@breadandcircuses8127 you people act like that's the only 1 religion. Lmfao. Do you know how many fucking made up religions the world has???? Just another harry potter book
I grew up 4 blocks away from Old Yankee stadium. I remember these games. The crowd would cheer anywhere they were. The stadium would roar and my heart would jump from afar: Number 2- Derek Jeter. -more roars
27>3... in what is known as the Live Ball era, which began in 1920-1921 and is baseball essentially as it is played today. Before the live ball era baseballs were made out of different material, fences were 500 feet, pitchers threw 80 mph, many important hitting, pitching, fielding statistics weren't yet kept, umpires sometimes were not even present, and games often ended in official ties due to darkness. While they still did hold world series' from 1903-1921 (called the Dead Ball era), due to the sheer magnitude of the changes made in 1920 to end the the Dead Ball era it is generally accepted especially among baseball historians and statisticians that titles/stats/records accomplished pre 1920 are basically a horse of a different color. In that: the game was simply not yet evolved to the game we know today (or even in 1922). You'd have to research to see for yourself the difference in these two era's of the MLB as they are too long and too many to write here in a comment. As I said, 1920-1921 is generally accepted by the baseball world (writers, stat holders, coaches, historians, etc.) as indisputably the year(s) when baseball became a more concrete and rule(s) based organization and taken more seriously as an institution all together. Thus, "titles" won by teams from 1903-1919 are universally regarded to be of lesser significance and validity than those won starting in 1921. With that said... 27>3 (in the Live Ball era.. aka baseball as we know it)
Yeah surprised Mo wasn't brought in late in that 8th inning for a 4 or 5 out save. The 8th inning had that feeling you get when the games momentum is about to change.
@@baroqueguitarist5673 He did pitch 2 innings in Game 4 so that would make sense. You're right tho. I would've guessed when the Sox loaded the bases he would come in
@@baroqueguitarist5673 3:02:06-3:02:20 "(crowd noise) Stanley could tie it with one swing....(pitch misses, crowd erupts) THREE and 0" I know what happens but I still get chills
Joe Torre blessed with a fine team and being the greatest manager that ever lived should be emulated by todays computer genius's.."put your best out there and let them play" was his motto
I still want to know who was the one writer who didn't put Jeter on his HOF ballot. Must have been a Boston writer who covered this game! And the Yankees should have known Tom Gordon was a career choke in the post-season. He cost them Game 5 in the 2004 ALCS, couldn't hold a 4-2 lead in the 8th inning when all he had to do was get three outs and let Rivera pitch the 9th.
no wonder why the red sox lost they didnt' have the team to win. They had second rate players darren lewis buford daubach just average players not stars. The yankees had star not superstars. Red sox had pedro and who else brett he was good twelve years prior to this. Kent Mercker starting they were doomed to fail that year.
The Yankees should have known better signing Gordon. It was his gag in Game 5 that cost them the 2004 ALCS, not Rivera the night before. Posada was useless during the post-season - except against Gordon!
The guy was good during the regular season, keep in mind do you remember how much of a dumpster fire the middle relief was in 2003? Would you rather that the Yankees had done nothing about that?
Mike Stanton was so bad. He was always coming in to face lefties, needing a couple outs to get to Rivera. He'd get one out then give up a hit or two and they'd be forced to bring Rivera in early, in a worse situation.
