Тёмный

207 - Manstein Goes Great War Style - WW2 - August 13, 1943 

World War Two
Подписаться 934 тыс.
Просмотров 306 тыс.
50% 1

From Sicily to Spas-Demensk, the Axis continue conceding ground to the Allies this week. But the fighting is still tough. The Wehrmacht has halted the Red Army offensive in the Kuban, and the British and American Armies have neither the strength nor the willpower to press the advantage against Axis troops retreating to the Italian mainland.
Join us on Patreon: bit.ly/WW2_207_DE
Or join the TimeGhost Army directly at: timeghost.tv/signup/
Special thanks to Seth Wiens, DivineInsurgent and Purple Purple for their support during this episode's premiere!
Check out our TimeGhost History RU-vid channel: / timeghost
Between 2 Wars: • Between 2 Wars
Follow WW2 Day by Day on Instagram: @ww2_day_by_day
Follow TimeGhost History on Instagram: @timeghosthistory
Like us on Facebook: / timeghosthistory
Hosted by: Indy Neidell
Director: Astrid Deinhard
Producers: Astrid Deinhard and Spartacus Olsson
Executive Producers: Astrid Deinhard, Indy Neidell, Spartacus Olsson
Creative Producer: Marek Kamiński
Community Management: Ian Sowden
Written by: Indy Neidell
Research by: Indy Neidell
Map animations by: Daniel Weiss
Map research by: Sietse Kenter
Edited by: Iryna Dulka
Artwork and color grading by: Mikołaj Uchman
Sound design by: Marek Kamiński
Colorizations by:
Mikołaj Uchman
Julius Jääskeläinen - / jjcolorization
Source literature list: bit.ly/SourcesWW2
Archive footage: Screenocean/Reuters - www.screenocean.com
Image sources:
Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe
IWM: C 3687, NA 5123, HU 63089, HU 63090, MH 24747, MH 24764, BU 10915, OPX 96, OPX 98, OPX 99
Soundtracks from Epidemic Sound:
Easy Target - Rannar Sillard
Dark Beginning - Johan Hynynen
Growing Doubt - Wendel Scherer
Break Free - Fabien Tell
Last Point of Safe Return - Fabien Tell
Out the Window - Wendel Scherer
Growing Doubt - Wendel Scherer
Trapped in a Maze - Philip Ayers
Ominous - Philip Ayers
Spellbound - Edward Karl Hanson
Secret Cargo - Craft Case
A TimeGhost chronological documentary produced by OnLion Entertainment GmbH.

Опубликовано:

 

12 авг 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1 тыс.   
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Have you heard? We're having TimeGhost Army Meetups in September! Check out our announcement video for more details: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-r42idqilO1A.html Tickets are available for sale exclusively to TimeGhost Army Members on Patreon: www.patreon.com/posts/70298303?pr=true TimeGhost.tv: timeghost.tv/timeghost-army-meetup-in-normandy-and-munich/ There are four chances for you to meet us: - 16/September/2022 at a general meetup in a bar in the vicinity of Colleville sur Mer, Normandy, France - 17/September/2022 at a smaller, more exclusive dinner in the vicinity of Colleville sur Mer, Normandy, France - 30/September/2022 at a smaller, more exclusive dinner in the vicinity of Munich (Benreid), Bayern, Germany - 01/October/2022 as a guest at the TimeGhost Team building at Oktoberfest in Munich Exact venues will be announced via email to all those who buy tickets once we know how big of a venue we need to book! For any questions at all, reach out to community@timeghost.tv
@satanicmuffin9309
@satanicmuffin9309 Год назад
Please update your "source literature list" in the description. It only lists sources for 1939, 1940, and 1941, while the series is almost 3/4 into 1943.
@rainyvideos3684
@rainyvideos3684 Год назад
I think that you all are not understanding with what Mainstein is trying to do. He's not advocating a WW1 style defense. That's closer to Hitler who refuses to give ground. If you actually look at what Manstein wanted to do, he wanted to do a mobile defense. The mobile defense would work like this, the Soviets would be allowed to overextend themselves like they always did and then you would counter-attack, encircle, and destroy the attacking enemy forces. This is what he advocated before Kursk and he wasn't listened too. He continued to advocate the same even after Kursk.
@QuizmasterLaw
@QuizmasterLaw Год назад
It's no fun being struck by your superior officer. Speaking from experience. Mostly because you can't strike back. What happens to suspected traitors who are in fact innocent? OIC... Coz we're all about to find out what happens to suspected traitors who are found guilty! Traduttore traditore p.s. It's really satisfying to see the actual traitor get their punishment. )
@slcpunk2740
@slcpunk2740 Год назад
@@rainyvideos3684 You can stop defending Nazi failures, they lost and no one cares any more except fascist fanboys ... it's been 80 years 🤦🏻‍♂️
@caryblack5985
@caryblack5985 Год назад
@@rainyvideos3684 I don't think they misunderstood Manstein. They said it was naive to expect that the Allies would accept a peace that left Hitler and the Nazis in power. Manstein believed he could achieve a stalemate and wear the Soviets down. That was not going to happen with the Soviets having many more troops and they out produced the Germans in tanks, planes and aircraft and the US was also sending great amounts of aid. It shows that he had no understanding of both the political and military situation which was decisively against Germany.
@Significantpower
@Significantpower Год назад
I'm amazed that the egos of Patton and Montgomery didn't sink Sicily into the Mediterranean.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
No wonder that for the rest of the war they had to put 1, if not 2 armies in between the 2 prima donnas.
@kevinganske967
@kevinganske967 Год назад
Sicily was used to it. They had lived with Mussolini for years after all.
@Dave_Sisson
@Dave_Sisson Год назад
I have always wondered why Montgomery was later promoted to Field Marshall while Paton never got to the top. Perhaps Monty had different skills to Patton or perhaps Monty was slightly less dysfunctional than Patton? Whatever the reason was, I doubt either of them would be promoted past Brigadier in todays world.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
@@Dave_Sisson Simple, Patton never rose above army level of command, Monty rose to command a full army group, commanding several armies. That alone did not warrant him becoming a field-marshall, that was a consolation price because Eisenhower denied him overall command of all the land forces in Western Europe. A job that Monty craved and pushed for ad nauseum to the point that Ike told him to quit trying to get the job or hand in his resignation. At which point Monty submitted and got the promotion from Churchill as a consolation. And yes, in todays world neither would have gotten the job. The current US Army has long abandoned General Marshall's system of ruthlessly sacking generals that failed. They now continue to fail upward. US generals are more politicians and representatives of the military industrial complex then they are commanders. As we saw in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Don't know about the British Army, but it was always favored generals with strong political skills over actual combat skills in peacetime. In WW2 it took years to weed out that deadwood for a Monty to rise on skills alone. The current small wars do not allow for actual talent to rise to the top. Plus the British Army is currently very small. The largest combat unit is the division, although the brigade or even the battalion combat group is the largest unit to see combat. Let alone the Corps, Army or Army Group levels that Monty commanded.
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 Год назад
@@Dave_Sisson The US had MacArthur (whose ego dwarfed Patton's and Monty's combined) and Eisenhower to be their 5-star war heroes, Monty was as good as the British had. And the psychological effect of his _finally_ being the one to break Rommel in North Africa can't be overestimated. It was the first really game-changing victory the Western Allies achieved in the war. And of course, Monty was an astute politician, while Patton couldn't have been further from that.
@self-transforming_machine-elf
"I'm gonna roll with the Joint Chiefs!" - Indy Neidell, 2022
@hilariousname6826
@hilariousname6826 Год назад
In Edmonton, Alberta, there was - and maybe still is - a rock band called 'The Joint Chiefs' ......
@agesflow6815
@agesflow6815 Год назад
Is that a prudent choice in 2022? Nevertheless, this was an excellent episode.
@DocBolle
@DocBolle Год назад
By the way: the crying german boy soldier on this episode's title image is Volker Lechtenbrink. The image is actually a painted copy of a screenshot from the German antiwar movie "Die Brücke" from 1959.
@LarS1963
@LarS1963 Год назад
That is a great movie. Or, at least, I remember it as such. It has been many, many years since I watched it.
@frankwitte1022
@frankwitte1022 Год назад
It is notable how "Die Bruecke" came out only 14 years after the end of WW2. It seems to me, Germany's reckoning with the horrors of war, and WW2 in particular, started early compared to the many other WW2 participants, on either side, that are still struggling to shed any kind of public, critical, light on their own part in WW2.
@samarkand1585
@samarkand1585 Год назад
@@frankwitte1022 *Japan left the room*
@frankwitte1022
@frankwitte1022 Год назад
@@samarkand1585 😂 I think they already left before I even made that comment.
@DocBolle
@DocBolle Год назад
@@LarS1963, I remember that we watched it in school back in the eighties.
@kmkessler
@kmkessler Год назад
I loved the Albert Speer quote, and I think it really applies today to the whole "Death of Expertise" thing we hear about. People with expertise in anything do not understand the depth of knowledge on a subject the expertise really represents.
@pax6833
@pax6833 Год назад
The thing is, as illuminating as the quote is, there is even still some over crediting to Hitler. The early successes of the war weren't all him either. The whole invasion of France was originally Mannstein's plan. And it execution in practice by Guderian differed significantly on the ground, exploiting weaknesses that neither Hitler or Mannstein anticipated. Ultimately, the early successes of the war were largely the result of the generals, not Hitler, as they had much more operational command and freedom of movement in the field. Hitler's main early war contributions were much more political, able to maneuver Germany into strategic alliances and exploit allied political weaknesses, when it came to military he could latch onto ideas or propose them, where they would be later refined by experts. It's notable that Churchill in many ways mirrored Hitler. The man was an absolute dunce when it came to military matters and his failure of leadership led to the loss of Norway and Malaysia, but where he excelled was political acumen, the main difference is that Churchill never tried to dictate and micromanage his military (at least after some of the early failures) like Hitler did. This isn't to say Hitler's generals were perfect either. The nature of post-war memoirs allowed them to foist many of their own failures (especially people like Franz Halder) onto Hitler. Ultimately, the subject of Hitler's leadership will always be controversial. We can highlight Hitler's failures, as he certainly deserves much of the criticism he received from his generals, but we should also be careful in indulging the views of people who had the benefit of hindsight and a conveniently dead scapegoat.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
@kmkessler and @Pax these are really interesting points. On the subject of generals I think there are examples to be found all over the war of leaders who were so enamored with the tactical and technical capabilities of their forces that they ignored whether the logistics and operational plans actually allowed for success, and vice-versa those who were secure in logistical and numerical advantages but squandered them with poor management of their troops. It takes a combination of a great many skills and aptitudes working together amongst leadership to win a war on this scale, and it is looking increasingly as if the axis powers are the more deficient in this regard
@NormAppleton
@NormAppleton Год назад
NOBODY should take anything Albert Speer said seriously. He slipped the noose and made up his own fairy tale. I'm really surprised Indy quoted that nazi scumbag.
@aaronpaul9188
@aaronpaul9188 Год назад
@@WorldWarTwo I dont know that the allies are enormously more proficient. They have structural advantages that gives them the leaway where similar mistakes arent as painful.
@robertkras5162
@robertkras5162 Год назад
It's an odd reflection from Speer - the expert clearly employed by Hitler for his expertise... (and managing to keep industrial production rising despite allied strategic bombing.) I'll disagree with Speer's assessment - at least in scope. Hitler is, by 1943, and expert on military matters - he's just a really bad expert - (just like the experts we've seen since 2020 - experts can be very wrong.). You become an "expert" and develop "expertise" based on "experience"; real experience comes from real life experiences. By 1943 Hitler's had plenty. He just failed to learn from it, and (like most Generals) was fighting the last battle. He has a propensity to gamble based on a feeling of destiny - (so did Stalin/Churchill/many generals). Top that off with paranoia. Those are personality defects - the same apparent in a lot of the 'experts' we've seen throughout the pandemic.
@57WillysCJ
@57WillysCJ Год назад
It really took another soldier that was fighting in Sicily at this time to push for the government to put more work in to helping soldiers with "battle fatigue" and probably the only one they would listen to even in the mid to late 1960s. Audie Murphy was one no one wanted to question his courage and suffered PTSD. Probably something everyone should take a moment to think about as these battles happen.
@broksholk4771
@broksholk4771 Год назад
Well said - the obvious physical toll aside, the scale of the mental wounds caused by this war are unimaginable.
@nathanweitzman9531
@nathanweitzman9531 Год назад
From what I remember, Germans did have a fairly modern outlook in treating PTSD. They kept their soldiers afflicted with PTSD as close as they could with their unit (and friends) as they could, took it very seriously, made effort not to shame sufferers, etc. Len Deighton is the source, I think. Sad it took so long for the allies to catch up there.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Very well stated
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
@@nathanweitzman9531 On the other hand, theirs was a political culture that executed people for telling jokes deemed harmful to the war effort and they executed their own soldiers far more than the British or Americans did. Their more enlightened behaviour existed but was accompanied by the suspicion that "weaklings", "cowards" and "traitors" had to be stamped out if any sign of their presence manifested itself. As the war went bad I suspect this tendency gained ground.
