2021 BMW M3 (510hp) RWD | 0-100 & 100-200 km/h acceleration🏁 | by Automann in 4K 

Yes, when is new car. 😂

@@Enko063 is there any known side effect after using it?! I am realy interested in..as a bmw hater...lol 🤣🤣🤣

@@Master321v bmw hater???🤣🤣🤣 how is possible to be a bmw hater lol. But engines are not reliable.

@@hasanagera somply not like a brand..much a do about nothing..and overhyped imo. S55 was shitry due to cranc hub..precious ones has bearing issues... If i imformed well..all these issues are solvwd in s58..and these m3 m4 will have awd versions...so..not too much chance for other brands..as these on stg2 makes 750horses..

@@Master321v haha I stop reading to s55 is shitty 🤡

It would be if you had a hangover

In Germany we say "Augenkrebs" 😁

it looks fantastic

Thanks man:)

@@Automann-TV Just spitting facts my man. Lately you have been the first person on RU-vid to post video's and acceleration times of the latest released cars.

The question should be...Why does this channel have more than 500 subs?

I subscribed! So there's one step closer to 500k.

I agree with your wondering

Yeah, because it's got way more than 510hp...

@@Dokepredator How do you know? Did you dyno it?

@@elsereno4 To be fair most German car manufacturers give out conservative power figures. On the dyne they always make more than claimed.

@@DanielSadjadian I know what you mean but that’s just not true. I had a standard M4 which put out 470hp while a friend’s Competition made 430hp. Smoked him every time. And I remember seeing a standard M3 or M4 on youtube that sadly only was in the 3xxhp range but take this with a grain of salt. And don’t get me started on N/A engines

@@elsereno4 you're wrong

It’s not faster , rs6 avant does 0-200 11.5 seconds , but it close ...

@@manoszervas9613 It is faster. We’re talking 100-200 here

Still i would chose rs7 or rs6 look miles better ahead go to abt tune it to 700 hp 1000nm and you have a beast. I know bmw it is good to drive you can do drifts but lets be real how many people who buy this will go to track 10 % maybe , and because of that i would choose audi over bmw i would only neeed a fast practical car you dont need more for a daliy use . This car proves that indiots will buy it joust because it is a bmw no matter how hideous it is .

OBMG Hitta 22inch wheels vs 19-20 inch wheels , rs6 is also heavier ...

@@manoszervas9613 Nobody cares. He pointed out that it’s faster, which are facts. End of story

I love it!

its fantastic, the quality looks supreme....

Wir dürfen wohl sehr gespannt sein auf den neuen C63s....aber ich stelle mal ne steile Hypothese auf: 100-200 km/h wird der C63s mit 641 PS nicht unter 7 Sekunden machen😇😜

@@Automann-TV wird er auch nicht. Der C63 wird zwar mehr Leistung als der M3 haben, aber obenraus bringt der Elektroquatsch nichts, ausser mehr Gewicht....ich wage zu bezweifeln, dass der C63 überhaupt schneller als der M3 100 auf 200 ist 😁

@@artansadiki3244 gleicher Meinung

Deine Rechtschreibung 👎🏼

@@ALCATRZ Machst du immer alles richtig ?

@@carinafarnschlader3798 Nein ich denke das tut er nicht.

the m3 standard on dyno has 547hp, while Bmw claim it has 480hp. I guess the m3c has around 580hp

@@namolmarinica3639 source?

@@sylvaind.6786 you can find it on internet, millions of sources, I read it on Car Throttle magazine

@@namolmarinica3639 one dyno showing 547 doesn't prove anything. Great engine though but I don't think BMW would sandbag 70hp on the Comp.

@@peterhammer6915 I had similar experience with the M3 Pure. Supposed to have 480 and went on a dyno that the company said is “rather conservative” - 2 close runs with the better one showing 551 bhp. Also it is possible to sprint from 0-100 kph in 3.68s (manual) not in 4.1 what bmw states. It’s always been that way that BMW gave rather slightly lower figures (expect for E90 M3) to make sure EVERY customer can do this times and has a car with stated power output - but this time I suppose that they just had to stick to the BMW Lineup. If they would state officially that an M3 is as fast as an M5 (competition) but waaay cheaper, who would still buy the M5 ? Because even from space inside they now are almost even…

~8,5sec

I guess we have to wait for that but judging from today it will be very hard to beat this time 100-200 km/h😀

@@Automann-TV u.re right!

RWD was AWD😉

@@Automann-TV There will be an xDrive M3.

What’s your point?

3.72 sec 0-100 km.h is the best time I.ve seen of this car, this was a bad launch to be honnest

@@namolmarinica3639 then it's good to get xdrive, every launch as good as the same time. Also fun when you turn it to 'DSC off' because it can send 100% to the rear. Drifting should be a piece of cake even with xdrive on it.

Yes, really sad but it will be faster than this. Look for the AMG engineered E-Motor and battery...

@@Dokepredator If the m3c has almost same time 100-200 as the e63s, I dont think the c63s 2022 will be quicker than m3c/e63s.

@@namolmarinica3639 the new C63e will have more power and less weight so naturally it'll be faster than the E63s

@@LOLcakes00 the c63 has 643 hp for 10sec, 543 hp will be the consistent power. Also, the weight could be around 1900kg-2000 kg, cuz it has E-turbo, baterries, cooling system baterry, electric engine, that 2 gears system for electric engine + 2l turbo engine.

