@@trentmorris2502because even though most people don’t use 4wd they still want it, also the same reason sports suvs are a thing. People want to pretend they have something they don’t, take the Haval h6 gt, looks sporty but its dead slow, the reason people buy it is because it looks fast but is still cheap.
Wow, your testing facility has it all..😮.. all sorts of road surfaces that people will encounter in real life, big up for that.. I think this is exactly what everyone should go for. People are not towing big trailers, and they never take their SUVs offroad, which makes this enough for most people. The cloth seats are nice and comfortable, you can park it out in the sun and never have to worry about it getting hot. I think the interior is aging well. The screen is big enough, and plus, there are still some physical buttons around. Yes, the screen in the Ford Everest is cool,but controlling most of the things through it is not easy. Very practical, reliable , and efficient. My pick.
I'd go with a 1.9 if there's a significant fuel saving over the 3.0. I don't tow and as long as the offroad capability isn't compromised I'd rather save a lot of fuel
Not bad for the smaller engine, would stick with the 3L. For the Triton, the traction control was calibrated to work in hand with the terrain select mode.
The biggest selling point of the Isuzu is the 3l for its relaxed torquey nature. Few will buy this smaller engine and those who do will normally regret it.
Hey Paul, great review as always. You mentioned that an updated MUX was realised in Thailand. I'm so close to looking at one (3 litre diesel), and I would love it if you had any information on Australia. Sadly, I haven't purchased a new car for years and would be shattered if an update MUX was around the corner.
Quieter, great torque, lighter, cheaper, less annual tax, less payload so less bouncy suspension. Plus modern gbox does the job so no worries for downshifting more than the 3L. In basic trim and 4x2 It' s a great deal
Good honest review. Spot on Paul. I Think Grandma's school bus. Drove the 1900 Ute here in Thailand a couple of times. Yeah, it will suit Grandpa. Full loaded and towing, you are going nowhere quickly, and it will probably use more fuel than the 3.0 in the same scenario.
I'm just here to pls that the new series you started where you spend 5 mins talking about the latest car news, PLS can that not be replacing the proper Monday podcasts. I enjoyed the banter between you all, as well as all the news and different opinions on things.
These smaller engines that have to work harder just to keep up will not have the same longevity as the bigger capacity option . The 1.9 would be a good choice for a 4 door sedan or station wagon where it really would achieve good fuel economy due to a better power to weight ratio.
This has about the same performance as a 3.2L 1988 EA Falcon. Even back then it was regarded as woefully slow and was only sold for 9 months. How far we have come in 36 years.
Looks like it was designed for fleet use to me, bare bones inside , fuel economy for fleets who have them as reps cars and don’t tow,. Not enough of a discount for me.
Could you do an explained video explaining how auto headlight levelling works specifically in utes and suvs and how it works when weight is added to the vehicle such as when towing?
i drive a 2019 ranger its got manual leveling headlights when i press and turn the knob it lowers and raises the beam of the lights at 5 its super close like about half of the range is gone at 1 its back to its highest and full range .... i guess its useful when the back of the pick up squats and the front raises up due to the load weight, you can lower it a bit so as not to dazzle oncoming traffic . . . i put mine at 2 so its a bit lower because sedans and lowered hondas and toyotas keep flashing me even if Im on my low beams... im guessing the auto ones works the same except its automatic when it detects the added weight
3.0 sounds like tractor but extra power is worth it. Only if they could add mild hybrid with this 1.9L engine and take total power up to 200KW, it would be great.
A smaller and less powerful motor in the MUX or DMax in the Australian market seems some what the wrong direction and big time. They need to at least get to hilux power and torque figures but even then the V6 diesel Ranger Sport/Wildtrak or the sister VW Amorok in V6 form just murder it. The $67,990 drive away price for a top spec MUX or DMax further negates a less powerful vehicle that is priced at $59,990 PLUS on roads so what’s the savings? $5k at best? When you go to sell it you will get more than that $5k difference back.
down hill assist is adjustable by gently squeezing accelorator or brakes to increase or decrease speed during descent. Also rough terrain mode and diff lock dont work together in mux. They work hand in hand in dmax however and should be an update for new model mux coming.
Paul, just some feedback mate. I attempted to use your purchasing service for a Tiguan R and Peter replied. After numerous replies back to him with the specific model I wanted he never returned my enquiry despite being ready to buy asap. Disappointing point as his service for your business is not recommended and absolute rubbish to be honest! Thanks for your videos mate 👍
In India I don't know what's the mindset of Isuzu but they sell this mux with this engine still the price is 85000 aud.. that's why fortuner is so popular here despite fat price of 90000-95000 aud..
I come from a BMW X5 40D …. 600nm, pulls like a school boy and every feature I could want. Had the unfortunate luck of ending up with some less than ideal rental cars in aus recently. Acadia, MU-x and prado…. I wasn’t impress to put it politely….. and now I’m waiting for the RS facelift MU-X to be available to order 😮
I feel bad for the markets that only get this small engine option, like vietnam. The 3.0l will always still be better in terms of overtaking, tackling uphills and towing, even tho it's louder and sounds more agricultural.