@LukeVilent
@LukeVilent Год назад
My grandma-in-law's brother - he was 16 then - was taken to build German defenses at Pantherstellung near Staraya Rusa, close to Novgorod. The conditions there were harsh, the men were malnourished and his family was to go several dozen kilometers by foot to bring food, mostly dried bread. There was a way out, though: refugees, who lived in the village, were proposing themselves to take place of the workers, asking for food for their families in return. The guy who took the place of gruncle-in-law was even smarter. He concealed his age, and after a few days of work went to Germans and shown his papers stating that he was too old. Interestingly, the Germans kept the rules, and soon he was back in the village. The gruncle, as he got back home, was extremely exhausted. The family initially had to feed him from the spoon. But it was clear that, after he gets better, he'd be either coerced to work on fortifications again, or sent as labor force to Germany - actually, most of the people sent to "Germany", and those included two of his uncles, ended up in Latvia, and the gruncle's uncles stayed there for the rest of their lives. So, the gruncle ran into the forest to join the partisans. He has seen the end of the war in Berlin. Many years later, the grandma-in-law visited the remains of those German positions. "They were truly impressive", - she told, "trunks of century-old oaks laid in three rows. And yet, they were penetrated."
@samdumaquis2033
@samdumaquis2033 Год назад
Interesting
@shawnr771
@shawnr771 Год назад
Thank you for sharing. Individual stories like this help connect us to the larger events of the past.
@BeingFireRetardant
@BeingFireRetardant Год назад
Learned what a gruncle is today... Honestly pretty fascinating stuff, hearing from those who lived it.
@LukeVilent
@LukeVilent Год назад
@@BeingFireRetardant You know, granny-in-law always says "I lived a pretty boring life". Every time I have a chance to visit her, I just start recording her stories on a phone. Unfortunately, couldn't do that for my own grandma and grand-aunt - I wasn't smart enough o to this as they were alive.
@lynnwood7205
@lynnwood7205 Год назад
@@LukeVilent But you are doing it now. Something I reproach myself about. Preserve the history of the not famous so all may learn.
@IrishTechnicalThinker
@IrishTechnicalThinker Год назад
The summarised character of Adolf Hilter at the end was magnificent.
@lycaonpictus9662
@lycaonpictus9662 Год назад
To say that Speer's self-serving memoir is often not the most reliable of sources would be understatement, but that particular quote is great and an accurate summation of Hitler as a "leader." It probably gives him a bit too much credit for Germany's early military successes, but excellently lays out why he later failed.
@DavidWLavoie
@DavidWLavoie Год назад
Wow Indy, that is in my opinion the most straightforward negative review of Hitler's military incompetence so far and I appreciate it. Here's to more of your honest opinion moving forward! Vielen Dank von diese timeghost Army member!
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thanks for your kind words and for your support of the channel @David Lavoie, they are greatly appreciated!
@julianasche9494
@julianasche9494 Год назад
Its Propaganda
@slcpunk2740
@slcpunk2740 Год назад
@@julianasche9494 fascist fanboy much?
@julianasche9494
@julianasche9494 Год назад
@@slcpunk2740 German Nazis one Thing, German Military tactics, engeniering the other
@ImmortalSugimoto792
@ImmortalSugimoto792 Год назад
@@slcpunk2740 I assume he means that post-war many of the wartime figures that survived tended to lump blame on Hitler to deflect criticism of their own actions. Speer and many noteworthy Generals in the Wehrmacht are guilty of this. Which is true.
@jliller
@jliller Год назад
The Speer quote about Hitler reminds me of a biography I read about Marconi's invention and development of radio. Marconi succeeded because he was a self-taught outsider who didn't understand what he was doing was "impossible" yet once he had achieved his breakthrough his efforts to improve and fine-tuning the invention were hindered by his scientific ignorance.
@Lttlemoi
@Lttlemoi Год назад
Similar to Faraday, a mostly self-taught experimental genius who was instrumental in discovering the relationship between electricity and magnetism and many other things in that field, but his lack of mathematical knowledge prevented him from really formalizing his ideas.
@stefanronda3092
@stefanronda3092 Год назад
Marconi took the idea from Nikola Tesla
@ramonribascasasayas7877
@ramonribascasasayas7877 Год назад
This is nowadays called 'thinking out of the box'. If your intuitions are right, odds are not totally against you and the job is well done then you succeed.
@korbell1089
@korbell1089 Год назад
A lot of inventions are made by people who didn't know that it was "impossible" to do something. But once shown, the "experts" took over and actually made it better in the long run.
@obsidianjane4413
@obsidianjane4413 Год назад
@@aleksazunjic9672 You missed the point. Hitler's early successes weren't even military. Winning election, Annexing Austria, Czechoslovakia, Sudetenland. All were accomplished because he didn't understand that they weren't supposed to be possible or advisable/acceptable. That the German military could continue, for a while, to provide victories to Hitler's adventures, doesn't mean that they were good decisions. He was attempting to play Bismarck, without anything like the education or wisdom to do so, and the results evidenced that they ultimately led to misery and ruin for millions.
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
Axis Evacuation of Sicily While these desperate battles were going on, Oberst Ernst-Günther Baade was overseeing an extremely well-planned evacuation operation. He’d been given considerable authority as Kommandant, Straits of Messina. In fact, he had been given carte blanche to gather together as many guns and men as he could, and to take command of a special ad hoc force that included army, navy and air force troops. Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine flak batteries came under his command, including more than seventeen hundred naval gunners, as did a number of highly competent naval commanders - among them Fregattenkapitän Gustav von Liebenstein, commander of the 2. Landung Division. It certainly helped that Baade had been appointed well in advance of the evacuation: even by 1 August, he and von Liebenstein had amassed some 140 vessels of all kinds, including 76 motor boats, 33 naval barges, 7 MFPs - 163-foot-long beaching craft - 13 further smaller landing craft and 12 Siebel ferries, each of which was a kind of double-ended motorized raft that could carry 450 men or ten loaded trucks. Back in the 1930s, Nazi Germany had very sensibly set up the world’s first combined services general staff, the OKW; but Hitler had then used it more as his mouthpiece than for its proper purpose of tri-service planning. Rarely, in fact, had there been much close cooperation between the three arms of the Wehrmacht, even during the glory years of the Blitzkrieg when the Luftwaffe had been spearheading great panzer thrusts on the ground. For the sole and particular purpose of Operation LEHRGANG, however, Baade had been given the authority to create a unified command; and with this, and with von Liebenstein’s cooperation, he had very effectively and efficiently set up new systems for roll-on, roll-off loading and unloading, ensuring that all crews were thoroughly trained in such procedures, all while frequently changing the embarkation and disembarkation points so as not to give the Allied air forces any firm targets. Baade had also amassed a staggering 333 guns either side of the Straits, making them one of the most heavily fortified stretches of coastline anywhere in the world. He had worked out, too, a very clear and efficient system of four distinct routes that would be used, with two more developed as back-up if necessary. The first route across the Straits would begin at the northernmost tip of the island, where 15. Panzer Grenadier Division were to embark. The second route, a little to the south, would be for 29. Panzer Granedier Division. The third route, a little longer, began just on the northern edge of Messina and would take XIV Panzer Korps headquarters, while the fourth route, starting close by and also a little to the north of the town, would ferry the HG Division, including the 1. Fallschirmjäger Division under Schmalz. Traffic controllers and engineers were assigned to each route, while assembly points were linked to ferry sites by telephone so that there would be no traffic build-up on the water’s edge as a juicy target for Allied air forces. Each assembly area was also camouflaged. Hube gave clear instructions to both Baade and his divisional commanders. No troops would be ferried across the straits by day, only by night. Weapons and equipment, however, could cross by day at Baade’s discretion, with anti-tank weapons, artillery and assault guns taking priority, in that order. Discipline was to be maintained at all times, and any sign of panic was to be dealt with immediately and with the severest measures - offenders were to be shot or clubbed to death. Hube, in turn, had been getting a series of messages from Hitler, including one in which he insisted Hube should not tell his men of the evacuation plans until they reached the crossing points. This Hube sensibly ignored, aware that many of his men feared a second Tunisgrad. He wasn’t ready to pull the plug on Sicily yet, but by the start of the second week of August, plans for LEHRGANG looked to be in good fettle. Baade and von Liebenstein had done well. Nothing, it seemed, had been left to chance. General Guzzoni had evacuated his surviving troops ahead of XIV Panzer Korps; typically, Italian and German plans were completely different, entirely independent and carried out without any cooperation whatsoever. The Italians were unable to lift much heavy equipment but, starting on 3 August, and using mainly two train ferries, began taking troops across the straits south of Messina straight away. Guzzoni finally left Sicily on 10 August; von Senger, his work done, had left two days earlier.The Allies were aware the Axis were preparing to evacuate, and on 3 August Alexander signalled both Admiral Cunningham and Air Chief Marshal Tedder, warning them the exodus might begin any day. ‘We must be in a position to take immediate advantage of such a situation,’ he wrote, ‘but using full weight of Navy and Air Power. You have no doubt co-ordinated plans to meet this contingency.’ As it happened, they hadn’t; but they did confer after receiving Alex’s signal. The Allied air forces had already been hammering Messina and the straits and continued to do so, but the geography was in the Axis’ favour. At their narrowest, the straits were a little over a mile wide, and most of Baade’s routes were 3-5 miles end to end, which was no great distance at all. It was a very confined space, closed in further by steep cliffs on either side. Added to these constraints was the mass of the more than three hundred guns assembled there in defence, which made hitting shipping very difficult indeed. Bombers were pounding the straits day and night - some 532 aircraft struck Messina in the first week of August alone - but mostly from height. Over 170 fighter-bombers dive-bombed Messina and the straits, but the intensity of flak made dive- bombing the narrows a lethal proposition with small chance of much reward. Even at a few thousand feet a barge looked tiny; from 20,000 feet, it looked like a pin-prick. Despite these difficulties, on 5 August alone two merchant ships, one of Baade’s precious Siebel ferries and twenty-one barges were destroyed by air power. Mary Coningham, one of the most aggressive of Allied air commanders, feared there was little that could be done to prevent an evacuation. ‘The difficulty of operating naval surface forces in the narrow part of the strait’, he wrote to Broadhurst on 4 August, ‘is obvious and I do not see how we can hope for the same proportion of success as at Cap Bon.’ For his part, Admiral Cunningham , Royal Navy Mediterranean Fleet commander sent up motor torpedo boats - MTBs - on fast, in-and-out raids, but there was not the remotest chance of warships successfully venturing into such heavily defended narrows, especially not with a follow-up invasion of mainland Italy to come in which every vessel in the Mediterranean would be needed. ‘A ship’s a fool to fight a fort,’ Nelson had once said, and - despite having himself attacked Copenhagen from the sea - he had a point. Warships passing a very heavily defended coastline in front of more than three hundred guns was simply not an option, especially not along straits as narrow as those of Messina. Admiral Cunningham had been a destroyer captain during Dardanelles Campaign in 1915 nd had seen what shore guns and fortress batteries could do to ships Sicily 1943 - James Holland
@TheJojoaruba52
@TheJojoaruba52 Год назад
Very informative. I always wondered why there had not been an Allied plan to cut off the evacuation. The Germans clearly had a better plan.
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
@@TheJojoaruba52 They learned a few things not to repreat Tunisgrad disaster ever happening again and geography and narowness of Straits worked in their favor too. Geography , weather etc are some of the main factors determines the course of military operations
@glennmacgilvra422
@glennmacgilvra422 Год назад
Would Allied submarines have been of any help? Or were there anti submarine defenses?
@pyorre2441
@pyorre2441 Год назад
@@glennmacgilvra422 Submarines need space to operate properly and they are rather slow moving when submerged which the allied submarines would have probably needed to be to not getting spotted and shelled by the coastal artillery. Even if one was able to sneak in and and make a torpedo attack against the evacuation ships there would have not been any room to avoid the counter attack of the italian/german warships. Losing a submarine to sink a few barges full of troops that could be saved by other ships around them doesn't sound good trade to me.
@davidwright7193
@davidwright7193 Год назад
Cunningham has plenty of experience of the loses a fleet can suffer in such confined waters off Greece and Crete while he was covering the evacuations there. I can well understand his feeling that Germany can replace a battalion more easily than he can replace a cruiser and his wish to keep all his big guns to cover later landings. Those 15 inch guns are the heaviest artillery the army can use in range of the coast.
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
As Admiral Horatio Nelson said it would be foolish for a one or a few ships to try taking on a series of stationary shore gun batteries
@slcpunk2740
@slcpunk2740 Год назад
Losses
@muttmankc
@muttmankc Год назад
Fair point, but tell that to the poor bloody infantry that is going to have to spend the next few years bludgeoning their way up the boot against those rescued forces. Why were not significant numbers of torpedo carrying boats, subs, destroyers, MTB's, redeployed to the area to pepper that narrow passage with torpedoes, at night if nothing else? Just spit balling, I know little more of this than what Indy just shared. 🙂
@lycaonpictus9662
@lycaonpictus9662 Год назад
The first attempt by Japan to seize Wake Island in December of 1941 is a good example of the danger posed to ships by shore batteries. The amphibious invasion was defeated before any troops even made it to the beach and in part because the shore batteries savaged one of the covering destroyers and sent it to the bottom with all hands. Air attacks claimed another. Wake of course was also much more thinly defended and fortified than the coasts of southern Italy.
