That is a typo in the slide 16 when describing the conventional definition for Larger the better Loss (around 6’35”). The correct statement should be “No loss if the quality characteristics is above the lower limit.” Instead of “....upper limit”. Same typo in the following statement.
I have a query. In Larger-the-better, conventional definition said that if quality characteristics is above upper limit, then there will be no loss. But, in graph, it has been depicted that quality character is above lower limit and there is no loss. Kindly clarify it.
That is a typo in the slide 16 when describing the conventional definition for Larger the better Loss. The correct statement should be “No loss if the quality characteristics is above the lower limit.” Instead of “....upper limit”. Same typo in the following statement. Thanks for the reminding.
