2022 Hyundai Palisade updated moderate overlap front IIHS crash test 

Lol yes I agree

Most disposable cars on the market IMO

@@meffffy I’d say Subaru and Hyundai are neck and neck in the garbage they produce.

Si igual como los toyota sino miremos el plastiquera de tacoma es horrible.

It's clearly a family SUV, of course rear passenger safety is a raised concern.

And clearly when the seatbelt tightened up when the impact happened it untightened so the rear passengers could literally be ejected from the car. And those people would mostly consist of children. Seems like they wouldn’t slack off on that since they have a decent rep about being safe cars.

Same, but I'm glad to see my dad's car didn't get poor on other tests.

LOOK at the REST. Much harder impact in this NEW test. Give opinion in 2 years, once they all modify for this new test!

@@pepeshopping IIHS alerts automakers *two years* (might be wrong on that but that’s what i remember being told) before a new test comes out.

I think Hyundai group usually perform pretty well in crash test… But they’re the type of company that does the bare minimum in terms of safety to get the best grade, but not above and beyond that.

This is a new, updated test. Many SUVs did poorly. For this updated test they added a smaller dummy in the back seat. Previously only the results were measured for the front occupant. The cars have not become less safe. The tests have become more difficult to pass. All these manufacturers will have to improve.

@@theclueguy3388that doesn’t make a difference, you can not learn if you never made a mistake so they had nothing to work off of.

It’s movement that are specifically on critical parts of the body, there was a lot of sideways which is very damaging. There’s also obviously a lot more paint on the airbags.

I agree, without the data, just from visual measurement, some "poor" ratings are doing better than the "good" and "acceptable" ratings. Which I agree this test is not a valid test. Not to consider people can have different body sizes compare to the dummy used in this test. And also some details IMO is not considered in the rating as well, for example, rav4's back row dummy's head was stuck by the airbag which visually can cause a huge damage, also Nissan Frontier's back row dummy hits the back window which can also deal tons of damage. Instead of looking at how close the dummy's head is towards the front seat back, and the "kinetic" of the dummy, why ignoring the other details that cause huge damage to the dummy?

I think it is because of the weight of the EVs, the battery is so heavy that the jump up of the car tail was significant lower. This can cause the back row dummy gets less kinetic energy and therefore less tension from the seatbelt. In the end less damage from the seatbelt tension.

@@cookiebaker6133I can see where you are coming from but the vw Jetta didn’t even leave the ground but was rated poor

The drain the fuel and replace it with stottard, the other fluids I wouldn't know if they leave or replace, because obviously it represents the weight of the vehicle in a sene

@@RockyFoxxowo if it was fuel that spilled out in the crash, that would cause it to get a poor rating (edit: it did)

The seatbelt tightened up In the rear seats when the impact happened it untightened so the rear passengers could literally be ejected from the car. And those people would mostly consist of children. Seems like they wouldn’t slack off on that since they have a decent rep about being safe cars.

It's an amazing and safe car. IIHS has just lost its marbles with mission creep (Increasingly high expectations every year)

I think it’s more 2020-2022 models

I highly doubt that quilted seats would have any impact on the vehicle’s rating

@@matthewmooney4301 it was a joke

Volvo are crap cars. Average build quality at the best.

@@legioner9 enlighten me on a good car brand then

@@busystudying6711 Today? Almost none. Lexus is no. 1. Other than it, I don't know.

Have you seen the jeep

Have you seen the subaru outback or crosstrek (I cant remember which one) in the side impact

honda crv and many others did the same in this test. this test isn't structure. it's rear passenger data.

Literally half of the cars did just as bad. Dk what you're talking about

Because it’s a new test. This happens every time there is a new test.

The model also same

⁠@@abcdefu721doesn’t the 2023 change the front grill and some other things?

​@@OnyxHuber1187it's identical structurally

@@RockyFoxxowo yes, but I’m just saying it’s still a different model visually

Wow

The sunroof burst because it hit the metal suport welded on the roof, which is holding the camera that films the rear dummy.

Sunroof wasn’t closed before crash. And idk why it needed that metal bar?

The sunroof was wide open I'm not surprised it broke, they tested other models with the sunroof shut.

@@Trinny1751 Nice troll, kid.

BS..the Honda pilot didn’t do any better! 😅

@@RaulCastroAtlanta Honda, like Toyota, is a terrible value proposition boosted by their reputation of being better than Chrysler in the 1980s. The Pilot they tested is inexplicably the outgoing model so perhaps the 2023 Outback-Explorer mishmash will do better.

Bro, like 10 other vehicles failed and you gotta criticize this one manufacturer?

@@0w3nn It’s a Hyundai video so yes and they have a pattern of doing poorly. CX-9 is super old and Jeep products are Jeep products. Toyota and Honda are also terrible cost cutters.

People have lost sight that this test is rear dummy data related to the seatbelt. Look at the actual reports for the data. The auto manufactures with marginal or acceptable have belt pretensioners that immediately retract and tighten during a collision in the back as they all do in the front. That's where anyone needs to start, regardless of manufacturer.

lap belt slid from hip into torso allowing for serious injury to that region of the body. Lots of movement allowed. Looks like it lacked adequate pretensioners in the back.

@@christina2975 Less movement than the Explorer, which was rated Good. Appears that too little movement may actually cause more neck injury.

According to the official ratings of this test, the rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.(probably because of the anti-submarining seat) And it might gets worse than just lap belt sliding here. the main problem here was that “The chest forces and the likely risk of head, or neck injury”, Which was probably the result of the lack of the Seatbelt safety equipments. Like seatbelt pretensioners, which can make you move back to the desired position in collision, and from my perspective, it seems to be able to make seatbelt shock absorbing function act more effectively if equipped.(In this case, this one doesn’t seem to have both) To sum : it seems your lower half'gonna be fine, too bad your upper part ain’t gonna🫡

@CallMehTech .. How so? ... Wow the vehicle's glass sunroof shattered big time??

Bro rear passenger seat belt broke his chest.

It did poor, did you see the kid in the back? Weird how there's a lot of positive comments here.... positive comments farm?

Found the Hyundai shill

Blind?

@@ureviews did awesome. All systems worked: airbags, seatbelts, even the windshield didn’t cracked. Great absorption of the crash. Excellent car.

@@40040 did awesome. All systems worked: airbags, seatbelts, even the windshield didn’t cracked. Great absorption of the crash. Excellent car.

@@울타리-w9e 뭘 보라고? Poor 나온거 또 있는데?

​@@justinek6974 아직 2023년 모델은 테스트 안함

@@자동차생활 그렇네 페리전이네. 근데 결과는 똑같을거얌

@@justinek6974 패이스리프트 하면서 에어백 추가 돼서 다를걸요

급식새끼ㅋㅋㅋ 나중에 울며겨자먹기로 중고로 아반떼 살거면서

so true.

Tested poor due to rear passenger head/neck & chest injury. Same reason the Pilot, Highlander, CX-9 all tested bad. If you’re gonna hate on Hyundai/Kia- gotta hate on Honda, Toyota, & Mazda too 🤷🏻‍♂️

​@@AyeeItsLaRockmazda cx9 n cx5 has bad result because theyre based on old platform, I believe if Im not mistaken since 2016. This Palisade however is more recent, thus makes it worse.

@@TheGillederais These cars got poor ratings only because of no rear seat pre-tensioner. Not a structural problem.

Hyundai and Kia are awesome cars. Went to Hyundai and never going back to Toyohondas with weak powertrains and awd systems.