@Raskolnikov70
@Raskolnikov70 Год назад
@@muttmankc More air resources would have been a better investment. Unfortunately the people in charge of the strategic air war believed that firebombing civilians was a better use of their men and machines instead of going after the landing and crossing sites. Fleets of B-17s carpet-bombing the area both prior to and during the Axis evacuation would have done the Allies far more good.
@sammccullough1255
@sammccullough1255 Год назад
"Sorry Bart. You can push them out of a plane. You can march them off a cliff. You can send them off to die on some God forsaken rock. But for some reason, you can't slap them." - Abe Simpson
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
My story begins in nineteen dickety two. We had to say dickety because the Kaiser had stolen our word twenty. I chased that rascal to get it back, but gave up after dickety six miles. Now, I'd like to digress from my prepared remarks to discuss how I invented the terlet…
@excelon13
@excelon13 Год назад
Absolutely love that end quote by Albert Speer. I've also always been intrigued by the Patton slapping incident. According to his diary the incident was the reason he wasn't given command of the First Army for D-day. Instead going to his junior Omar Bradley. I'm curious if Eisenhower included that in his decision-making.
@PhillyPhanVinny
@PhillyPhanVinny Год назад
It could have but the 3rd Army was always the better Army for Patton to command anyway. The US 3rd Army was the biggest army of any of the Armies in Western Europe during WW2 having I believe it was 18 divisions by the end of the war and the most armored divisions of any of the Armies in Western Europe as well. 3rd Army also was the army used by Eisenhower for the break-out of Normandy in Operation Cobra which led to the Falaise pocket/road of the death and that operation was best suited for a General like Patton. Bradley was much better suited as the Army Group commander handling the massive logistics work needed to serve the 3-5 armies he had under his command at any point during WW2 during the Western front. Bradley also has my favorite quote from WW2: “Amateurs talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics.” and that is what Eisenhower (in charge of all 4 of the Army groups, air-forces and navies) , Bradley, Montgomery Clark, and Jacob Devers (the very often forgotten 3rd Army Group Commander in Western Europe) were all experts in.
@UAuaUAuaUA
@UAuaUAuaUA Год назад
Patton was a problematic person with a short temper and a tendency to say and do the wrong thing at the wrong place. Just read how he was dismissed as Military Governor of Bavaria in 1945. Sad thing is, he didn't learn anything from the incident in Sicily.
@ricardokowalski1579
@ricardokowalski1579 Год назад
@@UAuaUAuaUA Yes Patton was all that. I can't defend the man. I can study his deeds, even admire his command, but not defend him. Respectfully.
@marks_sparks1
@marks_sparks1 Год назад
To be honest, Sicily was just one of many incidents that ultimately doomed Patton regards being unfit for command in the eye of Bradley and ultimately Ike. Historians to this day have tried to point out there was 1 specific incident in the war that made Ike ditch him. In Charles Whitings "48 Hours to Hammelburg" (a recommended read), it's claimed Task Force Baum was definitely the straw that broke the camels back. I'm not convinced. It was really a steady culmination of events 1943-45. ● the slapping incident in Sicily was egregious but there is two theories emerging that his command censure by Ike then, was not for that slap but for 1) encouraging a US massacre of Italian POWs (Biscari 14th July 1943) through his pre invasion order *that prisoners should be taken only under limited circumstances* 2) that both the slapping incident and Biscari massacre were themselves used as a cover to punish him for being so cavalier with Ultra intelligence in Sicily to the point that Allied High Command had to make an example of him to intimidate other Ultra recipients going forward regarding any compromise of their trump card of information. Makes sense in that the subsequent public commotion would help in deceiving the Germans that the Allies still hadn't broken their codes. ●the Knutsford Speech 1944 is given as another example of political interference. There is a train of thought going out that the speech was a deliberate part of the Operation Fortitude deception plan. And that the subsequent political turmoil was designed to ensure German high command fixated on him as leading an army to descend on the Pas-de-Calais. Patton was always going to lead 3rd Army. ● His subsequent performance in France & The Bulge should've saved him but Task Force Baum, the subsequent denazification controversy in Bavaria and his political statements on the USSR over that summer '45 were just looked at as part of a series of events regards Patton being insubordinate by Ike and Bradley when they made their decision to dismiss him from Third Army.
@kevinramsey417
@kevinramsey417 Год назад
Patton's worst enemy was always Patton. I've always thought he deserved a Sabaton song more for his conduct on the battlefield than off. They write about the good and the bad of war, and let's face it, George S. Patton was a little bit of both.
@hardanheavy
@hardanheavy Год назад
Speer playing the 'madman Hitler' card, absolving himself and others from as much responsibility as possible.
@bond0815
@bond0815 Год назад
Have you actually listened to the quote? Speer doesnt attack Hitlers sanity, but Hitlers professionalism / trust in experts. And he is spot on.
@robertkras5162
@robertkras5162 Год назад
Speer IS the consummate "expert" on economics and industrial production... Hitler wasn't running those things... very successfully... Speer kept Germany in the war with increased production despite strategic bombing... He's blaming Hitler for the (spoiler alert) loss of WW2 - just like Hitler blamed "Jews and traitors" for the loss of WWI.
@kixigvak
@kixigvak 2 месяца назад
My dad was a surgeon in the 93rd Evacuation Hospital. He had no use for Patton, whose visits to the hospital were regarded as a pain in the neck. The medical staff had work to do and visit by top brass was a distraction.
@Helekopa_Pailaka
@Helekopa_Pailaka Год назад
This is another great episode covering the complex, concurrent war activities across the globe. Thank you to the TGH team.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you Greg. It warms our hearts to have such a wonderful audience of history enthusiasts like you who appreciate our episodes. Please stay tuned
@Thenarratorofsecrets
@Thenarratorofsecrets Год назад
Ok, so i had always heard the story of the slap as "patton slapped a soldier and was kinda removed from combat command for like a year" the explanation of the slap never really went beyond "patient was shell shocked" PULLING OUT HIS GUN? LIKE WTF GEORGE. As a nurse i'd be fucking screaming at the general there. fuck that dude. get the hell away from my patient.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
@@davidw.2791 In WW1 they did not, and Patton's attitudes were very WW1.
@TheRandCrews
@TheRandCrews Год назад
@@stevekaczynski3793 didn’t he apparently kill a soldier with an entrenching tool in WW1 cause the guy had PTSD as well
@lewdachris7721
@lewdachris7721 Год назад
That letter from Eisenhower to Patton. Wow
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 Год назад
Pulling his pistol in hospital and threatening to shoot an enlisted man would probably have gotten him relieved of command in the American Civil War, in 1943 it was absurdly beyond the bounds of acceptable behavior for an officer. It's a testament both to his military skills and to Eisenhower's and Marshall's appreciation of those skills and determination to win the war that he ever commanded troops in combat again.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
@@brucetucker4847 With a hiatus of about a year.
@guameldestruir6239
@guameldestruir6239 Год назад
@@brucetucker4847 "military skills" anyone with a modicum of vigor would be as useful as patton was, he was an average commander with a huge ego.
@fat1fared
@fat1fared 8 месяцев назад
Very much this. The only reason Patton’s failings as a commander are forgotten is because he had the good fortune that MacArthur had an even bigger ego and an even greater list of failures to over for him.
@gunman47
@gunman47 Год назад
A rather curious thing to note this week on August 8 1943 is that the United States Army will ban the photo taking of all beach resorts in the Atlantic Ocean, and this even included painting or sketching beach scenes. This was justified as necessary for the defence of the eastern United States. Violators might be not allowed from visiting the beaches, or even be charged in a military court for violating regulations.
@PhillyPhanVinny
@PhillyPhanVinny Год назад
Very interesting. Just shows how during the war people had a very different opinion we do now with hindsight of how things in the war were going. During the war and even in the years just after it people did not think the war was over until late 1944 and 1945 or 46 for the war in the Pacific. In interviews with Germans just after the end of WW2 they all believed they still had a good chance of winning the war until the Battle of the Bulge failed. And that opinion went up as high as Hermann Göring who said he thought they still were going to end the war with his party still in charge of Germany. He thought there would be some kind of settlement peace deal that maybe removed mustache man from power in Germany and allowed the Germans to continue to fight the USSR with all their power, being able to purchase fuel and other resources from the Western Allies and have the USSR cut off from supplies from the United States. And Göring wasn't the only high ranking German to be thinking this either. It seemed like that was the majority view of the Germans interviewed after WW2 that the Allies would make some settlement with Germany so that they could turn around in full force and fight the USSR that wouldn't have the logistics support it needed from the West to advance as far as they did. And then with German ability to buy Western resources they dive the USSR back and get a peace deal with them as swell. It makes no sense. Because then what were the Allies even fighting the war for? But that is what they thought for some reason. I could see the lower ranks believing that if their higher-ups were telling them that was going to happen but high ranking officers believing it as well were thinking the West had the opinion of communism that they wouldn't get until the invasion of South Korea.
@robertkras5162
@robertkras5162 Год назад
Who, in the summer of 1943 was in any sort of position to invade the Atlantic cost of the U.S.? Sure - restrictions around Naval bases, docks, and ports, but aside of that it seems pretty silly.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
Logical enough - it had taken a while for a wartime mentality to be developed. For example the cities on the US east coast were fully illuminated at night early in the war and U-Boats had often attacked merchantmen that were silhouetted against the lights.
@NormAppleton
@NormAppleton Год назад
Yea See INDY! You have Trump Neo Nazis now.
@MsZeeZed
@MsZeeZed Год назад
@@robertkras5162 ​ Anyone in command of a type IX U-boat basically. If you can put yourself in that time, the Japanese had invaded “Alaska” straight after Midway and had only just been chased out and in 1942 type IX U-boats had sunk shipping off the coast of Long Island NY & Sandy Hook NJ. These were wild times.
@IrishTechnicalThinker
@IrishTechnicalThinker Год назад
Steiner is preparing for his counter attack right about now too.
@caryblack5985
@caryblack5985 Год назад
And it fails.
@Raskolnikov70
@Raskolnikov70 Год назад
@@caryblack5985 Steiner always fails. Poor Steiner.
@davidhimmelsbach557
@davidhimmelsbach557 Год назад
Patton's slapping incident can't be understood without understanding Patton's WWI incident: He totally broke down under German artillery fire -- for at least a FULL DAY. Yeah, the great man... "couldn't take the shelling anymore." He was not alone in that hell hole. His sole companion ended up being on the wrong side of Patton -- during the Bonus protest. (Great Depression) Now you can see that Patton was actually punishing PATTON -- as the target of his rage was his own prior (shaming) behavior -- that only one other ever witnessed. As ever, he saw in another that which was his own flaw/ fault. His internal shame caused him to totally lose it -- one more time. You can see high levels of narcissism in Patton, time and time, again -- but never more than his rage at his own shame. As for 1945 and his son-in-law -- if Patton had sent an entire Combat Command from any of his tank divisions -- the project would've worked beautifully. It was only after the Krauts realized that the raid was NOT by a Combat Command that the tank school instructors were able to rally and counter-attack. Previously, the Krauts were running around with their heads in a twist. After all, the war was lost, and 3rd Army was never turned back. The Americans at all times prior, advanced with overwhelming strength. This queer dash was quite the oddity. MacArthur did not surround himself with dolts. Instead, he stole all of his staffer's best ideas and claimed them as his own. This tic was so extreme that it became his policy. He was to be the face of the American armed forces in his theater. Period. In this, at least MacArthur adopted winning ideas -- rather immediately. He proved to be quite the showman. One trait: a photographic memory. He could, like certain Hollywood stars, memorize a speech after a SINGLE read -- and then deliver it like Ronald Reagan. ( The latter, BTW, had the same trait. Other famous ones: Jack Lord, Robert Mitchum. ) He REALLY ticked off George Marshall, for he had stunk up Eisenhower's 'jacket' something awful. MacArthur is the sole reason why Ike reported to Washington as a mere Lt. Col. Within days he was a major general... deciding the strategic flow of he war against the Axis. (February '42) Of Ike: "He's the best clerk I ever had" or words equivalent.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
Patton may also have suffered from dyslexia - some of his writings, especially earlier ones, have all kinds of odd misspellings. Dyslexia and the assumption by others, strong during his lifetime, that those with dyslexia are stupid may have had an effect on his psyche.
@davidhaaijema4521
@davidhaaijema4521 Год назад
Patton was a garbage leader, full frontal assaults on prepared defenses. The only reason he is praised is because his type of "just rush them without tought!" happened to work with the Ardenne offensive.
