How can Indian offer a touring bike with such shorts fenders? I don't want to have my luggage and my legs covered with mud and dirt from a wet road. The better basis for a touring bike would be the Indian Classic. The advantage is clear on HD side. Indian offers better rear suspension as an option. Why isn't it installed directly on the touring bike? I think, if both bikes were aquipped to be really comparable, the price level will be the same. My decision will go to the Indian.
I wanna know why I should pay a high price of $17K for a big heavy bike that only has one disc front brake instead of two. What a ripoff! Can't go tour riding in the rain with just one slippery wet disc to quickly slow you down in an emergency. That's dangerous AF!
