX siglo es uno misterio en vuestra mente.

En el Nacional Socialismo todas las "razas inferiores" fueron como esclavos. Y no se que usted es De la "raza superior". Parece que la mejor parte de las gentes del su lugar no son "Aryanos" segun las leyes del Nuremburg.

Ein würdiger Karlspreisträger,Frieden halten diese Typen nicht.

Nettes Märchen. Mehr nicht. 🙄

Springer-Presse. Ist heute noch genauso.

Sadly the western oligarchs never taught you a second language !

Area bombing was not outlawed until 1977, my friend. The shocking fact is that under international law as it stood in 1945, entire cities - and the people who lived in them - were perfectly legal and legitimate targets for assault from the air, because they contained facilities of use to the enemy war effort, and the bombers had to fly through defended airspace in order to reach them. You make the classic mistake of judging historic events by modern standards, I'm afraid, and whereas that statement is certainly true morally, it has no legal basis whatsoever.

@@MSM4U2POM There is something called a natural law and morality you i d i o t and I absolutely don't give a fck about the international law. According to that logic I could say for example that Holodomor wasn't a warcrime because the law didn't prohibit it back then. According to that logic I could say that all civilians sitting in their homes are a military target because the enemy can use houses for defence.