@davidhimmelsbach557
@davidhimmelsbach557 Год назад
@@davidhaaijema4521 You've just described Bradley and Hodges -- not Patton. Patton was a general addicted to the end run. He turned Rommel's flank back in North Africa. He'd discovered that the Krauts had placed a penal formation in defense on a jebel. Patton went straight for it -- and the Krauts collapsed -- promptly. Even this gambit was omitted from his biopic. In Sicily he went so far as to repeatedly out flank the Krauts with amphibious landings. Many objected -- see his biopic. However, they worked -- every time. That fact is also omitted from his biopic -- which was largely drafted by Bradley, himself. That's why Bradley keeps showing up in countless scenes that are supposed to tell the story of Patton. The biopic is Bradley's opinion of Patton -- his ego rival. In France, Patton again out flanked the Krauts. [ The unsung 'Professor P.' (4th Armored commanding) was a HUGE part of the Falaise pocket. Patton got rid of this scene stealer, of course. ] Even at Metz, Patton finally out flanked the Krauts. During his first shove, the enemy had not fully settled in. So, because of ULTRA intercepts, Patton thought he could get away with a rush job. But, the weather gods did not favor him -- nor much else. His boys were flat out tired -- and many were still straggling up to the front. That's how fast things had moved. [ American infantry divisions walked -- not rode in trucks -- unless higher authorities dispatched truck regiments to pick them up. When the entire 3rd Army was racing ahead, there were just not enough trucks. So the boys had to advance using the heel and toe. You get tuckered fast doing that. Popular histories omit that 3rd Army was strung out across France at that point. ] Bradley and Hodges gave us the Hurtgen Forest bloodbath. There's straight at 'em fighting for you. Nothing like that -- or Market Garden -- ever sullied Patton's rep. Patton had two big fans: Rommel and Adolf. Yup. Adolf was self-convinced that Patton would just HAVE to be the Overlord commander -- and told the Baron just that. (Dec 1943) It was for this reason that it was impossible for Patton to come in with Overlord. He was never told why. When he did show up with 3rd Army, Adolf (finally) released all reserves to stop him. The results are history. He kept sending his most esteemed generals to stop him, too. Patton trashed the best generals Adolf had on his bench. As for the Bulge: Bradley actually dismissed the significance of Adolf's last Big Play. ( It's in his own war bio.) Only Ike and Patton had Adolf dialed in. Both apprehended what was afoot -- right off the bat. It actually irritated all other generals when Patton revealed that his crew had been working the problem -- right from the first hour. In 1945, Bradley had to use his authority to stop Patton from advancing way, way in front of 1st Army. This event is omitted in all US Army historical maps presented to the public. The period when 3rd Army was miles deeper into Southern Germany than all others is simply missing from the historical record. Such is vanity.
@davidhaaijema4521
@davidhaaijema4521 Год назад
@@davidhimmelsbach557 Lol, he only went for the amphibious landings, after first for 3 weeks long doing frontal assaults down a narrow road.... I just can't even bother to properly reply to this. Just past the siegfriedline, he ordered frontal assaults on what was that town called again ? Sorry I can't remember every detail by head. But Patton always just went like you just said, straight for it, which is reckless. Only if that failed would he attempt some tactical flexibility. He was a butcher to his own men, period. And as a Dutch person, I know first hand how Americans are, pretending to be saints, when in fact it was "nah let the Dutch starve to death after we incited them to revolt during Market Garden" and the Canadians going "WTF ? NO! we're going to liberate these people". Hence why a Candanian coming here is always suprised at how well he is treated compared to any other foreigner. So get lost with this narrative that Americans gave a damn about innocent lives, pretty sure the firebombing of Dresden and your behavoir towards the Dutch should dispel that notion.
@davidhimmelsbach557
@davidhimmelsbach557 Год назад
By own Father served under Patton and Bradley. Morale went straight UP when Patton was in command. Not so with Bradley. The Market-Garden fiasco was British from top to bottom. Patton and Bradley were wholly against it -- from the get-go. You've really got your wires crossed. The Dutch rose up against the Nazis totally on their own. They had plenty of cause. The US ended up flying B-17s over Holland to drop food in 1945 -- as the British had yet to drive the Nazis out. Many areas had to await the end of the war. The Canadians were just about the last nation to jump into the soup -- as Monty had them bleeding heavily to clear Belgium's port. Only very much later did the Canadian army move into the Netherlands. Monty always had the Canadians and Americans doing his heavy lifting. Back in Sicily, both the British and Americans found moving the Krauts out of their hill defenses to be a bitch. There was nothing special about Patton's difficulties at that time. He did out flank the Krauts -- twice. Both worked. At the time, his subordinates were quite willing to just let the front stay as is -- and let the other (8th) army solve the Kraut defenses. Patton's opinion was that no regiment should be able to stop an entire American army in its tracks, hills or no. Patton was usually able to break through and just keep running. So, yeah, it was pretty straight ahead 'fighting.' He broke through in Sicily and raced to Palermo. Oops. Just too straight. He raced through the Cobra gap -- and enveloped the Krauts. Oops, just too much straight ahead 'fighting.' In the Bulge fighting -- every fight was a straight at 'em -- even for Monty. Everything turned on the roads -- in mighty rough country. No other Western commander ever gained Patton's rep for open field exploitation. Monty was a plodder. For straight ahead fighting -- he was the master. Almost all of his big battles had that character.
@krisfricke5538
@krisfricke5538 Год назад
That's all very interesting but... are you wearing a vest over a vest?
@T_Mo271
@T_Mo271 Год назад
It is stunning how long the Soviets kept hammering away in the Kuban, making no useful progress.
@Wien1938
@Wien1938 Год назад
It's quite a common trait amongst Soviet leadership. The best commanders had a better sense of when to call off attacks but most would keep going until ordered to stop.
@901Sherman
@901Sherman Год назад
@@Wien1938 Considering what I've read from Glantz and House's When Titans Clash and from some of Prit Buttar's works, such 'strategy' was basically an anomaly by this point. Given from what kind of successes Rokossovsky, Vatutin, Sokolovsky, Popov, Malinovsky, Tolbukhin, and(of course) Zhukov were able to achieve, Petrov seemed like the odd man out of the bunch who was still struggling with the ropes.
@Wien1938
@Wien1938 Год назад
@@901Sherman The phenomenon never goes away. Does not mean that it's a constant but it's always a possibility. What makes it seem to disappear for a while is the general success from August until the following September into October (1944), when III SS PzK holding the Wet Triangle north of Warsaw ends up in WW1 style defensive action. The Soviet commanders ended up attacking for two straight months and gaining tens of metres for thousands of casualties. Same thing happens in Courland. It's a trait that never disappears and becomes prominent when political pressure is being applied from the top.
@901Sherman
@901Sherman Год назад
@@Wien1938 "The phenomenon never goes away. Does not mean that it's a constant but it's always a possibility." The correct term is 'outlier'. Such a thing might have been the norm in 1941-42 but in 43-45 it was more a failure or incompetence of individual commanders than some endemic, widespread issue with the overal command culture. And that's if the commander is doing so willingly Most examples are extremely rare occurences when the political or other sorts of outside circumstances gets involved is why I argue that it did 'dissapear' (there's a difference between being forced by into constant, pointless attacks and doing so at you're own accord like what Petrov seems to be doing). "What makes it seem to disappear for a while is the general success from August until the following September into October (1944), when III SS PzK holding the Wet Triangle north of Warsaw ends up in WW1 style defensive action. The Soviet commanders ended up attacking for two straight months and gaining tens of metres for thousands of casualties. Same thing happens in Courland. It's a trait that never disappears and becomes prominent when political pressure is being applied from the top." There's the attack on Smolensk, 1943 by Voronov; the clearing of the right bank of the Ukraine by multiple Soviet fronts in 1944-44; the L'vov Sandomierz operation, 1944 by Konev; he Iassy-Kishinev operation, 1944 by Malinovsky's and Tolbukhin's fronts. All those had examples of attack axes being switched from German defenses too strong to rapidly penetrate to weaker points of the line. And the reason there aren't more is that most of the time, they achieve rapid penetrations. The battles against Courland and Warsaw are on a narrow, continuous defensive front with few weakpoints; easy access to strong reserves; Soviet forces there not getting priority in men and machines because the advance is on another area of the front; being overstretched greatly with their logistics. battering forward again-and-again is the only card to play. And at that point, it at least had some use: the Soviets were almost always on the offensive now inlike the previous years against an outstretched and weakening enemy and attacks that failed again and again were useful in tying down strong forces and preventing them from interfering in the main drive.
@Wien1938
@Wien1938 Год назад
​@@901Sherman The Wet Triangle battles were not essential. Those forces could have been switched to other weaker axis of advance but they were not. When those stubborn attacks are mounted, there is usually political pressure or command rivalry at stake. The same was true of battles in Hungary in December 1944 to February 1945.
@officerfriendly1230
@officerfriendly1230 Год назад
Can we just take a minute to appreciate how professional these videos are.
@DrJones20
@DrJones20 Год назад
No. Just kidding they're great
@dentoncrimescene
@dentoncrimescene Год назад
Minute taken.
@yes_head
@yes_head Год назад
And that vest! 😉
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
You live up to your name, Officer. And we certainly appreciate it!
@renatolopes3609
@renatolopes3609 Год назад
The description by Albert Speer applies so well to several modern leaders...
@davidhimmelsbach557
@davidhimmelsbach557 Год назад
Essentially ALL of them. The modern world is WAY too complex for even a genius to master. From Kennedy onward, every last American president held amazingly simplistic understandings. Ike was the last president who LIVED the complexity of WWII. He kept shooting down LeMay's fantasies, and such. Clinton was brilliant - yet a legend of laziness... completely feckless, time and time, again. The rest would test as light-weights in any IQ test. It's their staffers that make them look 'wise.' Obama, Trump, Bush, Bush, Reagan, Carter, LBJ, Kennedy, Biden -- not one figures to get into MENSA. But they all present themselves at a podium well enough to make it to the top slot. You'd be shocked as to how intellectually lazy this crowd is. Glad-handing supporters does take up a LOT of time.
@bramstedt8997
@bramstedt8997 Год назад
@@davidhimmelsbach557 HW Bush was the head of the CIA so I think he had some Ike-like grasp of complex subjects. Maybe same for his son to some extent. I do know they read intelligence reports themselves in great detail. Now as for their motives, goals, and decision making with that info, it’s tough to give them credit. Obama did not read intelligence reports, he had staffers brief him and really by the end of his term, Ash Carter was running the country. Trump was largely advised by staffers but brought a unique strategy/perspective to the table, as did Reagan. Clinton was too busy having orgies or whatever to do his job. Biden can’t even read a teleprompter so I won’t beat that dead horse. As for pre-Reagan, my friend in government wasn’t employed yet so doesn’t have any insight, but nobody got much done, except maybe Nixon (who seems awfully under-credited, undoubtedly due to watergate)
@alexamerling79
@alexamerling79 Год назад
Great episode like always Indy! Funny that Manstein is adopting a Great War style defense considering Hitler expected this war to be like the Great War when it broke out in 1939.
@josynaemikohler6572
@josynaemikohler6572 Год назад
Yeah, but why should it. It was going on for 4 years already and were way different. Also, Manstein forgot one essential thing: Russia can throw more into the frey then he can. Also, Russia can support their armies, while Germany can not.
@alexamerling79
@alexamerling79 Год назад
@@josynaemikohler6572 exactly
@SpaceCat01
@SpaceCat01 Год назад
are you drunk
@oOkenzoOo
@oOkenzoOo Год назад
In August 1943 in occupied France, prime minister Pierre Laval refuses any additional dispatch of French workers to Germany. In addition, he also refuses the German request to denaturalize the 20,000 Jews naturalized French since 1927. The French police no longer take part in roundups. A total of about 95,000 Jews were deported from France, including about 30,000 with the collaboration of the French state and its police.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
I don't think it mattered much as his government only ruled by the German willingness to tolerate him. Vichy France had been occupied as well in 1942 so really the only thing he really governed was his desk.
@Josak17
@Josak17 Год назад
@@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 His word greatly affected the willingness of French authorities to cooperate. Occupying a place is vastly removed from controlling it's institutions (like the police) which went from helping with the holocaust thus partially thwarting the holocaust in France.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
@@Josak17 I doubt that in august 1943, when all the signs were clear that the Germans were going to lose the war, when all of France's colonies had joined the Free French, a government in exile finally existed under The Gaulle. the word of one of the worst Nazi collaborators in history meant a damn. By this logic Himmler was a great savior of the Jews because he ordered the death camps to stop murdering Jew in 1945 because he figured the surviving Jews might be useful as bargaining tools.
@Josak17
@Josak17 Год назад
@@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 " the word of one of the worst Nazi collaborators in history meant a damn." It very much did, go look it up, French police for example stopped cooperating in the roundups. It's important to remember that there were many fascist French who were loyal to the new regime especially in the military and the police. You are looking at this in a post war context where everyone pretends they never collaborated or respected the Vichy state, but they did. " By this logic Himmler was a great savior of the Jews because he ordered the death camps to stop murdering Jew in 1945 because he figured the surviving Jews might be useful as bargaining tools." You radically misunderstand me if you think I am painting Laval as any sort of savior or hero, far from it, he was an evil Nazi sympathizing fascist who deserved exactly what he got, that does not change that this order factually significantly changed the situation and was very important both in how the holocaust in France was affected and in what it showed about increased confidence in ignoring what the Nazis wanted as the war turned against the Axis. The lives of some members of my family were quite possibly saved by this change.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
@@Josak17 It still sounds like a foul collaborator realizing he made the wrong bet and was carefully hedging his bets so he might be on the winning side of the war. It saved a few lives, yeah, that is always commendable. Doesn't excuse all those other people he got killed.
