200 HP Increase On 8PSI & 91 Octane 

Since this has a "fuel kit", which should be a "flex fuel" kit, sensor, then using pump E-85 [40-55% E] or better, proper E-85, -88, -90, -95, -100, will achieve much more power, cleaner burning, with exceeding less carbon deposits ->Boosted engines do NO require higher octane fuel which is necessary for high compression engines to slow the burning rate even - do NO provide more power -> pump E-85 achieves 40-50 + HP over 91 or 93 or C-16 -> proper E-85 achieves 100 + HP over any pump 91, 93, C-10,-16 fuel. Most people are just ignorant with false, faulty information about fuel within combustion, power. Sincerely

With price creep lately, it's becoming a better option to just pay a little more and get maggy/pro. Before when these blowers could be bought for $300-$500 bucks and piece everything together yourself, you could add a ton of power for not much money. A couple of companies then went ahead and bought every LSA they could, which ballooned the price of them. So now a used LSA can't be found for less than $1200 and it's becoming less viable. But the only trade is these blowers are designed and built to be daily driven, so repair and maintenance is almost non existent. I bought my kit years ago before everything went crazy and I still feel it was a good option for me at the time. Total kit for me was less than $4k, which maggy/pro were both $4k more. Also, the owner of BD was extremely helpful during install which you'll never, ever get that from maggy/pro.

I remember that

Yes. Big difference honestly.

@@RaceProvenMotorsports how much more do you think this setup would have made on 93? 580?

@@RaceProvenMotorsports Sure for high compression engines, the higher octane is necessary to slow the burning Sunoco had a dial on their pumps to select the octane, via adding more tetraethyl lead, back in the 1960's to early 1970's, before the fuel requirements changed along with lower compression engines. Fran, Matt, Eric, Kyle, Garrett, Bill should all become more knowledgeable with, about ethanol -> cleaner burning, more power and lacking, needing higher octane fuel with boosted engines. -> pump E-85 [40-55%] achieves 40-50 + HP over any pump unleaded 87-91, C-10, -16 -> true E-85 achieves 100 + HP You can show this via Your dynometer measurements with any vehicle, engine, build There are differences with ethanol + methanol, ethanol or methanol alone, though small. NASCAR use proper E-85, C-85, Indycar switched from methanol, M1 to ethanol in 2007, Top Alcohol mostly use either methanol, ethanol, Top Fuel use nitro-methane = nitrous + methanol. Sincerely

@@kolbyhumbert2680Kolby Humbert, clearly Your have False concepts about hydrocarbon fuels -> no power increase -> perhaps less -> higher octane = slower burning -> for high compression engines, not boosted much better with ethanol, even pump E-85 [40-55%] => 40-50 HP increase -> proper E-85C-85 = 100 HP + also over C-10, -16 methanol & ethanol, ethanol or methanol alone have some smaller variation of power between them methanol burns cleaner than ethanol since it has less carbon; methanol CH4O=CH3-OH - 4H/1C; ethanol C2H6O=CH3-CH2-OH - 6H/2C=3H/1C. Sincerely

I think i found my new best friend, Cold beer

OEM!

Find a used LSA and piece the rest of the kit together yourself. It isn't hard and it's very cheap. You'll need the adapter plate for your cathedral heads or you can buy used ls3 heads for cheap. Everything will literally bolt right in. It's stupid easy. Obviously any power mods you want will increase price (ie ported heads, cam) but if all you do is add the blower and leave everything else stock you'll still be 500+ whp easily.

why??

Sick burn yo

I never understood how some folks from Missouri say Missoura. At least on the Kansas City side I've heard it.