1.9 could be 2wd only and maybe only as a five seater ,that way reducing weight . 1.9 litre brings back memories of the Holden Starfire 1.9 and the Sunbird with the Opel 1.9 . Are they going with 1.9 to cater to certain tax laws ,is it just a push to be in the green ? Please find out if it can tow 3,000kg with all passengers, onboard ? Also imagine the 0-100 times with full load of passengers and from the safety thinking ,how safe would the 1.9 be for passing with passengers ?
Nothing major with the facelift, had a look at one today in Thailand. 360 camera (awful visuals), new digital dash still not great and electric steering finally for Thai market, new front and rear are the major changes. We lost the blue colour as well😢
Thanks Paul - you can never beat power to weight ratios of a three litre diesel - the Ford twin turbo Ranger also suffered from poor forward motion and a constantly hunting 10 speed auto transmission - I drive a Hilux so the Toyota Fortuner is a no-brainer and if budget was a consideration then a Mitsubishi Pajero Sport - I would never spend this amount of money on an Isuzu or Ford.
I have that ranger for work and it’s been quite nice up here in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Valley. I had a 21 Hilux, and that was nice and all but now I have seamless acceleration and radar cruise thanks to those extra gears.
@@AdamAus85 yes Adam - an analogue cluster is so much more reliable as you don’t need power - this is going to be a big problem as more manufactures adopt these - another observation is when Subaru removed the analogue coolant temp instrument from 2009 and only just reintroduced it for 2024/5 models - this cause a lot of engine overheating as drivers only saw a small below the tacho red light warning when it was too late - I owned 12 Subarus and stopped buying them when they did this and also introduced the flawed CVT in 2013.
$60k for manual seats with no heating etc. Old infotainment system with a small screen. Small and useless screen in front of the driver. No 360 degree camera. Slow takeoff and overtaking times. Terrible stopping distance even in the wet. Why would I buy this over a Sorrento? It’s not for the towing capacity cause you can’t tow anything near the 3T. I’m amazed that these sell. Hopefully the new model is better
I had to use a dmax 4x2 single cab for a day when my dual cab ranger was in for a service, both 2024 models. That 1.9 and that trans were a big step down from the ranger drivetrain. Yeah not an apples to apples comparison, the ranger is the 4x4 model and not completely pov spec. But even the interior switchgear was horrible to interact with (ac knobs, indicator stalk, etc). Isuzu (and now Mazda) make a half baked product imo.
Hi Paul, I suggest that you do the braking test exactly at 100KM/H for more accurate reading. At high speed even 5KM/h makes a lot of difference, and here in the video you did it in 110Ks. That won't be accurate.
@CarExpertAus doesn't use the vehicle's speedometer for braking or acceleration measurements due to inaccuracies across manufacturers. CarExpert uses a recognised GPS Application for such measurements on all vehicle tests to allow correct measurement and vehicle comparison.
The measuring devices used can calculate the exact speed it brakes from. So you can brake from 120km/h but it will calculate 100-0 time and distance. It uses science.
Nup. Makes no difference. We shot a video explaining this previously: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sBINoLMfiwk.htmlsi=aevNtLntxmx9mzi1
Sorry Paul, Mitsubishi doesn't need the Rough Road mode of this. The Triton already has 7 Drives modes, which you have failed to utilize properly as seen with other reviews where it performed spectacularly 😂
Don’t know why anyone in Australia would ever buy an Isuzu. Such crappy cars. If you watch the MU X commercial on TV, it’s all about its powered tailgate 😂 I owned an Audi A6 Avant 20 years ago that already had that feature back then
Engine size is way too small for this class of vehicle, it weighs over 2 tons, needs more grunt. The 3.0L is perfect and the price difference isn’t sufficient enough to go this over the bigger motor.
The engine is definitely too small for it's size at least it should have been a little bit bigger, about 2.2 ,2.4 with about 210hp or 218hp and that would be a lot more better to do the job
Im literally tired of constantly putting in fuel. Ive seen the vw 1.9 diesel in action while driving in convoy long distance and man did they do evevryyythinggg on ONE tank or that was the game these 1.9 ers play. I again stopped for fuel. 1.9 for me pls. I TOO WANA DO A THOUSAND plus ON ONE TANK
Gotta be pretty stupid to think this engine would be a good purchase decision. Tiny engine in a 2T+ car, its going to be working waaay harder than it needs to be and the result will be dead engine sooner than expected. Less towing capacity as well. The only selling point is lower fuel economy in the best of conditions. Not a very good idea.
1.9L? Do you know why the Japanese manufacturer keep offering junk to Australia? coz ppl will buy them no matter what. Have a look at Toyota with it's gutless 2.8L diesel Prado. Slow as a snail yet ppl just can't get their hands off.
So I have a question..... Most of the vehicle presenters reviewing a vehicle howcome they always say the interior "feels dated"? On what facts do they base these conclusions on? Almost on all ute reviews even the latest utes they always make the statement the interior "Feels Dates"..... irritates the living shit out of me when making a statement on baseless unproven facts.....
The Only Utes the Feel dated are The Hilux and The D-max, but with the new Updated interior for the D-max it makes it feel less dated then it did before!
OMG, the MU-X in the 3 litre form is just an average 4WD with a noisy underpowered engine, why in the hell would you buy this, but some people have more money that brains, I guess.