@21mozzie
@21mozzie Год назад
Speer's description for H at the end is one of the most brilliant descriptions of him that I have ever read or heard.
@ecophreak1
@ecophreak1 Год назад
Big hugs to you too Indy, for a better part of the last decade you've been part of my life and it's been a pleasure (not that I'm going anywhere)
@publiusscipioafricanus6475
@publiusscipioafricanus6475 Год назад
*"Tommorow the war will end and leaders shake hands, but that mother is still waiting for his son to come home."* To all soldiers no matter wich side you're in THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE!
@moosemaimer
@moosemaimer Год назад
"Professional soldiers are predictable, but the world is full of amateurs."
@astrobullivant5908
@astrobullivant5908 Год назад
One major trend I'm watching is the dramatic improvement in the Allied armies. The amphibious landing behind German lines really shows how the Germans' tactical edge is rapidly disappearing. It also shows how diverting units from Kursk to Italy really didn't strengthen the Axis position in Italy all that much.
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
It also shows Allies growing resourcefulness and compatence and confidence in all out Combined Operations between different arms (Army , Navy , Air Force of two different nations United Kingdom and United States closely cooperating and coordinating each other despite turf wars , ego trips , bickering , national jignoism and misunderstandings from a few select individuals , almost all were putting emphasis on giving priorty to win together) Remember last year Operation Jubilee , Dieppe Raid tuened out such a disaster due to bad planning and execution , now they are invading Sicily. That is how improved their tactical , operations and strategic operations are.
@robertleache3450
@robertleache3450 Год назад
Which begs the question: if Hitler had not called off the Kursk offensive by sending units to Italy; would the Germans have broken thru on the Southern side of the Kursk salient ??
@user-if4zv5nj5m
@user-if4zv5nj5m Год назад
@@robertleache3450 that's unlikely. Soviets had other pre-planned defence lines (not fortified but with plans and additional units having orders to man them in case of emergency) and enough reserves to plug any gaps up to front level. Certainly, losses would be higher and there won't be fresh units to participate in counter offensives, but great incirclment would be avoided for sure
@astrobullivant5908
@astrobullivant5908 Год назад
@@robertleache3450 I honestly think it's possible. There are a lot of exaggerated "Wehraboo" videos about it that make absurd claims, but I do think that the Germans could have broken through at Kursk and engaged the Soviets' reserves in mobile battle. Now, this would NOT have been the overwhelming victory that Hitler insisted upon, but it could have prolonged the war and it could have convinced Stalin to seek a separate peace again.
@jacksteel1539
@jacksteel1539 Год назад
@@astrobullivant5908 Honestly I really don't think a peace would have been possible especially as it must have become clearer and clearer every day that the war was shifting more into the Soviets favor, I think at best the Germans could have won the battle then had nothing left to do anything with their victory and be counter attacked again. I really don't see a way how the Germans could have done anything large scale even after a breakthrough with the amount of reserves and men the Soviets had.
@W1se0ldg33zer
@W1se0ldg33zer Год назад
'Build your opponent a golden bridge to retreat across.' ~ Sun Tzu
@robertkras5162
@robertkras5162 Год назад
IKE reflected later that allowing the AXIS escape from Sicily was a mistake; that the Allies should have put a force on the boot of Italy at the same time to block any possible escape.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
The Mongols often allowed encircled enemies an escape route - a small one. This was designed to prevent them from fighting to the death, at a time and place when there was no such thing as POW status and despair might produce desperate courage.
@gunman47
@gunman47 Год назад
A sidenote this week on August 7 1943 is that a rescue operation on Benito Mussolini is cancelled at the last moment as Otto Skorzeny received information that Mussolini had been moved hours earlier from his alleged holding location at La Spezia in Italy. However, this intel was flawed at Mussolini was never at La Spezia and in fact had been transferred out of the island of Ponza through a destroyer.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you Disckson Phua, great piece of information
@pantheman6139
@pantheman6139 Год назад
One of the top ten opening calls on this channel lol! I love you guys!
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
We love you too PantheMan!
@Verkinggettorix
@Verkinggettorix 3 месяца назад
I love how the intro phone calls started pretty cryptic and subtle and now they are just “what is he smoking…. Same thing as Hitler” ha love this series
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
Eighth Army Advance on Straits of Messina NOW THAT CATANIA AND Misterbianco had fallen, 5th and 50th British Divisions were advancing side-by-side in General Dempsey’s 13th British Corps as the Germans fell back towards the Tortorici Line. It was scrappy, difficult fighting, in which the advancing troops were being squeezed down roads that either hugged the coast or wound their way through the foothills of Etna. With so little room for manoeuvre, everyone felt cramped. David Fenner, for one, found the experience deeply unpleasant. The 50th British Division, especially, was hemmed in along the coast, which meant brigades moving up one at a time and, invariably, battalions advancing one at a time. Companies, taking it in turns to lead, would push ahead cautiously, waiting for the inevitable ambush. The officers, especially, were taking a hammering. ‘The platoon officer would be with the point section,’ noted Fenner, ‘the company commander with the lead platoon. The ambush would get the lot. Machine-guns, mortars and 88mm guns were all used.’ There would also be mines, booby-traps and snipers. The Germans were proving to be masters of the slow retreat, not least because they were disciplined enough to hold ground until the last. Throughout the 7th fierce fighting had continued in the Etna foothills. It was turning into a bloody and violent business, and 13th British Corps were in danger of becoming bogged down. This was the day when 13th Brigade, who had been in transit through wrecked and deserted towns, passing burnt-out British armoured cars and a host of other battle debris, arrived at the front, having been hurriedly brought forward into the fold of 5th Division. Captain David Cole and the 2nd Skins reached Pedara that evening with instructions to attack and capture three volcanic hills known as Tremonti a couple of miles north of the town the following day, Sunday, 8 August. These conical pimples had emerged back in 1669 during one of Etna’s worst eruptions and looked beautifully green compared with the bleached central plains and mountains. All around, the land was considerably more verdant here, with patches of bushes, undergrowth and plentiful trees. The volcanic hills themselves were steeply terraced; spreading away from them on the slopes running down to Pedara were vineyards and a maze of paths, while the road running towards them was, like most in the area, lined with stone walls. After the bare, wide-open Dittaino valley, this was dramatically close country. Supported by the Canadian Tank Brigade, artillery and mortars, the infantry once again had to take the leap of faith and venture forward - and no sooner had they all raised their heads than German machine guns opened up, tracer bullets whipping past and a cluster of mortar bombs crashing among them. Captain Cole and his wiring party were following behind D Company, and now quickly hurried forward to join D Company HQ and hastily install a field telephone. ‘There we were able,’ wrote Cole, ‘from behind a stone wall, to observe with the occasional distraction of random bullets zipping past us, the beginning of the attack.’ Forward went the D Company men, ducking, dodging, occasionally sprinting then diving, until they reached the foot of the Tremonti - where they ground to a halt. British mortars now drenched the three hills, while the heavy Vickers of the 7th Cheshire Machine-Gun Battalion continued to pour in relentless fire and the Shermans banged off shell after shell. The cacophony was deafening, the hills shrouded in swirling smoke and debris and dust - and then the infantry began climbing up the first of them, terrace by terrace. Just at the point where they were about to crest and take the summit, the Germans counter-attacked in time-honoured fashion. Cole watched it all open- mouthed. ‘With the two sides so closely intermingled, there was nothing we could do to help,’ he wrote. ‘A bloody scrap followed in which we saw our own men falling, as well as theirs, amidst the sunlit smoke drifting through the undergrowth.’ Grenades were hurling through the air, shots ringing out along with shouts and screams, and Lieutenant Roy Hingston’s platoon were falling back. By the time they reached the bottom again, he had just nine men left from the thirty or so who had begun the attack. Clearly, it was going to take more than a single company to capture Tremonti; but this would involve bringing up more men, more fire support, more ammunition - and so would take more time. After consulting with brigade HQ, it was decided to try again the following morning at dawn, with two battalions attacking. In the meantime, fighting patrols would be sent up the forward slopes of Tremonti to keep the enemy both on his toes and awake. At first light on Monday, 9 August, the 2nd Inniskillings attacked again, this time with A Company in the lead and the rest of the battalion following behind. Despite some initially heavy MG fire, their objectives were quickly taken as the enemy scurried away and disappeared down the slopes, mortars and bursts of machine-gun fire following them. A number of dead were found, both their own and the enemy’s. That evening, after dealing with prisoners, burying the dead and gathering themselves back together, the brigade moved out, heading forward again into Trecastagni and on to the road that led straight to Messina. From there, the next day, Tuesday, 10 August, they moved on once more, to the town of Fleri. This was still some 50 miles from the Straits, but the 2nd Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers had now fought their last in Sicily. News reached them on the 11th that they were being pulled back to a rest area near Paterno, to fatten them up for the next big battle - the invasion of Italy itself. Sicily 1944 - James Holland
@flyhighsun1833
@flyhighsun1833 Год назад
Magnificent work TimeGhost! The best 20 minutes RU-vid has to offer!
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for that high praise!
@bythebeardofmatt
@bythebeardofmatt Год назад
Another fantastic piece of work here. Thanks to all involved.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thanks @Matt Cook!
@ypaulbrown
@ypaulbrown Год назад
great stuff as always.......Bravo.....
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you Paul
@indianajones4321
@indianajones4321 Год назад
Oh no, will Manstein try to launch an offensive on the Isonzo River?
@Ingens_Scherz
@Ingens_Scherz 10 месяцев назад
Impossible not to subscribe to this channel after experiencing this pulsating, relentlessly researched, tour de force of the living history style. I only wish I'd discovered it long ago. Pretty breathtakingly good!
@thetake-geopolitics4961
@thetake-geopolitics4961 Год назад
Another great episode!! This RU-vid channel will be used as a basis for study many decades in the future the same way it is now
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for your very kind words, we appreciate it. Pleas stay tuned & check out all our weekly and special episodes
@glencochrane901
@glencochrane901 Год назад
The Speer quote about Hitler's military downfall was brilliant. Thanks for another great show. That quote by the way can be found in Albert Speer's, 'Inside The Third Reich,' first paragraph of Chapter 17.
@caryblack5985
@caryblack5985 Год назад
Too bad he did not have the insight much earlier.
@pocketmarcy6990
@pocketmarcy6990 Год назад
Wasn’t that written when Speer was pretending that he was a victim in the NAZI system and didn’t actually set up any slave labor camps
@pola5392
@pola5392 Год назад
At least the Kaiser knew not to override his generals Hindenberg and Ludendorff's expertise, and didn't as a result end up crashing and burning as spectacularly as Hitler who lost his life
@papageitaucher618
@papageitaucher618 Год назад
This was also the reason he started WW1 in the first place tho
@nathanweitzman9531
@nathanweitzman9531 Год назад
Ehhh, from what I remember of 'The Great War' episodes, it sounded like Luddendorff crashed and burned, but managed to deflect the blame in a way that set Germany up for the horrors of the Nazi regime itself. I wouldn't really describe the Kaiser as having the ability to override his generals in the late war, either.
@thomaskositzki9424
@thomaskositzki9424 Год назад
Wow, the Albert Speer diary quote was fascinating! That alone makes this episode great!
@effendi77
@effendi77 Год назад
Quoting Albert Speer, post-war, of course: "The tendency to wild decisions had long been his forte, now it speeded his downfall."
@naveenraj2008eee
@naveenraj2008eee Год назад
Hi Indy Another awesome week. Finally axis losing. What speer told is correct. Thanks for the video.
@SpartacusColo
@SpartacusColo Год назад
To be fair, Hitler was a master at running messages from command post, to command post. But still, as we've seen remarked, "The corporal is playing general again."
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 Год назад
It could be worse, they could have had a leader who said he knew more about military matters than any general because he spent a couple of years at a military school as a boy.
@nickprohoroff3720
@nickprohoroff3720 Год назад
You do this so well. A master class in insight.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you Nick
@michaelgreen1515
@michaelgreen1515 Год назад
Thanks as ever for your coverage.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thanks for watching, Michael
@Ratkill
@Ratkill Год назад
I remeber reading about the international reaction to the Patton incidents. Apparently Russia and Germany especially were dumbfounded. German officers were amazed that it was allowed to be covered by the press, and at the the reaction to it was so negative. I think at that point there has been around 20,000 executions of Germany's own personnel. Obviously even more for Russia. The fact that the allies most effective and feared general could be affected by something so "trivial" was absolutely extraordinary to them. It also really highlights the contrast in values. I'll have to dig up the book I read this in, I dont like referencing without a source.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
I have my doubts it was covered in the Soviet press at all. If it was, I would be interested to see what they wrote. As for the Germans, officers striking subordinates was considered a major breach of discipline and a sign of lack of self-control, and the fact that it was acceptable in the Romanian armed forces for officers to beat their juniors in Patton fashion was something the Germans saw as regrettable. There was a difference between drumhead executions without process (not yet common for the Germans at this point in the war, unlike later) and a commander impulsively slapping his troops around.
