@@sebastianmorber116those are big cubes which if good enough, is as not terribly hard compared to a short event like clock. That is like getting a 3.11 average in 3x3
@@pandahhh9115it's definitely one of the easier events to get the WR average below previous single (not anymore lmao) with the new regs but it's still hard, there are multiple people with sub 2 avgs on cam so it isn't super out of the question
WHAT THE ACTUAL FVK!!! This is really INSANEEEE 🔥🔥 3 WR's Singles in a same average and WR average faster than previous WR single, so crazy dude. You have my biggest respect. Congratulations!
@@kasirkasir3205 a 15 has only been done once at home ever that we know of. Hopefully if a 15 move scramble ever appears, the pros will be able to find the optimal solution because it should be easy to get the correct start.
2.87 was the first official sub-3 clock single... then 2.77... 2.61 with 7simul... and 2.54 at the start of the year... And this, the first sub-3 official clock average... is......... 2.52! Huge congrats! Remarkably consistent too!
by far the greatest record in WCA history. An averege sub the previous wr single with THREE sub wr singles. Completely unheard of, maybe even in the old days of WCA
Definitely the craziest record in Clock history. Another Poland Clock W added to the pile. We might have Yunhao 2.0 on our hands. Congrats! The jump is extreme, but I doubt it'll last more than 15 months even if nobody is capable of beating it now without an impossibly unlikely fluke. This is still 7 simul as vanilla as it gets.
@@akashsreedharan A bunch considering that there are 37 other 7 simul pin sets that often lead to 6 simul solutions or less on scrambles where it is not possible (or easy) with the Zhang pin set. Top solvers are just doing the same thing every solve with no optimizations with one pin set. Current 7 simul is literally as mechanical and thoughtless as Pochmann. 7 simul could not be more vanilla than it is in the current meta. I don't know where the misconception that 7 simul is optimized comes from.
@@CalebTrelfordinteresting take. Would you say block building prediction or 1 look 7 Simul is a way to optimize the common 7 Simul memo/pin set? Currently studying block building prediction during memo now.🫡
@@Clonkyboy Trying to optimize one pin set is like trying to find the best NS alg for a Skewb case. Sure, finding a better alg is beneficial, but there are much quicker ways to become faster at Skewb than just optimizing and drilling one alg (like learning other algs that can solve other cases). I don't know what you mean by "block building prediction." I believe that 1 looking is a good idea (I have no evidence to prove that it is, but nobody else has any evidence suggesting it isn't). If I were to start grinding Clock again (no free time moment), I'd force myself to 1 look every solve. I think that learning pin orders from different pin sets would be most beneficial (especially after getting 1 looking down). However, there are very few resources for this, and the ones that do exist are outdated due to the new regulations (even the main 7 simul pin order people use is likely suboptimal now).
@@CalebTrelford the idea of block building prediction is basically linked to 1 looking 7 Simul, being able to know how many turns to do for the intuitive block building part. Because 1 look 7 Simul is just difficult to memo sub12 as of now, I have started to study cases that would skip or at least give me good block building/intuitive parts of 7 Simul. As of the moment, I have studied around 3 cases, all through visually tracing how many moves an edge needs to do to match a certain edge. These cases basically tell me if I can skip a part on the intuitive block building part or at least give me an idea how many turns to build certain parts of the blocks. Hopefully in the future, I can manage 1 looking the scram in under 12 seconds to be able to use it officially. Thanks for your insights!
OMG i couldnt believe it at first when i saw it on wcalive but this is just insane. I feels like this wont be broken for years but who knows. HUGE HUGE CONGRATS!!
@@SaishaMittalnot by much, the single kinda sucks in comparison to the avg, .12 difference, less than 2x2, skewb, and pyra difference. I think plenty of people can break the single but the avg is insane
I actually thought this was fake when I saw it, just can't believe we're here already. MASSIVE congrats on pulling this out, literally shocked the entire cubing community.
Completely amazing... You got the first, second, third, and fifth fastest clock solves EVER in a single average! Only a few months ago the world record was an entire second slower...
I just cried out after I watch this (one of the reason is because clock is my main event and you just shattered the WR lol), this could be one of the hardest WR to break in the entire cubing history!
It’s mad impressive that you kept your composure going into the last solve, and got a clutch WR single to improve the average. It’ll be interesting to see how the rest of the clock results will be influenced by this
I was there and this was an amazing expierience to see the World record live. Hopę you will keep pushing the boundaries of cubing and get even better records (If it is even physicly possible) on clock.
Nice one Eryk!! The fact that you also beat the previous wr as an average is just insane, feel very happy for you! 😊 Hope you don’t mind us reposting, let us know if you want us to take it down.
This can't be real... Definitely the craziest moment in cubing history by a mile, or at least the craziest moment in cubing history since I start cubing in 2015!