@@namolmarinica3639 that's still 500kg lighter, with a 0-100 time of low 3s you still have at least 6 seconds of overboost to help with the 100-200 time, which means for the majority of the sprint you'll be more powerful than the E63s

Stuck in 2020?

@@sylvaind.6786 what are you doing step bro ?

Eu sagt halt nein :/

@@Real_Turismo ja leider

you can tune the S58 to go under 5 sec, no massive tunes needed. Comparing stock car to tuned car is utterly stupid. I have seen an 320i go to 200 in 5 sec. Not from 100 but from standstill. It had 1200 hp.

@@peterhammer6915 lol you act like I don’t know that. What I’m saying is from the factory this is great performance...

@@LoXHumaN ok I understood wrongly, sorry!

@@peterhammer6915 yeah, not trying to bash on the car as my cars pretty fast for what it is. I’m use to destroying stock m3’s from a roll but his new one would give me a dead even run. Very impressive for a stock car

I doubt it would beat this. Maybe it will have more power, but also more weight due to hybrid system. And that 2.0 engine..

The 2.0 is a very big deal. Everyone hates the idea. It’s that very reason that Mercedes-Benz will not allow the M3/4 to be faster. Expect huge torque from the combination engine and hybrid to overcome the weight. Also remember... the AWD M3/4 will be faster than the RWD M3/4 only on standing starts. The RWD car will be faster in roll racing because it weighs less and makes the same power. Mercedes F1 technology for the win... watch this space.

@@mr10secondGT Ofc it depends on how much power the entire system will have, but it is really difficult to overcome the weight with today's battery technologies. Only with low amount of high capacity batteries and big amount of power it will have good impact on performance. AWD better lunch, RWD quicker from a roll due lower weight and lower drivetrain loss.

@@mr10secondGT +40kg its not that more, and u can put it in 2wd, so mb 0.1 sec. difference

@@mr10secondGT A dude with common sense in these comments, rare

an m3 not sounding nice? you must be insane

@@prevaloir5362 i own an g82 M4 competition now and it’s been great driving the car with the pops and bangs, sounds great even with the opf😅😁

the F80 CS is an incredible experience, at least for me. Beats every normal 992 in that regard.

@@peterhammer6915 please go drive a high revving atmo sports car. The experience is on another level.

@@TheOrdersixtysix I have sat for 10 rounds in an 720S, yes its another level especially price wise. 991 Turbo is lightyears behind the McLaren in rawness. I have also driven R8 V10, which in my opinion wasn't any better than the F80CS, still costs double at least. F80 CS in its class for me the best. I owned a E92 M3 for 4 years and it rewwed up to 8700 (software tune). Engine fantastic but driving wise not in the same class as the CS.

@@peterhammer6915 I drove the reg F80 and the M2 CS. Fast cars, but not the same exhilarating experience as my analog E46 M3 or E34 M5. I just can’t get in tune with modern digital and turbo cars.

@@TheOrdersixtysix ok, for me it is the total opposite. E34 was a BIG disappointment when I drove it mid 90:s. Neither the E46 gave me thrills. First M-cars I loved were E39 M5 and E92 M3.

Don't think so but we will see 😅

500 to the rear is a bit of a reach

There was someone else that deleted their comment lol

congrats

Yes

@@Real_Turismo well ok but here in ireland we have a serious traction problem. it rains all the time, and traction is poor due to our farmers dirtying the roads, and dont get me started on potholes. So i don think i woudl have the skill or nerve to use all that power to the back wheels.

@@SuperCatbert get the awd m3🤷

Can‘t buy any new car then 🤷

@@Real_Turismo I think you can get some. When the time comes I’ll have to do a lot of research. It is possible to run a very successful business while respecting customers. I refuse to support this fakery trend. They know they offend non casual car fans and that’s unacceptable. We’re talking about a lot of money after all

@@riheg yeah but tbh, its super easy to deactivate it

@@Real_Turismo good to know

What about it?

Yes,Fat but cheap.

1805 kg WITH full tank and driver, very reasonable

@@peterhammer6915 Understand

Just wait for the awd and it will be a lot faster

How can you tell?

@@johannesotto8739 IMO it sounds so "plastic". Horrible comparing to let say a simple 325i E92.

@@johannesotto8739 don't cares, it's fake and sounds awful like in the 140i's etc.

u can turn off

@bob bob For a time being :)

@@Dokepredator you have no clue what your talking about. Nothing artificial in my M140i, when in sport+ you can hear exhaust noise out from the sunroof if it's open. Get a GR yaris then you know what's called artificial.

Also ernsthaft

Was redest du von korrigieren?

@@elsereno4 Die GPS Zeit ist nicht korrigiert

@@nugget9923 was gibt es zu korrigieren ? Es läuft über GPS und bei der Box ist keine große Korrektur nötig. Du korrigierst einfach mal willkürlich um 0,6s? Warum? Hauptsache das Auto schlechter darstehen lassen, als es ist oder was

7,72 bei 0,0 % slope = 7,72 korrigiert😉

@@nugget9923 Korrekter gehts nicht, min Jung