@konstantinriumin2657
@konstantinriumin2657 Год назад
Sounds like a myth. Patton wasn't seen by germans or soviets as extraordinary
@robertkras5162
@robertkras5162 Год назад
Slapping or beating was a way of life in the Japanese forces - top to bottom rank - for about any reason, infraction, or perceived failure of a subordinate.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
Patton was only seen as the Allies most effective and feared general by Americans who watch the movie Patton too much. A good movie but historically completely inaccurate. Judging by his 1943 Patton was an insignificant Corps commander in Tunesia who operated in a side show. Same on Sicily, where 7th Army supported the main show of 8th Army by taking most of Sicily that was hardly defended. There is nothing in Patton's 1943 war record that warrants him being the Allies most effective and feared general in that year. If anything that title should go to British general O'Connor, who in 1940-41 defeated an Italian army of 220K troops with just 33K troops and a lot of bluff. And he had been captured in 1941 in Rommel's 1st Desert offensive. But when Italy surrendered he would rejoin the British army. He never quite lived up to that reputation in Normandy and Western Europe commanding VIII Corps, but of all the Allied generals that were active or re-actived in 1943 his reputation was arguably the biggest.
@konstantinriumin2657
@konstantinriumin2657 Год назад
@@robertkras5162 The beatings will continue until the morale improves!
@johnpawlak7350
@johnpawlak7350 Год назад
Hey Indy and Team. Love your work! I know this series still has a lot of time left, but if you do another week by week series I think the Napoleonic Wars could be a cool subject. Maybe get Sabaton on the phone and cover the Great Northern War? Hope you all have a wonderful day!
@extrahistory8956
@extrahistory8956 Год назад
Already taken. The sister channel to the Great War series called Real Time History has already done a week by week series for Napoleon's Invasion of Russia and Napoleon the Third's Franco-Prussian War.
@Duke_of_Lorraine
@Duke_of_Lorraine Год назад
The napoleonic wars actually were a continuation of the revolutionary wars, so it would last 23 years (1792-1815). And due to the much more simple armies organisation, there wouldn't be much to say about it for most weeks
@extrahistory8956
@extrahistory8956 Год назад
@@davidw.2791 Then again, they could do what the Real Time History is doing and cover major, active campaigns in a weekly manner, while lumping in and summarizing the quiet weeks in longer videos.
@T_Mo271
@T_Mo271 Год назад
Really difficult to do a historical series based on events that have only a few historical paintings for visuals. And Real Time History has already done it quite well. There's not a lot of new ground to explore there.
@extrahistory8956
@extrahistory8956 Год назад
@@T_Mo271 Couldn't have said it better myself. Jesse and crew created a really engaging series on Napoleon that went into greater detail on the Russian campaign than any other documentary has ever done.
@geckoslikejam4810
@geckoslikejam4810 Год назад
for the past 3years, each week, has a ~15min of stress and anxiety free moment while I watch your show. Thank you.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for making us part of your week. Please consider joining the TimeGhost Army to help us keep going and making special episodes all the way through the end of the war… whenever that may be! www.patreon.com/join/timeghosthistory
Год назад
Thanks for this episode. I always wondered how they managed to pull of that evacuation of Sicilly. And the Albert Speer quote is quite something. I never heard it this well condenced. Reminds me of the apparents inability of modern day politicians in dictatorships and democracys alike to understand that theire opposit number in the other systems thinks differently and communicates as well as acts differently.
@davidkinsey8657
@davidkinsey8657 Год назад
Indy, I don't know if you are aware but the many psychologists want to drop the "D" from PTSD, arguing that suffering from PTS is not a disorder, it is a stress related injury.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Interesting David, thank you
@maxscholts8649
@maxscholts8649 Год назад
I'm currently reading Speer's memoirs and it's recommended as his perspective is very distinct, both from intelligence and background.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for the recommendation, Max
@Dustz92
@Dustz92 Год назад
It's also full of lies
@NormAppleton
@NormAppleton Год назад
He was responsible for at least 2 million deaths. Albert Speer was interested in Albert Speer looking good. He was a pig.
@mightiestalone9851
@mightiestalone9851 Год назад
@@Dustz92 awe why? cause he was a "NAZIIIIIII" omg noooooooooo! nazi nazi nazi!! get a grip!
@oldesertguy9616
@oldesertguy9616 Год назад
I think Speer was really remarkable, but I would seriously question a lot of what he says as he was also known to twist or minimize his involvement in things, such as the use of slave labor.
@CrimsonTemplar2
@CrimsonTemplar2 Год назад
Another great episode Indy & team.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for joining us as always, CT2
@the1ghost764
@the1ghost764 Год назад
Great 👍 Episode. I have to watch this again.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you fellow Ghost
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle Год назад
18:20 A non chess player playing a serious chess player. Initially the non player may have some success making obscure and random moves. The serious player will eventually figure out their opponent isn’t novel, it is that just don’t know why they are doing and turn the table and win
@korbell1089
@korbell1089 Год назад
Amatuerish or not, Hitler will have the last laugh once he sets up his Panther Stellung because no way will the USSR be willing to take the losses necessary to drive Germany from Eastern Europe!
@Raskolnikov70
@Raskolnikov70 Год назад
That chuckling you hear in the background has a Georgian accent.....
@clarencehopkins7832
@clarencehopkins7832 Год назад
Excellent stuff bro
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you Clarence
@olegadodasguerras3795
@olegadodasguerras3795 Год назад
Oooo Martin Gilbert Nice !! Amazing video
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you!
@gianniverschueren870
@gianniverschueren870 Год назад
Looks like there's some funky detailing going on in this tie, but kind of hard to tell. Stealthy. 3/5
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
@Gianni Verschueren now i can't stop staring at the tie when I watch this video, trying to work out what is going on with it
@gianniverschueren870
@gianniverschueren870 Год назад
@@WorldWarTwo you and me both
@panitaapplebum9910
@panitaapplebum9910 Год назад
thumbnail 207 ist a colourised image from actor Volker Lechtenbrink. German movie „die Brücke“ 1959
@MikiUchman
@MikiUchman Год назад
Indeed. This image became viral as it was thought (and I guess by many still is) to be authentic ww2 photo. It is often use as depiction of shell shock.
@jeremy28135
@jeremy28135 Год назад
Indy has such a professional charismatic delivery. It almost seemed like he had every last word of that passage from Speer's 'Inside The Third Reich' memorized
@willynthepoorboys2
@willynthepoorboys2 Год назад
Thanks for the video.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for watching
@aronjanssonnordberg307
@aronjanssonnordberg307 Год назад
The Kuban pocket seems more and more like a meatgrinder for the Soviets. I had no idea it held so long and so many died there.
@obsidianjane4413
@obsidianjane4413 Год назад
Its like the Courland pocket in the North. Neither were directly in line with the main thrusts or outcomes of major battles that decided the war.
@Raskolnikov70
@Raskolnikov70 Год назад
They should have gone on the defensive there back in early 1943. Even if they managed to re-take the straits, the Crimea was too defensible by the Germans and the meatgrinder would have continued - no big southern breakthrough possible there. Plus there wasn't any real important strategic reason for the USSR to re-take control of the Black Sea at this point, so why even bother? Send those units north where they could do some good during Kursk, ffs...
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 Год назад
One participant of the battle on the German side was Willi Heinrich, whose war novel _Das Geduldige Fleisch_ (The Willing Flesh) set during that campaign became the basis for Sam Peckinpah's movie _Cross of Iron_ .
@obsidianjane4413
@obsidianjane4413 Год назад
@@Raskolnikov70 They couldn't have known this at the time, the entire campaign, even the war hinged on securing the Caucuses. And a withdrawal to the peninsula would have freed up Soviet forces for further North, where Germany had pinned their hopes on Citadel.
@PhillyPhanVinny
@PhillyPhanVinny Год назад
On a note on the Manhattan project this episode shows the exact reason why later on the US does not share it's nuclear secrets with Britain that so many British people tend to get a bit upset about. Winston Churchill who was very familiar with American law and how it worked knew the agreement he was making was between his own government being the Prime Minister but just the American Presidents administration. That deal would thus only be in place with the administration of FDR since the President in the US does not make laws. The US President signs bills passed to him by the US Congress and Senate into law or he can veto the bill. So after the war was over when the US Congress had seen the power of the atomic bombs and seen how much was spent on the Manhattan project as well as the delivery system for the bomb (the bombers were even more expensive construction projects for the B-29 and B-50 Superfortress) so the US Congress rightly wanted to keep such technology a secret and passed Atomic Energy Act of 1946. Then British PM Clement Attlee thought this was unfair but it was explained to him by the Truman administration that the deal made was between FDR and Churchill not the US government and after the passing of the Atomic Energy Act sharing such information was out of Truman's hands. That law would later be amended so that the US could share nuclear secrets with VERY close allies like the British. But this situation is the exact situation Iran put itself in with the nuclear deal it made . The US Congress sent Iran an open letter telling them what they were signing with the President was just a deal they were making with the current President and any future President that wants to go along with the treaty could if they wanted to but they were warned Iran that if a GOP member became President in the next election that it was likely the nuclear deal agreed to between the current President and Iran would be voided. Because again, US Presidents didn't make laws, they can propose them and sign bills into law but the US Congress and Senate vote on what becomes a law. The same thing happened with the League of Nations. Woodrow Wilson came-up with the idea but he could not get the Senate controlled by the GOP at the time to agree for the US to join the League of Nations.
@strongbrew9116
@strongbrew9116 Год назад
It was kind of unsporting for the US to do that, considering the information given to the US by Britain from the Tube Alloys Project sped up development by a number of years. It's even stranger when you consider that the US had to obtain its uranium supply from Britain, as most of the world's supply of uranium was located in territories of the British Empire.
@kevinganske967
@kevinganske967 Год назад
In the end nearly all international agreements between sovereign nations are like this. The governments of the day will keep the agreements until they decide not to. The key to these type of agreements is to get something immediately upfront and let the future take care of itself. For example, the British(along with the Soviet spies who were watching them unfortunately) gleaned enough from their three years of participation in the Manhattan Project to eventually build their own bomb. The Iranians on the other hand got immediate and extensive (although mostly temporary) sanction relief, the release of some Iranian assets frozen in US banks and the eventual satisfaction of seeing the United States condemned as a treaty breaker (among other spicier designations) in some domestic and international circles. This was near as much as either of these nations could reasonably be expected to hope for under the circumstances. Most diplomats I would imagine are not naïve and know about the temporary nature of any executive branch only agreement with America. Nor is the USA exceptional in reserving for themselves in law the right to renege on signed agreements. It is a long standing, often unacknowledged, diplomatic tradition amongst all nations that I can think of. Even formal ratified treaties usually have a broad escape clause built into them designating a warning period before full withdrawal for instance. Diplomats are aware of this and usually act accordingly by insisting on early acts of good will that make the agreement worthwhile even if it is reneged on later. This is one the reasons the Munich Agreement was such notoriously poor agreement. The Czechs were forced to give away land in exchange for promises of good behavior by Germany. In other words they had to give up something for what was essentially nothing. This is not the case for Britain and Iran in the examples above. Both got something valuable in exchange for giving something valuable. Some Americans might actually claim that in both cases it was America that got the short end of the stick in these agreements. I leave others to decide on the whether that is true or not.
@PhillyPhanVinny
@PhillyPhanVinny Год назад
@@strongbrew9116 I wouldn't say unsporting. I'd say it evened out in the end with what Britain got and continues to get. By the end of the Manhattan project more than 99% of the hundreds of thousands of people working on the project were American citizens. The overwhelming amount spent on the project was made by Americans (I'm not sure of the exact number but I'd also bet it is more then 99%). So saying the British should then get the full results of the project made essentially in a handshake deal between 2 government leaders with one not having the authority to make such an offer and the other knowing the US President can't make such a offer seems like the right course to me. FDR often overstepped his bounds as President and if he was making Churchill think this promise they made stood between all future US Presidents he was again overstepping his powers. The US Congress makes laws and agrees to treaties, not the President. The President can negotiate a deal that Congress later signs but that is it.
@strongbrew9116
@strongbrew9116 Год назад
@@PhillyPhanVinny I think you don't really know how much Britain contributed. Financially, yes, overwhelmingly the US. But the British brought not only their own knowledge to the table (which was ahead of the US), but also the knowledge gained working with the French in the '30s (Paris Group), and the German scientists' (who fled to Britain). There was a concerted effort to downplay how much Britain contributed to the Manhattan Project, and unfortunately, it seems that many still believe that narrative.
@PhillyPhanVinny
@PhillyPhanVinny Год назад
@@strongbrew9116 I'm not downplaying it saying there was not British help and other nations scientists help as well. But the Manhattan project was a grad operation that had over 400,000 people working on it. Of those more then 99% were US citizens. Sure some were off the boat converted citizens but US citizens none the less just like all other US citizens who immigrated from the Old World. And yes, the British brought things they worked out that the US hadn't yet. But the US also had a ton they had worked out that the British had not yet. And many things they both had already worked out separately. But comparing the level of investment and work done on the bombs is really not even comparable. When Churchill was told the cost it would take to make an atomic bomb he was willing to give-up everything the British had to hope to be included afterword's when the Americans had worked out how to build and mass produce the bombs. Most importantly how to get enough U-235 out of U-238 which is actually a very common metal found in the Earth. It is just out of all the U-238 you find less then a percent of it is U-235 which is what is needed to make an atomic bomb and later Plutonium. Every advanced nation in the 1940s knew how a atomic bomb could work as they do today. The issue then and still today is the separating of the U238 from the U235. If you look it up it seems simple, you just crush it all into powder and spin it in turbines really fast to separate the materials. But in reality it is far more complex then that then I am going to go into. And that is the part the US worked out so that they could not just build one single atomic bomb but as many as they wanted to since as I said U238 is actually a very common metal to find in the Earth around the world.
@gregcampwriter
@gregcampwriter Год назад
Forte, as used at the end here, is one syllable. It comes from the French word that referred to the stronger lower third of a sword, as opposed to the more flexible outer third, the foible. The Italian forte is two syllables and means loud.
@AstroGremlinAmerican
@AstroGremlinAmerican Год назад
The battle between that grey inner vest and the brown outer vest (it's buttoned on OMG!) will go down in fashion history! That combo just slapped my eyes! I kid because I love.
@Southsideindy
@Southsideindy Год назад
It’s actually one single piece of clothing. I’ve worn it before.
@chuckvt5196
@chuckvt5196 Год назад
Great episode! Indy always enlightens! We in the USA often forget just what a huge part the Soviet Union played in the defeat of Nazi Germany. Had not Hitler invaded Soviet territory, it would have been incredibly difficult to defeat fortress Europe. Particularly since it was the USA that was doing the lion's share of checking the Japanese in the Pacific, tying down large amounts of men and materiel.
@chuckvt5196
@chuckvt5196 Год назад
@@davidw.2791 Yes! Very valid point!
@lycaonpictus9662
@lycaonpictus9662 Год назад
@@davidw.2791 Not to minimize China's contribution to the war but in a hypothetical scenario where it folds in 1942, how does Japan get those millions of men to Pacific islands? How does it feed them and keep them supplied with ammunition and medicine, particularly when the advantage at sea and in the air had shifted to the Americans? They wouldn't have made any difference and would have just contributed to the tally of men who died of starvation or disease when their remote island outposts were bypassed and the supplies stopped coming in. Look at the difficulty Japan had in even keeping it's forces on Guadalcanal supplied - and they numbered in the tens of thousands - when the air and sea shifted to the U.S. The Pacific War was first and foremost a naval conflict whose outcome was determined by control of the seas and the air above them. Japan having more ground troops at it's disposal wouldn't have changed anything. The primary contribution of China's resistance was keeping Japanese armies from posing a serious threat to British India. It also weakened the arguments of the Strike North faction. It did not however determine the war's outcome. Japan lost the war at sea.
@brucetucker4847
@brucetucker4847 Год назад
@@davidw.2791 Not really, they didn't have the shipping to transport a million soldiers to the South Pacific or to feed them and keep them supplied once there. They would have made a huge difference if it had come to an invasion of Japan itself, but thankfully that didn't have to happen.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for watching as always, Chuck. Stay tuned for even more hubris, more entanglements, more carnage, and more of this interminable war every week
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
German Army in East is not holding initiative anymore , the initiative (in strategic sense) is at the hands of Red Army now and with superior quantitity and even some quality aspects , they are determining the strategic moves and tempo in Eastern Front and now it is Germans reacting here and there trying to counter act Red Army actions desperately with fewer and diminishing resources. Unless some game changer in strategic sense occurs , numbers and attrition along with limits / finity of space to retreat , would determine everything in this front. Manstein is in huge error since Soviet Union has larger resources and STAVKA learned and still learning how to use those resources more and more efficiently to retake lost territory while Germans with fewer resources , suffering casaulties they could not replace nor afford to lose.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
Not quite, as the Red Army was starting to suffer from massive manpower shortages. The losses of 1941 and 1942 were just too massive for a country that had lost up to 40% of its prewar population to enemy occupation. No division in the Red Army would ever attain full ration strength anymore and by the war's end would be mostly at brigade levels of strength. Even the elite tank armies would never regain full strength again. But by skillfully concentrating forces at impending points of attack and nearly emptying quiet front sectors of as many men as they could the Red Army was able to still muster overwhelming force where it needed to be. And every part of the country that they liberated they would immediately round up every abled bodied man and press him into service. But of course the number of artillery and armor would continue to go up, another way that the Red Army attempted to compensate for having fewer infantry. Gone were the days of 1941 and 1942 when Red Army soldiers would have to fight with inadequate numbers of artillery, armor and air power to back them up.
@user-if4zv5nj5m
@user-if4zv5nj5m Год назад
@@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 also by 1943 planned numbers for anti tank and anti aircraft guns have finally been fulfilled in most of the divisions, not just elite units. Although German armor strength also increased, it is now operates in worce conditions when every division have enough guns that can at least reliably hit advancing panzers from their sides, not just having some (or no) guns that can penetrate them from the front, but can be easily avoided. Also in terms of air support luftwaffe had no major changes from 1941, but now facing aaa with sufficient ammo supply around every major target, making dealing precision hits much harder. Soviet production even caught up enough to create separate artillery and flak units to be moved where they were needed, so units engaged in front operations have even more guns that they Normally have
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
@@user-if4zv5nj5m Artillery, even the anti-air and anti-tank variety, is the God of War.
@lycaonpictus9662
@lycaonpictus9662 Год назад
@@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 That may be true but by 1943 the Soviet Union had finally managed a manpower advantage across the front, whereas throughout most of 1941 the manpower advantage was with the Axis. At Moscow, Germany's first major strategic defeat in the East, the Soviets had finally managed rough parity. The Soviet manpower advantage would only increase as the war dragged on. The harsh reality for the Germans was that they could far less afford the attrition in the East than the Soviets, and that time was not an ally. It had to win quick or it wasn't going to win at all, and the defeat at Moscow dashed whatever thin hopes there had been for a quick collapse of the Soviet Union. By 1943 both time and attrition had taken their toll, many of the soldiers who had taken part in those early victories were already moldering in Ukrainian or Russian fields, and the German army no longer had a capability to win the war.
@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
@@lycaonpictus9662 The Germans couldn't afford any war of attrition really, not with the USSR, nor the Western Allies. And yes, the Red Army had finally managed to gain numerical superiority across the board. But it wasn't sustainable because of the massive losses in men and territory that had been incurred. They desperately needed the manpower that they could draft from the Ukraine, Baltics and Belarus. In that sense Manstein was right that the only course of victory for Germany was to bleed the Soviets in a defensive war. He correctly identified what might win the war. Although winning in that sense was stretching it. He just didn't have a proper strategy nor the means to do so.
@Tomsworld
@Tomsworld Год назад
As a massive fan of History. This is all great. Thanks for doing it.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you for watching, we appreciate the kind words
@shaider1982
@shaider1982 Год назад
That scene in the movie ,Patton , where he slapped and almost shot a solidet was spot on then.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
Still downplayed it a bit - there were two known incidents (were there others that were not witnessed or mentioned, perhaps because the soldiers concerned were embarrassed?) The film implies Patton did it once.
@CrackheadYoda
@CrackheadYoda Год назад
That might’ve been the funniest phone call intro so far. “What has he been smoking? Same thing as Hitler I guess!!” Hahaha!!
@elessartelcontar6578
@elessartelcontar6578 Год назад
Manstein hoped for repeat of WWI: Russian regime exhausts itself and makes a separate peace with Germany. Overlooks robustness of Stalinist regime, as well as volume of US aid supporting Soviet war effort. But, attrition followed by separate peace might still have been best strategy available to the Nazi regime. Had Hitler not lost 500,000 men, plus equipment, in North Africa and Stalingrad, who knows? But then Hitler would not have been Hitler.
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
The thing is Red Army and STAVKA was also learning and improving its skills and had been pouring operational maneuver battle concept from thory to practical use too.
@keithnorris6348
@keithnorris6348 Год назад
Indeed Indy you do it darn well.
@galaxy6913
@galaxy6913 Год назад
At this point, Indy could be ordering take-out on the phone at the episodes start, and I will still think it would be another twist in his labriynth like way of telling the week as it unfolds. Love the work and detail you put into it.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Maybe we'll do that next time… pizza sounds good. Thanks for watching, Galaxy.
@pnutz_2
@pnutz_2 Год назад
every time someone comes up with some great war defensive strategy, it breathes new life into Konrad
@nicholasparker2086
@nicholasparker2086 Год назад
I wonder if we could bring him back that way?
@pnutz_2
@pnutz_2 Год назад
@@davidw.2791 Konrad Von Hotzendorf, Hero of Austria-Hungary and meme of The Great War channel back when Indy was on it. His portrait's hanging on the wall in most episodes of the ww2 channel, specifically on the far left in this episode
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
Etna Battles (3) Adrano - Bronte , outflanking Mount Etna On 4 August, Montgomery issued new instructions to Eighth Army. 30th Corps was to continue its drive towards Adrano and then head off up the left, western side of Etna to Bronte, a town and ducal fiefdom that in 1799 had been gifted to Admiral Nelson by Ferdinand III, monarch of what had then been the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. History was never far away in Sicily, not that most of the men fighting there had much opportunity or inclination to appreciate it. With plans for the invasion of mainland Italy now under way, Monty also had to start withdrawing troops in preparation for that next phase of the war in the Mediterranean. The Canadians were to be pulled out of the line once Adrano had fallen, 5th Division after the fall of Belpasso. In any event, the narrowing of the north-east of the island meant that only limited numbers of troops could make their way through the network of tiny mountain roads. General Oliver Leese , 30th Corps commander now gave the 78th British Battleaxe Division a particularly brutal assignment. From Centuripe, they were to get across the River Salso down the far side of the mountain, cross the Simeto the next night, then attack Adrano the night after that, with the 51st Highlanders protecting their right flank and the Canadians their left. For Peter Pettit and the gunners of 17th Field Artillery, this was a truly punishing schedule, especially coming on the back of the Centuripe battle - not to mention that they’d been on the go ever since their arrival. First, on 4 August, Pettit had to work out how they were going to get down from the town; this meant a recce on foot with the second-in-command from the 57th Field Artillery. The only possible route for all their guns, Quads and limbers was by the winding road, which was in full view of the enemy, now on the slopes overlooking the Simeto valley below Adrano. Halfway down, a large part of the road had been destroyed, but it was too dangerous for the sappers to repair in daylight; it would have to wait until dark. Further beyond the break in the road were almond and orange groves. ‘No cover worth the name for vehicles,’ noted Pettit. Later, at dusk, he went down again with the battery recce parties and showed them where he reckoned they should deploy the gun. That night, they dumped 6,000 rounds of ammo; then the convoy of thirty Quads and guns rumbled down, inched over a diversion round the blown bit of road and finally got in position for first light. Pettit, having snatched two and a half hours’ sleep, then hurried around trying to get the guns into place and camouflaged as much as possible before the sun began to rise far enough to show their every movement. By this time, he was both hot and exhausted. Three lorries were hit by enemy shelling and exploded as a further convoy of sixty came down the road. The infantry attack across the Simeto went off that night as planned; then, after Pettit’s men had finished firing, they had to pack up and get moving again. ‘We could not afford to have the column on the road at daylight or there really would be trouble,’ he noted, breathlessly. ‘Behind the ammo lorries were a Brigade HQ and the transport of two or more battalions who had to get down and through the river at the bottom in darkness.’ Somehow, the long convoys managed to push on over the Simeto. The enemy had pulled back again so there was no contact, although plenty of shelling. It was now Friday, 6 August, and the division was to attack Adrano that night. Yet again the guns were deployed ready for firing early in the morning. They shelled the town all morning while Pettit watched squadrons of fighter-bombers circling and dive-bombing enemy positions around Adrano. ‘The whole town seems to jump up in smoke and dust and nothing is seen but the huge dust cloud for some minutes,’ he jotted.13 ‘The amazing thing is that when it clears away, the whole town is still there and looks from this distance just the same as before.’ In the afternoon, word reached the gunners that the recce regiment ahead were already in Adrano, so they swivelled the guns and began pounding Bronte instead. Later, it then turned out the recce regiment wasn’t in Adrano after all, and so they changed the fire plan once again. Then Pettit was summoned by an officious intelligence officer to the division HQRA - the artillery headquarters. Off he went on what was a shockingly difficult drive in the dark. Getting back at 9.20 p.m., he was immediately plunged into preparations for the infantry attack on Adrano - zero hour midnight. Fire plans were as follows: concentrated fire for 170 minutes before the attack, then 180 minutes to accompany the infantry, moving their aim forward 100 yards every five minutes. The medium guns - the 5.5-inch - would also fire for 195 minutes on the back of the town from midnight. Incredibly, the Battleaxe Division had managed to keep to Leese’s timetable. By the morning of Saturday, 7 August, the infantry were in Adrano, their objective taken, and the gunners were packing up, loading up and moving out once again - straight into a log-jam as traffic from Regalbuto converged with their own convoys. They had to be ready to provide fire support just as soon as possible, although this was easier said than done. ‘Thick orange groves, walls, narrow gates and lava all over the area made it very difficult to find gun positions,’ Pettit acknowledged, ‘but we did after much head-scratching.’ Craters in the road hardly helped, and the maps they’d been issued with didn’t seem to bear much relation to the reality on the ground. Supper that night was eaten on the go, by heating up a tin of M&V - meat and veg - in his Humber’s radiator, where it fitted neatly if they took out the filter. The next day, Sunday 8 August, Pettit and his gunners passed through Adrano on their way up to Bronte, part of the western thrust of 30th Corps around the edge of Etna. ‘Adrano is a sort of Guernica,’ he noted, ‘bodies still on the pavements, ruins everywhere and they had to use bulldozers to clear a way through for wheels.’ That a bulldozer was even in Adrano was impressive, yet these sturdy machines were rapidly becoming as essential a piece of Allied equipment as any tank, truck or artillery piece, such was the level of destruction being caused. Quite simply, without bulldozers there could be no advance. They pushed on again in the heat, stopping repeatedly because of craters in the road. Here the country was much closer, the wide-open valleys of the island’s centre long gone. It was greener, too, a place of myriad groves and vineyards, but still more winding, narrow roads. Pettit spent much of his time wondering where on earth they were going to place their guns. ‘This is,’ he lamented, ‘the most awful artillery country.’ Which was a problem when the Allied way of war so heavily depended upon it; but such was the gunner’s exhausting, stressful and exceptionally demanding lot. No wonder that at times, this highly mechanized army appeared to take its time. In fact, given the circumstances and the conditions in which they found themselves, they were progressing with extraordinary speed. Sicily 1943 - James Holland
@mitanni0
@mitanni0 Год назад
A quite interesting book depicting the Sicilian campaign and ensuing evacuation from the viewpoint of air warfare is Gerd Gaisers "Die sterbende Jagd" (The Dying Hunt). It illustrates the pretty much hopeless fight of German fighters against impossible odds.
@jasonmussett2129
@jasonmussett2129 Год назад
Breathless narration 😀👍💯
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thanks Jason
@fuzzamajumula
@fuzzamajumula Год назад
I find it difficult to concentrate while wondering why you appear to be wearing a vest over a vest. 😂
@blaisevillaume9051
@blaisevillaume9051 Год назад
One is the back-up vest. That's in case the first vest suffers some critical failure.
@PetarJovanovic993
@PetarJovanovic993 Год назад
Sounds like you need to be put in some sort of a camp built for concentrating.
@tedohio3038
@tedohio3038 Год назад
Always wondered way the allies don’t do more to stop the withdraw from Sicily. Thanks for the explanation.
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
It wasn't that long ago the Germans seemed unstoppable. The Allies remembered this and were still proceeding with care.
@dentoncrimescene
@dentoncrimescene Год назад
This is the greatest channel.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
You're the greatest commenter. But don't tell anyone else we said that
@samdumaquis2033
@samdumaquis2033 Год назад
Great history vid
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you Sam
@krejslayer
@krejslayer Год назад
Ah yes, the infamous picture of the crying Hitler youth soldier from the movie Die Brücke. What's next, a picture of Bruno Ganz with a funny stache?
@stevekaczynski3793
@stevekaczynski3793 Год назад
There is a famous photo of an apparently shell shocked German sitting and hiding his head. Apparently taken by a Soviet photographer in 1943 after a German artillery position was taken. It might be a posed shot, however. Photos were part of propaganda and still are and situations can be faked. Official photos on the German side were the preserve of German propaganda units and so a picture of a crying German soldier would not make the cut. So a postwar film still was presumably used here. Some German soldiers did take pictures with pocket cameras and in some cases they documented their own atrocities.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Good idea!
@PhillyPhanVinny
@PhillyPhanVinny Год назад
How do I become Army member of the week, do I need to pay a higher set level longer? I have been a member of the Army since the start of the Patreon, week 1 at the private to PFC level only going down during the month and half after the company I worked for went out of business (I got a new job again now working in the online gambling industry). During that time I stopped supporting all the patreon channels I support except for you guys because I believe the work you guys do is so good and important. I wish I could afford to support you guys more but can't. I do my best to recruit as many people to your army as possible though (and know I have recruited at least 6 people to the army). Whenever anyone asks me what RU-vid channels I like to watch you guys are the first I name and I tell anyone with any interest in history they should be watching your channel. I hope you guys are not mad at me for having different opinions then you guys on very few topics on WW2 such as the Allied bombing campaign (I have even refrained from disagreeing with you guys on that topic in recent past weeks episodes such as the fire bombing of Hamburg episodes). I post on your videos weekly and am agreeing with you on 99% of your videos and defending you guys in the comments against the people who work to attack the work you guys do all the time.
@markvarenhorst1930
@markvarenhorst1930 Год назад
Thanks!
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you Mark!
@systemreset9410
@systemreset9410 Год назад
First rule of nuclear bomb club, dont talk about the nuclear bomb (to others)
@greenkoopa
@greenkoopa Год назад
If he's having a Downfall all he has to do is wait for Steiner to counterattack
@Raskolnikov70
@Raskolnikov70 Год назад
Steiner's busy trying to get Apple to re-install headphone jacks in their newest iPhones (I love those memes....)
@warwickeng5491
@warwickeng5491 Год назад
@@Raskolnikov70 Steiner is the dad who told his kid he was going out to get milk and ciggies and never comes back
@Darwinek
@Darwinek Год назад
11:49 Matt LeBlanc cameo. Good Easter egg there. Thanks, Indy.
@mohammedsaysrashid3587
@mohammedsaysrashid3587 Год назад
a wonderful coverage
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thank you
@paultyson4389
@paultyson4389 Год назад
Yes, in the last minute of episode 207 you have excellently summed up why Hitler's Germany initially enjoyed spectacular success with gung ho aggression over basically unprepared adversaries. But as Germany's (and Japan's) adversaries got more and more experienced and numerous so this advantage became more and more a disadvantage. Both Hitler and Tojo thought that their nations enjoyed an inherent racial superiority over their opponents and that would inexorably lead them to victory.
@yassinhafez1337
@yassinhafez1337 Год назад
plus they dont have the capactity for total warfare
@tigertank06
@tigertank06 Год назад
I wonder what would have happened had he had an August Von Mackenson type general.
@merdiolu
@merdiolu Год назад
ETNA BATTLES (1) After the fall of Mussolini, Kesselring had visited Badoglio, who assured the field marshal he had had nothing to do with the coup and had known nothing about it, but had felt honour bound to answer the call when the King had asked him to take up the reins. This, of course, was a whopping lie. He fully intended to continue the alliance, he told Kesselring - which, curiously enough, wasn’t quite the fib it at first seemed. The German C-in-C South then visited Ambrosio, still head of the Comando Supremo, who, like Badoglio, stressed Italy’s determination to continue fighting. On the basis of these meetings, he then reported to Hitler and the OKW that he believed the professed Italian intentions were sincere and thought it would be a mistake to pursue the plot to capture the Italian leadership in Rome, as the Führer had vowed to do. However, he also reckoned German troops would be able to occupy and hold Italy and the Balkans if sufficient numbers were sent in. The 3. Panzer Grenadier Division was already in Italy, and, as it happened, the 2. Fallschirmjäger Division had now arrived as well, ready to help carry out the planned coup; Kesselring had explained away their presence as reinforcements for Sicily, which Badoglio and Ambrosio accepted. Nor did the Italians appear to object in principle to German units moving into the north of Italy to protect the southern flank of the Reich and the Alpine passes. On 28 July, the plan for the immediate capture of the King and the Italian leadership was dropped, in part because of Kesselring’s report, in part because Jodl was strongly against it, and largely because by that time Hitler had calmed down a little after his initial fury and accepted that a longer game needed to be played with the Italians. Kesselring visited him in person on 29 July, and the Führer and OKW agreed instead to try to keep the alliance going for as long as possible, certainly until they were ready to carry out Operation ALARICH - now renamed, with brilliant irony, ACHSE, or AXIS in English - which would see German troops sweep in, swiftly disarm the entire Italian military and occupy the country by force. Rounding up the King and the Italian leadership would be part and parcel of this operation. This meant no sudden and hurried evacuation of Sicily lest it alarm the Italian leadership. Even so, Kesselring knew his men had to be prepared; there were now significant numbers of German troops on the island, and they were not to be lost as their compatriots had been in Tunisia. Evacuation plans needed to begin, and on 28 July Hube had ordered Oberst Hans-Günther Baade to start making a viable and efficient plan to get as many German troops out of Sicily as possible. Whether it was a matter of days or weeks, when the time came the Germans needed to be ready to act, and act fast. Initially, Kesselring rather hastily told Hitler that German forces would be sent across the Straits of Messina over three nights. On 2 August, however, Hube submitted a different plan, code-named Operation LEHRGANG, which was based on an evacuation over five nights. A measured, efficient five-night crossing, Hube believed, would give his troops a much better chance of successfully getting off the island with as much equipment as possible; three nights was simply too rushed and, he believed, not necessary. Geography and infrastructure greatly favoured his exit plan, because the narrowing of the Messina peninsula allowed him to create ever shorter defensive lines. As his men fell back, so fewer troops would be needed to maintain each narrower line, which would allow the bulk of his forces to get across the Straits before the last line was overrun. The Allies could pound their positions with as many aircraft as they liked, but Baade was already assembling an astonishingly large number of anti-aircraft and other guns either side of the Straits, while the narrowing of the peninsula and the limited road network would constrain the numbers of ground troops the Allies could throw at them. Keeping a cool head in the days to come was going to be vital, and Hube had one of the coolest around; he wasn’t Der Mann for nothing. By the evening of 5 August, however, Hube had realized that the Etna Line had been smashed wide open. The loss of Centuripe, the pressure on Adrano and Paterno, and the battering 15. Panzer Grenadier had taken at Troina had persuaded him the time had come to pull back to the next defensive line, and the last one that ran south of Etna - what Guzzoni had termed the Tortorici Line. It meant abandoning all those towns, and, at last, Catania too, but uppermost in his mind was the need to ensure that his units were not surrounded, cut off and taken prisoner; the moment one part of the line crumbled, the risk of that happening became just too great. Maintaining balance, and pulling back with as much cohesion as possible, was vital. Meanwhile, on 31 July, Generale Guzzoni had received a directive from the Comando Supremo in Rome telling him to hand over all remaining Italian troops on Sicily to the command of Hube and XIV Panzer Korps. In truth, Hube had barely paid him lip service since arriving on the island, but at midday on 1 August Guzzoni formally relinquished the reins; he still maintained his Sixth Army headquarters, however, feeling that, until ordered to the contrary, he had to remain at his post, no matter how impotently. The withdrawal of Guzzoni’s authority rather left von Senger twiddling his thumbs as well - although he too remained on Sicily, pending any instructions to the contrary. At this point he was encamped in a wood high in the mountains halfway between the northern slopes of Etna and Milazzo on the north-east coast. This ensured he was close to Hube and Guzzoni but also within easy reach of Baade, who visited him frequently to talk through his evacuation plans and get his advice. ‘Both of us had the feeling of having left the stage,’ wrote von Senger, ‘in order - as Baade expressed it - to watch this cosmic event from the box.’ Even up there, though, von Senger was hardly safe; every time he drove anywhere, he was at risk of attack by Allied aircraft. Then, in early August, he was forced to move his camp when an enemy plane was shot down and crashed into the trees nearby, setting them alight. Sicily 1943 - James Holland
@wardaddyindustries4348
@wardaddyindustries4348 Год назад
It took me all day but I got through the video... it was a busy day. Yall are clearly working hard as well.
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Thanks for watching
@chrismitchell4186
@chrismitchell4186 Год назад
This show is the Bees Knees... love it
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
We love you too, Chris
@mikaelcrews7232
@mikaelcrews7232 Год назад
Small side note about the most decorated US soldier of world war 2: Audie Murphy he never made a proper landing in World War 2, Him and company were supposed two make that second landing in Sicily was scrapped, his company was supposed to be pulled from the line and get replacements and equipment repairs but the company that was to replace them was sent instead. So he just sat in his foxhole eating grapes and watching the artillery shelling the hills in front of him!!!! In his own words "I had a new respect for grapes after that, because I was running to the latrine every 15 minutes for 2 days" It's in his book To Hell and Back!!!!
@WorldWarTwo
@WorldWarTwo Год назад
Great information, thank you!
Далее
The Bohdana: Ukraine's Secret Weapon of War
18:44
Просмотров 17 тыс.